Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/10/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved May 10, 2004. |
| 05/11/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0017 RITA RANCH LDS CHURCH / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: MAY 10, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Label Section corners on Location Map. 2: 8285 E. Rees Loop is incorrect. Delete from Title Block. The correct address will be assigned upon Development Plan approval. |
| 05/11/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0017 BRUCE R CALL AECM RITA RANCH LDS CHURCH |
| 05/13/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Dumpster enclosure shall comply w/COT Development Standards Section6. OK for traffic and refuse service. |
| 05/24/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Rita Ranch LDS Church D04-0017 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated April 16, 2004. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of eight (8) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 05/25/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | |
| 06/03/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-017 Rita Ranch LDS Church Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: June 3, 2004 DUE DATE: June 3, 2004 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is May 6, 2005. 2. In the parking calculation add a statement of how many parking spaces are required and how many are provided. While the number of fixed seats proposed in the chapel indicates that 55 vehicle parking spaces are required, it appears that, based on the drawing, 196 spaces are provided rather than 192. DS 2-05.2.4.P 3. General Note 4 indicates a Board of Adjustment variance is being sought for the steeple height, which is proposed at 67 feet. The maximum allowed height for a church in the C-2 zone is 40 feet, while design elements such as steeples may be up to 50 feet (10 feet above allowed structure height). Add variance case number, date of approval and conditions to the general notes. LUC 3.2.3.2.B LUC 3.2.7.3.A DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 4. Add the development designator "31" to general note 3. LUC 2.5.4.2.C.10 5. Revise bicycle parking calculation to be based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided (see comment 2). Note that the number of bicycle spaces required does not change. Indicate the location of class 1 bicycle parking to be provided on the drawing. Because bicycle parking is located away from the front project entry and on the opposite side of the building from the public right-of-way, directional sings must be provided to direct bicyclist from the public right-of-way to the bicycle parking facility. Indicate the location of dirctional signage to be provided on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.Q LUC 3.3.3.5 DS 2-09.5.1 6. Add a loading zone calculation stating that no loading zones are required or provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O LUC 3.4.5.1 7. List the conditions of development for annexation case number C9-84-84, from zoning ordinance 6143 on the d.p. DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 8. Add a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation to the plan stating the proposed FAR. The maximum allowed FAR per development designator 31, is 0.90. With a proposed GFA of 16,558 square feet and a site area of 191,228 square feet the proposed FAR calculates to 0.09. DS 2-05.2.4.M 9. Add a handicapped parking calculation to the parking calcs stating the number of h/c spaces required and provided. For uses providing between 76 and 100 total parking spaces 4 h/c parking spaces are required. ANS/ IBC 10. Add a parking detail and h/c parking detail dimensioning the spaces, h/c access aisles and maximum slopes of the aisles and ramps DS 2-05.2.4.P ANS 11. Label the location of any proposed freestanding signage and lighting on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.W 12. If any other easements exist or are proposed on the property, show their location, width, type, and provide recordation information. DS 2-05.2.3.B 13. Indicate the location of the proposed 67-foot steeple on the development plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.N 14. Label Section corners within the location map. For microfilming/archiving purposes all text must be a minimum of 12 point. Revise street names and all other labels within the location maps (both on sheet C1 and sheet SD1) to meet this minimum size requirement. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3 DS 2-05.2.1.C 15. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520)791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan |
| 06/03/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) An irrigation plan will be required for construction documents and permitting. LUC 3.7.4.5.C Refer to DS 2-06.5.0 for applicable standards and DS 2-07 for required content. 2) Revise the plans to comply with LUC 3.7.2.2. Include a calculation for oasis areas per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b. 3) Turf may not be located within the street landscape border Per LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 "Oasis areas may be located in the street landscape border only if: 1. The oasis areas do not total more than five (5) percent of the area of the street landscape border; and 2. The nondrought tolerant plants used in the oasis area are flowering bedding plants". Revise as necessary to comply. 4) Include the related case numbers in the lower right corner of the landscape plan, refer to development plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B 5) Revise the development plan and landscape plans to agree regarding the height of proposed screen walls. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 6) Submit a native plant preservation plan if applicable. If not, submit a Native Plant Preservation Application for Exception. The application is available at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf |
| 06/04/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 06/04/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: June 3, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 8285 E. Rees Loop Development Plan D04-0017 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 26 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1. 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 3. A separate grading submittal is required. 4. Show all drainage structures/systems on the DP. 5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 9. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. Wheelchair ramps are required at the curb returns. 10. Show Development plan number (D04-0017) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 11. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Please provide a detail of the refuse enclosure. Minimum interior width is 10' clear, including barricade posts (in all directions). 12. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 13. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 14. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 15. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 16. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 17. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 18. Show all drainage features on the DP. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Development plan purposes only. 3. Please include, in the DR, that you have reviewed and agree with the data from the DR entitled Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report for Pueblo Estrella (Parcel "H-H" at Rita Ranch). 4. An analysis beginning at the existing CRBC and upstream along the entire 60" SRP is warranted to determine the tail water for the proposed 60" pipe. 5. The text also calls out that the drop inlet structure is 12' deep, yet the details and plan views show +/-8'. Please explain. 6. Will the existing off site concrete channel for Pueblo Estrella be effected by the new drop inlet? 7. A gap between the existing channel to the South and the new drop inlet is shown on plan view but the detail shows no gap. Please correct. 8. A manhole is required for storm drains in excess of 45" in diameter every 500' per S.M.D.D.F.M. Chap. 10.9.1.8. 9. Descriptions of the cross-sections in the text do not match the cross-sections on figure 2. 10. Please show the southern most entrance above the drop inlet in the cross-section and the amount of ground cover , also call out the amount of ground cover for the North entrance as well. 11. Show the project/administration address on the cover of the Drainage Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 06/07/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 02, 2004 TO: Bruce Call, R.A., Bruce R. Call, Architect THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Rita Ranch LDS Church - Submittal D04-0017 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor.. Per Pima County Wastewater Management Planning Services, treatment and conveyance capacity in the downstream sewerage system exists for this extremely small project. The additional flow from this project should not cause any flow or effluent quality standards to be exceeded. Based on our records for Rita Ranch, this project would qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of a sewer service agreement. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D04-0017, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Only Sheet SD1 was submitted to this office for review. Submit all three sheets of the development plan to this office when you make the required resubmittal. We will not charge a review fee for those sheets, if they do not show information pertaining to the proposed sewers. In the following comments, we have assumed that all information regarding the sewers will be shown on Sheet SD1. If that assumption is incorrect, please show the requested information as appropriate. Sheet SD1: There are no on-site public sewers. Revise General Note 13to state: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet SD1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. (with these blanks appropriately filled in per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F).) Sheet SD1: Add a General Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet SD1: Show the plan number (G-84-089) for the existing 10' public sewer line in Rees Loop. Sheet SD1: Show the Building Connection Sewer (BCS) labeled with its size and the letters BCS. The entire length of the BCS needs to be shown. No further review comments can be made until these features have been shown. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If sewer information is shown on either of the other two sheets, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 06/07/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/07/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0017 Rita Ranch LDS Church 06/04/04 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (() Other: Grading and Paving CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84, Ord. 6143 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 06/03/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Comments () No Resubmittal Required REVIEWER: Deborah Estolano DATE: 6/3/04 |
| 06/08/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 8, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0017 Rita Ranch LDS Church: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |