Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D04-0001
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/04/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D04-0001 INTEKHAB RESIDENCE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 4, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 08/08/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: August 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Intekhab Residence: Development Plan. The activity number is D04-0001 SUMMARY: The Development Plan was received by Engineering on December 21st, 2004. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The next submittal must address the following items: 1. List the name, address, and telephone number of the person, firm, or organization that prepared the development plan. If a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer, prepared the plans, provide the applicable registration or license number along with the seal and signature of the professional. DS 2-05.2.2.A.2. This comment has not been addressed from the first review and second review. 2. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the development plan drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. a. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. DS 2-05.2.3.A. The above comment is from the first review. The length for the property along Queen Street and the length and bearings of the radius (southeast corner of the site) has not been indicated on the development plan. This must be shown on the development plan. The entire site must tie in. Revise accordingly. The above comment has not been addressed from the second review. The plan shows a 25' return. Show a point of tangency and curvature for the corner of Speedway Blvd and Queen Ave. |
| 08/14/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENTSTANDARD 1. Please submit a copy of the City approved development plan application extension letter for Zoning Review file. 2. Rotate the location map so that north faces towards the top of the sheet and add the north arrow. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 3. Provide a copy of the recorded Lot Combination Covenant for DSD records. Previous comment: Per Pima County Assessors Records, the site is comprised of two parcels which must be combined by providing a copy of the recorded City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. You may obtain a copy of the covenant online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf or you may contact me at the number below to receive a copy via fax or in person. 4. Per LUC Section 3.2.7.3.A.2 the minaret may not exceed ten (10) feet above the allowed structure height. R-2 zoning allows a maximum building height of 25 feet therefore limiting the allowed height of the minaret to 35 feet above finished grade. Elevation drawings provided show the minaret with a proposed height of 39 feet 8 inches exceeding the 35 foot height limit. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I 5. Proposed building and minaret heights labeled on the development plan do not match those shown on the elevation drawing. Assure that the proposed building and structure heights labeled on the development plan match those on the elevation drawings. 6. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/15/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. The SVT as depicted is STILL drawn incorrectly. See DS 3-01.0 figure 16 for guidance and resubmit. Please ensure that the SVT is labeled appropriately as to size. The SVT should have stem leg 20' long and sight leg 340' long. (DS 2-05.2.4.R) D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/15/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D04-0001 Intekhab Residence 08/12/05 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-15 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/15/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (xxxxx) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 12/30/04 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 8/11/05 |
| 08/22/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |