Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0033
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * 2 Sided Enclosure: Being that the enclosure is behind the building and there is a perimeter masonry wall, Es has no objections for the enclosure to not have three walls and doors. |
| 10/15/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0033 ACORN ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE LTD ST. PAULS UNITED METHODIST |
| 10/19/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0033 ST. PAULS UNITED METHODIST / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct Maguire St. to Maguire Av. On Location Map. 2: R13E to R15E on Location Map. 3: Correct Broadway Blvd. to Broadway Boulevard on Site Plan. 4: Number all buildings numerically. |
| 10/22/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved October 08, 2004. |
| 10/22/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/27/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Street landscape borders are required along both street frontages. LUC 3.7.2.4.A Revise the plans as necessary. 2) Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4. Revise the plans as necessary. 3) Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Provide verfication, in writing, of any approvals for required landscaping the public right of way. 4) Canopy trees are required along the northern property boundary per condition of rezoning. Revise the plans as necessary to provide canopy trees as defined in LUC 6.2.3 at the spacing required in the condition. C9-04-02 5) Except as otherwise provided by this Division, the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans as necessary to provide the required treatment in all right-of-way areas adjacent to the site. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 6) Screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I is required along Broadway Boulevard and Maguire Avenue. Revise the plans as necessary to provide the required screening. The locational requirements of LUC 3.7.3.2.C apply. 7) The vehicular use areas on the site are subject to the requirements of LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a which states "The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Revise the plans as necessary. 8) Revise the plans to provide plant protection for landscape areas per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. 9) Plant cover or dust control is required for the entire site. Revise the plan to identify existing or proposed treatments for all areas of the site. LUC 3.7.2.7 10) Parking spaces may not overlap the required street landscape borders. DS 2-06.3.3.E Revise the plan as necessary. |
| 10/29/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: ST. PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH D04-0033 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated October 5, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Sincerely, <<...OLE_Obj...>> Liza Castillo Right-of-Way Agent Land Management |
| 10/29/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please submit the following for the right of way dedication; 1. Legal description and sketch, 2. Title report dated within 30 days, Send to the Real Estate Division, 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Floor, Tucson AZ 85701 Attn: Jim Stoyanoff Thank you, |
| 10/29/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: October 29, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 8051 E. Broadway Blvd.,St. Paul's Methodist Church Development Plan D04-0033 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 09 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. A detailed response letter to the comments must be included along with the corrected copies of the DP with the re-submittal. 2. Call out all proposed sidewalks, vertical curbs and the wheel chair ramps on Maguire Ave. per the rezoning condition on general note 12. Also show conformance of the widening of Maguire Ave. to 24'. 3. Sidewalks must connect to the circulation path located in any adjacent street per D.S 2-08.4.1.D. The s/w in the SW PAAL shall be extended to the s/w on Broadway Blvd. 4. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 5. List the estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 6. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 8. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 9. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The refuge area must have three walls and clear space of 10' between bollards. The approach to the refuge area is 40' clear and cannot be at an angle. The minimum inside turning radius for a sanitation vehicle (UB-40) is 34'. Revise the turning radius for the curve connecting the two PAAL's. 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 12. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. To determine the size of the rip-rap blanket, provide a comparison of the existing and proposed hydraulic conditions (Flow, and velocity) for the discharge at the 24" pipe. Size the outlet structure in accordance to the Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (U.S. Department of Transportation, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels). 3. Provide percolation tests and results for the retention basin with the next submittal. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: 1. The SWPPP submitted previously was for the grubbing and earthwork permit only. A revised SWPPP will be required at the Grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8051 E. Broadway Blvd. CDRC |
| 11/03/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 2, 2004 TO: Kim B. Acorn Acorn Associates Architecture Ltd. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Saint Paul’s United Methodist Church Development Plan – 1st Submittal D04-0033 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Please be aware that Pima County Development Services Department has a new development plan checklist. This checklist can be found at http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.PDF for assistance when preparing a development plan. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. Based on the evaluation of the existing public sewer that serves this site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0033, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET DP2. Delete General Note 10 as it is included in the Utility Notes. SHEET DP2. Add the following notes THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORGINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 11/04/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 04, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0033 St. Pauls United Methodist: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/04/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0033 St. Pauls United Methodist 11/04/04 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-02 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: November 4, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: November 3, 2004 Urban Planning and Design Comments D04- 0033, St. Paul’s United Methodist: Development Plan November 3, 2004 Staff offers the following comments: Please revise development plan and landscape plan to comply with following rezoning case C09-04-02, condition(s) number 2, 5, and 12, as indicated below: Based on rezoning condition # 2, staff requires four sided architectural/building(s) elevations, drawn to scale to verify compliance. Please revise landscape plan, sheet L-1 for compliance with rezoning condition # 5. Please revise development plan; sheet DP-1, for compliance with rezoning condition #12. Please identify location of and width of sidewalk. Sidewalk to extend along the full length of eastern property line along Maguire Avenue. |
| 11/08/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-033 St. Paul's United Methodist Church Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: November 8, 2004 DUE DATE: November 8, 2004 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is October 7, 2005. 2. Revise location map to be at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile (as stated on the plan). Revise legal description in location map to read "R. 13E". DS 2-05.2.1.D 3. Revise general note 1 on sheet DP2 to read "Existing zoning is RX-1, proposed zoning is R-3." DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 & B.2 4. In the development data revise the total building area given below the square footage of the multipurpose building to be called simply "total" rather than "subtotal existing", since the multipurpose bldg. does not yet exist. 5. Indicate the location on the drawing (sheet DP1) of the new class 2 bicycle parking spaces to be provided near the proposed multipurpose building. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 6. Add a loading zone calculation stating that no loading zones are required or provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O LUC 3.4.5.1 7. List the conditions of development for annexation case number C9-84-84, from zoning ordinance 6143 on the d.p. DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 8. The handicap accessible parking calculation indicates 8 h/c spaces are provided but 9 are shown on the drawing. Revise to be consistent. IBC 9. The pedestrian circulation system must be continuous and connect all areas of the development, providing connections between the building and sidewalks along the adjacent street frontages. Refer to sidewalk locational requirements in Development Standards Sec 2-08.4. Label and dimension all sidewalks clearly on the plan. DS 2-08.4.1 10. Because Broadway Blvd is a designated Gateway Route, add a statement to general note 1.1 that the project is designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 11. Label the location of any proposed freestanding signage and lighting on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.W 12. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520)791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan |
| 11/08/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D04-0033 St. Paul's United Methodist: Development Plan 10/26/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Broadway (Pantano to Camino Seco) No 0 39,500 63,000 6 63,000 50,484 6 617 Route 8, 10 minutes (30 on Sunday), 0 miles Bus/Bike Lane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 11/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/12/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |