Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0012
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/15/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | no comments |
| 04/15/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | no comments. |
| 04/15/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | no comments |
| 04/15/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved April 15, 2004. |
| 04/20/2004 | FRODRIG2 | LANDFILL | REVIEW | Denied | Environmental Services Comments: * Service for the enclosure depends on the layout of the parking lot. * Question if the enclosure is going to be on the property leased for this business. * Per Section 6 of the Development Standards the enclosure requires side wall protection. * Clear area between bollards is 10 feet for the enclosure. |
| 04/21/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D04-0012 AMEC Infrastructure, Inc. ADOBE VETERINARY CENTER |
| 04/21/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0012 ADOBE VETERINARY CENTER / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 19, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Correct Lot 7 to Lot 9 on sheets 1 and 2. 2: Delete “East” and correct Woodland Ave to Woodland Road ( sheets 1 and 2). 3: Delete “East Woodland Road” on east side of property (sheets 1 and 2). |
| 05/06/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the note regarding grading on sheet L-1, it does not appear that the entire site will be graded. 2) Revise the limits of grading on the landscape and NPP plans to preserve existing grades in the vicinity of protected plants. DS 2-15.6.0 3) Revise the site and landscape plans to provide barriers at the perimeter of all portions of the vehicular use area. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 4) Per LUC 3.7.5.2.D1 "Within the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way, all areas between the MS&R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation." Revise the landscape plan to include native plant restoration as required in the above section. 5) The scenic route buffer area is to be measured from the property line, unless the City Engineer approves a portion of the 30" buffer in the public right-of-way. Revise the development and landscape plans as necessary. Provide verification, in writing, of any City Engineer approvals 6) Revise the landscape plan to include street landscape borders and screening in the vicinity of the pen south of the ingress/ egress location. The border and screening is required to extend along the entire street frontage where development is proposed. LUC 3.7.2.4 7) Include additional information regarding the existing fence on the site. The fence may not be compliant with code provisions such as LUC 3.7.3.7.D.2, LUC 3.7.3.2.B, & LUC 3.7.3.4. In addition the project is subject to the requirement for a Scenic Corridor Zone review. TCC Sec 23A-42 8) Revise the landscape plan to meet the mininum requirements for groundcover in the Woodland Road landscape border. Screening plants are not to be calculated when determining coverage. DS 2-06.3.7 Submit all plans and any requested correspondence for the next review. |
| 05/07/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 May 6, 2004 TO: Dave Martin, AMEC THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Adobe Veterinary Center - Submittal D04-012 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use: This project will be tributary to the Ina Road WPCF via the North Rillito Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D04-012, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Include the number of proposed fixture units. Based on this number a Sewer Service Agreement may be required. SHEET 1. Include the following permitting note “A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.” SHEET 2. Show the proposed sewer lines, label their size, length and slope. Please show the proposed sewer lines in a different line type than the existing sewers, and show a symbol in the legend witch matches the line type used for the proposed sewers. SHEET 2. If connecting to the 18-inch existing sewer line, connection shall be made by either constructing a new manhole or by connecting to one of the existing manholes. SHEET 2. Label the invert elevation at the point of connection between the proposed sewer and the existing sewer. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided on the first sheet. |
| 05/11/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 11, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT: Adobe Veterinary Center Development Plan D04-0012 (First Review) T13S, R15E, Section 33 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Engineering Section has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) for Adobe Veterinary Center and does not recommend approval of the DP and DR at this time. The DS is accepted for DP review purposes. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. The project is within a Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) overlay. The drainageway within the 400 feet of Tanque Verde Road must be maintained in its natural condition. Revise the plan to remove the proposed chip sealing and the solid waste enclosure from within the drainageway. 2. Show roof drainage patterns and add a note indicating that all sidewalks and pedestrian paths will be kept flood free for up to a 10-year event. (DS 2-05.2.4.H.2 and DS 2-08.3.1) 3. Provide for striping or other marking in the "Large Vehicle Parking" area so that access to the solid waste enclosure is maintained. (DS 6-01.3.1) 4. Revise detail H on sheet 3 to show bollards along the sides of the enclosure as well al along the rear. (DS 6-01.42.C.2) 5. Add a note "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." (DS 2-05.2.2.C.2.a) 6. Add a note "A floodplain use permit and finish floor elevation certificate is required." (DS 2-05.2.2.C.2.b) 7. Show all easements on the DP along with recordation information. Indicate the purpose of each easement and whether it is public or private. (DS 2-05.2.3.B) 8. Show water surface contours for the 100-year flood. Provide contours at intervals of no more than 200 feet.(DS 2-05.2.3.I) 9. Show and label existing and proposed sidewalks along the right-of-way. (DS2-05.2.4.L) Provide curb and sidewalk along each adjacent right of way. (DS 3-01.3.3.a) Drainage Report: 10. Revise the DR to provide the correct retention volume requirements. The run-off coefficients for the five-year rainfall depth must be used when computing the five-year retention volume. 11. Provide an encroachment analysis to show that there will be no adverse impacts either upstream or downstream of the development. 12. Provide a detail of the retention basin with enough detail to demonstrate that sufficient volume is provided. 13. Provide results of a percolation test, which show that the retention basin will be empty within 12 hours. 14. Address off-site drainage areas. Provide a site plan with contours extending far enough to determine the drainage patterns of adjacent properties that might affect the project site. If you have any questions, or if you wish to set up a meeting, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate |
| 05/11/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | no comments |
| 05/11/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Adobe Veterinary Center D04-0012 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated April 7, 2004. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please provide the approved site, electrical load and offsite improvement plans for a preliminary electrical design. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of six (6) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 05/11/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | no comments. |
| 05/11/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-0012 Adobe Veterinary Center Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: May 11, 2004 DUE DATE: May 11, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 14, 2005. 2. Depict and label the COT/Pima County jurisdiction limits on the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D 3. List as reference, the following annexation case number and ordinance number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets, Annexation (Rezoning) C15-89-2 and Zoning Ordinance # 7428. DS 2-05.2.1.K and DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 4. Revise general note 1 to state the existing zoning as SR. Remove the word 'Commercial'. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 5. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D04-0012. List the development plan case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 6. Revise general note 2 as follows. The use is to be listed as Animal Service - Veterinary Clinic DD "5", subject to LUC section 3.5.4.1.E. (The proposed use is listed twice in the same note). DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 7. This development is subject to the requirements and criteria of the Major Streets and Routes Setback and Scenic Corridor overlay zones. A separate Scenic Corridor submittal and fees are required for review and approval prior to approval of the development plan. As of this review date the application and submittal for the Scenic Corridor could not be verified. Additional comments may be forthcoming due to the Scenic Corridor review, which may affect the design of this development. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 8. If applicable, draw all on site existing or proposed easements. The location, width, purpose and recordation information (docket and page) must be labeled on the plan. DS 2-05.2.3.B and DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Label the future curb to property line dimension and label the width of the future sidewalk. Clarify the status of the roadways labeled as East Woodland Avenue and East Woodland Road. Per the Pima County Assessors online records it appears that Pima County owns the roads. Please provide documentation that states, indicates, or shows that the land has been dedicated as right-of-way. DS 2-05.2.3.C and DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 10. Address the following items related to the vehicular use area. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 and (DS 3-05 Veh. Use) A. Dimension the back-up spur. The minimum radius is 3 feet. Indicate the type of wheel stops or barriers to be provided around the vehicular use area that will keep vehicular traffic of the undeveloped areas. B. A five-foot wide pedestrian refuge area with a four-foot sidewalk is required along the east side of the building. Draw and label the refuge area as required. C. The double shot chip seal will not hold up to large vehicular use. It is advised that chip seal not be used in this area. Asphaltic concrete would be preferable. Also barriers are to be provided on the edges of the paved areas to keep vehicular traffic off undeveloped or unpaved areas. D. A note indicating large vehicle parking for the south parking lot implies parking for vehicles other than cars. Please clarify what type of large vehicles will use this area. Also the parking lot must be striped and must meet the same requirements for parking spaces minimum sizes and PAAL areas for two-way traffic. E. The refuse container has been placed in the large vehicle parking area. Once the parking lot has been striped please demonstrate maneuverability into and out from the refuse container location. F. Provide a five-foot pedestrian refuge area with a four-foot concrete sidewalk between the south side of the building and the PAAL area providing access to the parking spaces in the south parking lot. 11. This site has frontage on a major street and a local street. An interpretation which was made by the Zoning Administrator with regards to building setbacks when a parcel fronts on a major street the local street is viewed as a major street for purposes of applying the building setback. Please revise the following items related to the building setback requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.I and DS 2-05.2.4.N A. Keynote 11 refers to a 10-foot setback for non-frontage. This note does not apply to this site, please revise as follows or remove the note. Tanque Verde is a Major Street and is also a Scenic Corridor therefore the building setback as stated in the LUC section 2.8.2.5 Scenic Corridor will supersede the building setback based on LUC section 3.2.6.5. The building setback is based on a three to one ratio. Based on the proposed building height 21'-1" the minimum building setback from the Tanque Verde property line is 63'-3". (Per the plan the proposed building setback exceeds the minimum.) B. The building setback from the both Woodland Avenue and Woodland Road is to be based on the greater of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane. Please revise keynotes related to building setbacks. (The building setbacks from both local streets exceed the minimum required.) C. Keynote 12 must be revised to state that the 30-foot natural buffer is measured from the future property line and not from the back of ultimate sidewalk. D. Two dimension notes with leaders do not appear to point to a specific item. The two dimension leaders are depicted in the lower right corner of the site. Revise the leaders to point to a specific item or remove if not specific to a building setback requirement. E. Clarify if the 60-foot pen is enclosed or will it be constructed with a roof structure or is it a corral structure. If the pen is enclosed or constructed with a roof structure, the building setback for the structure must be fifty feet from the property line. If additional structures are proposed such as corrals, barns, shade structures etc, please show on the plan, the location, size, height, and type or purpose of each structure. F. A fifty-foot dimension has been shown in the lower section of the property (at the intersection of Woodland Avenue and Woodland Road) but it is not clear what the dimension is intended for. 12. Address the following items related to pedestrian circulation. DS 2-05.2.4.K and DS 2-08 A. Per DS 2-08.4.1. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. This site has frontage on three streets and must be provided with a four-foot sidewalk from each street sidewalk. The sidewalks must connect to the on site pedestrian circulation. The sidewalks must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas by constructing a raised concrete sidewalk. This site has not been provided with any sidewalk from any of the three street frontages. Please add the sidewalks as required, label and dimension. B. As mentioned in comment 10, a pedestrian refuge area with a four-foot concrete sidewalk is required along the east and south sides of the proposed buildings. Drawn and label the required pedestrian refuge area and sidewalk. C. Keep in mind that the onsite pedestrian circulation must also be an accessible route with handicapped access ramps where required to provide or continue an accessible route. 13. Per LUC section 3.4.5.3 loading zone table and based on the proposed gross floor area, this development must be provided with one 12-foot wide by 35-foot long loading zone. The loading zone must be drawn on the plan, labeled and dimensioned. Maneuverability into and out of the loading zone must be demonstrated. The number of loading zones required and number provided must be listed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.O 14. This development must be provided with 23 parking spaces based on a parking ratio of one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. Of the 23 spaces one must be must be a handicapped with an eight-foot access aisle. Per the drawing the 22 spaces have been provided with two handicapped spaces and one shared eight-foot wide access aisle. The reduction utilized for a reduction in vehicle parking is not applicable to this development. The reduction may be used for existing developments only. This site does not appear to have a hardship that would prohibit the developer from providing the required number of parking spaces. Please provide the 23 vehicle parking spaces as required, remove the reduction calculation, and revise the calculation for the number of parking spaces required and provided. DS 2-05.2.4.P 15. Indicate the type of postal service to be provided. If the service is to be provided inside the building add a keynote stating so. If the service is other than inside the building show the location of the freestanding postal pedestal and label. DS 2-05.2.4.V 16. If applicable indicate the location, size and type of freestanding signs. The signs may not be placed within the 30-foot natural buffer. DS 2-05.2.4.W 17. As stated in comment seven, this site is subject to the criteria and requirements of the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. The development plan may not be approved until a scenic corridor review and approval has been granted. The same development plan is to be used for the review of the scenic requirements. Additional notes must be added to the plan including a color and materials palette that describes the name of the paint colors, manufacturer and manufacturer number, materials palette with the same information, view corridors drawn and labeled and the view corridor calculation. Additional comments will be forthcoming once the Scenic Corridor application and revised development plan drawing is re-submitted for review. Add the following SCZ notes to the development plan. An additional sheet may be required to provide the required SCZ information, which includes notes, color and materials palette view corridors. 1. Include in 30 foot buffer label the notation "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 2. Add and annotate the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary on the development plan. 3. Please add the following notes to the development plan. a.) View corridors = (calculation). b.) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of Tanque Verde Road right-of-way line, not to exceed 30 feet. c.) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, driveway entrances, private yards, and structural improvements. All existing vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti must be preserved or relocated on the site. d.) Existing Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. e.) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Tanque Verde Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is re-vegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D f.) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible Tanque Verde Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. Colors are as follows: (list approved colors from SCZ-04-____ case.) g.) Fencing and freestanding walls facing Houghton Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. h.) All areas between the Tanque Verde Road MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. i.) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Tanque Verde Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. j.) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length. See the landscape reviewer comments for additional notes that must be added to the development plan and landscape /NPPO plan sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D040012dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and landscape plans and additional requested documents |
| 05/11/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | no comments |
| 05/11/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 11, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D04-0012 Adobe Veterinary School: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 05/12/2004 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 4/23/2004 Case Number Project Name Estimated Daily Traffic (in average 24-hour vehicle trips) D04-0012 Adobe Veterinary Center 330 Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 792-9151 |
| 05/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | no comments |
| 05/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | no comments. |
| 05/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | no comments |
| 05/12/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | see landfill comments |
| 05/13/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | no comments |
| 05/13/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | no comments. |
| 05/13/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | no comments |
| 05/13/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0012 Adobe Veterinary Center 05/12/04 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: None GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Corridor COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/11/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: dce 791-4505 DATE: 05/11/04 |
| 05/13/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 05/13/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments. |
| 05/13/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 05/13/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | comment 1 |
| 05/13/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | comment2 |
| 05/13/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | no comments |
| 05/13/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | no comments. |
| 05/13/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | no comments |
| 05/13/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | comment3 |
| 05/13/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |