Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0016
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/30/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/03/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved May 03, 2004. Approval is for conditions as noted on plan. Prior to approval of building permit plans, the following will be reviewed. 1. Location of new/existing fire hydrants. 2. New/existing water mains and relocation of water mains that appear to be located under existing buildings. 3. Fire ratings of exterior walls llocated adjacent to property lines. 4. Emergency vehiclei ngress/egress devices provided at gated entrance to self-storage units. Minimum clear, unobstructed width of gate opening shall be 20 feet. |
| 05/04/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0016 MIDVALE-VALENCIA CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 3, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct R14E to R13E in Location Plan and Title Block. Correct Midvale Road to Midvale Park Road on Sheet 1. |
| 05/11/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | |
| 05/13/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | No details for refuse collection or enclosure. Resturants normally have two metal dumpsters (garbage & recycling). Resturants require grease containers. Containers should not be stored within the clear area of the dumpster enclosure. |
| 05/19/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Midvale - Valencia Center D04-0016 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated April 21, 2004. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There is a conflict with the existing electrical three-phase underground primary that is located under the new proposed building. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please contract Mr. Randy Alday at (520) 918-8256 regarding this conflict. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 05/24/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/24/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to provide a minimum 10' wide street landscape border along Midvale Road. LUC 3.7.2.4 2) Show building 1 on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.0 3) Revise the landscape plan to include continuous screening along Commerce Court and Midvale Road. Clearly show and label all proposed screening elements. DS 2-07.2.2 4) If buildings are utilized to meet the screening requirements along streets, the area between the property line and the building are to be included in the area calculations for vegetative coverage. DS 2-06.3.4.C.1 5) Revise the location map and title to reflect the correct legal description, the correct range is 13. DS 2-07.2.2 6) Revise the plans to show the correct zoning for the parcel located north of the site, (O-3). 7) Revise the plans to include an interior landscape border along the north property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, C9-89-20 8) Clearly label all refuse storage areas on the plans and provide screening as necessary per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 9) Revise the grading plan as necessary to correspond with the revised site and landscape plans. Resubmittal of the complete DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED. The NPP application is approved. |
| 05/25/2004 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center 5/21/2004 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Widen to 6 lanes Valencia (Oak Tree to I-19) Yes 2004 38,700 22,000 4 67,500 69,003 6 1,615 Route 29, 30 minutes, 0 miles Programmed Bike route with striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 05/25/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 05/26/2004 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Midvale-Valencia Center REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 26 May 2004 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04-0016 Resubmittal Required: Revised Drainage Statement, Development Plan and Landscape Plan. SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Statement. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The drainage statement must demonstrate conformance with the Midvale Park Master Drainage Plan/Report, in accordance with rezoning condition #3. Please provide a response letter to the comments provided below and address all comments on revised Development and Landscape Plans, and in a revised Drainage Statement. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1. Submit a revised drainage statement demonstrating conformance with the Midvale Park Master Drainage Plan/Report. Provide a copy, or include excerpts of the Master report with the revised statement, and include discussion with references in the text addressing this proposed development's conformance to the Master Report, in accordance with Rezoning Condition # 3 - case # C9-89-20 (Development Standard 2-05.3.2 D). DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size, in accordance with Development Standard (DS) 2-05.2.1 C. The consultant is encouraged to differentiate line types for easements, buildings, parking spaces, etc., for purposes of clarity/readability on the revised submittal. 2. Depict and label the Santa Cruz River on the project-location map, with the subject property approximately centered within the square mile, and correct the Range to "R13E" (DS 2-05.2.1 D 1& 2). 3. Provide recordation information for all easement realignments, abandonments or vacations, and provide a copy of the legal description with any exhibits for the proposed easement realignment. The revised easement must be depicted on the plan prior to recommendation for approval (DS 2-05.2.3 B). 4. Provide Commerce Court and Midvale Park Road right of way widths, recordation data, and type and dimensioned width of paving. (DS 2-05.2.3 C). 5. Ensure all dimensions from street monument lines to curb, sidewalk, and all utility locations are provided, fully labeled (DS 2-05.2.4 D 2). 6. Please ensure all easements are clearly depicted and labeled, with recording information provided on the plan - see additional requirements outlined for these Development Standards (DS 2-05.2.3 B & D, 2-05.2.4 G). 7. Indicate the Q100 entering the site from the adjacent retention basin, in accordance with the drainage statement accompanying this submittal (DS2-05.2.4 H 7 8. Provide all loading zone dimensioning (DS 2-05.2.4 O). 9. Provide a detail for all onsite refuse provisions and include the symbol depicting the dumpsters in the legend. The plan must include enclosure details, and depict vehicular accessibility/maneuverability for each, at a minimum, in accordance with Development Standard 6-01.0. Please address the apparent omission of a refuse provision for pad 4 and revise the enclosure angle for the dumpster south of Pad 2, demonstrating a clear approach of 14' by 40' (DS 2-05.2.4 T). 10. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning case # C9-89-20. 11. Address roof drainage direction(s) and depict and label roof downspout locations and associated sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of the 10-year rainfall event at a minimum, under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F). LANDSCAPE PLAN: Submit a revised landscape plan reflecting all Landscape Review Section comments and applicable Development Plan revisions made in response to all review comments provided for this submittal. GENERAL COMMENTS: A grading permit will be required for this development. A grading permit application submittal with a copy of the stamped/approved Development Plan and three sets of Grading and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans will be required prior to any building permit issuance. Resubmittal shall require revised Development and Landscape Plans and a revised Drainage Statement. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Douglas Williams Sr. Engineering Associate Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 05/26/2004 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 29, 2005. 2. Correct range is R13E under the location map. (D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3) 3. Add the annexation case number C9-83-84 to all applicable case numbers listed in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-05.2.1.K) 4. List the rezoning conditions for case number C9-89-20 and annexation conditions for case number C9-83-84. For a copy of the rezoning and annexation conditions please contact our office. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2) (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.7) 5. This project has been assigned development plan case number D04-0016. Place the D04-0016 file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2) 6. Add the following general note: "This project is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone criteria." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10) 7. Easements proposed for abandonment must be recorded and the docket and page noted on the plan prior to final approval of the development plan. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G) 8. Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of five (5) lots, which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. You may obtain a copy of the covenant online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf or you may contact me at the number below. The Pima County Assessors Tax Combination Form may be obtained at the Assessors office. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.A 9. Label the zoning classifications of the adjacent properties on the plan. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.B) 10. a) Label the PAAL's within the personal storage area as one-way or two-way. b) A one-way parking area access lane (PAAL) within a development for storage must be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. A two-way PAAL within a development for storage must be a minimum of thirty (30) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. c) Vehicular and pedestrian cross-access agreement is required with the adjacent properties. Provide a copy of the recorded cross-access agreement prior to development plan approval. d) Dimension back-up spur or provide a typical detail. Refer to D.S. 3-05.2.2.D for design criteria. 11. Dimension the existing and future right-of-way and curb locations for adjacent streets. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.F) 12. Rezoning condition 1b for case C9-89-20 listed on the approved tentative plat S98-009 requires the development site to be buffered along the north edge with a minimum 50 foot building setback which includes a minimum ten-foot landscaped area. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I) 13. Label the proposed height for all buildings. Building setbacks from O-3 zoning and streets may not be verified for compliance until this information has been provided. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.N) 14. Indicate the location of the striped pedestrian paths where they cross a PAAL. The continuous pedestrian circulation path must connect all buildings on-site with the pedestrian path located in the right-of-way. A sidewalk must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane except where crossing a PAAL and must meet locational requirements as described in Development Standard 2-08.4. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.K) 15. Include the gross floor area of all buildings in the floor area calculation under general note 19. Square footage for self storage does not add up correctly and the square footage for the restaurants is not included. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.M) 16. a) Fully dimension the vehicle stacking spaces and drive through-lanes for the drive-through facility for PAD 1. A minimum of six (6) stacking spaces are required. The length of a stacking space is 18 feet. Refer to D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2 for design criteria. b) Dimension the area between the drive-through lane and the north side of the building on PAD 1. If there are any entrances/exits along that side of the building, a minimum five (5) foot wide pedestrian refuge area will be required. Otherwise, a minimum two (2) foot building setback is required from the edge of the lane. 17. a) List the number of loading zone spaces required and provided for each proposed land use class. b) A 12' x 35' loading zone is required for PAD 4. c) Dimension the loading zones for PAD's 2 and 3. (LUC 3.4.5.3) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.O) d) Dimension the area between building for PAD 3 and the loading zone. Minimum five foot (5) foot wide pedestrian refuge area is required around the building. (D.S. 3-05.2.2.B) 18. Vehicle parking ratio for storage is listed incorrectly. Refer to LUC Sec. 3.3.4 "Personal Storage" for the correct vehicle and bicycle parking requirement and list on the plan. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P) 18. a) Provide a handicap parking calculation. b) Detail handicap parking spaces, access ramps, and access aisles. Post disabled parking signs. Refer to ICC/ANSI A-117.1-1998 and 2002 IBC for handicap parking space, ramp, and access aisle specifications. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P) c) Provide adequate handicap parking for pads 3 and 4. 19. a) Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided and list the number and class type required and provided. (LUC 3.3.3.5) b) Provide a fully dimensioned detail for Class I and Class II bicycle parking spaces. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. c) Indicate the location, specific type of rack, and the number of bicycles it supports on the plan. Indicate the width of clearance available for maneuverability. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q) 20. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with rezoning conditions. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.U) 21. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage including billboards and outdoor lighting. 22. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/27/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 26, 2004 TO: Anthony Tsang, A. C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Midvale-Valencia Center, Lots 4-9 - Submittal D04-0016 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use: This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southwest Interceptor. Treatment and conveyance capacity was allocated for this project by the earlier development of this property under case number S98-009, (Midvale-Valencia Retail Center, Lots 1-9). Based on our records for this property under case number S98-009, this project would qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of a sewer service agreement. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D04-0016, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. All Sheets: Add development plan case number, D99-0059, to the list of cross-reference numbers. All Sheets: Revise cross-reference number, D975-015, to reference a valid development plan number. Sheet 1: Show the size and the plan number of the existing public sewer line in Midvale Park Road. Sheet 1: Show the size and the plan number of the existing public sewer line south of the property on the Furber development. Also, show the manhole numbers for the manholes in this existing public sewer line, as they have been shown on PCWMD's base maps. Sheet 1: Show the existing public sewer easement (and it's width recording information) for the existing public sewer line south of the property on the Furber development. Sheet 1: PCWMD's sewer maintenance vehicles are not able to travel in the existing public sewer easement on the Furber development . Therefore, they must be able to drive from Midvale Park Road through the parking area access lanes (PAALs) of this proposed development to approach existing public sewer manhole 4982-02 from the east, service the manhole, turn around and then return to Midvale Park Road via the PAAL at any time of the day or night. Show a public sewer access easement being granted by separate instrument for this purpose. This easement must be the full width of the PAALs and have an acceptable turnaround area at existing manhole 4982-02. No parked cars or vertical curbs may interfere with PCWMD's vehicular access to this manhole. A legal description and a 8 ½" X 11" drawing of the public sewer access easement must be submitted to this office for review and approval. Following the approval of these documents by this office, Subdivision Coordination will ask for an additional blueline of the development plan and a title report current to within 60 days. These documents will be forwarded to the Real Property Division for preparation of the easement, signatures and recording. This office can approve the development plan once the legal description and drawing of the easement is accepted, but we cannot approve the Mylars of the development plan until after the easement is recorded and the recording information is filled-in on the development plan. Sheet 1: A label pointing to existing public sewer manhole 4982-02 indicates that the "line continues east with flow". No such line is shown on the as-built drawings for this public sewer line, so the line continuing east is most likely a private sewer line. All existing sewers on the property must be shown. This private sewer line must be tracked to where it ends, and shown as existing on the development plan. Also, any existing private sewer lines in the private sewer easement to the north must be shown as well. Sheet 1: Show that each segment of the proposed private sewer line is 8". This is best done in the Private Sanitary Sewer Data table. Sheet 1: Show the rim and invert elevations for new private manhole #6 in the Private Sanitary Sewer Data table. Sheet 1: The proposed private sewer lines may not be run inside and parallel to the public right of way of Midvale Park Road as shown. We recommend that the proposed private sewer lines connect to an existing private sewer line in the private sewer easement if possible. We further recommend that the BCS from Pad 1 flow east to a new private manhole located approximately where the potable water line for Pad 1 crosses the proposed 8" private sewer line, and an 8" private sewer line be run south from this new manhole to where the existing private sewer easement turns to the west. Based on the label pointing to existing public sewer manhole 4982-02, there is reason to believe a existing private sewer line is present in this easement. Connect Pad 3 to the 8" private sewer line running south, with a long BCS that runs south and then east in the PAALs. If this is not possible, connect the proposed private sewer lines to the public sewer system at existing public sewer manhole 4982-01 if possible. If this cannot be done, explain why in the response letter. Sheet 1: Show the proposed private sewer line in a private sewer easement. Sheet 1: Revise the legend in such a manner that the symbols in the legend can be more easily seen. Sheet 1: Please use a small circle with the letters CO beside it as the symbol for sewer cleanouts. The symbol used for sewer cleanouts on this submittal, is typically used to depict valves in potable water lines. Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. (with these blanks appropriately filled in per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F).) We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. |
| 05/27/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center 5/27/04 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other: Irrigation Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-89-20 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/27/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other: Lighting Plan and Elevations REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 05/27/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Midvale/Valencia Center, D04-0016 The General Plan, Santa Cruz Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual all provide guidance for the review of this development. Additionally, the proposed development site is located within the Midvale Annexation Area, C9-89-20, Ordinance 9096. The Santa Cruz Area Plan states that new development within or near existing neighborhoods should be designed and scaled to be compatible with existing neighborhood characteristics. The Design Guidelines Manual states this should be done through four-sided architecture. Please submit elevations of all four sides of the proposed buildings. Please design side and rear building façades with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façades. The Design Guidelines Manual states that dumpsters shall be screened with masonry walls and landscaping. Additionally, it states that the landscape screen around dumpsters shall consist of material such as tile, stone, or brick and plantings up to six-feet high. It also states that the screen walls should be constructed with graffiti-resistant materials and encourages shared dumpsters. Please show the location of the dumpsters and the type of screening that will be utilized. The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual promote safe by design concepts. Lots abutting common areas should not utilize high walls that isolate the common areas that could promote criminal activities. Placing the “eyes of the community” into these areas creates a safe environment for residents. Where perimeter walls are provided along lot lines that abut designated open areas, common areas, the masonry portion of the wall should not exceed three (3’) feet in height, except for pillars, with wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. A detail of this wall needs to be provided on the development plan. Provide a note to the General Notes Section on the Development Plan that reads “all masonry walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and shall be maintained in a graffiti-free condition. The color of the walls shall be complementary to that of the restaurant/storage/retail center.” Please show a detail of the proposed masonry walls and indicate that they will be graffiti-resistant and what material they will be constructed of. Provide a note to the General Notes Section on the Development Plan that reads “All security lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjacent residential uses or residentially zoned areas.” Please provide a detail of lighting. Provide a note to the General Notes Section of the Development Plan that reads “A drainage report consistent with the Midvale Park Master Drainage Plan/Report is required.” Please provide verification that the Engineering Department has received the required drainage report. On the Development Plan, sheet 1 of 3, only two loading zones have been identified. Please identify the remaining three. On the Development Plan, sheet 1 of 3, it states that the project is located in Township 15 South, Range 14 East, Section 10. Please correct this to read “Township 15 South, Range 13 East, Section 10. In the General Notes Section, Number 7, please include the number of parking spaces required, and the number provided. In the General Notes Section, Number 20, please include the number of loading spaces required, and the number provided. In the General Notes Section, Number 21, please include the number of bicycle spaced required, and the number provided. |
| 05/28/2004 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/28/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 28, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0016 Midvale-Valencia Center: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the tentative plat and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |