Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/16/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved June 16, 2004. |
| 06/22/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | all corrections to be made on next copy and reviewed by CDRC staff. |
| 06/22/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Indicate contour intervals along with the north arrow and scale, which should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H 3. If one special overlay zone is applicable to the property, add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 4. Add Note: "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". D.S. 2-08.4.1.E 5. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the development plan drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-05.2.3 6. If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B 7. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C 8. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: water lines. 9. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E 10. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2 11. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R 12. If applicable, indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V |
| 06/22/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | all corrections to be shown on revised plan and reviewed by CDRC staff. |
| 06/22/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 22, 2004 TO: Donald Laidlaw, Laidlaw Consulting, LLC THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Revised De Nouveau Salon - Submittal D04-025 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the South Rillito West (South Line) Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, D04-025, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Add reference project number C9-95-20 in the title block. Add the following notes A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. Include the number of proposed fixture units. Based on this number a Sewer Service Agreement may be required. Show the connection of the HCS to the public sewer line. Provide a legend which shows symbols for whichever of the following apply and use those symbols in the layout. - Existing public sewers - Existing private sewers - Proposed private sewers We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 06/22/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 25, 2004 TO: Donald Laidlaw, Laidlaw Consulting, LLC THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Revised De Nouveau Salon - Submittal D04-025 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The comments in this letter supercede the comments made in Dickie Fernández's 06/22/04 review letter for this submittal of the development plan This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the South Rillito West (South Line) Interceptor. Treatment and conveyance capacity for this project was committed during the earlier development of this property under development plan case number, C9-95-20. The additional flow from this project should not cause any flow or effluent limits to be violated. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, D04-025, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Add cross reference number C9-95-20 to the title block of each sheet. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWER CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT HAS _______ PROPOSED AND _______ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F). Note: A formal Sewer Service Agreement for the project may be required when the total number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents exceeds 144. Sheet 1: Show the House Connection Sewer (HCS) as EXISTING. Sheet 1: The development must indicate where the HCS connects to the public sewer system. We would prefer that this connection be shown on the development plan, but in this one case, we will allow a label to be used. If the HCS connects to public sewer line, G-291, (and we understand that it probably does) the label might read, CONNECTS TO G-291. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 06/29/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | RESUBMITTAL OF ANY REVISED PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/29/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: De Nouveau Salon D04-0025 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated June 15, 2004. If an upgrade to the service is needed application should be made by contacting the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 07/14/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-025 De Nouveau Salon Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: July 14, 2004 DUE DATE: July 15, 2004 1. LUC Section 5.3.8.2 permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 15, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-025) on each sheet of the d.p., landscape plan and NPPO plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. Dimension the building setback to the property line along Wilson Avenue DS 2-05.2.4.I LUC 3.2.6.5 4. Calculate the percent building area expansion on the development plan. With a 2,684 square foot existing building and a proposed 614 square foot addition, the building area expansion is proposed to be 23 %. 5. Label the proposed building height on the plan. Per rezoning condition 1.D the maximum height is sixteen (16) feet and one-story. DS 2-05.2.4.N DS 2-05.2.4.U 6. Revise the location plan to include labeled section, township and range corners. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3 7. Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation based on the gross floor area of building divided by site area. DS 2-05.2.4.M 8. Per DS 3-05.2.2.D a minimum distance of 3 feet is required behind backup spur where there is an obstruction, such as a wall, over 6 inches in height. It is noted on the plan that a DSMR is being sought. If approved place the DSMR number, date of approval and conditions as a note on the plan. DS 3-05.2.2.D 9. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. PSMc\H\Devplans04\D04-025rev1.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan. |
| 07/19/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show both existing and MSRP future SVTs at the access point to the site. (DS 2-05.2.4.R) D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/19/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |