Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0034
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/26/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Provide a General Note on the plan: "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided, by the Developer, as required by the Tucson Fire Code. |
| 11/30/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0034 LA ESTANCIA RETAIL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/29/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Little Town Road to Littletown Road on Location Map. Correct Centurty Park to Century Park Drive on Location Map. Number buildings numerically. |
| 11/30/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0034 CASTRO ENGINEERING CORP. LA ESTANCIA RETAIL CENTER |
| 12/02/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfills w/in 1000 feet of this development. * No recycling service is shown for the complex. It is recommended that recycling be considered. From experence recycling is important in mall type of bussinesses. By reversing the collection flow of the containers double wide enclosures could be easily constructed at the area shown that would address all refuse collection needs. |
| 12/13/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 13, 2004 TO: Frank Castro, P.E. Castro Engineering Corp. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: La Estancia Retail Center Development Plan – 1st Submittal D04-0034 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Please be aware that Pima County Development Services Department has a new development plan checklist. This checklist can be found at http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.PDF for assistance when preparing a development plan. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project S99-060, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0034, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Delete General Notes 12 and 17. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 1. As no off-site sewers are proposed, delete General Note 16. SHEET 1. As found in the Pima County Development Plan Requirements, section J.2.b, please add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). SHEETS 3 & 4. Show the Pima County plan number and the size of the existing public sewers in these two sheets. SHEET 4. Be aware that this project proposes to connect to a sewer line (G-2000-096) that has not yet been built. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 12/15/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D04-0034 La Estancia Retail Center 12/13/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Kolb Rd (I-10 to Valencia) No 0 13,800 46,000 4 46,000 36,636 4 9,163 None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 12/17/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 12/20/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: December 20, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: La Estancia de Tucson Retail Ctr. Development Plan D04-0034 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 19 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 3. The development notes on the Tentative Plat state: "No further platting and no development, including grading, grubbing or other alterations to the existing property shall occur on any portion of the platted property until the existing Julian Wash has been relocated…..". There are notes on the recorded FP to this effect also. This must be addressed prior to approval of the DP. 4. If the Ret./Det. basins per the Master Drainage Report have not been constructed, then a temporary ret./det. basin will need to be constructed to satisfy the drainage requirements. 5. The right-of-way for Los Reales Rd. shall be abandoned prior to the Dev. plan approval. 6. Label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. Sidewalks are required along the frontage of the property for all new developments per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. 7. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 8. List estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 9. Show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 10. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Show Development plan number (D04-0034) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 13. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Include a typical detail of the refuse enclosure on the development plans. A refuse container located on the West side of the main building cannot be serviced due to the max. back-up distance of the service vehicle. See D.S. 6-01.4.1.C. Revise as necessary. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 16. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 17. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The development notes on the Tentative Plat state: "No further platting and no development, including grading, grubbing or other alterations to the existing property shall occur on any portion of the platted property until the existing Julian Wash has been relocated…..". 3. If the Ret./Det. basins per the Master Drainage Report have not been constructed, then a temporary ret./det. basin will need to be constructed to satisfy the drainage requirements. 4. A Letter of map revision (LOMR) will is necessary due to the modification of the FEMA flood hazard map as shown on FIRM panel 2855 K, effective date February 8, 1999, prior to the issuance of any permits. 5. Include in the DR a statement that you have reviewed the approved Master Drainage Plan for La Estancia de Tucson and agree to the data shown in that DR. 6. Include the portion of the CLOMR that affects the property in the DR. The CLOMR submitted and that was included in the DR does not show the property. 7. FUP will be required for any construction in the floodplain. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/La Estancia de Tucson Retail Ctr |
| 12/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0034 La Estancia Retail Center 12/20/04 () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: La Estancia PAD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon / Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway (Kolb) COMMENTS DUE BY: December 20, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan (x) Other: Elevations REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 12/20/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments La Estancia Retail Center – D04-0034: 1st submittal The La Estancia Planned Area Development (PAD) establishes comprehensive guidance and regulations for the development of homes and associated support services on approximately 565 acres along the north side of Interstate 10 between Kolb Road and Wilmot Road. The PAD implements the City of Tucson General Plan by specifying policies and site development standards, which replace the current zoning on the property. The subject property is located in the La Estancia PAD and Rincon/Southeast Subregional Plan. The La Estancia PAD, Rincon/Southeast Subregional Plan, General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual all provide guidance for the review of this development. Show the correct path of the Julian Wash on the Location Map. Show and label the boundaries of the appropriate Approach Departure Corridor (ADC) for Davis Monthan Air Force Base on the development plan. Note on the development plan the performance criteria and prohibited uses within the applicable corridor. (ordinance no. 10073) Show and label the boundaries of the appropriate Noise Control District (NCD) for Davis Monthan Air Force Base on the development plan. Note on the development plan the performance criteria and prohibited uses within the applicable district. (ordinance no. 10073) The minor refinement letter dated June 29, 2004 states that collector streets are to be designed in conjunction with each of the subdivision plats. At the time that each subdivision plat is submitted, collector street design will demonstrate phased interconnectivity between subdivisions. The original circulation plan map shows a street on the north side of the subject property that connects Kolb Road to Via Rio Pico. Demonstrate how there will be vehicular and pedestrian interconnectivity between the proposed development and blocks 34 and 35. (minor refinement letter) Continue the sidewalk along Kolb Road for the entire length of the property. Locate shade trees along the sidewalk, spaced no more than 25 feet on center. (plans) A landscape improvement district for the upgrade and enhancement of Kolb Road from Valencia Road to Interstate 10 needs to be created. The entity to administer this district will be agreed upon by the City, County and private owners prior to any capital improvements being performed on Kolb Road. Please create the landscape improvement district. (I.C. Development Partnership) Verify that all billboards have been removed from the entire 565-acre site. (I.C. Development Partnership) The intersection of Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road is a Secondary Entry Statement. Secondary Entry Statements need to be similar to Project Entry Statements, but smaller in scale. Show a cross-section of Via Rio Pico at the intersection of Kolb Road. (II.D.2 Secondary Entry Statements) The intersection of Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road must have a left turn lane. There needs to be a landscaped median on Via Rio Pico at the intersection of Kolb Road. All trees at this intersection must be 24” box size and selected from the City of Tucson approved drought-tolerant list. The crosswalk at this location shall have enhanced paving/crosswalk. Both sides of this intersection need to be developed as the Secondary Entry Statement. Show the landscape and design along the Julian Wash. Via Rio Pico must have left turn lanes at all local streets and project driveways/ entries. (II.B.c) Show through a color detail that the groundcover along Via Rio Pico and at the intersection of Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road is colorful. (II.D.4. Secondary Streetscapes) The required trees along Via Rio Pico need to be spaced no more than 50 feet on center. (II.D.4 Secondary Streetscapes) There shall be a series of berms in the Julian Wash linear park along Via Rio Pico. The vegetation in the Julian Wash linear park shall be designed with native trees, shrubs, and groundcover reflective of the Sonoran Desert. A master design needs to be approved by the appropriate public agencies. (II.A. Land Use Plan, II.C. Open Space and Recreation Plan, Exhibit II.C.2, & II.D.6) Building facades at the rear, side and the roof are to be designed with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment. Please submit dimensioned elevation drawings of the buildings that demonstrate five-sided architecture. (plans) State the proposed heights of the structures in the retail center. Also, state the maximum building heights on the development plan. (III.A.7 & ordinance 10073) Demonstrate state of the art building techniques and design being used to conserve energy, water and non-renewable resources. (I.2 Project Objectives) Provide for spine infrastructure to create a state of the art wired community and enable homes and businesses to take advantage of any new, enhanced communication opportunities. (I.2. Project Objectives) Connect the pedestrian circulation system along Via Rio Pico and Kolb Road to the internal pedestrian circulation system of the proposed retail center. (plans) Show safe and functional pedestrian circulation systems within the retail center. (plans) A signage theme needs to be prepared and approved by the La Estancia Design Review Committee. Please show documentation that the La Estancia Design Review Committee has prepared and approved a signage theme. (III.A.11. Signage) Each development within the noise mitigation overlay must demonstrate that noise impacts are mitigated. Within the noise mitigation overlay zone, office, residential, and educational facilities must be provided with insulation or otherwise designed to reduce the interior noise level to Ldn 45 or less or as required by building codes. Submit a site plan and other supporting materials demonstrating these mitigation measures to the Design Review Committee. Mitigation must also be demonstrated as part of the development plan approval. (III.A.10) All proposed development plans and subdivision plats within the PAD area shall be submitted to the La Estancia Design Review Committee prior to the review by the City of Tucson. Please show documentation that the La Estancia Design Review Committee has reviewed this development plan. (IV.B.) To lessen the visual impact of the dumpster areas, please increase the amount of vegetation around the dumpster screen walls. This should include canopy trees and ground vegetation. (plans) All walls, including all dumpster screen walls, are to incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatment, such as; the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; or a visually interesting design on the wall surface. Please show a color detail that demonstrates compliance. (plans) Any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and 3 feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. If applicable, please show a detail that demonstrates compliance. (plans) The development plan is required to have 1069 parking spaces and is proposed to have 1188 parking spaces. Therefore, the development has an additional 119 parking spaces or 11% over the required number. One of the major purposes and intents of the PAD is to create a more walkable community and a community that is less reliant on the automobile. At the same time, policy supports the reduction of parking if there are enhanced streetscape, landscaped pedestrian walkways perpendicular to buildings, landscaped and shaded pedestrian seating areas, and/or shaded pedestrian linkages through projects. Policy also supports development that limits the visual impact of parking areas along the street front. Please construct a landscaped and shaded pedestrian seating area in the development. Also, please reduce the visual impact of the seven row parking area along Kolb. This could be accomplished with a combination of additional landscape islands, berming along Kolb Road, building relocation, etc. (plans and PAD) Change the plat to read the correct required FAR. (III. Development Regulations) Locate bicycle parking at the 15,900 square feet building. (plans and PAD) |
| 12/21/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: LA ESTANCIA RETAIL CENTER D04-0034 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated November 22, 2004. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of eight (8) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 12/22/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) Include the SVT's at the intersection of Kolb and Via Rio Rico. 2. Show and label both existing and future ROW (DS 2-05.2.3.C, 2-05.2.4.E, 2-05.2.4.F) While the ROW is labeled, it isn't show whether this is existing or future. If it is at the future ROW iaw the MSRP, clearly label it as such. 3. The maximum driveway with is 35' in commercial areas. Both access points scale to 40'. (Tucson City Code Chapter 25) 4. Sheet 4 of 4, the match line call-out should say "see sheet 3" vice 2. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/22/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Include related case numbers on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.1.B. 2) The La Estancia PAD and the La Estancia de Tucson Tentative Block Plat identify the proposed development as part of Phase 3. Also, p. 33 of the PAD stipulates that the relocation of Los Reales Road and the Julian Wash will be completed prior to approval of Phase One. Revised zoning documents and plats may be required if this phase is intended to preceed completion of required improvements and other phases. 3) Provide verification, in writing, of City Engineer approval for landscape improvements in the public right-of-way areas. LUC 3.7.2.9., PAD p. 79. 4) Revise the plans such landscape improvements do not interfere with proposed refuse pickup locations. Per DS 6-01.2.2.B.3 A twenty-five (25) foot minimum height clearance, free of any overhead obstructions (wires, branches, etc.), shall be provided above the collection site. 5) All loading areas are to be screened from adjacent streets with a 6' masonry wall. Revise the DP and LP to comply. Show all loading areas and all required screening. 6) Per LUC 3.8.4.5 the native plant preservation "plan shall affirm, by a statement on the Plan, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law". Revise as necessary. 7) The salvage and mitigation analysis on sheet N1 indicates that Pima Pineapple cacti may exist on the site and that they have been included in the inventory. Revise the inventory to show any of these found on the site. One hundred (100) percent of Federal Endangered species shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site per LUC 3.8.6.2.A. 8) Revise the landscape plans to ensure compliance with the canopy tree spacing requirements of LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. 9) A note on sheet N-1 indicates that the location of a temporary on-site nursery is shown. Provide location on the plans. 10) Revise the DSD contact number for inspections on sheet N-1. The correct number is 791-5640 Ext. 1140. |
| 12/22/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 28, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0034 La Estancia Retail Center: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/23/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-015 La Estancia Retail Center Site Plan Review (1st review) Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 12-23-04 DUE DATE: 12-23-04 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 22, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-034) on each sheet of the d.p., landscape plan and NPPO plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. The legal description of the project site indicates that it is made up of 2 parcels, Block 30 and 36 of La Estancia de Tucson Block Plat. These parcels must be combined with a signed, notarized and recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property, a copy of which may be obtained from the zoning review counter at City of Tucson Development Services Department. DS 2-05.2.1.D 4. As indicated in general note 5 the project is located within the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). Add an Airport Hazard District (AHD) note to indicate that the elevation above median sea level (MSL) of the SE end of Davis Monthan Airforce Base runway is 2,705 feet. Include the mean elevation of the site and indicate the max height of the proposed buildings is not to exceed 2,845 feet (140 feet above the elevation of the southeast runway) above MSL. Add the maximum proposed building height for each building and the maximum allowed building height to the notes and the drawing. The maximum allowed height per the La Estancia PAD Development Regulations is 60 feet but the AHD may be more restrictive based on the elevation of the site in relation to the elevation at the SE end of DMAFB runway. Provide elevation drawings to detail heights and to demonstrate compliance with PAD Standards. Revise the symbol for the Airport Hazard Zone line in the legend to match that shown on the drawing. Also correct the location of the line on sheets 1 of 4 and 4 of 4. Refer to city AEZ maps to verify the location of the line. LUC 2.8.5.7.A.2 5. Indicate location and type of all proposed freestanding signage and freestanding lighting on the development plan. Indicate the location of any existing billboards. DS 2-05.2.4.W 6. Include a reduced-scale map of the PAD district on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion to be developed with this proposal. DS 2-05.2.1.F 7. A pedestrian sidewalk must connect all areas of the development and must provide connections between the building to sidewalks along the adjacent street frontages. The pedestrian access between the building and the adjacent rights-of-way must be located to minimize conflict with vehicular access to the project. Revise to show pedestrian circulation connections. Refer to sidewalk locational requirements in Development Standards Sec 2-08.4. Redevelopment Plan Document Sec. III.A.3.b 8. Loading zones are required for each building. Revise drawing to show all loading spaces. LUC 3.4.4.1.B.2 9. Provide a loading zone calculation detailing the number of loading zones required and provided for the development. Show each required loading space dimensioned at 12' x 35' on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.O 10. The La Estancia Phasing Plan indicates that the proposed development is part of scheduled phase IV and should follow other substantial projects such as realignment of roads and washes, and construction of parks. Phasing note 7 indicates that, unless otherwise amended, dedications of right-of-way, assurances, construction of storm drains, parks, etc. must be done in sequence per the phasing plan. In addition, Development Note 1 on the La Estancia Block Plat states that no development, including grading, grubbing or other alterations shall occur on any portion of the platted property until the relocation of Julian Wash has been completed and evidence of the completion has been certified and recorded by the Devleopment Services Director. In addition, based on the PAD 7 document the relocation of Los Reales Road and Julian Wash will be completed prior to approval of phase 1. Provide evidence that this phase 1, and other early phases of development have been completed prior to approval of the Retail Center Development Plan. La Estancia Plat 11. Dimension all building setbacks as required. Based on the PAD 7 document (refer to Development Regulations for La Estancia Development area 7) building setback from public street are required to be a distance equal to 60 percent of building height but not less than 20 feet. (See comment 4 regarding building height). Also, add the building dimensions to the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.I La Estancia Development PAD 7 Document DS 2-05.2.4.N 12. Dimension back up spurs at the end of parking rows on the drawing. DS 3-05.2.2.D 13. A requirement of the La Estancia Pad 7 is that linear park be provided along Julian Wash and bike lanes be provided along main project roads. Label the location of the linear park and bike route on the drawings to further clarify what is shown in the Julian Wash cross section A on sheet 2 of 4. Document - PAD 4 Development Area 2 Development Standard e 14. Show the pedestrian circulation system fully dimensioned with widths. Indicate with a dimension that there is sufficient sidewalk width (a minimum of 4-feet clear) in the area of the proposed bicycle racks. Revise plan to show all sidewalks fully dimensioned. DS 2-05.2.4.K 15. Provide a standard and handicapped parking space detail. Show spaces fully dimensioned in the detail and state the dimensions and maximum slope of the h/c access aisles and concrete ramps to be provided. One of every 8 or fraction of 8 parking spaces must have an access aisle with an 8-foot width for van accessibility. Revise plan by labeling location of 8-foot h/c van accessible ailses and provide a calculation of the number of van accessible spaces required and provided. The h/c aisle near the southeast corner of the largest building scales to 8 feet but is labeled as 5 feet, Revise drawing. Show wheelstop curbs to be provided in parking spaces, dimensioned at 2-½-feet from the front side (wheel side) of the wheelstop curb. Note: wheelstops must be provided in spaces where vehicles may overhang landscaped areas and sidewalks which are less than 6-½ feet wide. If the 11 easternmost parking spaces have adjacent landscaping as indicated by keynote "C" add wheelstops to these spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.P DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 ANS 17. Dimension width of entrance drives on the plan. 18. A minimum 5-foot pedestrian refuge, including a 4-foot concrete sidewalk is required between the building and the PAAL. Please revise plan to show the 5-foot pedestrian refuge, fully dimensioned, along the entire west side of the building. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 19. Show all right-of-way information on the plan including recordation data, dimensioned width of paving, curb cuts, and dimensions from street centerline to curbs and sidewalks. Where realignments have taken place for Los Reales Road or Kolb Road or Julian Wash, indicate the recordation of dedications and abandonments. DS 2-05.2.3.C 20. Per La Estancia Pad document, all proposed development plans must be submitted to the L:a Estancia Design Review Committee prior to Development Plan Review. Document - PAD 7 Section IV-B. 21. Provide a bicycle parking calculation showing the number of class 1 and class 2 spaces required and provided. Add a fully dimensioned detail of both class 1 and class 2 bike spaces and show the location of all spaces/ both types on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 22. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520)791-5608. |
| 12/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |