Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0006
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2005 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/01/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0006 Palo Verde Realty/Revised Development Plan DATE: June 28, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 07/08/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Remove plant symbols from the development plan, identify only the landscape buffer dimensions and locations and materials for screen walls. 2. Submit the NPP plan. LUC 3.8 3. According rezoning Case C9-02-12 the following conditions apply to this site. Revise landscape and development plan as necessary. A) "A 6' high masonry wall shall be located on the north property boundary with 24' box canopy trees planted south of the wall a maximum 25' apart". The plans require revisions to specify the required tree size and the spacing of the trees must conform to the condition. B) A 30" high masonry wall shall be installed on the west side of the site along the entire length of the Westmoreland Ave. street frontage, except for vehicular or pedestrian entrances. In addition, the parking area is required to be screened in accordance with LUC Table 3.7.2-I. That would require additional screening to meet the 5' height requirement. Walls higher than thirty inches may not be located in the SVT. A variance or redesign of the project will be required. 4) The landscape buffer along Westmoreland Avenue must be a minimum of ten feet wide along the entire street frontage. 5) Revise sheet 3 to remove the "per MS&R" for the St. Mary's right-of-way dimension. 6) Terminate the 6' screen wall where it intersects with the SVT at Westmoreland Avenue. RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 07/12/2005 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 12 July 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D05-0006 T14S, R13E, Section 11 Resubmittals Required: Revised Development Plan and Landscape Plan. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development and Landscape Plans, and approvals are not recommended at this time. All previous comments have not fully addressed. Please address the comments below on revised plans and in a very detailed response letter, with specific discussion/responses to all portions of each comment provided. Although worded differently for clarity, all comments below relate to comments provided on the previous review. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1. Provide ALL site boundary information on Sheet 1. All lot lines should reflect bearings and distances, with curve data for the southwest corner, based upon a known, recorded bearing with bearing and recording information provided on the plan. The information provided could not be found when researching the Field Book referenced/provided. Furthermore, the basis of bearing provided describes elevation information (DS 2-05.2.3 A). 2. To fully address previous comment #'s 6 & 7, please identify the recording information (or plan number) for the existing 8" VCP in the St. Mary's Rd. Right of Way (DS 2-05.2.3 D). 3. Depict, label, and dimension the 8 5/8" gas line, with reference to Paving Improvement Plan # I-65-054, if it is still in place. Please provide a clear and detailed (if necessary) response to this comment (DS 2-05.2.3 B&D). 4. For simplicity, this project should have only one development plan sheet, rather than sheets 1 and 2. Provide all MS&R Plan right of way information ON ONE SHEET. Dedications per the MS&R Plan is a required condition of rezoning approval. Revise the plan to reflect such (including the 25' spandrel), with recording information provided on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4 D 2 E & F, and Rezoning Condition # 15). 5. Depict the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on sheet 1. Future SVT's originate at the future curb location which must also be depicted on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4 I, R & DS 3-01.5.0); 6. Address and identify construction of NEW vertical curb along Westmoreland Avenue, per rezoning condition #7, and include the word "New" at the beginning of keynotes 2 and 4 (DS 2-05.2.3 C); Depict, label AND DIMENSION NEW FIVE (5') foot wide sidewalk (Westmoreland Ave frontage), 2' from back of curb, and a new curb access ramp in accordance with Rezoning condition # 17 and Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Standard Detail 207 (DS 3-01.3.3 A & DS 2-05.2.4 L); 7. Please include reference to City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details for Public Improvements (in addition to Standard Specifications) under Paving Notes, and reference the most current (2003) Edition. 8. The consultant may wish to correct the spelling of the word "corner" in Rezoning Condition # 15, sheet 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Please provide a note or detail specifying the locations of all water harvesting basins, demonstrating conformance to rezoning condition # 19 (note/detail 3). Resubmittal will require a revised Development Plan and Landscape Plan addressing the comments provided above. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 07/13/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/13/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 13, 2005 TO: Eduardo J. Ornelas Arquitecto E. J. Ornelas & Associates THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D05-0006 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on March 29, 2005, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. As previously indicated on March 29, 2005, follow the development plan requirements checklist found at http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.PDF for assistance when preparing this development plan. The required general notes and design information requested in this checklist is not yet shown on the development plan. Sewer information must show if the sewer is existing or proposed, public or private. Show the size, length and slope of any proposed sewer. Show the rim and invert elevations of any proposed manholes/cleanouts. Show the Pima County plan number and size of the existing public sewer to which the project is connecting. Show any sewer easements that may exist along with their corresponding recording information. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/15/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 6, 2006. 2. Previous comment was not addressed. Take out sheets one (1) and (3) and renumber the sheets as required. Previous comment: It is not necessary to include a "present or proposed site" development plan and landscape plan (sheet 1 and sheet 3). Provide a development plan and landscape plan that shows how the site is to function with future right-of-way conditions only (i.e. sheet 2). This review will be based on the development plan provided on sheet 2. 3. List the names, address, and telephone number of the developer of the project. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1) 4. Where applicable, remove the word "recommended" where rezoning conditions are referenced. The conditions are not recommended, they are imposed. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2) 5. Revise the Floor Area Ratio to the following: Proposed F.A.R. is .16. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.M) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. |
| 07/18/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0006 Palo Verde Realty 07/15/05 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Manzo Neighborhood Plan/Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/12/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 7/11/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D05-0006, Palo Verde Realty July 11, 2005 Current staff comments (italic and bold letters) are still applicable from previous staff comments dated March 31, 2005: Prior to approval of this development plan, a consideration by Mayor and Council to extend the time allowed to satisfy the conditions of rezoning case C9-02-12 shall be approved. Please provide written confirmation from the Department of Development Services, Rezoning Section that rezoning condition # 22 has been met (see attached rezoning C9-02-12 information). Please revise development plan for compliance with rezoning condition C9-02-12, condition # 2, which reads: Renovations and/or repairs to the existing structures shall be limited to one-story and designed to be compatible with the existing residential character of the neighborhood. Elevations indicating colors of all existing and proposed structures shall be submitted at the time of development plan review. Please provide building elevations, to scale (four sided), which provide the colors to be used on proposed and existing structures. Please revise development plan & landscape plan to comply with rezoning case C9-02-21, condition # 5, which reads: A six foot high masonry wall shall be locates on the north property boundary with twenty-four (24) inch box canopy trees planted south of the wall a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet apart. Based on the site design submitted, rezoning condition #5 is not met. Please redesign site design to meet rezoning condition or contact the Department of Development Services, Rezoning Section to address this issue. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning case C9-02-21, condition # 6, which reads: A thirty (30) inch high masonry wall shall be installed on the west side of the site along the entire length of the Westmoreland Avenue street frontage, except at vehicular or pedestrian entrances. Based on the site design submitted, rezoning condition #6 is not met. Please redesign site design to meet rezoning condition or contact the Department of Development Services, Rezoning Section to address this issue. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning case C9-02-21, condition # 9, which reads: Please revise Development Plan, sheet 1 of 5, hexagon note # 8 to state that the traffic directional sign will direct traffic to proceed south to St. Mary’s Road. |
| 07/20/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Property owner is working on getting the legal description for right of way dedication. |
| 07/21/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |