Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0036
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | January 3, 2005 TO: Tri H. Miller Rick Engineering Company THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Old Spanish Trail Marketplace Development Plan - 1st Submittal D04-0036 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. 2. Based on the evaluation of reference project C12-94-26, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0036, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 4. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 33, as it is a duplicate of General Note 19. 5. A private Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of residential lots has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the development plan. 6. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 01/05/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Marketplace: Development Plan 1/3/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 22nd St (Harrison to Houghton) No 0 7,100 44,000 4 67,500 23,897 6 6,590 Route 7, 30 minutes, 0 miles None from Harrison to Old Spanish Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 01/06/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) List the CDRC case number and related case numbers on the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Identify the type of screening proposed along 22nd St. and Old Spanish Trail. Screening on Old Spanish may not disturb the 30" natural buffer. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 The "screen provided" column on the Landscape Border and Screening Schedule on sheet G-1 should also list the type of screening material in addition to the height. 3) The development plan should include water surface contours for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated per DS 2-05.2.3.I Riparian habitat within the existing 100 year flood limits is not to be altered unnecessarily per TCC Sec. 26-5.1. and habitat which is removed is to be mitigated per approved WASH Guidelines (http://dot.ci.tucson.az.us/stormwater/watercourse_preservation/washguidetoM_C.pdf) Drainage improvements are required to incorporate natural appearing materials. See condition 1n of case # C9-87-02. 4) Revise the basin slopes to comply with the provisions of DS 10-01. Slopes for basins three feet deep and greater are not to exceed 4:1. SRDM p. 78 5) Revise note 7 on sheet G-1 to include values for the area calculations. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2 6) Revise note 11 on sheet G-1 to clarify that dust control is required for portions of the public rights-of-way between the property line and the street. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 7) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B, DS 2-15.3.4.A 8) Revise the native plant preservation plans to modify the status of plants within the 30' scenic route buffer area to PIP. Revise the landscape plan to show existing plants to be preserved in place. DS 2-15.3.4.A, DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 9) Revise the development and landscape plans to ensure that the parking design complies with LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. 10) Add the current and future sight visibility triangles to the landscape plans. Clarify that shrubs which typically exceed thirty inches in height will not be located in the sight visibility triangles. DS 2-05.2.4 |
| 01/07/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Old Spanish Trail Marketplace D04-0036, T14S, R15E, SECTION 23 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Report on December 07, 2004 The subject submittal has been reviewed. We offer the following comments. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. The existing contour lines do not show elevations. Provide the existing elevation in order to determine existing drainage patterns. 2. Address water harvesting and explain how the runoff will be directed the water harvesting areas. 3. It is not clear if sidewalk scuppers will be incorporated in the drainage plan. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk or walkway (including the walkways around the proposed buildings). Demonstrate compliance with this requirement and include any design calculations in the drainage report. 4. The "Grate inlet, Storm drain and Curb inlet " Ratings do not appear to apply the appropriate safety factors and they do not provide the final recommended inlets and openings sizes. Additionally, it appears that the ratings results are shown incorrectly on the drainage exhibit. Revise as necessary. 5. It appears that the HEC HMS for proposed conditions does not route watershed area III through watershed area IV as shown on the drainage exhibit. Revise. 6. The HEC RAS analysis for the realigned wash includes five 60" pipes underneath the Harrison Road entrance. The HEC RAS plots show only four pipes. Revise. 7. HEC RAS cross section #28 is not shown on figure #3. 8. Label the proposed finished grade on the storm drain sketches. 9. Show on the drainage exhibit the cross section location of the typical driveway conveyance capacity calculations. 10. Verify that the proposed retention basins will have acceptable infiltration rate. This recommends utilizing bleed pipes to drain the basins instead of the infiltration method. 11. The detention/retention basins bottoms should be sloped or have a low flow channel to allow the basins to drain completely and prevent nuisance ponding. 12. It appears that the proposed detention/retention basins require security barriers as required by the "Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual". Refer pages 81 and 82 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for additional information. 13. All proposed detention/retention basins shall include maintenance ramps. 14. Address sediment traps or other sediment control measures in all the proposed detention/retention basins to demonstrate compliance with Section 3.4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual. 15. Provide the design calculations for the proposed erosion protection pads. 16. The realigned wash is designated as a Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat, which is a designation that requires protection. Since the drainage scheme is proposing an extensive encroachment on the wash area, proper mitigation should be provided. Address this issue in the Drainage Report and work with the Zoning Division to determine an acceptable mitigation plan based on the WASH Ordinance mitigation requirements. 17. Provide a soils report that addresses slope protection and required building setbacks from the proposed detention/retention basins. 18. The Basin Maintenance Checklist should include the proposed detention/retention basins and all storm drain systems. Development Plan: 1. Provide the correct D(yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. State the proposed zoning as required by 2-05.2.2.B.2. 3. Revise General Note # 9 to include all proposed onsite drainage facilities. 4. Add a general note, which states that this project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations (D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.2.a) 5. Add a general note, which states that a floodplain use permit is required for the proposed wash relocation (D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.2.b). 6. The existing contour lines do not show elevations. Provide the existing elevation in order to determine existing drainage patterns (D.S. 2-05.2.3.E.). 7. Verify compliance with Rezoning Conditions number 4, 5, 6 and 7. Additionally, explain the existing and future curb and sidewalk information on sheets 3 and 4. 8. Show the far side sight visibility triangle at the Harrison Road southern entrance (D.S. 2-05.2.4.R). Additionally, it is not clear why the plans show existing and future sight visibility triangles. 9. The structures and P.A.A.L's are proposed across lot lines that were established by Plat #C12-94-26, which is not acceptable. This project requires a Block Plat, by which the established lot lines are removed. Additionally, it appears that the C12 number in the Title Block is incorrect. 10. Explain how the Common Areas, drainage and the pedestrian and utility easements, as shown on the plan, will be abandoned. Additionally, the realigned wash should be dedicated as a drainage easement. Please be advised that proposed abandonments and dedications must be processed and the recordation information must be shown on the Development Plan before it can be approved. This Office recommends processing the proposed abandonments and dedications on the Block Plat. 11. Explain why the required 1' No Access Easements are proposed to be abandoned. The easements are required by rezoning condition number 5G. 12. It appears that the trash enclosures near buildings 2 and 11 are not accessible. Revise as necessary (D.S. 2-05.2.4.T). 13. Show the existing 100-year floodplain as required by D.S. 2-05.2.3.I. 14. Show clearly the curb and sidewalk that will be installed with this project. Please be advised that the required sidewalk width on the all Major Streets and Routes is 6' (D.S. 2-05.2.4.L.). 15. All proposed easements shall be labeled and dimensioned as required by (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G). 16. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2). 17. Provide locations and types of drainage structures as required by D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. 18. Any work in the public right of way may require an excavation permit and/or a private improvement agreement. Check with Permits and Codes (Steve Tineo @ 791-5100) for additional information. 19. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement. 20. Show the 100year water surface elevations in the realigned channel (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.6.). 21. Show all applicable set backs as required by D.S. 2-05.2.4.I. 22. Please be advised that a sample of the proposed bank protection will be required with the grading plan submittal to ensure that the proposed material is acceptable and complies with rezoning condition 1N. 23. Old Spanish Trail Road is a Scenic Route. Revise sheet 4 to reflect that. Additionally, label the 30' buffer correctly. 24. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: Show the water harvesting basins. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 01/10/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Marketplace 01/06/05 () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-87-02 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor (Old Spanish Trail) COMMENTS DUE BY: E. Anderson SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 01/03/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments Old Spanish Trail Marketplace – D04-0036 The subject property is located in the Pantano East Area Plan. The Pantano East Area Plan, General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual provide policy guidance for the proposed development plan. 1. The plans promote five-sided architecture, which consists of architectural detail on all four sides and the roof. In regards to the large commercial strip (buildings 5 – 12), please incorporate the architectural detail (facades and color) from the east, north, and west sides to the south side of the structure. In addition, please provide color details of buildings 1 - 4 and provide five-sided architecture. 2. Please provide a color detail of the six feet high masonry screen wall along the east and south sides of the property. 3. Please provide pedestrian connectivity from building four to building five. 4. Show pedestrian connectivity to the proposed development to the Diamond Shamrock parcel, which is located on the corner of Harrison Road and 22nd Street. 5. Please show the proposed color for the six feet wide pedestrian circulation system, per zoning condition 1.M. 6. The plans promote safe and visually pleasing pedestrian walkways that provide a shaded microclimate for pedestrians and visual relief for motorists. Please show the sidewalks along Harrison, 22nd Street, and Old Spanish Trail. Please locate canopy trees along Harrison Road and Old Spanish Trail. The trees should be at minimum 15 gallon in size and spaced no further than 50 feet apart on center. The trees should be located no further than 10 feet back from the back of the sidewalk. 7. The plans promote softening dumpster masonry screen walls. Please locate significant ground vegetation and canopy trees around all dumpster screen walls on the property. Also, please construct the dumpster screen walls with one of the following decorative materials: a) tile, b) stone, c) brick, d) textured brick/block, e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or f) a combination of the above materials. Please show a detail of the screen walls. |
| 01/10/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE D04-0036 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan dated December 2, 2004. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The existing pole and anchor (unit 43) appears to be in conflict with the new turn lane. All costs associated with the relocation of facilities will be billable to developer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Contact the Project Manager, Marc Romito for any project scheduling questions at (520) 917-8732. Also, submit two (2) copies of the final set of plans including electrical load and off site improvement plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 01/11/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | If your are not converting this to a subdivision plat then Real Estate needs the following: Completed RES Application form and $200.00 for the requested abandonment of utility easement (Tucson Water's interest only) you must secure all other utilities abandonment directly with them. Legal description of the utility easement to be abandoned. You will need to address the abandoned common area's by amending the CCR's and recording them. |
| 01/11/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: January 10, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Marketplace: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services No effort has been made to preserve the exceptional xeroriparian habitat crossing the southwest quadrant of the site. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/17/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-0036 Old Spanish Trail Market Place Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 13, 2005 DUE DATE: January 3, 2005 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 6, 2005. 2. This site has been previously subdivided and recorded. A block plat to eliminate the existing property or lot lines as defined by the recorded plat will be required prior to approval of the development plan. Technically this project should have come in for a development plan/block plat review. Contact Craig Gross for more information on the block plat process and for his determination on procedure. 3. Please block out the street names on the location map to make them more legible. The Location map does not need to include all lot lines. A simple line drawing that depicts the major and collector streets is sufficient and also makes the map more legible. Please revise the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D 4. Please clarify if the existing conditions that were conditions of rezoning for the previous development are applicable to the proposed retail development. Provide documentation from Glenn Moyer that supports the change of development plan and whether or not new conditions have been attached to the new development. Submit a copy of the revised conditions if applicable and list the revised conditions on the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.K 5. As noted in a previous comment that a block plat will be required prior to approval of the proposed development in the interim a development plan project number has been assigned to this project. Please list the following development plan number in the lower right corner D04-0036. Please be aware that the Block Plat will be assigned a different case number and the case number will be provided at the time the block plat is submitted. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. Please clarify if existing easements recorded per the previous plat will remain or will the easements be abandoned by separate documents or by the new block plat. DS 2-05.2.3.A 7. Please clarify if and how the existing Diamond Shamrock development is impacted. Has the Diamond Shamrock parcel been split as shown on the revised D.P. or is the parcel inclusive of the four parcels previous subdivided per the previous plat. DS 2-05.2.4.A 8. Please address the following comments related to the vehicular use areas. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 a. Dimension the width of the PAAL between the loading zone and the landscape island/parking spaces along the south side of building two. b. Label the width of the drive-through aisle. The minimum width allowed is 12 feet. Label the length of the stacking spaces. Each space must be a minimum of 18 feet in length. c. Label the width of the driveway entrance at Old Spanish Trail. d. For consistency label the width of all PAALs. e. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone located between buildings 3 and 4. When access into the loading is not possible the loading will not be used and therefore big rigs tend to park lengthwise in the parking stalls taking up 7 parking stalls. Please insure that all the loading zones can be accessed. f. Please clarify if cross access will be provided between the Diamond Shamrock site and the shopping center site. Provide any relevant documentation related to cross access if applicable. g. Please clarify what the open area along the southeast side of building 4 will be used for. It is not clear open the plan if this area is additional loading areas or parking. 9. Please indicate on the plan all concrete pedestrian sidewalks by hatching the areas with the concrete symbol. Please keep in mind sidewalks must be provided to loading zones and refuse container locations. If the buildings have door openings in the rear to allow access for loading and unloading goods and for use by the employees to access the refuse containers please show and label the door locations on the plan. The doors should be as close to both the loading zones and the refuse containers. The painted cross located in located in the double row of parking spaces between buildings 3 and 4 must be revised to show a concrete sidewalk and must be raised or if flush with the pavement must be physically separated by extruded curbing or some form of barrier. Revise as required. A concrete sidewalk must be provided along the entire north side of building 4. The refuge area must be a total of five feet wide with a minimum four-foot wide concrete sidewalk. Dimension the width of sidewalks connecting all the buildings. Per rezoning condition 1.m the width must be a minimum of six feet. 10. Please add bicycle directional signage to direct the cyclist to the bicycle parking facilities that are not visible from the street frontage. Several of the bicycle parking facilities will not be visible from the street frontage. Please show and label the required bicycle directional signs. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 11. Please provide a separate response letter detailing how all rezoning conditions have been addressed and demonstrate graphically on this plan, compliance with all applicable conditions. It is acknowledged that the rezoning case and conditions were based on the previously approved plat and that several of the conditions have been met or will be met per the new plan. DS 2-05.2.4.U 12. Indicate on the plan the type and location of postal service that will be provided for all uses. DS 2-05.2.4.V 13. Indicate on the plan all the locations of proposed freestanding signs. The type and size must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.4.W 14. See landscape review comments related to landscape borders, screening, and NPPO. DS 2-05.2.4.X 15. This site does not have frontage on a Gateway Route and therefore is not subject to any Gateway requirements or exceptions. Please remove any notes related to Gateway Route. List all the proposed uses on sheet one i.e. building 1 - restaurant building 2 - retail building 3 - office etc. 16. The following is related to the Scenic Corridor Review. Please address the following comments. a. Draw and label the 400-foot Scenic Corridor Boundary based on the future Old Spanish Trail property line. b. Any development site, which has at least 200 feet of frontage along a Scenic Route, will have view corridors. The Old Spanish Trail frontage is equal to 204 feet and therefore the view corridors must be provided (See LUC section 2.8.2.B for more info). Per the plan view corridors have not been drawn and it appears that based on the proposed development the view corridors cannot be met. Please revise the plan and demonstrate that view corridors will be provided. Add view corridor calculation. c. Add the following SCZ notes: 1. Include in 30 foot buffer label the notation "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 2. Add and annotate the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary on the development plan. 3. Please add the following notes to the development plan. a.) Add the view corridor calculations. b.) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right- of-way of Old Spanish Trail right-of-way line, not to exceed 30 feet. c.) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, driveway entrances, private yards, and structural improvements. All existing vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti must be preserved or relocated on the site. d.) Existing drainage-ways are to be maintained in their natural state. e.) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Old Spanish Trail will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is re-vegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D f.) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from Old Spanish Trail will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. Colors are as follows: (list approved colors from SCZ-04-13 case.) g.) Fencing and freestanding walls facing Old Spanish Trail will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. h.) All areas between the Old Spanish Trail MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. i.) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Old Spanish Trail and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. j.) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length. d. The materials and color palettes must be listed on the development plan. Also, the color renderings must include the materials name and colors labeled directly on the elevations. 17. The Engineering, Landscape, and Signs Reviewers made the following comments. Please address the comments and revise the plans as requested. Engineering Reviewer Laith Alshami: 1. Old Spanish Trail is A scenic Route, revise sheet 4 to reflect that. 2. Label the 30-foot buffer correctly. Landscape Reviewer, Joseph Linville: 1. The landscape section does not recommend approval at this time. A number of design issues raised in the development plan review may any render any decision preliminary at this point. Signs Reviewer Chuck Stephenson: 1. Sign permits must be obtained for. 2. Proposed signage must comply with Section 3-40 Scenic Corridor Zone of the Tucson Sign Code. As of this review date the Scenic Corridor application cannot be approved based on the submitted development plan and per issues still pending as a result of comments made by the CDRC reviewers, which are related to the Scenic Corridor requirements. Please revise the plans as required and address all CDRC comments related to the development plan and scenic corridor applications. Re-submit the development plan for review along with any requested documents for the Scenic Corridor. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\D040036dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, land landscape plans, Scenic Corridor requirements and documents, and additional requested documents |
| 01/18/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/07/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/08/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved December 08, 2004 |
| 12/11/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0036 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE |
| 12/13/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development. * Detail of single enclosure OK. * No detail of the double enclosure. * Service restructions with the following enclosures. * Enclosure by Building 3 - 14' x 40' clear area in conflict with parking. * Enclosure by building 2 - 14' x 40' clear area in conflict with island. * Double enclosure by building 11 - 14' x 40' clear area in conflict with detention basin. * Questions: * Is there any refuse enclosures for building 4? * What are the provisions for recycling for the different buildings in the complex? * If any othe buildings are going to be a resturant it is recommended that a double wide enclosure be provided. Such bussinesses have a need for a recycling container for utilization. |
| 12/15/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0036 OLD SPANISH TRAIL MARKETPLACE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Include: A development of Blocks B thru F of 22nd street at Harrison Road, Bk 46, Pg 94 in Title Block. 2: Correct “Target Center” to Old Spanish Trail Crossing on all sheets. |
| 12/29/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. The Developer shall provide either a "right out only" raised median diverter at the access point from 22nd Street, similar to the one depicted on the plans across 22nd on sheet 3 OR build a back-to-back 3/4 raised median diverter in the median of 22nd Street. As designed, there is potential of a conflicting left turn movement if a left out movement is allowed at this access point. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |