Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/10/2004 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/11/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/16/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Provide an accessible ramp which allows accessibility from the striped pedestrian path onto pad 2. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K 2. The 2, 000 square foot res/office building for the storage use is not included in general note 19. Please add the area and revise applicable calculation. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/18/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Enclosures by building 8&9 are required to be metal containers (4CY) on casters for roll-out type of service. |
| 08/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center 08/20/04 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other: CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-20 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/23/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Other: REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 08/20/04 Urban Planning and Design Midvale/Valencia Center, D04-0016 After speaking to Mr.Joseph Linville, Senior Planner/Landscape Section of the City of Tucson, you are required to provide a 6-foot-high wall on the north portion of the property, as a requirement of the Land Use Code. Design concepts. Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: a) tile, b) stone, c) brick, d) textured brick/block, e) a course-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or f) a combination of the above materials. A detail of the proposed screen walls to be shown on the landscape plan as part of development plan submittal. Whether you can negotiate a party wall agreement with the neighbor, or whether you must construct a new one, please provide us with an elevation of the wall detail. |
| 08/20/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/20/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | The Development Plan may be recommended for approval with a condition that a note be added on sheet 1, adjacent to pad 2, specifying relocation/recordation of a new easement, prior to building permit approval, should re-location be necessary. |
| 08/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center 10/05/04 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other: Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-20 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/05/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10/04/05 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN MIDVALE/VALENCIA CENTER, D04-0016 The proposed elevation is a significant improvement over the prior elevation proposed for this site and responds to our comment regarding four-sided architecture. |