Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0001
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/20/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Fire hydrants are required. Provide a General Note on the plan stating" Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code." |
| 01/24/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosure require a 10' clear area inside the shown bollards. * No recycling provisions mentioned or shown. |
| 01/28/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0001 PLAZA DE SAN VINCENTE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 28, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Revise Location Map to include Section, Township, Range and section corners. Label adjacent lot numbers on site plan. Delete suite numbers from site plan. Official suite numbers will be assigned at time of permit request. jg |
| 01/28/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0001 BT DESIGN GROUP PLAZA DE SAN VINCENTE |
| 02/09/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-001 Plaza de San Vicente Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: February 9, 2005 DUE DATE: February 15, 2005 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is January 17, 2006. 2. Place the development plan number (D05-001) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Place any other reference case numbers, such as the annexation case numbers (C9-85-95 and C9-83-65) in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Add annexation ordinance No. 6016 to LUC note 1 on sheet SD-1. List any additional and applicable conditions of annexation in this general note. DS 2-05.2.1.K DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 3. According to the Assessor's Records the project site is made up of two lots which must be combined prior to development plan approval. Provide a copy of notarized and recorded "Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property". This document can be obtained from the Zoning Review Counter. 4. Refer to DS 2-05.2.1.D for location map criteria. Revise the location map to indicate the extent of the subject property and to show that it fronts on Research Loop. The location map should cover approximately one (1) square mile. Provide the scale of the location map. Label major watercourses such as Pantano Wash. Label section, township and range and show section corners on the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D 5. The minimum width of a 2-way PAAL is 24 feet. The PAAL between the two buildings is less than the required 24 feet due to the location of the loading zone. Revise. LUC 3.3.7.2 6. Rather than stating "subject to LUC requirements applicable to particular uses", add to general notes 2 & 3 all of the specific LUC restrictions which the proposed uses are subject to. For example, the principal proposed use of Retail vehicle rental is subject to LUC 3.5.9.5.B & .C and the Commercial Services secondary use of Salvage and Recycling is subject to LUC LUC 3.5.5.6.A &. C, and so on. LUC 2.7.1.2 7. In addition to the maximum permitted floor area, add to the Floor Area Ration (F.A.R.) calculation a figure stating the proposed F.A.R (proposed gross floor area divided by actual site area). LUC 3.2.11 8. In addition to stating that the buildings are limited to 35 feet in height by annexation condition, label the maximum proposed height of each building on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.N 9. Add a parking space typical detail showing the wheelstop curbs dimensioned at 2-½ feet from front of parking spaces and showing the dimensions of the handicap parking spaces and aisles along with the maximum slope of the h/c aisles and ramps. Indicate that for the required van accessible spaces the width of the access aisle shall be 8 feet. ANS/ IBC DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 10. Continuous pedestrian circulation must connect between the phase 1 and 2 buildings and must also connect the phase 2 facility to the Research Loop right-of-way. Dimension clearly the width of the pedestrian circulation system throughout the site. DS 2-08 DS 2-05.2.4.K 11. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan |
| 02/10/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 10, 2005 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Plaza De San Vicente Development Plan D05-0001 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan. The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report for Plaza De San Vicente and does not recommend approval at this time. Development Plan Comments: 1. Delineate all easements on the development plan, including the drainage easement along the north property boundary and the pedestrian, maintenance and utility easement along the drainage way. Include recordation information for each easement. (DS 2-05.2.3.B) 2. Provide right-of-way information for each of the adjacent streets. Include recordation data. Indicate whether the streets are public or private. (DS 2-05.2.3.C) 3. Show sidewalk along Research Loop. Indicate whether the sidewalk is existing or proposed. New sidewalk must be at least 5 feet wide. (DS 2-05.2.4.L) 4. Revise the Development Plan so that the designated loading zones do not interfere with the solid waste collection vehicle access to the container enclosure. (DS 2-05.2.4.T) 5. Show and label water surface contours in each of the drainage channels. The distance between contours must be no more than 200 feet. (DS 2-05.2.3.I) Drainage Report Comments: 6. Demonstrate that criterion 2 in the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual will be satisfied. Refer to Section 2.3 on pages 14-16 of the manual. 7. Provide design details and calculations to show that the spillways will contain the expected volumes and the discharges will not contribute to erosion. Submit a revised development plan and revise drainage report. A complete grading permit application including a stormwater pollution prevention plan will be required for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 02/14/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 02/14/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 14, 2005 TO: John Taylor BT Design Group THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Plaza de San Vicente at Castside Research Commerce Center Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-0001 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. Based on the evaluation of project Co12-83-34, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0001, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET SD-1. Show project reference numbers Co9-80-198 and Co12-83-34 in the title block. SHEET SD-1. Revise General Note 8 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET SD-1. Add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). SHEET SD-1. Add the following General Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET SD-1. Add the following General Note THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. SHEET SD-1. Add the following General Note NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. SHEET SD-1 & SD-2. Remove the five foot stucco wall placed within the public sewer easement. SHEET SD-1. Show the Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer. SHEET SD-1. Show the size, slope and length of the proposed private sewers. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 02/16/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. 1) Revise the native plant preservation plan to comply with the minimum preservation requirements of LUC 3.8.6.2.A 2) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations of preserved and/or transplanted protected plants per DS 2-15.3.4.A and a summary of plants required per DS 2-15.3.4.B.2. 3) Remove the protected plant inventory from the landscape plan, except as requested in comment #2. 4) Revise the plans for the vehicular use area in the vicinity of the refuse storage location, such that no parking space is more than forty feet from the center of the base of a canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a Ensure that the minimum vertical clearance is provided in the vicinity of the dumpster. DS 6-01.2.1.B.1.b 5) Dimension the landscape border adjacent to Research Loop. Show any required sidewalks. 6) Note height of the required screen adjacent to Research Loop on the landscape plan. Ensure that the screen is located behind or at the back of the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.3.2.C |
| 02/18/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 2/14/2005 Case Number Project Name Estimated Daily Traffic (in average 24-hour vehicle trips) D05-0001 Plaza de San Vincente: Development Plan 220 Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 792-9151 |
| 02/18/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 18, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0001 Plaza De San Vincente: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/18/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0001 Plaza De San Vincente 02/17/05 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-95 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: none COMMENTS DUE BY: February 15, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 1/28/05 Please elaborate on the type of ‘commercial storage’ that will be provided in phase II. Indicate what type of client would be using the facility and what may be anticipated to be stored there. By the indication of storage units shown on the development plan, staff may consider this more aligned to Personal Storage instead of Commercial Storage. By LUC definition Commercial Storage is defined as ‘the keeping of trade and personal goods by business and industrial establishments. Typical uses include cold storage plants, warehouses, and utility storage yards’. In contrast Personal Storage is defined as ‘the renting or leasing of space for storage of personal effects. Typical uses include multiple unit storage facilities or miniwarehouses’. It is crucial to identify the type of storage to be constructed since Personal Storage is not allowed within this I-1 zone with P-I criteria, as a restriction place on the property by the annexation condition Sec. 5.5 of ordinance 6503. Condition Sec.2.1.d requires site specific traffic access study at the time of development plan review. Please contact the Traffic Engineer if study is needed. Condition Sec. 2.2.a requires the submission of a complete hydrologic drainage report. Please contact the Flood Plain Engineer if report is needed for this project. |
| 02/22/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: PLAZA DE SAN VICENTE D05-0001 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated January 12, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing underground facilities within the project area. However, if a conflict does occur any relocation costs will be billable to the developer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Also, submit a final set of plans including site, off site, electrical load, and the AutoCAD version of the plans on CD. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 02/22/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Tucson City Code, Chapter 25 requires driveways to be separated by a minimum of 4' from end of curb returns in Industrial zones (TCC 25-40). The westernmost driveway does not meet this separation requirement. 2. Tucson City Code, Chapter 25 requires driveways to be separated by a minimum of 5' from catch basins in Industrial zones (TCC 25-40). The eastern driveway on Eastside Loop appears to be within 5' of the CBC. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/23/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |