Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0006
Parcel: 116122810

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0006
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/07/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/09/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved March 09, 2005.
03/14/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D05-0006 PALO VERDE REALTY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: March 14, 2005




The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:


Add Township, Range to Location Map.

Delete 1324 from Address information.

Correct St. Marys Rd to Saint Marys Road on sheets 1 and 2.
03/29/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied Please submit the following items to the Real Estate Division per re-zoning (C9-02-12) condition No.# 15;

1.) Legal description and sketch for the St. Mary's right of way dedication per MS&R and 25' foot radius spandrel at the southwest corner,

2.) Title report for subject property dated within 30 days,
03/29/2005 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied March 29, 2005

TO: Eduardo J. Ornelas
Arquitecto E. J. Ornelas & Associates

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty
Development Plan – 1st Submittal
D05-0006


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Northwest Outfall Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

Based on the evaluation of project D03-036, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0006, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

This submittal is too incomplete for further review. Please follow the updated checklist found at http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.PDF for assistance when preparing a development plan. This checklist will provide the necessary information for the required general notes, layout format and presentation.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
04/04/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty
D05-0006


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan
dated February 28, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the
existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions.

Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
04/06/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Transportation Information for
Rezoning, Subdivision, and
Development Requests
Delivered to:
Date Delivered:
Development Services - City of Tucson
4/1/2005
Case Number Project Name
Estimated Daily Traffic
(in average 24-hour vehicle trips)
D05-0006 Palo Verde Realty: Development Plan 13
Pima Association of Governments
Transportation Planning Division
177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona
85701-1127
(520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 792-9151
04/06/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 6, 2006.

2. It is not necessary to include a "present or proposed site" development plan and landscape plan (sheet 1 and sheet 3). Provide a development plan and landscape plan that shows how the site is to function with future right-of-way conditions only (i.e. sheet 2). This review will be based on the development plan provided on sheet 2.

3. Label the township, range, and section on the location map. (D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3)

4. List the names, address, and telephone number of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1)

5. List as a general note: "Existing zoning is R-2." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1)

6. Add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is O-2."

7. List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval on the development plan. Also place the C9-02-12 rezoning case number and D05-0006 development plan case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2)

8. List the proposed use as a general note: "Administrative and Professional Office "27." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3)

9. Add the following general note: "This project is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback zone criteria." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10)

10. C-2 zoning is incorrectly labeled on the drawing. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.B)

11. Floor Area Ratio provided is incorrect. Proposed F.A.R. is .16. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.M)

12. Add the following note under the parking calculation: "Loading space is not required for this project." (D.S. 2-05.2.4.O)

13. Remove the Lot Area Reduction calculation under the Zoning Information block. It is not clear why this calculation needs to be noted. If it applies to the MS&R reduction, it may not be used in this case since future right-of-way is required to be dedicated as part of the rezoning.

14. Dimension wheelstop location. Wheelstop curbing shall be located two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space.

15. Detail handicapped parking, disabled access aisle, and parking sign. Detail access ramp. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P)

16. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.5, a minimum of two (2) Class 2 bicycle parking space are required for this site. Revise the bicycle parking calculation as required and indicate the number and class type provided under the keynote. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q)

17. Provide a fully dimensioned detail for Class 2 bicycle parking facility. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria (surfacing, location, dimensions etc.). (D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q)

18. Provide a response letter, which details how each rezoning condition has been addressed. If applicable, provide necessary documentation, details, or drawings to demonstrate compliance. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.U)


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.
04/06/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: April 4, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0006 Palo Verde Realty: Development Plan
116-12-2810

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services
File: 116-12-2810, St Marys and Westmoreland.


No comments.





Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
04/06/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0006 Palo Verde Realty 04/04/05

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-12

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Manzo Neighborhood Plan/Santa Cruz Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No

COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/01/05

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 3/31/05

Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments
D05-0006, Palo Verde Realty
March 31, 2005

Staff offers the following comments:

Prior to approval of this development plan, a consideration by Mayor and Council to extend the time allowed to satisfy the conditions of rezoning case C9-02-12 shall be approved.

Please revise development plan for compliance with rezoning condition C9-02-12, condition # 2, which reads:

Renovations and/or repairs to the existing structures shall be limited to one-story and designed to be compatible with the existing residential character of the neighborhood. Elevations indicating colors of all existing and proposed structures shall be submitted at the time of development plan review.

Please revise development plan by adding to sheet 1 within the general notes a note stating this site is subject to rezoning case C9-02-12. Include within this general note the actual rezoning conditions 1 – 22, exactly as formatted and shown in the letter signed by the City Clerk, dated August 6, 2004 (see attached copy).

Please revise development plan & landscape plan to comply with rezoning case C9-02-21, condition # 5, which reads:

A six foot high masonry wall shall be locates on the north property boundary with twenty-four (24) inch box canopy trees planted south of the wall a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet apart.

Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning case C9-02-21, condition # 6, which reads:

A thirty (30) inch high masonry wall shall be installed on the west side of the site along the entire length of the Westmoreland Avenue street frontage, except at vehicular or pedestrian entrances.

Please development plan to comply with rezoning case C9-02-21, condition # 9, which reads:

A traffic directional sign shall be installed and maintained at the exit point onto Westmoreland Avenue, directing traffic to proceed south to St. Mary’s Road.
04/07/2005 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Craig Gross, CDRC
SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 7 April 7, 2005
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D05-0006
T14S, R13E, Section 11

Resubmittals Required: Revised Development Plan and Landscape Plan.

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Drainage Report, Development Plan and Landscape Plans. The drainage report is approved for Development Plan purposes, although the site does not appear to lie within a FEMA floodplain, as stated in the report. Approval of the Development and Landscape plans is not recommended at this time. Consulted and referenced for review of this project were the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS), the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0) and the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM - DS 10-02.0). The following comments are offered:

DEVELOPMENT PLAN:

1. Please delete what appears to be an unnecessary Sight Visibility Triangle on Sheet 1 (far side SVT for westbound St. Mary's traffic?) at the corner of Westmoreland Ave. and St. Mary's Rd.
2. Omit/delete the curb returns and curb access ramps depicted at the Westmoreland Ave. ingress/egress.
3. Include General Notes as listed in DS 2-05.2.2 C 1 (a & b).
4. Include a General Note as listed in DS 2-05.2.2 E.
5. Provide ALL site boundary information as described in DS 2-05.2.3 A.
6. Provide ALL easement information as described in DS 2-05.2.3 B.
7. Depict and label all utility information, including any sanitary and storm sewer data and service equipment on and adjacent to the site DS 2-05.2.3 D.
8. Provide the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson datum, with City Field Book and Page numbers provided (DS 2-05.2.3 E);
9. Depict and label all pertinent existing and future (MS&R) right of way information on one sheet, in accordance with DS 2-05.2.4 D 2 and DS 2-05.2.4 E & F and Rezoning Condition # 15;
10. Depict the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on sheet 1. Future SVT's originate at the future curb location which must also be depicted on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4 I, R & DS 3-01.5.0);
11. Address and identify construction of new vertical curb along Westmoreland Avenue, in accordance with rezoning condition #7. Contact Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) for Public Improvement permit requirements at 791-5100 (DS 2-05.2.3 C & 2-05.2.4 L);
12. Rezoning condition # 17 stipulates that any existing damaged sidewalk be replaced with new sidewalk along the Westmoreland Avenue frontage, and that a new curb access ramp be installed at the corner of St. Mary's Road and Westmoreland Ave., adjacent to the site. Depict, label and dimension new FIVE (5') foot wide sidewalk (Westmoreland Ave frontage), 2' from back of curb, and a new curb access ramp in accordance with Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Standard Detail 207 (DS 3-01.3.3 A & DS 2-05.2.4 L);
13. Address roof drainage direction(s) and associated sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of 10-year flows, minimum, under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E, 2-08.5.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F);
14. Address Rezoning Condition # 9 in a response letter and on Sheet 1. If an egress only is to be designed at Westmoreland Ave., include reference to a directional sign to be installed and maintained at this egress, directing traffic to proceed south onto St. Mary's Rd;

Resubmittal will require a revised Development Plan and Landscape Plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or via email at Doug.williams@tucsonaz.gov

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/08/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP:

1. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #9 which states " A traffic directional sign shall be installed and maintained at the exit point onto Westmoreland Avenue, directing traffic to proceed south to St. Mary’s Road." Ensure that the proper symbol for a new traffic sign is used as described in Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition.

2. Label the dimension for the curb return radii at the access point. They are required to be 18'r minimum.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
04/11/2005 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Remove plant symbols from the development plan, identify only the landscape buffer dimensions and locations and materials for screen walls.

2. The planting plan and layout calculations must include the locations, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place.

3. According rezoning Case C9-02-12 the following conditions apply to this site. Revise landscape and development plan as necessary.

A) A 6' high masonry wall shall be located on the north property boundary with 24' box canopy trees planted south of the wall a maximum 25' apart.

B) A 30" high masonry wall shall be installed on the west side of the site along the entire length of the Westmoreland Ave. street frontage, except for vehicular or pedestrian entrances.

C) Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of or painted with graffiti resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials a) Tile b) stone c) brick d) textured brick/block e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster f) or a combo of the above materials.

RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED.
05/02/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed
05/02/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No known landfill with in 1000 feet od this development.
* Property does not have sufficient depth to allow for on-site metal front loading service.Refuse sevrice is approved for curbside Automated Plastic Containers (APC) off of Westmoreland Avenue. Only two 90 gallon containers are authorized for service. Additional out of phase service can be arranged through ES at the current listed rates. APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. Contact ES Customer Service at 791-3175 to arrange for service.
05/02/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Passed