Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0019
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/19/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/21/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0019 HOUGHTON RD COMMERCIAL CENTER / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: MAY 21, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Number Storage Buildings and Office/Residence numerically. 2: Delete direction from street names on Location Map and Sheet 1. |
| 05/24/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Add a General Note to the plan stating: "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code." |
| 05/28/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | OK No known landfills within 1000" of this development. No enclosures details. Enclosures to comply w/Section 6 of the Development Standards. Ten feet clear inside and ten feet by fourty feet clear area in front w/ten foot slab. Dumpster at the resturant pad service angle will block both lane of the PAAl when being serviced. No provisions for recycling. |
| 06/08/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit the native plant inventory on 24" X 36" sheets. DS 2-15.3.0 2) A native plant preservation plan is also required for improvements in the public right-of-way. LUC 3.8.3.1 3) Revise the native plant preservation plan to include limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A.1 4) Revise the native plant inventory to list the plant numbers in sequence. DS 2-15.3.0 5) Revise the native plant preservation plan to include information regarding fencing requirements for protected plants and natural areas to remain. Show the fence location on the preservation plan. DS 2-15.5.0, LUC 3.8.6.7.B 6) Revise the notes on the preservation plan to include the requirement for metal inventory tags, in addition to color-coded flagging. LUC 3.8.6.7.B 7) Revise the landscape plan to use barrel cactus in the Houghton Road scenic route buffer area only at densities consistent with other properties in the vicinity. LUC 3.8.6.6.C RESUBMITTAL OF ALL REVISED PLANS IS REQUIRED. RESUBMIT REVISED LANDSCAPE AND NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLANS. |
| 06/10/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | -----Original Message----- From: Castillo, Liza Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:17 AM To: 'Craig Gross'; 'Ferne Rodriguez' Subject: HOUGHTON RD COMMERCIAL CENTER, D04-0019 SUBJECT: HOUGHTON RD COMMERCIAL CENTER D04-0019 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated May 18, 2004. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of eight (8) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Cell Phone/Pager: (520) 904-2668 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 06/11/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-019 Houghton Rd. Commercial Center Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: June 11, 2004 DUE DATE: June 15, 2004 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is May 18, 2005. 2. Place the development plan number (D04-019) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Also, place the SCZ case number (refer to comment 3), on each sheet of the site plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. Place any other reference case numbers, such as the annexation case number (C9-84-84) in the lower right hand corner near the title block. List the conditions of annexation as a general note. DS 2-05.2.1.K DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 3. The project site is made up of two lots which were previously split in 2002. Because the parcel splits shown in the detail on sheet 1 of 6 create a total of four lots, this project is required to be submitted as a subdivision plat with tentative and final plat required. Please resubmit for subdivision review. Refer to DS 2-03 and LUC 4.1.1 for platting procedures. Further comments based on the subdivision plat submittal will be necessary. LUC 4.1.1 4. This project area is within the 400-foot Scenic Corridor for Houghton Road. A Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) application must be approved prior to development plan approval. Include the SCZ case number, date of approval, approved colors and conditions in the general notes. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 5. Label and dimension the 400' Scenic Corridor line, along with the 30' natural buffer, on the drawing on sheet 1 of 6. Provide a calculation of view corridors to demonstrate compliance with LUC 2.8.2.6.B. It does not appear that the required 20 percent view corridor is provided through the site within the 400' SCZ area. LUC 2.8.2.3 LUC 2.8.2.4 LUC 2.8.2.6.B 6. Revise the required vehicle parking calculation to be based on a shopping center of less than 50,000 square feet, which is the lesser of 1 space per 175 square feet of gross floor area or the sum of the required spaces for each separate principal land use proposed. DS 2-05.2.4.P LUC 3.3.5.6.B 7. Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on 8 percent of the total vehicle parking spaces provided, 50% class 1 and 50% class 2. Also, provide a detail showing a fully dimensioned layout of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking (including width and length of spaces and a 5-foot clear area for bicycle maneuverability per DS 2-09). LUC 3.3.5.6.B.2 8. In addition to stating that the buildings are single story, specify the maximum building heights above design grade elevation on all four sides of each building. Setbacks cannot be verified until building heights are provided. The required setback from the R-1 zoned property to the east is 1-½ times the building height. The required setback from the Houghton Road Scenic Corridor is 3 times the height of structure from edge of future right-of-way. LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-05.2.4.I LUC 2.8.2.5.A 9. Handicapped parking spaces must be evenly distributed throughout the site. No h/c spaces are provided on the Brake Max portion of the site. Revise drawing and calculation. ANS/ IBC 10. Cross access and cross parking agreement must be recorded between the proposed Houghton Road Commercial Center lots which have shared access drives and also with the property to the south. Provide a copy of the recorded agreement and add the docket and page of recordation to the plat. DS 2-05.2.4.P 11. Provide the development designator "35" as part of general note 2. Also add a general note which details the restrictions which some of the proposed uses are subject to. In the I-2 zone the personal storage use is subject to LUC 3.5.10.3.C and .F, which read respectively: "All walls and doors visible from adjacent streets and residential properties shall be surfaces with a non-reflective material" and "The facilities exterior façade visible from adjoining visible from adjoining residential properties or street frontage shall be earth tone in color and of masonry, stucco or similar materials." Demonstrate compliance with these restrictions by providing elevation drawings of the self storage buildings labeling the materials and colors to be used. The automotive trade service & repair is subject to LUC 3.5.4.15. LUC 2.7.3.2 12. Add a Floor Area Ration (F.A.R.) calculation to the plat stating the maximum allowed F.A.R. (6.00) and the proposed F.A.R for each lot. LUC 3.2.3.2.B 13. Recent aerial photos show a building located on the property. If the building is still existing, show its location with a dashed line and label it "to be removed". 14. Parking calcs state that only two vehicle spaces are provided for the personal storage facility but eight spaces are shown on the drawing. Parking calcs state that 56 spaces are provided for the restaurant but only 52 are shown on the drawing. Revise parking calcs to be correct. DS 2-05.2.4.P 15. Dimension the width of the drive-through for the restaurant, both at the drive and at the window. Also, show the required six stacking spaces fully dimensioned on the drawing per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 16. Per LUC 3.4.4.2.B.2 each building (except for personal storage uses) must be provided with at least one loading zone have a loading zone. Add a loading zone to the calculations and to the drawing (fully dimensioned) for the proposed Brake Max parcel. Label and dimension the loading zone for the proposed restaurant. Indicate the location and dimension the two required and provided loading zones for the retail shops building. LUC 3.4.4.2.B.2 DS 2-05.2.4.O 17. Dimension the width of the drive through lane, both in the stacking spaces leading up to the window and at the window itself. Also, dimension the length of the stacking spaces. DS 3-05.1.C.2 18. Delineate and dimension the required pedestrian refuge area to be provided along one side of the PAALS accessing the self storage units. LUC 3.3.7.2.C.4 19. Revise parking space detail to indicate that for the required van accessible space the width of the access aisle shall be 8 feet. ANS 20. Continuous pedestrian circulation must connect the self storage facility to the Meadow Willow Trail right-of-way. Pedestrian circulation walks may not pass through a parking space as is depicted to the north of the self storage office. DS 2-08 21. Wheelstop curbs are required to be placed in parking spaces to prevent vehicles from overhanging landscaped areas or reducing width of pedestrian walks to less than 4 feet. Vehicles may also not overhang into the 30-foot scenic buffer area. Show wheelstop curbs in all required parking spaces. Wheelstops must be dimensioned at 2-½ feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C 22. Dimension the width of the pedestrian circulation system. DS 2-05.2.4.K 23. Remove references to Silverbell Road in the SCZ notes. SCZ notes specific to this project will be determined in the process of the SCZ review. 24. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: subdivision plat, cross access/cross parking agreement |
| 06/16/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 15, 2004 TO: Ryan Bale/Peggy Rau, EEC THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Houghton Road Commercial Center - Submittal D04-0019 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. However, evaluation of the off-site public sewer may qualify the project for partial credit towards Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-0019, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Confirm that the number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents will be 19,538. This number will be used to prepare a Sewer Service Agreement during your next submittal. SHEET 1. Add the following permitting note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET 2. This project involves existing public sewer, proposed public sewer and proposed private sewer. Please add a symbol to the legend defining each of these three possibilities and show them appropriately on the layout. Show the entire off-site proposed public sewer to the point of connection to the existing public sewer. Label the existing public sewer with the appropriate Pima County plan number and size. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 06/16/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: June 16, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT:Houghton Rd. Commercial, 7511 S. Houghton Rd Development Plan D04-0019 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. A grading plan is required under separate submittal. 3. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required along with the grading plan. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 4. Bollards will be required for the future access to the south. Please revise. 5. Concrete curbs and sidewalks are required along Meadow Willow Trail per D.S. 3-01.3.3. 6. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 7. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. It appears that there are exist. building on site and on the two easements near the SE corner of the property. 8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The future curb location is not shown correctly. The future FOC distance is 12' from the MS&R right-of-way. Please revise. 9. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 11. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. This comment pertains to the two parcels/easements on the assessors map (detail "B"), at the SE corner of the project. 12. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. The future curb locations are not shown correctly or at all. The furture FOC distance is 12' from the MS&R right-of-way. This is where the 20' stem side begins for the future SVT. 14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. This comment pertains to SW corner of the storage building. 15. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Please provide dumpster enclosure details. Please move the extruding curb leading into the trash enclosure laterally at the SE restaurant location. The curb should be set back 7' from the centerline of the enclosure. This will give the "clear space" a total of 14' in width. Also the space between the bollards on the inside of the enclosure should be 10' min. per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Contact John Clark at Environmental Services @ 791-5543 for more information. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 19. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 20. Please edit SCZ note no. 4. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This drainage report was reviewed for Development plan purposes only. The final review and acceptance is done at the grading plan stage. 3. Please explain the difference between the exist. and dev. Q100's. It appears the numbers are off just a bit. 4. Show the project address on the cover of the DR report. 5. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 6. Please include the percolation test results in the DR. 7. Security barriers must be provided at the top of all basins slopes steeper than 4:1, where depths exceed two feet per the Stormwater det./ret. manual 3.6.2. 8. It appears that some suppers/depressed curbs are undersized. Please include all scupper and curb openings calculations. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 06/17/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: June 17, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0019 Houghton Rd. Commercial Center: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Remove the Houghton Greenway trail. Indicate a non-motorized public trail easement will be dedicated that corresponds with the Houghton Rd Scenic Corridor Buffer on Houghton Road. Revise the location of the Houghton Greenway paved path to show it at the eastern edge of the Houghton Road future right of way. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 06/21/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT still has concerns on the operation of the interchange, as previous requests, the City needs to realize the failure of these intersections and analyze the impact of the additional traffic on this area. |
| 06/21/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0019 Houghton Rd. Comm. Center 06/21/04 ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation Ordinance #6142 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor COMMENTS DUE BY: June 15, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( x ) Other: Color building elevations and color sign package REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 06/04/04 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN HOUGHTON ROAD COMMERCIAL CENTER, 04-0019 1. The General Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual support functional pedestrian circulation systems within developments Please connect the proposed Brake Max and restaurant to the internal pedestrian system and where not accessible to the pedestrian path along Houghton Road. 2. Sheet 2 of 8 of the Landscape Plan shows a six feet high wall in a vehicular area along the southern portion of the property. Please show the correct location of the screen wall. 3. Please construct any proposed masonry screen wall around the perimeter of the development, or within the development, including the screening of the dumpsters of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials. Please provide a detail of all proposed walls in the development and indicate the materials that will be used. 4. To reduce the negative visual impact of the dumpsters and subsequent screen walls, please consider locating vegetation around the dumpster areas including canopy trees. 5. Houghton Road is planned to have limited access in the future. At best, the proposed ingress/egress on Houghton Road will be right in/right out, with a significant chance of eventually being closed. Please take this into consideration. With the only possible access on the property being from Meadow Willow Trail, it would seem that the restaurant, which will have significantly more traffic, would be better located where the Brake Max is located and vice versa. 6. To allow better circulation within the proposed development and the property to the south, please create an additional cross access to the south. This could be located on the eastern portion of the commercial activity, west of the storage units. |
| 06/21/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | no comments |
| 06/21/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Any right of way dedications needed will require a legal description with sketch and a title report of the subject property dated within 30 days. |
| 06/21/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Label curb return radii at all access points. 25' minimum. 2. This development will require a decel/turn lane for both north and south bound Houghton Rd. at the access point to the property. A minimum 100' stacking queue with appropriate transitions will satisfy this requirement. 3. A traffic impact analysis is required for this development. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |