Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to locate the street landscape border along Sarnoff Road entirely on the parcel, unless the City Engineer approves the landscaping in the public right-of-way. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals received. 2) Revise the calculations and the plans to comply with LUC 3.7.2.3.A, (Ord. No. 10016, §1, 8/2/04). There has been a recent code revision. 3) Revise the development plan to show the wall variations shown on the landscape plan. C9-02-05 4) Submit a native plant preservation plan. LUC 3.8 5) Revise the plans to locate plants which typically exceed thirty inches in height (Caesalpinia mexicana, Cassia artemisiodes) outside of sight visibility triangles. LUC 3.7.3.4 |
| 08/26/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved August 26, 2004. |
| 08/27/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0031 ACCURATE AUTOMOTIVE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: AUGUST 26, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Provide copy of recorded deed with additional portion of Lot 10 prior to approval of Development plan. |
| 08/30/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this develpoment. * Enclosure does not have sidewall protection. * 14' x 40' clear space has a concrete extruded curb in the area. The rear wall also might be in conflict with the area. |
| 08/30/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: August 29, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 8283 E Bowline Road, Accurate Automotive Development Plan D04-0031 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1. 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 3. A separate grading plan is required. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. For more information, please contact John Clark with Environmental Services at (520) 791-3175. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Please show future SVT on Sarnoff Rd. The future face of curb distance for a 90' R/W is 10' from the future R/W. In this case, the exist. and the future R/W are the same width (90'). 7. Per Key note 29, vertical curb only allowed in the right-of-way. 8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 9. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 10. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Will any of the existing easements be abandoned? 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Show Development plan number (D04-0031) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 16. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 17. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Drainage Statement: 1. The Drainage Statement is accepted for Development plan purposes only. Final acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 2. A sidewalk scupper appears necessary at the SE corner to accept a portion of the split flow along the frontage of proposed development on Sarnoff Road. Please address. 3. Please edit paragraph 2 on page 1 to read that a drainage statement is required. 4. Please edit paragraph 1 on page 11 to remove the "proposed apartment complex" and replace with the correct use. 5. Show the project address (8283 E. Bowline Road) on the cover of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8283 E. Bowline Road CDRC |
| 09/02/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | no comments. |
| 09/02/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0031 Accurate Automotive 09/02/04 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-05 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/20/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 8/31/04 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN D04-0031 ACCURATE AUTOMOTIVE This development plan is subject to the conditions of Rezonign Case No. C9-02-05 and the Pantano East Area Plan. Please address the following: Provide a typical wall detail showing the decorative treatment, per Rezoning Condition 9. “Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. Those screen walls visible from the public right-of-way shall incorporate one of the following decorative material: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials. In addition, any continuous wall greater than seventy-five (75) feet in length and three (3) feet in height shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations.” |
| 09/02/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0031 THE J.R. TUTTLE CO. ACCURATE AUTOMOTIVE |
| 09/09/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: ACCURATE AUTOMOTIVE D04-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated August 6, 2004. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please call (520) 770-2062 to apply for service. Also, submit a final set of approved plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of eight (8) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
| 09/15/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | September 15, 2004 TO: Kory Dingle, The J. R. Tuttle Co. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Accurate Automotive Facility - Submittal D04-031 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the review of project C12-86-29, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0031, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Add project reference numbers C12-86-29 and C9-85-95 to the title block. SHEET 1. Include the following permitting note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET 1. Include the following permitting note PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERIMTS, A JOINT USE & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE SHARED PRIVATE SEWER LINE WILL BE PREPARED, APPROVED BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, SIGNED AND RECORDED. SHEET 2. Show the plan number (PV-86-028) for the private sewer line to which this project will be connecting. Obtain a letter from the owner of private sewer line PV-86-028 authorizing the owner of this project to connect the proposed private building connection sewer. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 09/15/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | October 7, 2004 TO: Kory Dingle, The J.R. Tuttle Co. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Accurate Automotive Facility - Submittal D04-0031 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Items 1, 6, 8 & 9 of Dickie Fernández's September 15, 2004 review letter are hereby waived for the following reasons: This project is located on Lots 9 & 10 of the 22nd Street Business Plaza of Tucson commercial subdivision. Treatment and conveyance capacity for this development was committed during platting process under subdivision plat case number Co12-86-19. I was unaware that the existing private sewer line in Bowline Road was constructed by the 22nd Street Business Plaza of Tucson when I directed Mr. Fernández to write items 6 & 8. The remaining items are minor drafting issues, that can be addressed on the Mylars.. 2. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The revisions required by items 3, 4, 5 & 7 of Dickie Fernández's September 15, 2004 review letter may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 09/17/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 09/20/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-031 Accurate Automotive Facility Sarnoff Dr. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 9-20-04 DUE DATE: 9-21-04 1. LUC Section 5.3.8.2 permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is August 22, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-031) on each sheet of the d.p., landscape plan and NPPO plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. The westernmost portion of the site is zoned C-3. Show the zoning boundary between the existing C-3 and proposed C-2 zones on the plan. Label the zoning of all adjacent parcels on the plan. Revise general note 1 to read "Existing zoning is C-1 and C-3. Proposed zoning of C-1 portion is C-2." DS 2-05.2.4.B 4. Add future sight visibility triangle (SVT) along Sarnoff Dr. DS 2-05.2.4.R 5. Revise the location of the loading zone so that it does not conflict with the cross-hatched pedestrian refuge area and so that it does not block one of the vehicle repair bays. Also, dimension the width of PAAL at its most narrow point behind the loading space. A minimum 24-foot PAAL is required for two-way traffic. The distance between the loading space and the island along the north side of the parking rows scales to only 20 feet DS 2-08.4.1 DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 6. The width of the pedestrian sidewalk is shown as 4 feet on detail 2/2 but there is a dimension of 5 feet shown on the drawing. Revise to be consistent. DS 2-05.2.4.K 7. Sarnoff Drive is a designated Major Street and Route. Add a general note stating that the project meets the criteria for LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 8. Dimension future curbs and sidewalks from centerline of Sarnoff Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C 9. Dimension building setbacks on the plan. Building setbacks to Sarnoff Drive (MS&R) are required to be the greater of 21 feet and the height of exterior building wall measured from back of future curb location. Revise keynote 11 accordingly. Building setbacks to Bowline Road (side street) are required to be 10 feet from property line. Perimeter yard building setbacks to adjacent commercial zoned properties are zero (0) feet. DS 2-05.2.4.I LUC 3.2.6.4 10. Dimension the setback to the proposed 8-foot high wall to the south and east of the building. Per LUC 3.2.5.2.I walls must meet perimeter yard setbacks applicable to buildings on the site. See comment 9 above regarding how setbacks are to be dimensioned from the two adjacent streets. DS 2-05.2.4.I 11. Add the building dimensions and label the proposed building heights along each wall of the building. DS 2-05.2.4.N 12. Label and dimension any existing or proposed easements and add their recordation information to the site plan. DS 2-05.2.3.B DS 2-05.2.4.G 13. Indicate if any freestanding signage is proposed along the Roger Road entrance. If so, show the location, size, height of the sign. DS 2-05.2.4.W 14. If any new freestanding lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type. DS 2-05.2.4.N 15. According to Assessors Records, this project area is made up of two parcels. A lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: a signed, notarized and recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property, and an approved Pima County Tax Combination Form. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. PSMc\H\Devplans04\D04-031rev1.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan, lot combination documents. |
| 09/21/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 20, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0031 Accurate Automotive: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/22/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments. |
| 09/22/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |