Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0003
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/26/2005 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/27/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved January 27, 2005. |
| 02/02/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Office space in an existing house. No room for dumpster enclosure on site. For type of bussiness approved for APC curb side service. Service will be provided on the residential APC service day in the area. |
| 02/08/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0003 CIVANO HOLISTIC INSTITUTE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Approved with the following condition: Correct Civano Blvd. to Civano Boulevard and delete “South”. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 02/10/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: February 10, 2005 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Civano Holistic Institute, 5343 S Civano Blvd Development Plan D05-0003 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 1 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Although a note expressing that no vegetation or walls…..etc. are not allowed in the sight visibility triangle, the SVT must be shown on the plan view also. Drainage Statement: 1. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which is not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more………… per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3. 2. The content and format of the Hydrology report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 3. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage Statement. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 5343 S Civano Blvd CDRC |
| 02/18/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0003 Civano Holistic Institute 02/17/05 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (parking inventory) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-91-14, PAD-6 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: February 24, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 2/15/2005 Please provide calculations as they relate to density caps as shown on Exhibit 12 of the Neighborhood 1 PAD. Provide the total number of dwelling units for the specific block and the total square footage of commercial area for the same specific block including this project. LUC Parking requirements within the Neighborhood Center District may be reduced by 50% including parking requirements for residential use. Please correct the number of required parking spaces for the dwelling unit to one (1) required. This will reduce the overall parking requirement by one (1) for a total of five (5) spaces instead of six (6). The parking inventory should also reflect this change. The following items are required by the Revised Civano IMPACT System and MOU. These items may have already been reviewed by Timothy Smith of Swaim Associates Ltd., Architects AIA, 3936 E. Fort Lowell 202, Tucson Arizona 85712. Because this is now being reviewed for a commercial mix-use different criteria may apply. Please Contact Mr. Smith at 326-3700 to obtain required certification for this project. A stamped set of plans indicating compliance would be sufficient to meet these requirements. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.1.2, non-residential building permits shall provide a certification that the plans as submitted provide for a total energy use through the building shell, heating and cooling systems (“building energy use”) of at least 55% reduction for each structure from the annual energy use by a comparable non-residential structure in 1990 as established by the Model Energy Code. The certification shall identify the 1990 level used, the method of determining that level and the source material documenting that level. The energy conservation shall commence at the time of initial occupancy. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.1.3, building plans shall identify the manner in which the proposed structures will be designed for the use of solar energy through the orientation for passive heating and cooling purposed, consistent with Civano’s goals. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.1.4, plans shall incorporate some beneficial use of solar energy to reduce the energy demands from heating and cooling and interior water heating. Solar devices such as currently found in A.R.S. 44-1761 shall qualify as beneficial uses of solar energy will satisfy this requirement. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.1.5, Landscape and hardscape coloration and/or vegetation shall be used to reduce the microclimate temperature adjacent to the structures. The average reflectivity of all major landscape and hardscape surfaces must be 0.5 or greater on the albedo scale or result in equivalent energy savings. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.1.6, describe a program that identifies procedures for preserving construction materials for recycling construction materials in construction. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.8, plans shall provide built-in recyclable separation features and storage of hazardous materials. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.9, plans for each structure shall identify some recycled material used in the construction of the structure. Per the Revised Civano MOU Section 5.3.10, all structures shall minimally comply with the Civano Model Energy Code/Sustainable Energy Standard as adopted and as it may be amended. |
| 02/22/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: CIVANO HOLISTIC INSTITUTE D05-0003 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated January 25, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. If you require upgrades to the service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062 for an application. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 02/24/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/28/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | raffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/04/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT: Civano Holistic Institute Case number: D04-005 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: March 3, 2005 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 25, 2006. 2. This project has been assigned development plan case number D05-0003. Please note the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. The development plan case number shall be larger or bolder than the cross-reference case number already listed. 3. Under the vehicle parking calculation, revise the number of vehicle parking spaces required for office to 1.1 spaces. Revise total number of vehicle parking spaces required for office and yoga studio to 4.5 spaces, which rounds up to a total of five (5) spaces required. 4. Since Michael St. Paul is out of the office this week and he has a copy of the parking inventory, verification of parking inventory compliance will have to wait until resubmittal of this plan. 5. Revise the bicycle parking calcualation to required a minimum of two (2) spaces x 40% which will then require a total of three (3) Class II bicycle parking spaces. 6. A physical barrier (i.e. curbing, post bollards) will be required between the driveway and the bicycle parking spaces. This is required to prevent vehicles from damaging the bicycles, rack, or overhanging into the bicycle parking area. 7. Demonstrate graphically or by note, ADA accessible path is flush with sidewalk area and will not exceed maximum slope allowed. If path is sloped, indicate direction of slope and percentage. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. |
| 03/04/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |