Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0045
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/24/2004 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 24, 2004 To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT: Lot 4 @ Westpoint Crossing Development Plan D03-0045 (Second Review) T15S, R13E, Section 02 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Engineering Section has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) for Lot 4 @ Westpoint Crossing and does not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. The solid waste enclosure is not accessible. Revise the plan to provide safe access. Dimension maneuverability for the enclosure locations and for access routes both before and after servicing the container. Per the development standard solid waste vehicles are not to be required to back up more than 40 feet. (DS 2-.5.2.4.T and DS 6-01) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 02/27/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0045 Lot 4 @ Westpoint Crossing 02/26/04 ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-90-17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: February 26, 2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( x ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( x ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: REVIEWER: E. Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 02/20/04 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS LOT 4 @ WESTPOINT CROSSING, D03-45 2. Please provide a pedestrian access lane west across the access street to Irvington Road. Also, please continue the sidewalk/pedestrian access lane along the entire southern portion of the lot, and connect it to the lot to the east. 5. Condition 1.c states that all mechanical equipment, outside storage areas, and dumpster locations shall be screened. Please show the screening of the "owner's room and fire riser room" on the development plan. In addition, any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: a) tile, b) stone, c) brick, d) textured brick/block, e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or f) a combination of the above materials. Please show a detail of the type of wall that will be used for the "owner's room and fire riser room" and "trash enclosure" areas and that they will be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. 6. Condition 14.f states that the enhanced landscape scheme shall have canopy trees in the landscaped areas around drive-through areas. In addition to the three canopy trees along the north side of the drive-through, please provide canopy trees along the western side of the drive-through area. |
| 03/04/2004 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM:David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-0045 Lot 4 at West Point Crossing - Fast Food Restaurant Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: March 4 , 2004 DUE DATE: February 26, 2004 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 15, 2004. 2. This comment was not addressed as requested. Prior to making this comment on the first review of the development plan Craig Gross and I discussed the need for an as built plan. Because of numerous changes to the overall development it is necessary to have an as built plan. I discussed this issue with Craig once again and the need for an as-built plan is still required. (Previous Comment: This site has been developed in phases and several of the buildings as approved by the original tentative plat/development plan have been redesigned and built other than approved. Separate revised development plans for those buildings came in for review and approval by CDRC but the overall tentative plat/development plan has never been revised completely. As a requirement of approval of this development plan for lot four (4), a revised overall as-built development plan will be required. The revised development plan must include all changes that have been made as it pertains to building configuration, square footage, parking lot reconfiguration, and vehicle parking calculations as well as all applicable LUC Data such as floor area ratio, building heights, loading zoning requirements, handicapped parking spaces, bicycle parking, etc. It has been a few years since the original tentative plat/development plan was approved but the first three sheets of that plan would be the sheets that must be revised and submitted with the next development plan submittal. Call me if you have any questions regarding this comment. Also if you need copies of the original tentative plat/development plan for West Point Crossing, please call Marilyn Kaltoff and she may be able to request copies be made for a fee. Marilyn's phone number is 791-5608 ext. 1117.) 3. This comment was addressed as requested but the name indicates shops, which implies some form of retail use will occur within the building. In fact, your response to the previous comment no. 9 is that the proposed use is for a restaurant. Please revise the title block and any notes referring to the use of this building as shops and revise to restaurant use. Under the "Proposed Building Data" text block, revise the use and add the applicable LUC subject to section numbers as follows, LUC section 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5. (Previous Comment: List the proposed name of the project, if there is no name list tenants name, or property address. Add to the title block, a brief legal description that describes the location of the overall site. DS 2-05.2.1.G.1 & .2) 4. Now that the actual use has been established as a fast food restaurant and that a drive-through is proposed additional requirements for the drive through must be addressed. The minimum width of a drive through lane is 11 feet and the minimum number of vehicle stacking spaces required is six (6). The length of a stacking space is 23 feet. Demonstrate on the plan that the drive through lane will accommodate the six stacking spaces without encroaching into the PAAL. Add within the drive-through lane a symbol depicting a 23-foot long by 8-foot wide stacking space (six spaces). The six spaces include the space at the window. (Previous Comment: Under general note 3 list the specific uses proposed for the shell building, i.e., retail, restaurant, personal service etc. Per the plan it appears that a drive through window is proposed along the west side of the building. Typically, drive through lanes are used when a restaurant or drugstore. Indicate what use is proposed that will utilize the drive through. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3) 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Please see comment two. (Previous Comment: Pedestrian circulation within the site has been demonstrated but the continuous circulation that should connect to the on site circulation throughout the center cannot be verified. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue. Submittal of a revised overall development plan must be submitted with the next development plan submittal for this project. See related comment 2. DS 2-05.2.4.K) 6. See related comment 3. (Previous Comment: If available at this time, list under the "Proposed Building Data" text block the actual or proposed square footage for each of the proposed uses in the new shell building. I acknowledge the overall square footage has been listed. DS 2-05.2.4.M) 7. I acknowledge that per your response the location or type of postal service had not yet been determined and therefore was not added to the plan. If the postal service will be provided with in the building add a note stating so. If the service is to be provided as a freestanding mailbox please ensure that the location of the mailbox is not placed within a required pedestrian circulation path or parking space etc or as noted in the previous comment. (Previous Comment: Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D030045dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and landscape plans and additional requested documents |
| 03/04/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | March 9, 2004 TO: Lonny Rollins, P.E. Stantec Consulting Inc. THRU: Craig Gross City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Shops “A” at West Point Crossing Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D03-045 The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: SHEET 1. Add the following note “A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.” ÿALL SHEETS. The title of the project shall appear on the lower right corner of each sheet and shall match the title displayed in large bold lettering on the top center of Sheet 1. Please revise accordingly. SHEET 1. Show legend for existing public sewer lines and proposed private sewer lines. SHEET 2. Show the appropriate Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer lines. SHEET 2. Show the appropriate manhole numbers for the existing manholes. Subject to the above conditions this Development Plan is hereby approved. The above comments will be reviewed on the mylars. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6947. Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Copy: Project DF/df |