Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0020
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/25/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved May 25, 2004. |
| 05/28/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | No known landfill within 1000 ft. of this development. No refuse collection required for this new car storage lot. |
| 05/28/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0020 Precision Toyota Storage Lot 05/28/04 ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-34 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pullman Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: June 21, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( x ) Other REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 05/28/04 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments Precision Toyota Storage Lot - D04-0020 1. Please label the screen wall on detail two and three of sheet DP2 as either constructed of, or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. 2. Please show where the outdoor lighting will be located. If there is to be outdoor lighting, please show a detail that meets condition nine. 3. Please show a typical wall elevation, with the proposed required landscape, that demonstrates compliance with condition 15, in regards to the requirement for different heights of vegetation. Please show a detail that reflects what the wall and vegetation will look like initially after planting and a second detail when the vegetation is mature. |
| 06/02/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0020 SAYLER-BROWN BOLDUC ARCHITECTS, L.L.C. PRECISION TOYOTA STORAGE LOT |
| 06/08/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: PRECISION TOYOTA STORAGE LOT D04-0020 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated May 20, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and any easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The existing poles at the southwest corner of Roger and Fairview appear to be in conflict. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8479 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 06/10/2004 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Plan 1. A brief legal description. Indicate correct lot square footage. As per the Assessor's information it indicates that parcel code 106-06-001E has 72,745 square feet of area. Verify, correct and revise. D.S. 2-05.2.1.G.2 2. Indicate contour interval along with north arrow and scale, which should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. Reposition Scale: 3"=1 mile directly below Location map lettering. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H Indicate and label contour lines with a light line weight. 3. A legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be placed on the plan, preferably on the first sheet. D.S. 2-05.2.1.J 4. The following special overlay zones is applicable to the property, add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 General Notes # 15 shall remove the statement "As Modified by the City Engineer." 5. A widening intersection is required as per MS&R Ordinance. Roger Road and Fairview Ave. are both Collector streets and intersect therefore the future ROW is required. Future ROW's for Roger Road is 100 feet with a widening of 130 feet and Fairview Ave is 76 feet with a widening of 100 feet as per MS&R Plan, Policy 2 and Figure 1 Correct and revise. 6. Right-of-way lines at the corners of street intersections will be rounded with a curve radius of 40 feet for commercial or industrial districts. D.S. 3-01.6.4.B 7. At the intersections of streets with other streets or of streets with PAALs/driveways, the curb line will be connected with a curve having the minimum radius shown in Figure 6, measured at the face of the curb. D.S. 3-01.3.2.C Indicate all curb radii along street. 8. All curb cuts, curb returns, and curb depressions will be located in accordance with the City of Tucson Code, Chapter 25. D.S. 3-01.3.2.E 9. Indicate all existing buildings and structures, including roof slope and location of downspouts. Indicate roof direction/drainage. Add note to General Notes: "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event." D.S. 2-08.3.1 10. Indicate existing site conditions for south end of property. The following information shall be provided on the development plan drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-05.2.3 11. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B 12. Indicate the following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C 13. If applicable, the following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. D.S. 2-05.2.3.D 14. Indicate City of Tucson field book number and page for the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate to compare to proposed conditions in order to verify maintenance of drainage patterns. D.S. 2-05.2.3.E 15. For land that slopes less than approximately one (1) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one (1) foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than one hundred (100) feet apart in all directions. D.S. 2-05.2.3.E.1 16. If applicable, indicate existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. D.S. 2-05.2.3.F 17. Indicate other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled to be removed or retained. D.S. 2-05.2.3.G 18. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. D.S. 2-05.2.3.H 19. Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated. D.S. 2-05.2.3.I 20. Where natural flood prone areas, such as washes, channels, drainageways, etc., exist within the development plan boundaries of the drawing, water surface contours for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated must be shown and clearly labeled. D.S. 2-05.2.3.I.1 21. The linear distance between water surface contour intervals should not exceed two hundred (200) feet unless prior agreement has been made with the City Floodplain Engineer or designee. D.S. 2-05.2.3.I.2 22. A symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals on the development plan should be included in the legend. D.S. 2-05.2.3.I.3 23. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.2 24. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E 25. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G 26. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development plan. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H 27. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.1 28. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2 29. Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3 (Check for emergency spillways, security barriers and access into basin (s) for maintenance. (A minimum of one 15-foot-wide vehicular access ramp shall be provided into each basin. The maximum roadway or access ramp slope shall not exceed 15 percent. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. SMDDFM 14.3.3 & 4 and 2.3.1.6.C)). 30. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.4 31. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development plan area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.5 32. Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-sections. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R 33. New projects, including mobile home parks, consisting of 3 or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, size, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2 Adherence to the Standard is to assure: o minimum safety criteria are met; o consideration of adjacent properties; o provision for on-site collection and maneuvering to avoid on-street traffic conflicts; o minimum conflict with pedestrian and vehicular traffic along streets and on-site. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T Contact John Clark of Environmental Services @ 791-3175 ext. 1136 to reach an agreement that does not meet Development Standards 6-01 and to obtain a DSMR. 34. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U As per document C09-00-34, Page 2, item #9 requires to be noted on development plan. Item #19 must be made prior to development plan approval. 35. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V 36. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W 37. Indicate spot elevations throughout PAAL and at Approximate Limit of Additional Detention area. 38. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purpose only. 39. Indicate Cut and Fill quantities in cubic yards on development plan. A Grading Plan review may be required. Delineate grading limits. 40. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert @ 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 41. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM.14.3 must be included on Development Plan. Correct and revise. 42. Include Maintenance checklist in drainage report as per SMDDFM 14.3 43. Submit a Percolation Test for the retention basins along the west and south side of the proposed site. 44. Indicate address and CDRC project number on cover sheet of Drainage Report. 45. Drainage Report, Page 3, paragraph 6, second sentence indicates a "10% below existing condition flows," it should read "15% below existing condition flows," Correct and revise. 46. Drainage Report, indicate datum used. 47. Drainage Report clarification for statement on Page 4, paragraph 4, line 2 "as water harvesting/retention areas." Water harvesting areas are 6 inches in depth and retention areas as noted per Drainage Report calculations. Correct and revise plans and report. 48. Drainage Report, Page 4, Drainage Table, column 2 indicates 1.85 acres. As per the Assessor's information it indicates that parcel code 106-06-001E has 72,745 square feet of area which equals to 1.67 acres. Verify, correct and revise all pages affected by this research. Submit document indicating acreage size for this parcel. 49. Hydrologic Data sheet calculation for Developed area indicates Watershed Type to be Nat./Rural with a Contributing Area Factor of 1.00. As per SMDDFM 4.06 and 4.08 this information is incorrect. Correct and revise all developed calculations. 50. It appears drainage patterns have changed, verify discharge. 51. Indicate a dimensioned detail / cross section of detention/retention basin. Dimension detention/retention basin on development plan and hydrology map. 52. Indicate WSE for detention/retention basins and details. And ponding limits. 53. Indicate spot elevations within detention/retention basins and additional detention area. 54. Indicate a dimensioned detail of water harvesting area with WSE. 55. Indicate flow arrows and slope % for retention basins. 56. Indicate an inlet / outlet dimensioned detail. 57. Indicate type of erosion control to be proposed for inlet discharge. 58. Details with walls, indicate property line, footing. Indicate dimensions on all details. 59. Street details are to be dimensioned and designed as per D.S. 3-01.10.Figure 12 60. Indicate type of material to be used for walls. 61. DP2, Sheet 1, Detail 4, Detention Basin Weir Opening, indicate distance for every wall opening on center. 62. Use a different line weight or type to indicate wall (s). Indicate symbol in legend. 63. Relocate text that overlays other text or details. |
| 06/11/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0020 PRECISION TOYOTA STORAGE LOT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 6/10/2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Fairview Road to Avenue on Location Map. 2.) Change a portion of the Southwest to a portion of the Northwest on all Title Blocks and in Location Map. |
| 06/11/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit any revised plans for an additional review. |
| 06/22/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-0020 Precision Toyota - New Car Storage Lot Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: June 22, 2004 DUE DATE: June 21, 2004 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 24, 2005. 2. Please relocate the section number labeled 23 to the outside of the map. The number within the map gives the appearance that the map includes coverage of two sections. Also please label the City of Tucson / Pima County corporate limits. DS 2-05.2.1.D 3. This Project has been assigned the Development Plan case number D04-0020. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including the NPPO and Landscape sheet. Also rezoning condition 9 was listed on sheet one. Please list the condition. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please revise general note five (5) stating the use of the property as follows. The use, if strictly storage of vehicles "for the Toyota dealership" should be listed as commercial storage DD "31", Subject to LUC section 3.5.10.1. If the use is something else other what the tile block implies please clarify and adjust all relevant code criteria related to the use. Remove all information from general note five that does not apply to the commercial storage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 5. Although general note 15 states that the MS&R setback has been met has been listed the proposed nine foot high walls do not meet the street perimeter setbacks. Both streets are collectors on the MS&R map and therefore the minimum setback is 21 feet from the back of the future curb location. Also it does not appear that the correct cross-section for Fairview. The sidewalk along Fairview appears to be within the Toyota property. If the sidewalk is to remain within the property an easement will be required. It will be necessary to speak with the COT Real Estate Division for more information. Please address the MS&R street cross-section dimensions and location of the required sidewalk and curb. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 and DS 2-05.2.3.C 6. If applicable all existing or proposed easements must be drawn on the plan. The location, width, purposes, and recordation information must labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.A and DS 2-05.2.4.G 7. It is not clear at this time whether the existing right-of-way will be sufficient for the necessary improvement required by the rezoning condition 3. Please clarify if COT transportation has reviewed the proposal and insures the rezoning condition has been met at least on paper. Please provide some memo or letter from COT transportation. DS 2-05.2.4.E 8. Please insure that the screen walls meet the minimum building setbacks. The nine (9) foot high screen walls must be setback a minimum of 21 feet from the back of future curb locations on Fairview Avenue and Roger Road. The minimum setback along the west and south property lines is based on one and one-half times (13.5') the height of the wall from the property lines. An LDO review and approval will be required if the setbacks cannot be met. Draw and label the setback dimensions from the back of curb on Roger and Fairview to the walls and from the west and south property lines to the walls. A matrix that is to represent the building setbacks has been drawn on sheet one but does not provide the required or the proposed setbacks. Provide the information proposed or remove the matrix as it does not serve any purpose without the requited information. DS 2-05.2.4.I 9. The parking requirement for the commercial storage is based on the following. Commercial Storage: Hazardous Material Storage: Motor Vehicle: SA. One (1) space per five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. FGA, plus one (1) space per five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area for the first twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area, one (1) space per ten thousand (10,000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area for over twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. of outdoor storage area. Bicycle: Eight (8) percent - ninety (90) percent Class 1 and ten (10) percent Class 2. Based on the gross lot area of 80,496.81 square feet, a total of 10 vehicle-parking spaces are required. These spaces must meet the minimum vehicle-parking space dimensions and the PAALs accessing the spaces must meet the minimum width requirements for two-way traffic where necessary to access the parking spaces. The required parking spaces may not be vehicle storage spaces and should be designated as required parking. Please define on the plan the required spaces and insure that the spaces meet the requirements for vehicle parking space dimensions and that the PAAL used to access the spaces meets the requirements. Revise the parking calculations to correctly state the number of spaces required and number provided for the correct use "Commercial Storage". DS 2-05.2.4.P In addition two bicycle-parking spaces all class two spaces are required. A class two bicycle parking facility must be drawn on the plan and labeled. A fully dimensioned detail drawing of the facility must be added to the plan. The detail must include the type of facility, manufacturer, surfacing material, lighting, and must be physically separated from the vehicular use area. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 10. No structure or object taller than 30 inches may be placed within a sight visibility triangle. The walls along the Fairview Avenue and Roger Road property lines have been placed in the SVT. Either the right-of-way information on the plan is incorrect or the walls must be relocated outside the triangles. Revise as required. DS 2-5.2.4.R 11. Submit a separate response letter that states specifically how all the rezoning conditions have been or will be met. DS 2-05.2.4.U 12. If applicable indicate the location type and size of any existing or proposed freestanding signage or if applicable existing billboards. DS 2-05.2.4.W 13. See Landscape reviewer comments related to the landscape borders, screening, and NPPO. DS 2-05.2.4.X If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D040020dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and landscape plans and additional requested documents |
| 06/23/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 22, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0020 Precision Toyota Storage Lot: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 06/23/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering rejects this DP: 1. Access points to the site from both Fairview and Roger shall have 25' radius curb returns. 2. Revise general note 5. It states proposed use is for retail, office, medical service-outpatient, etc. I thought this was a new car storage lot. 3. Sheet DP2 is labeled as sheet 1 of 2 in the title block. It should be sheet 2 of 2. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/24/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | June 24, 2004 TO: Thomas Saylor Brown, R.A., SBBA Architects THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Precision Toyota New Car Storage Lot - Submittal D04-0020 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. Good Job! If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 06/25/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No Comment |
| 06/28/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments. |