Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0037
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0037 ENTRANCO ANDREW LAUREN GRANITE |
| 01/10/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 01/11/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: ANDREW LAUREN GRANITE D04-0037 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated December 10, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 01/11/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 6, 2005 TO: Jeffrey A. Stanley Entranco THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Andrew Lauren Granite Development Plan – 1st Submittal D04-0037 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. Based on the evaluation of project C12-88-09, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0037, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Revise General Note 15 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. As found in the Pima County Development Plan Requirements, section J.2.b, please revise General Note 20 and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). The sewer layout does not differentiate which sewer is existing and which sewer is proposed. Please use different line types to differentiate between proposed private sewers, existing private sewers and existing public sewers. Development Plan Requirements indicate that the sewer design must be shown all the way to the point of connection to an existing public sewer. Please revise the design accordingly and include the Pima County plan number and the size of the existing public sewer. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 01/13/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) List related case numbers on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Show and label any walls on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 3) Show areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope. DS 2-07.2.2.B 4) A continuous 30" high screen is required along Apache Park Place. Clarify how this requirement is to be met in the area west of the central driveway. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5) Revise the plans to comply with LUC 3.7.2.3.A. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree. 6) The irrigation system will include an automatic timing controller. DS 2-06.5.4 7) Revise the landscape plan to locate the required street landscape border required adjacent to Fair St. within the property lines. LUC 3.7.2.4 8) Revise the landscape plan to correctly show the adjacent right of way area south of the site. Show the asphalt path and note that decomposed granite will be placed in unpaved portions of the right of way. This also applies along Apache Park Place. LUC 3.7.2.7.A.4 9) List plant quantities on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2. 10) Remove the reference to Speedway in the plant materials list. 11) Show all sight visibility triangles on the site and landscape plans. DS 3-01.5.0 Revise the landscape plan to locate plants which typically exceed thirty inches in height outside of the SVT's. 12) The NPP application is not approved. Provide additional photos of the western portion of the property. DS 2-15.0 RESUBMITTAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS IS REQUIRED. IN ADDITION PHOTOS OF THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY AND CLOSE UP PHOTOS OF ANY EXISTING VEGETATION. |
| 01/14/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-037 Andrew Lauren Granite Apache Business Park TRANSMITTAL: January 14, 2005 DUE DATE: January 12, 2005 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 13, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-037) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Also, add the rezoning case number (C9-81-60) to the landscape plan sheet as was done for the development plan sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. Per the legal description on the plan and per Assessor's Records, the site is made up of two parcels which must be combined prior to development plan approval. Provide a copy of the notarized and recorded Covenant for the Use and Development of Real Property. Copies of these forms are available from the zoning review counter of City Development Services Department. 4. Add the adjacent zoning of the property to the east (adjacent I-1) to the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.B 5. Provide a fully dimensioned handicap parking detail, showing the adjacent access aisle dimensions and specifying the maximum slope of the aisle and associated h/c ramps. ANS/IBC 6. If any new freestanding lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type. DS 2-05.2.4.U 7. If any new freestanding signs are proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type. DS 2-05.2.4.W 8. The loading zone calculation states that one loading zone is required/provided. It appears that two loading zones are depicted on the drawing. Clarify and revise the plan drawing to be consistent with the calculations DS 2-05.2.4.O 9. All requested changes must be made to the development plan and landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 01/18/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments |
| 01/23/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Andrew Lauren Development Plan Submittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 31 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04-0037 SUMMARY: The Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on December 15, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 10-02.2.3.1.3: On page 2 of report, further describe existing and proposed conditions on site in last paragraph. Clarify the two hydrologic data sheets - both are labeled as existing conditions. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: A soils report will be necessary for recommendations and assessment of soils for the site. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.H: Provide contour interval next to scale and north arrow. 4) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.2.A.2: List the address and telephone number of the person / firm that prepared the development plan. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: For legend, address and clarify the following: a) Differentiate existing and proposed spot elevations. 6) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Indicate proposed and existing pavement/ground elevations in PAAL between lots. Spot elevations do seem to match; clarify future grading and site drainage at this location. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K & 2.B.8 & 2.B.9: Applicable rezoning case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block. Verify whether case numbers listed on Apache Business Park plat are applicable at lower right hand corner of sheet. Provide status of rezoning conditions for items G & H. 8) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Provide the following boundary information: a) Provide north boundary distance as shown on Bk42 pg66. b) Label line bearing for section 31 per Final Plat for Apache Business Park. c) Label BCSM at intersection of Calle Capote and Fair Street. d) Assure that all text is legible - some text overlap is shown. 9) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.B: The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. Specifically check to see that any easements from the Bk42 pg 66 are shown on the Development Plan. List 1' no access easement with docket and page. 10) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.D & E: The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided. Assure all existing utilities (gas, TEP, sewer, electric) and all easements are delineated and labeled on the plan view with any applicable dimensioned widths and invert elevations, as well as existing sewer rim elevations. Provide dimensions for water easement at north side of project. 11) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.C: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. a) Provide right-of-way information for Fair Street including recordation data, dimensions, and docket/pages. b) Provide information regarding common area A for the private street on north side. c) Provide standard detail reference for driveway apron. Provide at minimum width for entrance; dimension. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.S: Width of entrances shall be constructed to meet maneuverability of emergency vehicles. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Label standard detail for accessibility ramps for sidewalks. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Explain proposed solid waste pick-up. Provide maneuverability for solid waste vehicles to avoid entering traffic conflicts. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Explain and label cross access easements. 16) DS 2-03.2.4 F: Provide 5-foot wide sidewalk along Apache Park Place. For detail 2, show proposed curb at Apache Park Place. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clarify elevations in landscape area to show how water harvesting for basin requirements are achieved. For detail 2, replace "weep hole" with "wall opening" unless a retaining wall is proposed. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Keynote 29 indicates an electric utility box in basin area; explain and show how utility boxes will be excluded from the basin area. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Provide lengths of SVT dimension along edge of paving/curb, not along diagonal legs of triangles. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 21) Please acknowledge that a separate grading permit application submittal will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. Scupper invert elevations, as well as, size and spacing of wall openings will be required at grading plan review stage. A Right-of-way Use Permit may be needed; contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100. Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit revised Drainage Report, revised Development Plan, soils report, and any other documentation. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 01/25/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/14/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/15/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved December 15, 2004. |
| 12/20/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0037 ANDREW LAUREN GRANITE/DEVELOPMENT PLAT DATE: December 20, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add suffix to Santa Rita and Pennsylvania on Location Map. Include Recorded Book and Page for Apache Business Park in Title Block. jg |
| 12/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0037 Andrew Lauren Granite 01/10/05 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-81-60 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/10/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 01/07/05 |
| 12/21/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development. * There is not sufficient space as the enclosure is shown for the service truck to turnaround w/out exposing the rear of the truck into the public right of way to make the turn into the 16' PAAL. * No provisions shown or mentioned concerning recycling. * The enclosure does not show any sidewall protection. * Enclosure requires 10' clear dimension between sidewall bollards. |
| 12/21/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 20, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0037 Andrew Lauren Granite: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/29/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |