Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0030
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/13/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
08/16/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved August 16, 2004. |
08/19/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill w/in 1000 feet of this development. * Project part of Midvale Commerse Center. Concept for refuse collection was at 45 Degre at the NE corner of the lot. * Development Plan shows enclosure at the north side of the building. * With the 14' x 40' clear area perpendicular to the enclosure the service truck would be positioned half way across the E-W PAAL. * Service trucks cannot be position in the clear area from the E or W to service the container. The service truck can position itself from the north but then it would have a hard time backing out of the service area. * No provisions for a recycling container. * Recommend that a two unit enclosure be considered at the NE corner by the sidewalk at a 30 degree angle for service from the west off the PAAL. * |
08/19/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0030 CHILI’S GRILL & BAR/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 16, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add recorded Book and Page to Midvale Park Commercial Center on Sheet 1. Revise Vicinity Map to show only Section 10; add Section, Township, Range; Label section corners; remove direction from all street names. jg |
08/20/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per LUC 3.7.4.3.B "Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area". Revise the plans to allow for water harvesting in landscape areas, where applicable. 2) Revise the plans as requested by other agencies. 3) An irrigation plan is required with the landscape plans submitted for permit applications. Approval of the development plan will be conditioned upon approval of an irrigation plan per DS 2-07.2.2.C. Resubmittal of the development plans and landscape plan is required. |
08/31/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Chili's Grill & Bar D04-0030 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated August 9, 2004. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The underground three phase primary in duct running from the pad mounted transformer (MPCC-11) to junction cabinet (MPCC-9) will need to be relocated. All costs for relocation of facilities that are in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load, site, grading and paving plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of eight (8) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8745 Cell Phone: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8700 |
09/02/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0030 Chili’s Grill & Bar 09/02/04 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (grading, erosion control, utility, & civil specifications) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-83-34, C12-89-20, D99-061 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Valencia Road (gateway) COMMENTS DUE BY: September 9, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other (building elevations) REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 8/27/04 The Santa Cruz Area Plan and Design Guidelines Manual state that higher quality facades, at the rear and sides of new buildings, and rooflines should be constructed through careful design and detailing. Building facades at the rear and side and rooflines shall be designed with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, signs, lighting, screen walls, rooflines, and materials. Please submit elevation drawings of all sides of the development. The Santa Cruz Area Plan, General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual state that signage should be an appropriate scale, height, and color to integrate with development and enhance the experience and perception through scale and mass. Please show the proposed sign package and demonstrate how the proposed signage and surrounding landscape work mutually to adhere to the goals of the applicable plans. Condition 2.a of C9-83-34 requires that a complete hydrologic drainage report be submitted at the time of individual development plan review as determined necessary by the City of Tucson. Please verify with the Flood Plain Engineer for submittal requirements. |
09/08/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Chili's Grill and Bar REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 8 September 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04-0030 Resubmittals Required: Response letter, Revised Development Plan and geotechnical report/recommendations SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan package. Engineering approval is not recommended at this time. Please provide a response letter to the comments provided below and address all comments on a revised Development Plan. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1. Provide recordation information for all easement abandonments, dedications, vacations and/or relocations on the plans. Include copies of legal descriptions with exhibits, where applicable (DS 2-05.2.3 B & 2-05.2.4 E). 2. Please ensure all easements are clearly depicted, dimensioned and labeled, with recording information provided on the plan - see additional requirements outlined for these Development Standards (DS 2-05.2.3 B & D, 2-05.2.4 G). 3. Show sight visibility triangles based on the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan future curb location. The future curb should be depicted/labeled 12' south of the south property line, based upon the existing Valencia Rd. right of way information provided of 150' (DS 2-05.2.4 R). 4. Provide sidewalk underdrain callout note(s) on Sheet C002. 5. Identify whether the southwest curb access (accessible) ramp in the Valencia Rd. right of way is existing or proposed on sheet C002. 6. Written, notarized documentation/authorization from the affected property owner will be required for the proposed offsite demolition/improvements. Said authorizations must be provided prior to grading permit issuance. Either provide this material with a resubmittal, or submit with a completed grading permit application, two sets of grading/improvement plans, a copy of the geotechnical engineering exploration and analysis, and a reference copy of the stamped/approved Development Plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: *Additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. *A right of way permit will be required for any work in the public right of way. Contact Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) - Permits and Codes Section at 791-5100 for questions/inquiries. *A grading permit will be required for this development. Submittal of a completed grading permit application with a copy of the stamped/approved Development Plan, one copy of the geotechnical engineering exploration and analysis, and three sets of Grading and Erosion Control Plans will be required prior to permit issuance. Resubmittal will require a response letter, a revised Development Plan and geotechnical report/recommendations addressing the comments provided above. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
09/09/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 23, 2004 TO: Wes Butero, Olsson Associates THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Chili's - Midvale Park Commercial Center - Submittal D04-0030 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southwest Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on evaluation of project D99-061, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0030, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Show the number of wastewater fixture units. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 12. SHEET 1. Add the following permitting note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET 1. The legend shows the same symbols for both, existing and proposed sewer lines, manholes and cleanouts. Revise this legend so that existing and proposed sewer infrastructure can be differentiated and follow these symbols throughout the layout. SHEETS 6, 7, 8 & 10. These sheets show an existing private sewer line SHEET 9. Show the size of the proposed building connection sewer. SHEET 9. Show the invert elevation of the connection point between the existing and the proposed sewer. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
09/13/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 12, 2005. 2. Add the section, township, and range to the location map on sheet C001. (D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 3. Add the following general note on sheet C001: "This project is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone criteria." (D.S. 2-05.2.12.B.10) 4. Revise general note number two (2) to be based on the gross site area (Lot 3 only) by square footage and acreage. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.11) 5. All proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plan, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G) 6. Label and dimension existing and future right-of-way and curb location for Valencia Road on development plan sheet C002. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.C) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.F) 7. As a note, add the docket and page for the cross access and parking agreement in place. In addition, please provide a copy of the agreement for Zoning Review with the next plan submittal. 8. A striped pedestrian crosswalk is required at all locations where the pedestrian path crosses a PAAL. Please label and dimension all crosswalks on sheet C002. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.K) (D.S. 2-08) 9. Provide as a note, the maximum building height proposed. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.N) 10. Provide at least one (1) van accessible parking space. (2000 IBC Section 1106.4) 11. Provide a detail of the proposed bicycle parking spaces, including materials for paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. For specifics, refer to Development Standards 2-09. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q) 12. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.R) 13. If applicable, provide a detail and the location of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage including any billboards. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.W) 14. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
09/14/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |