Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0005
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/23/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The Development Plan is denied 02/23/04. A general note must be added stating: " Addition fire hydrants shall be provided, by the Developer, in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code." |
| 02/26/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 11, 2004 TO: Irene Volenick Planning Resources THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Family Dollar Store – Midvale Park Road Development Plan – 1st Submittal D04-005 The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southwest Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. ALL SHEETS. Add the subdivision plat case number, D04-005, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. SHEET C-1. Include the necessary General Notes as established by the Pima County Development Plan Requirements. SHEET C-1. There shall be a General Note indicating the total proposed number of fixture units for this project. SHEET C-3. Show all existing sewer lines with their respective sizes and Pima County plan numbers. Please make sure to use a font that is easily legible as the current submittal made it difficult to read. SHEET C-3. Show the sewer line servicing the building and indicate on plans if it is existing or proposed as well as if it is public or private. Size, length and slope information to be included. SHEET C-3. If connecting to an existing sewer line 12 inches in diameter or larger, a manhole will have to be installed per Pima County Standard Detail WWM A-3 (13). We will require a complete set of revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. The review fee is $50 per revised sheet for the second submittal. The second submittal will include 2 revised sheets and a check for $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of revised sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947. Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Copy: Project DF/df |
| 02/26/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0005 FAMILY DOLLAR STORE – MIDVALE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: February 25, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Revise Vicinity Map per Subdivision Standards for a Location Map (Include Section, Township, Range, North Arrow and Section Corners). Street names should be legible; delete directions from street names. |
| 03/05/2004 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: FAMILY DOLLAR STORE D04-0005 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated January 30, 2004. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com Office: (520) 917-8479 Pager: (520) 218-6565 Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 03/09/2004 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | From: John E. Clark PE, RLS Engineering Project Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services Location of proposed trash enclosure cannot be serviced by direct truck pick up. If the enclosure is constructed at this location the dumpsters would have to be on casters and service would be subject to additional fees. Consideration needs to be given for recycling services. This would constitude a combined or another enclosure w/dumpster. |
| 03/11/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise all plans to include a suitable barrier per DS 3-05.2.3.C between the project and undeveloped portions of the site. 2) Revise the landscape plan to clarify where decomposed granite will be used on the site. Dust control is also required for the public right of way areas adjacent to the site per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3. 3) Revise the site and landscape plans to show the proposed screen wall consistently. The wall is required to be located a minimum of two feet from the parking area access lanes per DS 3-05.2.2.B.3. The wall may be located within the required street landscape border only if the location complies with LUC 3.7.3.2.C 4) Provide information on how the refuse storage area complies with the screening requirements of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Show any walls or other screening elements on the landscape plan. 5) Submit a native plant preservation plan. LUC 3.8, DS 2-15.0 |
| 03/15/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0005 Family Dollar Store – Midvale 03/12/04 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-83-34 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/17/04 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other (Elevations) REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 03/02/04 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Family Dollar/Midvale, D04-0005 The General Plan, Santa Cruz Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual and all provide guidance for the review of this development. The Santa Cruz Area Plan states that new development within or near existing neighborhoods should be designed and scaled to be compatible with existing neighborhood characteristics. The Design Guidelines Manual states this should be done through four-sided architecture. Please submit elevations of all four sides of the proposed building. Please design side and rear building façades with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. The Design Guidelines Manual states that dumpsters shall be screened with masonry walls and landscaping. Additionally, it states that the landscape screen around dumpsters shall consist of material such as tile, stone, or brick and plantings up to six-feet high. It also states that the screen walls should be constructed with graffiti-resistant materials and encourages shared dumpsters. It must be indicated on the General Notes Development Plan that loading space uses and activities shall be limited to hours of store operation from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m Provide a detail of lighting and a note to the General Notes on the Development Plan that reads “All lighting shall be directed down and away from adjacent residential properties.” |
| 03/16/2004 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 15, 2004 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D04-0005 Family Dollar Store - Midvale: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plan and has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 03/18/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 18, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Family Dollar Store, Midvale Park Development Plan D04-0005 (First Review) T15S, R13E, Section 03 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Engineering Section has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) for the Family Dollar Store and does not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Revise the vicinity map so that it is legible and drawn to scale. Include section lines, jurisdiction boundaries and north arrow. (DS 2-05.2.1.A) 2. Provide north arrow, contour interval and scale on each sheet. (DS 2-05.2.1.H) 3. List the required drainage notes on the Development Plan. (DS 2-05.2.2.C.1) 4. Add a note stating, "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0. (DS 2-05.2.2.D.2) 5. Add the required utilities note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 6. Revise the location of the detention basin so that the top of cut slopes shall not be made nearer to a site boundary line than one fifth of the vertical height of cut with a minimum of 2 feet (610 mm) and a maximum of 10 feet (3048 mm) as required by Chapter 36 of 2000 IBC (local amendments) Section 14.2. 7. Show drainage patterns including roof drainage. Show that all pedestrian routes will be maintained flood free for all flows up to a 10-year event. (DS 2-05.2.4.H.2 and DS 2-08.3.1) 8. Show the connections to the drainage outlet shown on sheets 1 and 2. (DS 2-05.2.4.H.3) 9. The solid waste enclosure is not accessible. Revise the plan to provide safe access. Dimension maneuverability for the enclosure locations and for access routes. (DS 2-.5.2.4.T and DS 6-01) 10. Label Irvington Road and Midvale Park Road as MS&R routes and provide recordation information. (DS 2-05.2.3.C) 11. Provide correct Sight Visibility Triangles for the entrance PAALs. The near side SVT is 20' x 345' and the far side SVT is 20' x 30'. Drainage Report 12. Revise the drainage report to indicate that the project is within a balanced basin. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.A.1) 13. Submit with the drainage report a detailed site plan which clearly shows the dimensions and locations of the proposed detention basin. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4) 14. Show the location, size and type of inflow and outflow structures to be employed. Include dimensions and elevations of critical portions of the structures. Include a description of the function of the drainage outlet shown on Sheets 1 and 2 of the Development plan. Show all connections to the drainage outlet. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a) 15. Show the location and size of the access and maintenance ramp for the basin. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.b) 16. Show the maximum water surface elevation and ponding limits for the basin. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.f) 17. Provide a detailed Basin Maintenance Checklist and Schedule. (DS 10-02.2.3.1.6.C) A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required to be submitted with the grading permit application. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/19/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Label ROW as ROW or 1/2ROW and as existing, future or both. 2. Label SVTs as existing or future or both. 3. Midvale Park Road is designated an arterial roadway in the current MSPR. Near side SVTs should be 20x345. 4. Show and label far side pedestrian SVTs. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/19/2004 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No Comment. |
| 03/22/2004 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 03/22/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 03/24/2004 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: D04-005 Family Dollar Midvale Park Rd / Irving TRANSMITTAL: March 16, 2004 DUE DATE: March 17, 2004 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 19, 2005. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be twelve (12) point or greater. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. The project location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three inches equals one mile (3" = 1 mile). This location map should display the subject property approximately in the center of the one (1) square mile area. It must also provide the section, township and range, with the section corners identified, a north arrow and the scale. The preferred location for the location map in the upper right corner. DS 2-05.2.1.D 4. All development plans must be submitted in an engineering scale "no more than forty feet to the inch." The scale provided (1" = 30') does not match the scale of the drawings provided. Please declare the scale being used adjacent to the north arrow and rectify the apparent discrepancy, and place the in the upper right hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.C DS 2-05.2.1.H 5. The annexation case number, the subdivision name and case number should be listed in the lower right corner of each sheet next to the title block. Also list the annexation conditions of development as a note. DS 2-05.2.1.K DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 DS 2-05.2.2.B.8 & 9 6. Identify the zoning as: "Existing zoning is ____." Also state: "The proposed use of the property is General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec 3.5.9.2.C." Also state the subject to on the plan. The development plan number (D04-005) must be placed on each sheet of the development plan, the landscape plan and the NPPO in the lower right corner next to the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 LUC Sec 2.5.3.2.B.2 7. Please state that this project is designed to meet the criteria for the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) overlay zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 LUC Sec 2.8.3 8. All existing and proposed easements must be graphically depicted and dimensioned on the development plan. The recordation information and purpose must be stated on the plan. DS 2-05.2.3.B DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Identify the right-of-way width and future right-of-way width of West Irvington Road and dimension those half right-of-ways. Also identify the current and future curb locations along Irvington Road and Midvale Park Road. Note that both Irvington Road and Midvale Park Road are MS&Rs. DS 2-05.2.3.C DS 2-05.2.4.F 10. This project is currently identified as one site. Clearly declare the intentions of the developer. If the property is to be split, please provide proper documentation for the split and delineate the property division on the plan. Be aware that splits of real property require a separate process for review and approval. If this project is part of a phased development then identify it as such. Provide calculations and all required information to demonstrate the each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Each phase must be designed to assure legal access for all phases of the development. The FAR should be calculated for the entire site, not just for the "developed area." DS 2-05.2.4.A DS 2-05.2.4.C DS 2-05.2.4.D.4 LUC Sec 4.1.2 11. Parking area assess lanes (PAALs) must be a minimum of twenty-four feet (24') wide for two-way traffic. The PAAL along the northeast side of the structure appears to be less than the twenty-four feet (24') required. It appears that there is only room enough room for one-way traffic. Please revise. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 LUC Sec 3.3.7.2.I 12. Please provide the wall height from design grade facing the property line adjacent to South Midvale Park Road on the plan. This information is necessary to determine the required setback for this project. The minimum setback is the greater of twenty-one feet or the height from the back of future curb. Under no circumstances are setbacks measured from the centerline of a street. Please revise note #3 as required in the General Notes. DS 2-05.2.4.I LUC Sec 3.2.6.5.B.1 13. A pedestrian refuge area with a minimum width of five feet (5') must be provided between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. A pedestrian refuge is required along the northeast side of the building, with the exception of the loading zone. This pedestrian refuge must be a sidewalk that is physically separated from any vehicle travel lane. The pedestrian refuge and sidewalk are not permitted between the loading zone and the structure. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 DS 2-08.4.1. DS 2-08.4.1.B & F 14. The Class 2 bicycle parking cannot be placed in a location that blocks pedestrian circulation. Please demonstrate a minimum of four feet (4') of pedestrian clearance adjacent to the bike rack. Please provide a more complete detail for the Class 2 bicycle parking and provide a detail for the Class 1 bicycle parking if you are providing Class 1. You may provide four (4) Class 2 bicycle parking spaces in this instance, rather than two (2) Class 1 and two (2) Calss2 spaces, because there are less than fifty (50) vehicle parking spaces provided. The number of bicycle parking spaces is based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Please revise the calculation DS 2-05.2.4.Q DS 2-08.5.1.A LUC Sec 3.3.3.5 JUC Sec 3.3.7.8.A 15. Provide a fully dimensioned refuse collection area including the location of the dumpsters. DS 2-05.2.4.T 16. Indicate the location and type of postal service. DS 2-05.2.4.V 17. Indicate the location type of proposed free-standing, pedestal and wall signs. DS 2-05.2.4.W 18. A barrier must be provided adjacent to the PAAL on the southwest perimeter of the property being developed to prevent vehicle access to the undisturbed portion of the property. DS 3-05.2.3.C 19. Revise the side walk section of the accessible parking on the plan and the detail. The maximum slope is 1:12. This slope requirement is also applicable to the where the pedestrian assess lane / crosswalk intersects the sidewalk (keynote #4). Crosswalks are not permitted adjacent to a parking space. Please revise the plan to show a raised concrete sidewalk next to the parking space. You may place the crosswalk so that it goes directly into the van accessible lane. Also add another "s" to accessible in the detail title. DS 2-05.2.4.P ICC/Ansi-A117.1-1998 20. Remove "BLOCK F" from the adjacent properties to the west and south, and leave only "MIDVALE TERRACE." If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St.Paul, (520) 791-5608. |