Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0032
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan as necessary to correspond with any changes made to the site plan. 2) Include the numbers of any related cases in the lower corner of the landscape plans. 3) Submit a native plant preservation plan per DS 2-15.0. The location of the masonry wall along Broadway Boulevard may conflict with protected plants. 4) Revise the landscape plan to indicate where existing vegetation is to remain.Site preservation fencing per DS 2-06.0 Figure 1 will be required. |
| 08/25/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/25/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved August 25, 2004. |
| 08/29/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0032 EASTPOINTE COMMERCIAL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/26/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved on condition that suffixes are completely spelled ( sheet C-2.1) on mylar. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 09/03/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this project. * Shown refuse enclosure cannot be serviced as designed. Service trucks cannot be position perpendicular to the enclosure in the 14' X 40' required clear area. Recommend that the enclosure be redesigned at a 30 degree angle or perpendicular to the north. * No provisions shown for recycling. |
| 09/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: Eastpointe Commercial Center D04-0032 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated August 23, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 09/13/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0032 Eastpointe Commercial Center 09/16/04 () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-83-09 & C10-99-55 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Route COMMENTS DUE BY: September 20, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (x) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (x) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 09/08/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Eastpointe Commercial Center – D04-0032: 1st submittal 1. The development plan states that the gross area is 5.66 acres and that the development plan is for lots 1-5. Page four of the development plan and the landscape plan only shows one lot. Please change so the development and landscape plans are similar. 2. Please place all the zoning conditions on the development plan. 3. Please provide the required colored building elevations. 4. Please provide the elevations of the proposed signage that is required to be compatible with the landscaping and architectural style of the development. Please show the sign elevations with the proposed landscaping. 5. Please provide the required color building elevations. |
| 09/21/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 20, 2004 TO: Adam Siros, DPA Architects THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Eastpointe Commercial Center, Lots 1-5 - Submittal The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project D03-0002, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0032, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 1. Transfer General Notes 10-15 to Sheet 4. SHEET 1. Calculate the total number of wastewater fixture units for the specific project site, not for the whole development site. Based on this number, a sewer service agreement may be required. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 09/28/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-0032 Eastpointe Commercial Center - Lot 2 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: September 28, 2004 DUE DATE: September 20, 2004 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 24, 2005. 2. Add the owner/developer name(s), address, and phone number(s). This information should be listed on sheet one and sheet C-2.1, and must be specific to lot 2 and the proposed development (Bank One). DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 3. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D04-0032. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. The case numbers listed on sheet one should be listed as reference case numbers only. Please revise as required. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please address the following items related to vehicular use areas. a. All PAALs must be a minimum of 24 feet wide. The PAAL area along the west side of the building is a not full 24 feet wide. Please revise the drawing to include a 24-foot PAAL as required. b. It is not clear on the drawing if the crosshatched rectangle along the north side of the building is required loading zone. If so please as such and label the length and width of the loading zone. c. Clarify if the area north of the third drive-through is an escape lane. If so please label as such. If the area is to be an escape lane the loading zone must be relocated outside the lane so as not to prohibit the use of the lane. If the loading zone is to remain in this location sufficient distance between the loading zone and the third drive-through lane must be maintained to provide access to the escape lane. The minimum width for a one-way travel lane is 12 feet. d. The overall height and clearance of the drive-through structure must labeled on the plan. The minimum clearance for a structure with a drive-through lane is 15 feet. e. The LUC subject to section 3.5.4.5.A allows up to three drive-through lanes with one restricted to a drive-through ATM Teller lane. Label the drive-through reserved for the ATM Teller. 5. Additional review of the parking inventory must be made to insure that the correct number of parking spaces have been provided and for the number of spaces that are required. Based on my review of previously approved development plan for the number the parking spaces on lot 2 while comparing the number of parking spaces per the new site plan for lot 2 the parking calculation does not add up as listed. Per my count of the previous D.P. lot 2 was designed with a total of 68 vehicle-parking spaces. The revised site plan for lot 2 depicts a total of 23 spaces. Per the previous D.P. the total number of vehicle-parking spaces listed was 306. Lot 2 is depicted as noted earlier with a total of 23 parking spaces, which is 45 spaces less than the previous approved D.P. The revised calculations do not list the inventory correctly. Please review the parking inventory and revise the parking calculations accordingly. Bicycle parking is required for this development at a ratio of 8% of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Based on the 23 vehicle parking spaces depicted on the plan a total of tow (2) bicycle parking spaces is required. Both spaces can be class two facilities. Please draw a fully dimensioned detail drawing of the class two facility which includes the type and manufacturer of rack, the number of bicycles the rack holds and lighting proposed. List under the parking calculations the number of bicycle parking spaces required and number provided for the use on lot 2. 6. The building configurations and locations have changed since the previously approved D.P. and therefore the Scenic Corridor view sheds have also changed. Please revise the scenic corridor view shed calculations to accurately depict the view sheds and linear footage provided based on the new buildings and locations of those buildings. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\D040032tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, land landscape plans, and additional requested documents |
| 09/30/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |