Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/07/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to provide screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I along the northern boundary. Multi-unit storage and loading areas are required to be screened with a 6' high masonry wall. Submit a party wall agreement with plans for permits. |
| 07/09/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | The two enclosures for buildings 8&9 can not be serviced at the angle shown for direct pickup. Recommend that the enclosures be combined for roll-out type service between the buildings. Building 9 square footage is large and a secong enclosure should be considered for the west end. Recycling should be considered for building 8&9 and pad 2. |
| 07/14/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0016 MIDVALE-VALENCIA CENTER/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/12/04 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved on condition that R14E is corrected to R13E in Title Block on mylar. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 07/16/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 29, 2005. 2. Prior to resubmitting this plan, please contact me to set an appointment to go over the following comments. 3. Provide a copy of the recorded lot combination covenant covenant as described in the previous comment. Previous comment: Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of five (5) lots, which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. You may obtain a copy of the covenant online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf or you may contact me at the number below. The Pima County Assessors Tax Combination Form may be obtained at the Assessors office. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.A 4. Label the on-site zoning boundary for the C-1 and C-1Ò zoning classifications. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.B) 5. Where is the back-up spur located? If spur is adjacent to property line, a minimum distance of three feet is required between the back of spur and the lot line or barrier above six inches in height. 6. Provide accessible ramps at all location where the striped pedestrian path meets the raised sidewalk. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.K) 7. Include the gross floor area of all buildings in the floor area calculation under general note 19. Square footage for self storage does not add up correctly and the square footage for the restaurants is not included. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.M) 8. a) Revise loading zone calculation to note the correct number of spaces required for retail use four (4). The retail/restaurant use requires two (2). b) Dimension the area between building for PAD 3 and the loading zone. Minimum five foot (5) foot wide pedestrian refuge area is required around the building. The sidewalk should continue through this area to provide pedestrian access to and from Midvale Park Road and the rest of the center.. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.B) 9. The handicap ramp detail on sheet 2 of 3 shall include the slope % and direction of slope for both access aisle and ramp. A minimum four (4) foot sidewalk is required outside the ramp landing. Previous comment: b) Detail handicap parking spaces, access ramps, and access aisles. Post disabled parking signs. Refer to ICC/ANSI A-117.1-1998 and 2002 IBC for handicap parking space, ramp, and access aisle specifications. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P) 10. Under the parking calculation, please list the number and class type of bicycle parking spaces required and provided for each land. If class I is required and provided, provide a detail and indite the location where it will be provided. Previous comments: a) Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided and list the number and class type required and provided. (LUC 3.3.3.5) b) Provide a fully dimensioned detail for Class I and Class II bicycle parking spaces. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. 11. Dimensions noted on the plan shall scale correctly. Revise drawing where required. 12. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 07/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center 07/20/04 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other: Irrigation Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-20 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/19/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: Verification of Drainage Report Submittal to Engineering, Consistent with Midvale Park Master Drainage Plan REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 07/09/04 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN MIDVALE/VALENCIA CENTER, D04-0016 The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual promote safe by design concepts. Lots abutting common areas should not utilize high walls that isolate the common areas that could promote criminal activities. Placing the "eyes of the community" into these areas creates a safe environment for residents. Where perimeter walls are provided along lot lines that abut designated open areas, common areas, the masonry portion of the wall should not exceed three (3') feet in height, except for pillars, with wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. Please provide a detail of this wall on the development plan. |
| 07/20/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/20/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Midvale-Valencia Center REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 20 July 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04-0016 Resubmittal Required: Revised Development Plan and Landscape Plan. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage correspondence. All previous comments have not been fully addressed, and approvals are not recommended at this time. Please provide a response letter to the comments provided below and address all comments on revised Development and Landscape Plans. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1. Development Standard (DS) 2-05.2.4 D 3 specifies conformance to parking area access lane (PAAL) requirements listed in DS 3-05.0. This item was inadvertently overlooked during the first review, however this development must conform to these requirements. Development Standard 3-05.2.1 C 3 a & b require unobstructed radii of 18 feet at all locations where a PAAL utilized for fire lanes or refuse collection intersects another PAAL, with a minimum 5 feet at all other PAAL intersections. Please revise the plan at all such locations accordingly. 2. The plan may not be recommended for approval prior to provision of recording information for the easement realignments, abandonments and/or vacations - all revised easements must be depicted on the plan prior to recommendation for approval (DS 2-05.2.3 B). 3. Please provide all loading zone dimensioning on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4 O). 4. Provide a detail for all onsite refuse provisions, fully dimensioned and labeled, and depict vehicular accessibility/maneuverability for each, at a minimum. Correct/revise the enclosure east of pad 3, as it now appears to propose two dumpsters within a 15-foot wide enclosure. Please clarify whether the enclosure southeast of pad 2 is proposed for one or two dumpsters (DS 2-05.2.4 T & DS 6-01.0). 5. Please revise the typical curb return radii at all PAAL/Driveway intersections with Collector and Arterial Roadways to 25', at a minimum. Commerce Court access locations should be included, since it functions as a Collector roadway in terms of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) (DS 3-01.10 Figure 6). 6. In response to previous comment # 4, depiction of the Midvale Park Road right of way has revealed the necessity for depiction of the future curb/sidewalk area configuration for this road. The future curb should be depicted 12' (feet) from the property line, in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan sidewalk area configuration for future 150' right of way improvements. Future Site Visibility Triangles must be depicted based upon this future curb location, and will affect the proposed monument sign location proposed at the southwestern corner of the site (DS 2-05.2.4 F & R). LANDSCAPE PLAN: Submit a revised landscape plan reflecting conformance to all Landscape Review comments and applicable Development Plan revisions made in response to all review comments provided. GENERAL COMMENT: As noted previously, a grading permit will be required for this development. A grading permit application submittal with a copy of the stamped/approved Development Plan and three sets of Grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans will be required prior to any building permit issuance/approval. Resubmittal shall require revised Development and Landscape Plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 07/20/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has no comments on this project. |
| 07/20/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 20, 2004 TO: Anthony Tsang, P.E., A. C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Midvale-Valencia Center, Lots 4-9 - Submittal D04-0016 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 1. Eliminate the three parking spaces that lie within the public sewer easement east of existing manhole 4982-02. Revise the design of the sidewalk to show a depressed concrete sidewalk that is flush with the PAAL in order to provide maintenance access for Pima County Wastewater Mangagement Department vehicles. Additionally add removable bollards to the design. SHEET 2. Delete General Note 16. Under separate cover, a private Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the development plan. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 07/20/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center 07/27/04 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other: Irrigation Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-20 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: N/A SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: Verification of Drainage Report Submittal to Engineering, Consistent with Midvale Park Master Drainage Plan REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 07/27/04 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN MIDVALE/VALENCIA CENTER, D04-0016 Per my discussion of July 27, 2004, with Mr. Tang, a detail of a masonry wall is not required since a 10-foot-landcape border will provide screening for the site. The six-foot walls that will be used to screen the dumpsters should utilize decorative materials (such as tile, stone, brick, adobe, or wood), textured covering materials (such as stucco or plaster), or a combination of two or more materials. These shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of buildings and development. 1. Ddesign concepts. Lots abutting common areas should not utilize high walls that isolate the common areas that could promote criminal activities. Placing the "eyes of the community" into these areas creates a safe environment for residents. Where perimeter walls are provided along lot lines that abut designated open areas, common areas, the masonry portion of the wall should not exceed three (3') feet in height, except for pillars, with wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. Please provide a detail of this wall on the development plan. |
| 08/04/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to provide screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I along the northern boundary. Multi-unit storage and loading areas are required to be screened with a 6' high masonry wall. Submit a party wall agreement with plans for permits. |