Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0023
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/08/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved June 08, 2004. |
| 06/10/2004 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: June 10, 2004 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Starbucks Coffee Development Plan. The activity number is D04-0023. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Statement were received by Engineering on June 9, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DP, DR GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS 1. Place the development plan number (D04-0023) by the Title Block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 2. Sheet DP2 MS&R note under the Key Notes is incorrect. Because of MS&R intersection widening the future width is 150 ft. for both streets. Correct the note. 3. Indicate township, range, and section on the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D 4. The location map shows section numbers but not section lines. Correct. DS 2-05.2.1.D 5. Indicate the contour interval by the north arrow on sheet DP2. DS 2-05.2.1.H 6. Label all contours lines on the plan. None of the contours is identified. Elevations can not be determined. DS 2-05.2.3.E 7. Dimension from street center line to existing curbs and sidewalks. Dimension sidewalk width. DS 2-05.2.3.C 8. Provide a sidewalk from the building to Speedway. At least one sidewalk must be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. DS 2-08.4.1.A 9. Several keynotes shown on the plan are incorrect. Keynote 6, "New 5' wide striped pedestrian walkway" is pointing at a patio. Keynote 5, "existing sidewalk" is pointing at landscape areas. Please plan check the document and correct the keynote errors. 10. Because the lot is over 1 acre in size, retention is required. Show the basin on the plan. Indicate bottom elevation, top elevation, 100-yr. peak water surface elevation, 100-yr. peak ponding limits, slope gradient. Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, SDRM, 2.2 and DS 2-05.2.4.H 11. Depending on the retention design, basin security barriers may be required, access ramps may be required, outlet structures may be required, etc. Since a basin has not been provided on the plan these items can not be reviewed. Future new comments are likely as the plan evolves. 12. A soils report is required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. Basins must drain within 12 hours. Provide percolation test. The soils report must also provide a minimum building setback from any basin. SDRM, 3.5.1 13. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Development Plan. 14. Place a note on the plan that all roof downspouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E DRAINAGE REPORT 1. 5-year threshold retention is required. Provide the appropriate analysis and design. See the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, SDRM, 2.2 and 3.2. 2. A detailed basin maintenance checklist and schedule must be included in the Drainage Report. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.C 3. Because retention is required this document is a Drainage Report not a Drainage Statement. Correct the title. SMDDFM, 2.1.1 |
| 06/14/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Orientation of enclosure OK 14' x 40' clear area required in front of enclosure. Shown curb lies within this area. 10' concrete slab required in front of enclosure. 10' clear area required between bollards inside enclosure. No provisions shown or discussed for recycling. |
| 06/16/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0023 STARBUCKS COFFEE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: JUNE 16, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Add Section, Township and Range to Location Map and Title Block. 2: Add Recorded Book and Page to Catalina Heights Annex in Title Block and Location Map. 3: Correct Bellevue Ave to Bellevue Street on Sheet 1. |
| 06/16/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to provide calculations for the existing annual planting areas within the street landscape border. Oasis areas are restricted to 5% of the area of the street landscape border and 2.5% of the total site area. LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 2) The plans are required to conform to any conditions of rezoning. Submit documentation regarding any applicable conditions. C9-85-80 Existing development on the site is subject to the plans and the regulations in effect at time the project received zoning compliance approval. LUC 3.7.1.2 3) Per LUC 3.7.3.2.B, "screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street". The existing screen wall does not conform to the regulation. Revise the plans as necessary. 4) Tree planters within the vehicular use area are to be a minimum of four feet wide. Revise all plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 5) Retention basins are required to comply with the landscape and slope requirements of DS 10-01.0. 6) Identify the height of any existing or proposed walls on the site and landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2. |
| 06/22/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0023 Starbucks Coffee 06/22/04 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-80, CD9-85-80 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia/Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: none COMMENTS DUE BY: July 5, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 6/14/04 A major policy of the Arcadia/Alamo Area Plan is to provide safe and efficient circulation systems for all modes of transportation including pedestrian. When reviewing the drive-thru area shown, two problems appear. One is the pedestrian entrance from Wilmot Road crosses over the required stacking area of the drive-thru lane. This sets up an unsafe situation for the person having to cross to access the establishment. This is also supported by the Development Standards. The pedestrian path needs to be relocated. The second problem is having the end parking spaces using the stacking area as drawn to maneuver in. This though is an easy fix. Required stacking is six (6) spaces for a single drive-thru window per the development standards. Remove the last two (2) stacking spaces shown on the drawing allowing maneuvering area for vehicles utilizing the handicapped and regular parking spaces that are adjacent. Please dimension the sidewalk area adjacent to the outdoor patio areas to assure that a six (6) foot wide pedestrian path is maintained as required by rezoning condition 1.f. The concrete also needs to be colored as indicated in the rezoning condition. Please add a note to the development plan that all lighting shall be shielded and directed away from residential uses as stated in rezoning condition 1.e. A drainage report is required per rezoning condition 1.a. Please contact the floodplain engineer to determine what will be required for this project and provide a response to this department on those findings. |
| 06/29/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: Starbucks Coffee D04-0023 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated June 7, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities along Wilmot Road. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8479 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 07/06/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | |
| 07/07/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 6, 2004 TO: Thomas Saylor Browe, SBBA, LLC THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Starbucks Coffee - Submittal D04-0023 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano and South Rillito - Central Interceptors and the Tucson Boulevard Flow Control Structure. Treatment and conveyance capacity was allocated for this project during the original subdivision of Catalina Heights Annex. Based on our historical records for this area, this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of a sewer service agreement. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D04-0023, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet DP1: Revise General Note 8 to read: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. A formal Sewer Service Agreement will not be required for this project, due to relatively small number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents being proposed. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 07/07/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 07/07/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D04-0023 Starbucks Coffee 6/14/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Wilmot (Speedway to Pima) No 0 45,000 63,000 6 63,000 51,386 6 1,098 Route 5, 30 Minutes, 0 Miles Bike route with striped shoulder Speeadway (Craycroft to Wilmot) No 0 47,600 63,000 6 60,290 63,000 6 Route 4, 15 Minutes, 0 Miles None |
| 07/08/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC Transmittal TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-023 Starbucks Coffee NWC Speedway & Wilmot Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: July 8, 2004 DUE DATE: July 7, 2004 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 7, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-023) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. e. DS 2-05.2.1.K DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 3. The project site is shown on the plan to be made up of two lots but the Assessor's Records and the legal description given in the title block of the plan indicate that the property is made up of one large parcel. If the parcel has been split provide zoning approved lot split documents along with recorded cross access/cross parking agreement (see comment 4). LUC 4.1.1 4. Cross access and cross parking agreement must be recorded between the proposed Starbucks and the existing shopping center. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement and add the docket and page of recordation to the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.P 5. The single class 2 bicycle post is sufficient to provide 2 bicycle parking spaces (one on each side of the post). Revise calculation to indicate two class 2 bicycle parking spaces provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 6. Dimension building setback from back of curb location along MS&R streets Wilmot Road and Speedway Blvd. DS 2-05.2.4.I LUC 3.2.6.5 7. Add a Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) calculation to the development plan stating the maximum allowed F.A.R. (0.75) and the proposed F.A.R for the site. LUC 3.2.3.2.B 8. Per LUC 3.4.4.1.B.2 each building must be provided with a loading zone, based on the number of spaces required for the uses within each building. This restaurant use with more than 1,500 square feet (1,499 square feet of building area plus 714 square feet of patio area) must have a loading zone. Add a loading zone to the calculations and to the drawing (fully dimensioned) for the proposed Starbucks parcel. Label and dimension the loading zone for the proposed restaurant. Indicate the location and dimension the two required and provided loading zones for the retail shops building. 3.4.4.1.B.2 DS 2-05.2.4.O LUC 3.4.3.3 9. Dimension the width of the drive-through for the restaurant, both at the drive and at the window. Also, show the required six stacking spaces fully dimensioned on the drawing per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 10. Dimension the width of the drive through lane at the pickup window. Also, dimension the length of the stacking spaces. DS 3-05.1.C.2 11. Continuous pedestrian circulation must connect the building to the existing sidewalk along Speedway Blvd. Pedestrian circulation walks may not pass through stacking spaces for the drive through lane. Revise location of pedestrian connection. DS 2-08.4.1.A DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.a 12. Revise location map by labeling section, township and range numbers and section lines. DS 2-05.2.1.D 13. Revise keynote 5 to be correct. Keynote 5 (existing sidewalk) points to the north property line where no sidewalk is shown. DS 2-05.2.4.K 14. Label the height of existing masonry wall in keynote 16. DS 2-05.2.4.N 15. Add site visibility triangles to the intersection of Speedway and Wilmot. DS 2-05.2.4.R 16. Indicate the maximum slope of the handicap access ramps and aisles in the accessible parking detail provided on sheet DP2. ANS/IBC 17. Add intersection widening information to right-of-way widths per MS&R plan. MS&R plan 18. Show wheelstops in parking spaces to the north and west of the drive-through lane. Vehicles may not overhang property lines or into the drive-through lane and landscaped areas. DS 3-05.2.3.C 19. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. PSMc\H\MyDocs\D04-023rev1.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: development plan, approved lot split documents, cross access/cross parking agreement |
| 07/08/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/08/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 07, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0023 Starbucks Coffee: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/15/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | CDRC STAFF | TRACKING | Completed |