Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0036
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/24/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | General Comments: 1. Truck positioning for service. * Refuse trucks present standards have a turning radius for the rear inside wheels of 55 feet and for the right front bumper for clearance of 50 feet. * The trucks have to be positioned perpendicular to the enclosures for servicing of the enclosed dumpsters. * The trucks have to be able to turn into the clear area and to be positioned perpendicular to the enclosure. 2. As stated in the response, recycling is not anticipated for the complex. With service organizations offering a reduced service charge for recycling dumpster services are showing up frequently for bussinesses. Suggest that a second look be given for recycling for this development. (Pad 3 drawing depicts a fast food resturant and there is a high percentage of recycling boxes that their products are shipped in. The same is true for all retail stores.) Submitted Drawings Conflicts That Would Prevent Service: * Building Pad 4. Service trucks cannot be positioned in the 14' x 40' service area without affecting the south parking area. * Building Pad 5. First submittal location was OK. This submittal enclosure location brings the south curb of the PAAL into conflict. * Building Pad 6. Location is the same as the origional submittal. The south curb of the PAAL is in conflict. * Building Pad 11 & 12 (Double Enclosure). Service trucks cannot be positioned perpendicular in the service area without affecting the south curb of the PAAL. |
| 02/24/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0036 OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 2/24/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 02/25/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the basin slopes to comply with the provisions of DS 10-01. Slopes for basins three feet deep and greater are not to exceed 4:1. SRDM p. 78 Provides sections for the basins and/or note the slope ratios. 2) Revise the native plant preservation plans to modify the status of plants within the 30' scenic route buffer area to PIP. Revise the landscape plan to show existing plants to be preserved in place. DS 2-15.3.4.A, DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 3) Revise the native plant preservation plan to ensure that preservation is in compliance with LUC 3.8.6.2.A. A minimum of thirty percent of each species shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site. |
| 02/28/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 25, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Marketplace: Resubmittal Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services No comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/03/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith ALshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/03/2005 SUBJECT: Old Spanish Trail Marketplace D04-0036, T14S, R15E, SECTION 23 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Report on February 17, 2005 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. It does not appear that the sidewalk scupper design calculations were included in Appendix D. Check Appendix D and revise as necessary. 2. Pursuant to our meeting on March 2, 2005, we concluded that the proposed detention basin might be modified to meet landscape review requirements. Revise the Drainage Report accordingly. 3. Show and label clearly on the drainage exhibits the detention basin security barriers and maintenance access ramps. 4. Label cross section TY on the drainage exhibit as "Typical driveway cross-section for conveyance capacity calculations". 5. It does not appear that sediment traps or other sediment control measures were addressed in Section 3.1. Address this issue and provide the required sediment control in all the proposed detention/retention basins to demonstrate compliance with Section 3.4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. 6. It does not appear that the proposed erosion protection pads were addressed in Section 5.2. Address this issue and provide the required design calculations. 7. Provide a Geotechnical Report that addresses slope protection and required building setbacks from the proposed detention/retention basins. Development Plan: 1. Revise General Note # 9 to relocate the word "rests" to the appropriate place. 2. Add a general note, which states that the depicted "existing 100-year floodplain", which impacts the areas where lots are proposed, shall be removed or contained within the proposed drainage facilities once they are constructed and completed. Additionally, add a note that requires the Developer to acquire a Floodplain Use Permit, with the Grading Plan, for any proposed work in the said 100-year floodplain, which would result in the floodplain containment. The purpose of this comment is clarify on the plat that floodplain use permits will not be required for the impacted individual lots when they come in for permitting (D.S.2-03.2.2.C.2.b.). Revise General Notes 35 and 36 accordingly. 3. Verify compliance with Rezoning Conditions number 4, 5, 6 and 7. Additionally, explain the existing and future curb and sidewalk information on sheets 3 and 4. The "Compliance to Rezoning Conditions" letter was not found within the submittal. 4. It is still not clear why the plans show existing and future sight visibility triangles. 5. All proposed easements shall be labeled and dimensioned as required by (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G). Easements, which are proposed to be dedicated by a separate instrument, must processed prior to the approval of the final plat and the recordation information must be shown on the final plat. 6. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: Show the water harvesting basins. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 03/03/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Marketplace 03/04/05 () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-87-02 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor (Old Spanish Trail) COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/04/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 03/03/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments Old Spanish Trail Marketplace – D04-0036 The subject property is located in the Pantano East Area Plan. The Pantano East Area Plan, General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual provide policy guidance for the proposed development plan. 1. The plans promote five-sided architecture, which consists of architectural detail on all four sides and the roof. In regards to the large commercial strip (buildings 5 – 12), please incorporate the architectural detail (facades and color) from the north elevation to the south side and the entire lengths of the west and east sides of the structure. In addition, please provide color details of buildings 1 - 4 and provide five-sided architecture. 2. Please show the proposed color for the six feet wide pedestrian circulation system, per zoning condition 1.M. 3. The plans promote safe and visually pleasing pedestrian walkways that provide a shaded microclimate for pedestrians and visual relief for motorists. Please locate canopy trees along Harrison Road. The trees should be at minimum 15 gallon in size and spaced no further than 50 feet apart on center. The trees should be located no further than 10 feet back from the back of the sidewalk. 4. Please locate cross walks along the ingress/egress areas that connect the two respective sidewalks. Also, please locate a sidewalk along Old Spanish Trail east of the entrance. |
| 03/03/2005 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no objections. |
| 03/04/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/17/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Market Place Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: March 17, 2005 DUE DATE: March 4, 2005 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 6, 2005. 2. Please clarify if the existing conditions that were conditions of rezoning for the previous development are applicable to the proposed retail development. Provide documentation from Glenn Moyer that supports the change of development plan and whether or not new conditions have been attached to the new development. Submit a copy of the revised conditions if applicable and list the revised conditions on the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. Please address the following comments related to the vehicular use areas. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 a. Please clarify if cross access will be provided between the Diamond Shamrock site and the shopping center site. Provide any relevant documentation related to cross access if applicable. b. Please clarify what the open area along the southeast side of building 4 will be used for. It is not clear on the plan if this area is additional loading areas or parking. 4. Please indicate on the plan all concrete pedestrian sidewalks by hatching the areas with the concrete symbol. Please keep in mind sidewalks must be provided to loading zones and refuse container locations. If the buildings have door openings in the rear to allow access for loading and unloading goods and for use by the employees to access the refuse containers please show and label the door locations on the plan. The doors should be as close to both the loading zones and the refuse containers. The painted crosswalk located in the double row of parking spaces between buildings 3 and 4 must be revised to show a concrete sidewalk and must be raised or if flush with the pavement must be physically separated by extruded curbing or some form of barrier. Revise as required. A concrete sidewalk must be provided along the entire north side of building 4. The refuge area must be a total of five feet wide with a minimum four-foot wide concrete sidewalk. Dimension the width of sidewalks connecting all the buildings. Per rezoning condition 1.m the width must be a minimum of six feet. 5. There does not appear to enough directional signage directing the cyclist to the bicycle parking facilities that are located at building 2 and building 5. Add and label the signage as required. Previous Comment: Add bicycle directional signage to direct the cyclist to the bicycle parking facilities that are not visible from the street frontage. Several of the bicycle parking facilities will not be visible from the street frontage. Please show and label the required bicycle directional signs. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 6. Please insure that the monument signs are annotated with a keynote. The monument signs have been shown on several sheets but have been annotated on only two of the sheets with the sign keynote. Previous Comment: Indicate on the plan all the locations of proposed freestanding signs. The type and size must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.4.W 7. Please address the following remaining comments related to the Scenic Corridor. The following comments were not addressed correctly or in full. Previous Comments: The following is related to the Scenic Corridor Review. Please address the following comments. a. The 400-foot Scenic Corridor Boundary line must be extended to the southeast property line. Previous Comment: Draw and label the 400-foot Scenic Corridor Boundary based on the future Old Spanish Trail property line. b. The screen wall materials and color list (palette) included in the SCZ binder package does not match the screen wall materials and color list (palette) on the plan sheet 4. The color dark brown listed for the slump block or adobe is on the plan sheet but not in the SCZ binder package. Submit one additional color copy of the materials list. The one that was submitted with the latest binder was in black and white. Also, submit an additional copy of the color renderings of the elevation drawings. Please insure that the height of the tallest structure is labeled. c. After discussing the monument signs and signs in general issue with Craig Gross, he has informed me that he did speak with the developer. The developer was told that the sign colors must be included with this scenic package or a separate scenic review and approval will be required for the sign colors. Please let me know what the developer intends do. d. Submit two copies of the color renderings for the monument sign walls. Label the colors and materials on the color renderings. 8. As of this second review date the Scenic Corridor application cannot be approved based on the submitted documents. Please revise the plans as required and address all CDRC comments related to the development plan and scenic corridor applications. Re-submit the development plan for review along with any requested documents for the Scenic Corridor. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\D040036dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, land landscape plans, Scenic Corridor requirements and documents, and additional requested documents |
| 03/18/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |