Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0015
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/06/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/06/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Revise the plans to provide additional screening of the parking areas from Bonita Ave. LUC Table 3.7.2-I Ensure that the buffer meets coverage requirements. DS 2-06.3.7 Show existing wall along the western boundary. |
| 08/10/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: YWCA OF TUCSON / REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: AUGUST 10, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 08/12/2004 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 10, 2004 TO: Charles Corrales, Steve Corrales Engineering THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: YWCA of Tucson 'New Building' - Submittal D04-0015 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet C3. Revise the design slope of the proposed sewer as it currently indicates 27%. SHEET D1. Show the postal code for the owner’s address, it is currently missing the last digit. SHEET D1. As previously requested, please revise Wastewater Management Note 1 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. We have sent to your office under separate cover a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Once the three originals of the Agreement have been signed by the Owner of Record, and notarized, they must be returned to Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the development plan. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project |
| 08/13/2004 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-015 YWCA of Tucson Site Plan Review (2nd review) Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 8-13-04 DUE DATE: 8-19-04 1. Place the development plan number (D04-015) on each sheet of the d.p., including sheets C-1 through C-4 in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 2. A requirement of the Rio Nuevo PAD for Development Area 2 is that a 5-foot high vegetative screen and a 5' wide landscape strip be in place along the north side drainageway. Please demonstrate compliance with this PAD standard on the development plan. Rio Nuevo Redevelopment Plan Document - PAD 4 Development Area 2 Development Standard f 3. There are two detail #1's shown on sheet D2. Revise the bicycle detail label to #3 to be consistent with the keynote M statement DS 2-05.2.1.D If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520)791-5608. |
| 08/17/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Design shows the enclosure behind a gate. If the gate screens the dumpster from adjacent properties then no door would be required on the enclosure. Drawing of the location of the enclosure does not match the enclosure detail. Questions will arise on what is to be built. |
| 08/19/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT: D04-0015 YWCA of Tucson 08/18/04 Civic Assembly () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Other: Irrigation, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, & Floor Plan and Elevations. PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT: Río Nuevo Redevelopment Plan Development Area 2 COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/19/2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASKFORCE, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other: REVIEWER: Deborah Estolano DATE: 08/17/04 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS D04-0015 YWCA of Tucson – Civic Assembly This Development Plan must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the 1987 Río Nuevo Redevelopment Plan/ Planned Area Development (PAD) and any of its components. Please also note that this document is available at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/genplan/srplans.htm To assure that this development is in conformance with the PAD, please address the following: APPROVAL BY THE REDEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR (CITY OF TUCSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE) In the resubmittal request, you have indicated that you have provided Larry Cummings, Economic Development (791-5093) plans for their review. Please provide a copy of the written approval by the Economic Development office (PAD Sections III.B.2.b.1 and III.B.2.b.3). If revisions occur and substantial changes are made to this Development Plan, the developer must re-submit the revised Development Plan to the Redevelopment Administrator prior to re-submittal to CDRC for review (PAD Section III.B.2.b.3). DEVELOPMENT SITE METHANE CONTROL PLAN The PAD area contains two closed Solid Waste Disposal Sites (SWDS). The site that affects this parcel is located on the property to the west. This PAD includes a Master Methane Control Plan (MMCP) that addresses mitigation measures associated with methane generation and migration and methane monitoring and reporting procedures. The applicant must submit a Development Site Methane Control Plan (PAD Sections III.B.4.c, III.B.4.d, III.B.4.e), and the report generated by Patterson Evanoff Engineering, Inc. The applicant should also consult Arizona Revised Statutes 49-701.29.k to assure that they are in compliance. The reports should be submitted to the following agencies: City of Tucson Environmental Services – Lee Jacobs, Jeff Drumm Fire Department - Dan Uthe, Fire Code Administration Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) – Gretch Wagenseller, 628-6708 Once the above agencies have reviewed the report submitted by Patterson Evanoff Engineering, Inc. and approved it, please provide a copy of their written approval. |
| 08/20/2004 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Tucson YWCA Development Plan 2nd submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04-0015 SUMMARY: The revised Development Plan, revised Drainage Report and Landscape documents were received by Development Services Department Engineering on August 6, 2004. Development Services Department Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for development plan purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 10-02.14.2.10: Clarify retention volumes on page 7 of the drainage report; revise drainage report. 2) D.S.Sec.2-05.3.2.A: Provide a geotechnical report. Discuss suitability and feasibility of soils for proposed project. The report should discuss existing geotechnical conditions, and proposed recommendations for foundations and pavement design. Also include recommendations for slope grades and minimum distances from foundations. The report shall have minimum setbacks for basins from structures. Infiltration test results will be required to be submitted. The geotechnical report shall specifically address all criteria listed in this section. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Show how infiltration rates shall meet Water Harvesting and Detention / Retention criteria per DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a. Discuss any recommendations for the soils indicated as possible landfill. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 3) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.D.2: Curb returns at entrance shall meet minimum face of curb radius per table 3-01.10.Fig.6; driveway/PAAL to collector street is 25'. 4) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Address the following basin comments: a) Delineate and clarify label for the 100-year ponding limits in northwest basin; b) Correct leader line for "42.00" at west end of water harvest area detail on sheet C-1. Show direction of storm water in water harvesting area. Also clarify FFE elevations with regard to basin grades; specifically check elevation of south building and water harvest area elevations to show positive drainage around and away from the proposed buildings. 5) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Provide locations and types of drainage structures including outlet for the Retention Area and any sidewalk scuppers. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points to provide reference to future grading and site drainage that shows the conveyance from the basins if they overtopped. Provide invert elevations of bleeder pipe from northwest basin. 6) Tucson Code Sec.29-23.A.5: Development plans submitted to the city pursuant to this section shall be sealed by a professional registered with the Arizona Board of Technical Registration who is knowledgeable regarding landfills, methane gas, and the health and safety issues that can arise when developing on or in the vicinity of landfills or a person who has similar professional qualifications. Regarding existing monitoring well, provide copy of any environmental report or landfill engineering assessment regarding the status of site due to proximity to old landfill. 7) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Provide soils report that includes geotechnical assessment addressing possible landfill material at boring B-2 and recommendations for removal or impact on the project. In next submittal, provide copy of the soils report including map of borings. Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit revised Drainage Report, revised Development Plan, complete bound copy of the soils report, and other documentation. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 08/23/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |