Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/26/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/01/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-008 Silverbell Pavilion Retail Silverbell Road Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: June 1, 2005 DUE DATE: June 10, 2005 1. It is acknowledged in response comment 10 that a cross access agreement is to be recorded between the subject property and the property to the south. The agreement must include cross access provisions for both the vehicle drive and the dumpsters, which are proposed to be accessed from the property to the south. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement and fill in the docket and page of recordation in the note on page 2 of 5 on the plat. DS 2-05.2.4.P & .G If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, cross access agreement |
| 06/01/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: SILVERBELL PAVILION RETAIL D05-0008 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review May 26, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the existing facilities must properly be depicted on the plans. The facilities that are shown are not accurate. Refer to the TEP facility map and the red-lined development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The existing transformer (ERP-68) appears to be in conflict with the proposed parking area. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 06/04/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0008 Silverbell Pavilion Retail 06/02/05 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Irrigation Plan & Utilities an CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation – C9-60-39 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 06/10/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 4/18/05 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 06/03/05 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0008 Silverbell Pavilion Retail 04/12/05 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Irrigation Plan & Utilities an CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation – C9-60-39 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/18/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 04/11/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D05-0008, Silverbell Pavilion Retail Staff offers the following comments: The Santa Cruz Area Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that higher quality facades, at the rear and sides of new buildings, and rooflines should be constructed through careful design and detailing. Building facades at the rear and side and rooflines shall be designed with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, signs, lighting, screen walls, rooflines, and materials. Please submit elevation drawings of all sides of the development. The Santa Cruz Area Plan, General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual state that signage should be an appropriate scale, height, and color to integrate with development and enhance the experience and perception through scale and mass. Please show the proposed sign package and demonstrate how the proposed signage and surrounding landscape work mutually to adhere to the goals of the applicable plans. Provide a note to the General Notes Section on the Development Plan that reads “all masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and shall be maintained in a graffiti-free condition. Please show a detail of the proposed masonry walls and indicate that they will be graffiti-resistant and what material they will be constructed of. |
| 06/08/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/09/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section Does not recommend approval at this time. Revise the plans as indicated in the comments below and as requested by other agencies. Revise the development and grading plans as necessary to conform to specific landscape comments. 1) Revise all tree planting areas to comply with LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. Planters are required to be a minimum of four feet wide (inside dimension) and must contain a minimum of thirty-four square feet. Provide dimensions for all planting areas on the site/landscape plans. The planter adjacent to the handicapped parking spaces appears to be too small and is not dimensioned. 2) Show the future sight visibility triangles on the site and landscape plans. Revise the landscape plans to ensure that all plantings provide the required sight distance. DS 3-01.5.0 Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Dasylirion wheeleri grow too tall to be planted in SVT's. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION IS APPROVED. |
| 06/15/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 14, 2005 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Silverbell Pavilion Development Plan D05-0008 (Second Review) T14S, R13E, Section 03 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Revised Drainage Report The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report for Silverbell Pavilion and does not recommend approval at this time. Drainage Report Comment: 1. Revise the Long Term Maintenance Responsibilty.Provide for annual inspections by a Registered Professional Engineer as required in the Drainage Manual. The inspection reports must be available to the City of Tucson. Provide for assignement of all the required maintenance as described in the Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.2.E. A complete grading permit submittal and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/20/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 1, 2005 TO: Philip A. Carhuff Krebs Carhuff Architects THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Silverbell Pavillion Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D05-0008 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 4 as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 4. Provide the recording information for the private sewer easement. Provide written approval of the proposed private off-site sewer design from Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s Design section. This submittal includes five sheets, one more than the first submittal for this project. Therefore, $50.00 should be added to the $100.00 review fee from the first submittal as described in item 8 of the April 6, 2005 review letter. Item five below will include this $50.00 review fee. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $89.00 ($50.00 + $39.00) made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/20/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 22, 2005 Philip A Carhuff, AIA Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 East Prince Road Tucson, AZ 85716 Subject: D05-0008 Silverbell Pavilion Retail Center Development Plan Dear Phil: Your submittal of May 26, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (waste water, TEP, engineering, zoning, landscaping, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (zoning, engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 577-4599 |