Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D04-0034
Parcel: 141090670

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D04-0034
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/15/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/16/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D04-0034 LA ESTANCIA RETAIL CENTER/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: February 16, 2005



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

NOTE:

1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.














jg
02/16/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved February 16, 2005.
02/24/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Include related case numbers on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.1.B. Examples of related cases include the tentative plat for La Estancia de Tucson S99-060 and the Rezoning for PAD 7, Ordinance No. 9298.

2) The La Estancia PAD and the La Estancia de Tucson Tentative Block Plat identify the proposed development as part of Phase 3. Also, p. 33 of the PAD stipulates that the relocation of Los Reales Road and the Julian Wash will be completed prior to approval of Phase One. Revised zoning documents and plats may be required if this phase is intended to preceed completion of required improvements and other phases.

3) Provide verification, in writing, of City Engineer approval for landscape improvements in the public right-of-way areas.
LUC 3.7.2.9., PAD p. 79.

4) All loading areas are to be screened from adjacent streets with a 6' masonry wall. Revise the DP and LP to comply. Show all loading areas and all required screening. Clearly label any required screening elements on the development plan and the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3
02/24/2005 CRAIG GROSS PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied February 24, 2005

TO: Frank Castro, P.E.
Castro Engineering

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: La Estancia Retail Center
Development Plan – 2nd Submittal
D04-0034


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


A private Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the development plan.

SHEET 3 & 4. Show the invert elevations for all proposed private manholes.

SHEET 3 & 4. Show all building connection sewers and label them “BCS”. Additionally show the size, length and slope.

SHEET 3 & 4. Show the slope of the proposed private sewers.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Projec
03/02/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. The SVTs as labeled are incorrect and inconsistent. Via Rio Rico will be the THROUGH STREET side when determining the SVT length at the intersection with the two access points to the Project. The SVTs as depicted don't scale to anywhere close to the written dimension. The stem side on SVTs are required to be 20', not the 15' as depicted. For SVT sizing purposes, Via Rio Pico will be a collector road and Kolb Road is an arterial road. Refer to DS 3-01.5 for guidance.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
03/03/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D04-0034 La Estancia Retail Center 03/04/05

( ) Tentative Plat
( x ) Development Plan
( x ) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: La Estancia PAD

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon / Southeast Subregional Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway (Kolb)

COMMENTS DUE BY: March 02, 2005

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( x ) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( x ) Development Plan
( x ) Landscape Plan
( x ) Other: Elevations

REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 03/02/05

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS
LA ESTANCIA RETAIL CENTER - D04-0034: 2ND SUBMITTAL

The La Estancia Planned Area Development (PAD) establishes comprehensive guidance and regulations for the development of homes and associated support services on approximately 565 acres along the north side of Interstate 10 between Kolb Road and Wilmot Road. The PAD implements the City of Tucson General Plan by specifying policies and site development standards, which replace the current zoning on the property. The subject property is located in the La Estancia PAD and Rincon/Southeast Subregional Plan. The La Estancia PAD, Rincon/Southeast Subregional Plan, General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual all provide guidance for the review of this development.

The PAD is a regulatory guide for the future development of a sustainable, balanced community of residential, office, commercial, industrial and recreational uses that promote an aesthetically pleasing living environment by ensuring high standards of development quality. Objectives of the PAD are to diminish the dominance of the automobile, provide visual and pedestrian linkages, and provide for pedestrian and bikeway networks throughout the project. The second submittal does not address the above objectives.

The development has no vehicular access from Kolb Road. However, the development is orientated in a way that resembles a development that fronts on Kolb Road. It seems that it would be appropriate and would better conform to the policies in the plans and PAD to locate the front of the commercial development and pedestrian friendly storefront entrances facing Via Rio Pico.

It has been recommended that Kolb Road be a future full access control roadway with a 300 feet wide right-of-way with over 60,000 vehicles per day. There will be a traffic light located at the primary entrance into La Estancia, south of the Julian Wash. A traffic light is not possible at the Via Rio Pico/Kolb Road intersection. The proposed 200,000+ square feet commercial development and the future industrial uses along Via Rio Pico will create a substantial amount of traffic at the Via Rio Pico/Kolb Road intersection. The Via Rio Pico cross-section in the PAD was not designed with such an intensive use in mind at this location. To offset the intensity of this site, Via Rio Pico should be constructed with the minor collector cross section along the future development. Another way to offset the intensity of this site is to locate a collector road to the south of this site that crosses the Julian Wash and leads to the minor collector street on the opposite side of the Julian Wash.

1. Show the correct path of the future Julian Wash on the Location Map.

2. Show and label the boundaries of the appropriate Approach Departure Corridor (ADC-2) for Davis Monthan Air Force Base on the development plan. Note in the General Notes that the property is located in the Approach Departure Corridor (ADC-2) and note the performance criteria and prohibited uses within the applicable corridor under General Notes. (ordinance no. 10073)

3. Note in the General Notes that the property is located in the 65 Noise Control District (NCD) for Davis Monthan Air Force Base. Note performance criteria and prohibited uses within the applicable district. (ordinance no. 10073)

4. The minor refinement letter dated June 29, 2004 states that collector streets are to be designed in conjunction with each of the subdivision plats. At the time that each subdivision plat is submitted, collector street design will demonstrate phased interconnectivity between subdivisions. The original circulation plan map shows a street on the north side of the subject property that connects Kolb Road to Via Rio Pico. Demonstrate how there will be vehicular and pedestrian interconnectivity (cross-access) between the proposed development and blocks 34 and 35. (minor refinement letter and plans)

5. The minor refinement letter dated June 29, 2004 states that collector streets are to be designed in conjunction with each of the subdivision plats. At the time that each subdivision plat is submitted, collector street design will demonstrate phased interconnectivity between subdivisions. The intensity of the proposed use creates a situation where there needs to be safe and functional pedestrian and vehicular connectivity to the portion of the PAD south of the Julian Wash and to Kolb Road. Locate a minor collector road to the south of this site that crosses the Julian Wash and leads to minor collector road on the opposite side of the Julian Wash. (minor refinement letter and II.B.c)

6. The development has no vehicular access from Kolb Road. However, the development is orientated in a way that resembles a development that fronts on Kolb Road. It would be more appropriate and would better conform to the policies in the plans and PAD to locate the front of the commercial development and pedestrian friendly storefront entrances facing Via Rio Pico. Please reconfigure the development and locate the front of the commercial development along Via Rio Pico. (plans and PAD)

7. A landscape improvement district for the upgrade and enhancement of Kolb Road from Valencia Road to Interstate 10 needs to be created. The entity to administer this district will be agreed upon by the City, County and private owners prior to any capital improvements being performed on Kolb Road. Please create the landscape improvement district. (I.C. Development Partnership)

8. The intersection of Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road is a Secondary Entry Statement. Secondary Entry Statements need to be similar to Project Entry Statements, but smaller in scale. Show a cross-section of Via Rio Pico at the intersection of Kolb Road. (II.D.2 Secondary Entry Statements)
- The intersection of Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road must have a left turn lane.
- There needs to be a landscaped median on Via Rio Pico at the intersection of Kolb Road.
- All trees at this intersection must be 24" box size and selected from the City of Tucson approved drought-tolerant list.
- The crosswalk at this location shall have enhanced paving/crosswalk.
- Both sides of this intersection need to be developed as the Secondary Entry Statement. Show the landscape and design along the Julian Wash.

9. There shall be a series of berms in the Julian Wash linear park along Via Rio Pico. The vegetation in the Julian Wash linear park shall be designed with native trees, shrubs, and groundcover reflective of the Sonoran Desert. A master design needs to be approved by the appropriate public agencies and at minimum the northern portion of the linear park needs to be shown on the development plan. (II.A. Land Use Plan, II.C. Open Space and Recreation Plan, Exhibit II.C.2, & II.D.6)

10. Building facades at the rear, side and the roof are to be designed with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment and the use of Sonoran Desert shades of colors (greens, blues, yellows, oranges, reds, purples, etc.). In addition, the construction of Building 1 and Building 2 should be constructed so that there are differentiating rooflines and canopies. Building 1 and Building 2 should be constructed so that the storefronts are distinguishable. Please submit dimensioned elevation drawings of the buildings that demonstrate five-sided architecture, the use of Sonoran Desert colors, and distinguishable storefronts. (plans and PAD I.A.)

11. Demonstrate state of the art building techniques and design being used to conserve energy, water and non-renewable resources. (I.2 Project Objectives)

12. Provide for spine infrastructure to create a state of the art wired community and enable homes and businesses to take advantage of any new, enhanced communication opportunities. If this has been provided, please state on the development plan what infrastructure has been provided. (I.2. Project Objectives)

13. The PAD was created to allow for the reduction on the dependence of automobiles. This creates a scenario in which pedestrians and bicyclists have safe and functional connectivity to all uses. Connect the pedestrian circulation system along Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road to the internal pedestrian circulation system of the proposed retail center. (plans and PAD). Please provide pedestrian connectivity from the sidewalk along Kolb Road, the northern entrance along Via Rio Pico, and an additional midpoint between the to ingress/egress points off of Via Rio Pico. The connectivity along Kolb needs to be developed to create an actual and perceived safe route from the residential and commercial areas of the PAD south of the Julian Wash.

14. Policy supports development that limits the visual impact of parking areas along the street front. Please reduce the visual impact of the seven row parking area along Kolb. A solution would be to move Building 3 to the south and Building 4 to the north. In addition to building relocation, additional mitigation could include additional landscape islands in the parking area and berming along Kolb Road and Via Rio Pico. (plans and PAD)

15. Show safe and functional pedestrian circulation systems within the retail center. (plans and PAD) The pedestrian crosswalk that leads to Via Rio Pico on the southern portion of the property needs to connect to a sidewalk. There needs to be additional pedestrian circulation in the development that will allow safe and functional passage to and from the different buildings. The pedestrian crosswalks cannot lead to a landscape island, which requires a pedestrian to walk through the island. The pedestrian crosswalks also cannot lead to a curb. Please provide the required ramp to allow for handicapped accessibility. The commercial development needs to first and foremost cater to pedestrians and bicyclists. Examples include:
- Provide a wide, shaded, designated pedestrian and bicycle access area from Via Rio Pico, where the new collector intersects with Via Rio Pico and the corner of Via Rio Pico and Kolb. The access should have limited, preferably no, contact with vehicular activity.
- Pedestrian sidewalks that stub to a landscape island, stop, and continue from a landscape island on the opposite side of a parking isle should continue through, and be a portion of the parking isle. This area would serve as a shaded pedestrian access lane, which provides shade for pedestrians and parked vehicles.
- Awnings, arcades, or canopies at customer entrances.
- Pedestrian ways distinguished from vehicular areas by material such as brick, concrete pavers, scored or patterned colored concrete.
- Pedestrian siting areas within sight of, and easily visible from areas of greatest activity, including along principal entryways and in pedestrian plazas.

16. A signage theme needs to be prepared and approved by the La Estancia Design Review Committee. Please show documentation that the La Estancia Design Review Committee has prepared and approved a signage theme. (III.A.11. Signage)

17. Each development within the noise mitigation overlay must demonstrate that noise impacts are mitigated. Within the noise mitigation overlay zone, office, residential, and educational facilities must be provided with insulation or otherwise designed to reduce the interior noise level to Ldn 45 or less or as required by building codes. Submit a site plan and other supporting materials demonstrating these mitigation measures to the Design Review Committee. Mitigation must also be demonstrated as part of the development plan approval. (III.A.10)

18. All proposed development plans and subdivision plats within the PAD area shall be submitted to the La Estancia Design Review Committee prior to the review by the City of Tucson. Please show documentation that the La Estancia Design Review Committee has reviewed this development plan. (IV.B.) There was no letter in the submitted materials.

19. All walls, including all dumpster screen walls, are to incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatment, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; or a visually interesting design on the wall surface. Please show a color detail that demonstrates compliance. Please use similar colors as those proposed for the buildings. (plans and PAD)

20. Continue the sidewalk along Kolb Road for the entire length of the property. Locate shade trees along the sidewalk, spaced no more than 25 feet on center. (plans and PAD)

21. Policy supports shaded seating areas in large commercial complexes. Please construct a landscaped and shaded pedestrian seating area in the development. Make sure the shaded seating area is located outside the ADC-2. (plans and PAD)
03/07/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed
03/07/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: March 7, 2005
Planning Administrator

SUBJECT: La Estancia de Tucson Retail Ctr.
Development Plan D04-0034 (Second Review)
T15S, R15E, Section 19

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan.

The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.


Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. No obstructions, including parking spaces, above 30"…..ect. are allowed in the sight visibility triangles. Revise as required.
3. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. List who will be the responsible party to maintain the regional det./ret. basins with the responsibility note.

Drainage Report:
1. The DR has been accepted for Development plan purposes only. Final acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/La Estancia de Tucson Retail Ctr 2
03/07/2005 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Center
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
D04-015
La Estancia Retail Center
Site Plan Review (2nd review)
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 3-7-05
DUE DATE: 3-4-05

1. Revise the symbol for the Airport Hazard Zone line in the legend to match that shown on the drawing. The AHD line on the drawing appears to correspond only with the symbol for easement lines. The new city AEZ maps indicate the site is partially within the Airport Departure Corridor-2 (ADC-2) for Davis Monthan Airforce Base. This overlay zone limits uses. Refer to LUC 2.8.5.8.B for specific prohibited uses in the ADC-2 and add a statement to General Note 5 that this development is within the ADC-2. Developments that are not in conformance with the performance criteria of LUC 2.8.5.8.B.1 are permitted only if a protected development right plan was approved by Mayor and Council specifically for such development prior to June 30, 2005. Also, add a note that the project site is also with the NCD-65 of the Airport Environs Zone. Within the NCD-65 office, residential, and educational facilities must be provided with sound attenuation to reduce the interior noise level to Ldn 45 or less as specified by Development Standards 9-05.
LUC 2.8.5.7.A.2
LUC 2.8.5.8.B
LUC 2.8.5.6.A

2. Revise SVT dimensions to be correct.
DS 3-01.5

3. Per La Estancia Pad document, all proposed development plans must be submitted to the La Estancia Design Review Committee prior to Development Plan Review. Provide documentation to this effect.
Document - PAD 7 Section IV-B.

4. Indicate location and type of all proposed freestanding signage and freestanding lighting on the development plan. Provide documentation that the La Estancia Design Review Committee has approved signage. DS 2-05.2.4.W

5. The La Estancia Phasing Plan indicates that the proposed development is part of scheduled phase IV and should follow other substantial projects such as realignment of roads and washes, and construction of parks. Phasing note 7 indicates that, unless otherwise amended, dedications of right-of-way, assurances, construction of storm drains, parks, etc. must be done in sequence per the phasing plan. In addition, Development Note 1 on the La Estancia Block Plat states that no development, including grading, grubbing or other alterations shall occur on any portion of the platted property until the relocation of Julian Wash has been completed and evidence of the completion has been certified and recorded by the Devleopment Services Director. In addition, based on the PAD 7 document the relocation of Los Reales Road and Julian Wash will be completed prior to approval of phase 1. Provide evidence that this phase 1, and other early phases of development have been completed prior to approval of the Retail Center Development Plan.
-La Estancia Plat

6. A pedestrian sidewalk must connect all areas of the development and must provide connections between the building to sidewalks along the adjacent street frontages. The pedestrian access between the building and the adjacent rights-of-way must be located to minimize conflict with vehicular access to the project. Revise to show pedestrian circulation connections.

7. Revise bicycle parking calculation to be based on the vehicle parking provided rather than that required. LUC 3.3.3.5
DS 2-05.2.4.Q

8. Label the building heights and dimensions on the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.N

9. A requirement of the La Estancia Pad 7 is that linear park be provided along Julian Wash and bike lanes be provided along main project roads. Label the location of the linear park and bike route on the drawings to further clarify what is shown in the Julian Wash cross section A on sheet 2 of 4. Document - PAD 4 Development Area 2
Development Standard e

10. Provide a standard and handicapped parking space detail. Show spaces fully dimensioned in the detail and state the dimensions and maximum slope of the h/c access aisles and concrete ramps to be provided. Show wheelstop curbs to be provided in parking spaces, dimensioned at 2-½-feet from the front side (wheel side) of the wheelstop curb. Note: wheelstops must be provided in spaces where vehicles may overhang landscaped areas and sidewalks which are less than 6-½ feet wide. DS 2-05.2.4.P
DS 3-05.2.3.C.2
ANS

11. A minimum 5-foot pedestrian refuge, including a 4-foot concrete sidewalk is required between the building and the PAAL. Please revise plan to show the 5-foot pedestrian refuge, fully dimensioned, along the west side of buildings 1 and 2. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520)791-5608.