Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0031
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/01/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans such that no parking space is more than forty feet from the base of a canopy tree. 3.7.2.3.A. 2) Revise the native plant preservation plan to enlarge and/relocate inventory numbers on the aerial photo for clarity. |
| 11/01/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0031 ACCURATE AUTOMOTIVE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 1, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED ON CONDITION THAT A COPY OF THE COMBO FORM IS PROVIDED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 11/09/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/09/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0031 Accurate Automotive 11/09/04 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-05 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/10/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 11/05/04 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0031 Accurate Automotive 09/02/04 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-05 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/20/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 8/31/04 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN D04-0031 ACCURATE AUTOMOTIVE This development plan is subject to the conditions of Rezonign Case No. C9-02-05 and the Pantano East Area Plan. Please address the following: Provide a typical wall detail showing the decorative treatment, per Rezoning Condition 9. “Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. Those screen walls visible from the public right-of-way shall incorporate one of the following decorative material: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials. In addition, any continuous wall greater than seventy-five (75) feet in length and three (3) feet in height shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations.” |
| 11/09/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-031 Accurate Automotive Facility Sarnoff Dr. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 11-9-04 DUE DATE: 11-12-04 1. Place the development plan number (D04-031) on each sheet, including the landscape plan and NPPO plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 2. According to Assessors Records, this project area is made up of two parcels. A lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide a signed, notarized and recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised landscape plan, lot combination documents. |
| 11/09/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Craig Gross DATE: November 9, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 8283 E Bowline Road, Accurate Automotive Development Plan D04-0031 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None. Development Plan: 1. The Development Plan is conditionally approved. The are two minor revisions to the Development Plan that need to be addressed: · Key note 12 is not near or pointing to the loading area. Revise as required. · The inside radius for a UB-40 vehicle is 36', not 30'. Revise as required. Drainage Statement: 1. The Drainage Statement is accepted for Development plan purposes only. Final acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8283 E. Bowline Road CDRC 2 |