Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0035
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-0035 Bear Canyon Pizza Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: December 29, 2004 DUE DATE: December 30, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 26, 2004. 2. This development plan has been reviewed by the zoning review section for compliance with the development designator for the proposed restaurant use DD "28", Development Standards Plan Format and Content and Scenic Corridor requirements. Please address the following comments and revise the plans as required and provide all requested documents necessary for the follow-up review. 3. Remove the distance and bearing notes from the location map on sheet 2. I believe these notes were placed in error. Also draw and label the COT and Pima County jurisdiction limits. DS 2-05.2.1.D 4. In the tile block please list the pad or lot number for the proposed development. Add to the title block a brief legal description. DS 2-05.2.1.G. and .2 5. Please revise general note three to state then number of existing lots rather than proposed or remove the note. (I believe that a tentative plat/development plan was approved for the subdivision.) 6. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D04-0035. Please list the case number on all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 7. Add a general note that states that this project has been designed to meet the overlay criteria of the Major Streets and Routes Map. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 8. Under general note one list the gross lot area of lot 2 by square footage and acreage. DS 2-05.2.2.11 9. Remove all zoning classifications labeled B-1 and replace with C-1. DS 2-05.2.4.B 10. Label the PAAL width for the PAALs along the south side of the building and along the east side of the building between the east edge of the drive-through lane and the parking stalls for the OSCO building. The minimum width for two-way traffic is 24 feet. Draw and label the drive-through window. Also draw, dimension and label the stacking capacity (vehicle spaces) within the drive-through lane. Six spaces each, eighteen feet in length must be provided within the drive-through lane including the one at the window. The drive-through lane must be separated from the PAAL areas, demonstrate compliance. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 and DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 11. This project is subject the criteria of the Scenic Corridor. One of the criteria that must be met is the building setback from the existing or future street property line. Based on the proposed building height of 30 feet (maximum height allowed for commercial use in the Scenic Corridor) the building setback must 90 feet. Draw and label the building setback from the street property line. Also please draw and label the building setback from the south property line. DS 2-05.2.4.I 12. Onsite pedestrian circulation is required. This project's sidewalk (circulation) must connect to the adjacent developments to the west and east. Demonstrate on the plan how this will be accomplished. Also the proposed location of the access ramp from the drive-through lane must be relocated from this location. The access ramp leads directly into the drive-through lane, which makes it unsafe for the pedestrian and the delivery personnel. Please revise as required. DS 2-05.2.4.K 13. On the footprint drawing list the building square footage, building heights, and building dimensions. DS 2-05.2.4.N 14. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading area. DS 2-05.2.4.O 15. The overall parking cannot be verified until the parking ratio for the personal services has been revised to correctly list the number of parking spaces required and provided. The parking ratio for personal service is based on one space per 100 square feet of GFA. Revise the parking calculations as required. DS 2-05.2.4.P 16. Draw the location of the bicycle parking spaces for the new restaurant. The number of bicycle parking spaces required is based on the number of parking spaces required or provided for the new use. Show, label and dimension the bicycle parking facility area. Add a separate detail drawing that depicts the specific facility for the new use. Include the bicycle parking in the calculations as required. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 17. Show the location and list the type of refuse container proposed for the new use. DS 2-05.2.4.T 18. Indicate on the plan the location and type of postal service proposed for the new use. DS 2-05.2.4.V 19. Show locations, types, and sizes of all new signs. DS 2-05.2.4.W 20. See Landscape Review comments related to landscaping, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.Z 21. This development is located on street frontage that is designated as a Scenic Corridor. A scenic corridor review and approval is required prior to final approval of the development plan. The previous development plan approval for the OSCO development was reviewed for scenic corridor compliance. Certain variances were requested and approved prior to final approval of the development plan. The variances only applied to the development proposal at the time. This new development must comply with the scenic corridor requirements except for the 30 foot buffer requirement. The requirements that must be met include the following: a. Building setback is based on a 3:1 ratio. (The minimum building setback required for a 30-foot building is 90 feet from the future property line. Maximum height is 30 feet.) b. A color and building materials palette that describes the proposed colors and building materials, the manufacturer of each, part number/name of materials and paint. c. Color renderings (4 sided building elevations) that depict the proposed building, materials and color (paint) lists. d. Color renderings of the proposed signage with the materials and color (paint) lists. If the colors and building materials that were approved for the OSCO are used for the new development a new scenic corridor will not be required. As long as compliance for items a - d as noted above can be met. If the new development will not be constructed with the approved building materials or painted with the approved colors a scenic corridor application will be required. Please let me know prior to submittal of the revised development plan of the decision regarding the scenic requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\D040035dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 01/05/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: BEAR CANYON PIZZA HUT D04-0035 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review November 30, 2004. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Blue Stake and pot hole facilities to verify the exact location. In order to apply for electric service call the New Construction department at (520) 770-2062. Also, submit a final set of plans including electrical load and off site improvement plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of six (6) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 01/10/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | 1. Annexation agreement requires developer to contact Master Homeowner's Association and adjacent neighborhood groups, and offer to meet, a minimum 30 days prior to submitting for CDRC review. Please provide appropriate documentation of notice and meeting notes. 2. Building elevations and color palette are required for review. Please include in next submittal. 3. All new signage for this use should be reviewed at this time. Please provide drawings and color palette. |
| 01/10/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/30/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/01/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved December 01, 2004. |
| 12/03/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0035 BEAR CANYON PIZZA HUT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/02/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 12/06/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development. * Development is on an existing building pad in an approved development with existind refuse enclosures. * Existing enclosure can be serviced at the angle constructed. There is a conflict with the curb being in the operating 10' by 40' area. Operation could damage the curb. The enclosure does not have side wall protection and the side walls could be damaged during operation. * Recommend that consideration be given for a recycling enclosure be constructed. This particular type of business would have a large amount of recycleable material. |
| 12/06/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0035 LANDMARK ENGINEERING, INC BEAR CANYON PIZZA HUT |
| 12/13/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | December 13, 2004 TO: E. Bruce Wilson, P.E. Landmark Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Bear Canyon Pizza Hut Development Plan – 1st Submittal D04-0035 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Please be aware that Pima County Development Services Department has a new development plan checklist. This checklist can be found at http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.PDF for assistance when preparing a development plan. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project S99-037, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0035, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Combine General Notes 19 and 20 into one General Note that reads as follows: THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). SHEET 2. Show the Pima County plan number for the existing private sewer line to which this project will be connecting. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 12/21/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 20, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0035 Bear Canyon Pizza Hut : Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/21/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | 345 estimated daily trips in 24 hr period. |
| 12/23/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Title the landscape plans. 2) Revise irrigation note 5 on sheet 1 to indicate that irrigation will be provided as necessary to maintain plantings as shown on the plans. Irrigation may be necessary after the establishment period. LUC 3.7.6 3) Add related case numbers to the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2 RESUBMIT THE LANDSCAPE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The NPP application is approved. |
| 12/27/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/28/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | NO COMMENTS. |
| 12/30/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 30, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Bear Canyon Pizza Hut Development Plan D04-0035 (First Review) T13S, R15E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Drainage Report and Development Plan. The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) for Pad 3 at Safeway Plaza and recommends approval. 1. The drainage report must be revised to provide calculations showing the required threshold retention volume. 2. In the drainage report provide results of percolation tests showing that the basin will empty within 12 hours. Submit a revised drainage report along with the development plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |