Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved July 9, 2004. |
| 07/14/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0028 SAFEWAY PLAZA PAD 3/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/13/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete Suite 1, Suite 2 and Suite 3. Suite numbers will be assigned at time of Tenant improvement. 2.) Correct building numbers on storage buildings (see attachment). |
| 07/21/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/23/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: Safeway Plaza, Pad 3 D04-0028 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated July 2, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The existing transformers is in conflict with the new building. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8479 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 07/28/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: July 28, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Pad 3 at Safeway Plaza at Golf Links and Wilmot Development Plan D04-0028 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None. The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) for Pad 3 at Safeway Plaza and recommends approval. 1. The Floodplain Use Permit T04OT01501 will be reviewed in conjunction with the Grading Permit Application. Floodplain use permit applications must be submitted at the permit counter, not through the CDRC office. If the development plan must be resubmitted, The Engineering Division requests an opportunity to review the revised development plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 07/29/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/30/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0028 Safeway Plaza PAD 3 07/29/04 (xxxxx) Tentative Plat (xxxxx) Development Plan (xxxxx) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-95-19 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/04/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (xxxxx) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: d. estolano 791-4505 DATE: 7/28/04 |
| 08/02/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 2, 2004 TO: Paul Keesler, P.E., Stantec Consulting, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Safeway Plaza Pad 3, Golf Links Road and Wilmot Road, Lots 1-7 - Submittal D04-0028 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Aviation Corridor to Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of the reference project S00-022, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0028, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 2. Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. (with these blanks appropriately filled in per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F).) SHEETS 4-7 & 11. The development plan must clearly show which sewers are new and which are existing. Per the PCWMD's basemaps, most of the private sewers shown on the site as "new" are actually existing, and only a very few of the sewers shown will truly be new. Show the proposed new sewers bolder than the existing sewers and make sure that all labels are appropriate. SHEETS 4-7 & 11. Show the plan number for the existing private sewers. SHEETS 6 & 7. Show the correct manhole number (and its associated public sewer plan number) for the manhole in existing public sewer line G-71-045, where the existing public and private sewers serving this project connect to sewer line G-71-045. SHEETS 6 & 7: All lettering on a development plan should be oriented to the bottom or one of the sides. Revise how the size of the existing public sewer line in Wilmot Road has been shown so that the lettering is oriented to the bottom of the sheet, and the sewer plan number is shown in the plan view. SHEETS 6 & 11. The size of the proposed new private sewers shown on Sheet 6 does not match that shown on Sheet 11. Revise as necessary. As you have shown two grease interceptors on the plans, 6" sewer pipe is recommended between the point where the three BCS lines come together to the point where they connect to the existing sewers. Note: A manhole must be installed at each point where 6" sewers change direction. SHEETS 6 & 11. A existing 6" sewer stub has been shown on Sheet 11. A manhole must be installed where the existing sewer stub connects to the existing private sewer lines for maintenance purposes. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan / tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 08/03/2004 | JOHN CLARK | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Conversion of one building pad into space for three building. Following are the review comments for the refuse service: Enclosure detail sheet 3 No sidewall protection No doors shown A 14' x 40' service area required at a max two percent slope in front of the enclosure. Require a callout of the size of the WWF for approach concrete pad. Note: Of the three buildings two are shown as fast food restaurants. Fast food refuse service normally requires space for two dumpsters. (One for garbage and one for recycling.) Fast food usually has a grease container that cannot be stored in the clear area of the enclosure. If the property owner controls the enclosure the one enclosure may work. Normally businesses control their own containers and with two restaurants the one enclosure is probably not sufficient. Following are the review Comments for the refuse service for the development: Enclosure detail does not show any doors or side wall protection. Enclosure requires ten (10) foot clear area between the side wall bollards. No refuse service shown for the self-storage area. No provisions shown for recycling service. Note: If any of the proposed pads are for a restaurant they usually have space for two dumpsters and require a space for a grease container. |
| 08/04/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-028 Safeway Plaza Pad 3 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: August 4, 2004 DUE DATE: August 4, 2004 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is July 7, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-028) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 3. Dimension the width of the pedestrian circulation system. DS 2-05.2.4.K 4. Wheelstop curbs are required to be placed in parking spaces to prevent vehicles from overhanging and reducing width of pedestrian walks to less than 4 feet. If no wheelstops are to be used the sidewalk adjacent and west of the covered patio area must be a minimum of 6-1/2 feet in width. Dimension sidewalk width at a minimum of 6-1/2 feet or show wheelstop curbs in parking spaces where required. Wheelstops must be dimensioned at 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C DS 2-08 5. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan |
| 08/04/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/04/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/04/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-028 Safeway Plaza Pad 3 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: August 4, 2004 DUE DATE: August 4, 2004 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is July 7, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-028) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 3. Dimension the width of the pedestrian circulation system. DS 2-05.2.4.K 4. Wheelstop curbs are required to be placed in parking spaces to prevent vehicles from overhanging and reducing width of pedestrian walks to less than 4 feet. If no wheelstops are to be used the sidewalk adjacent and west of the covered patio area must be a minimum of 6-1/2 feet in width. Dimension sidewalk width at a minimum of 6-1/2 feet or show wheelstop curbs in parking spaces where required. Wheelstops must be dimensioned at 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C DS 2-08 5. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan |