Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D03-0042
Parcel: 13216647A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0042
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/28/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/29/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved 10/29/03.
11/05/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Passed
11/05/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: November 5, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0042 Federal Express Parking Lot: DP

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has no comments.

Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
11/05/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0042 FEDERAL EXPRESS PARKING LOT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: November 5, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1.) Include recorded Book and Page for Park Avenue Industrial Center (Title Block).
11/06/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT:        FEDERAL EXPRESS PARKING LOT
        D03-0042

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated October 10, 2003.  TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time.  There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project.  In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities.

Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. 

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com
(520) 884-3882
11/06/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D03-0042
GDA Southwest,LLC
FEDERAL EXPRESS PARKING LOT
11/20/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Craig Gross, CDRC
SUBJECT: Federal Express Parking Lot
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: November 21, 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D03-0042
T14S, R14E, Section 11

Resubmittals Required: Development Plan / Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report received on 28 October 2003. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT:

1. The runoff coefficients used for 5 year threshold retention volume requirements should be revised, in addition to the volume requirement stated in the text (pg.3), and the stated runoff coefficients utilized (paragraph 1, page 2) to correspond with the values provided in table 3.4 of the Pima County Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual (Development Standard -DS-10-01.0), and Table 4.3 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM) - DS 10-02.0;
2. The proposed weir outlet dimensions and locations do not appear to replicate existing conditions flow patterns. Please discuss existing patterns in the report, with specific reference to any points of discharge concentration(s), as is proposed under developed conditions. Describe and present any hydraulic calculation sheets for each of the hydraulic systems used, such as riprap spillways, to return flows to either natural or existing locations and magnitudes along downstream property line(s), fully labeled and dimensioned (SMDDFM, Section 2.3.1.5 F);
3. Provide detention/retention basin details and cross-sections, fully labeled and dimensioned with basin tops, bottoms, and adjacent grades noted (see item # 10, below). Please include clear depiction of maintenance access ramps, labeled and dimensioned, per Section 2.3.1.6.A of the SMDDFM, (DS 10-02.0);
4. The report does not discuss acceptance/conveyance of offsite flows. Please address these watersheds (OS1 and OS2 in figure 3) accordingly, as they appear to affect the site, demonstrating continued acceptance and safe conveyance under developed conditions. Please discuss how and where these flows are routed through this development, and through either or both of the detention basins.
5. Curb inlet calculation recommendations specify two 6' openings and one 9' opening, whereas Figure 5 provides a note in the legend for 3' openings at these locations - please revise or clarify Figure 5 accordingly (SMDDFM Section 2.3.1.5 B);
6. Provide retention basin percolation test results. Test procedures shall be performed in accordance with the recommended procedure of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood Control District;
7. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, and liability of the drainage improvements and detention/retention basins, described in the drainage report, (SMDDFM, Section 2.3.1.2 E);
8. Provide a detailed Detention/Retention basin maintenance checklist and schedule, and basin performance criteria for annual and as-needed inspections of the basins and drainageways, addressing the items specified in the SMDDFM (sections 2.3.1.6 C 1& 2 and 14.3);
9. The drainage report should address conveyance of 100% of 10-year flows under sidewalk areas, in order to assure compliance with Development Standards 2-08.5.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F;
10. Existing ground elevations on the site do not appear to correspond with existing Public Improvement Plans on file. Please provide a basis of elevation based on City of Tucson datum with Book and Page noted. Please ensure all elevations provided in the report and on the exhibits correspond with established elevations.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN:

1. Correct General Notes 1 and 2 to correspond with this site. Provide a local basis of elevation and indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson datum with Book and Page noted. Please ensure all elevations provided on the plan correspond with established elevation - see Paving Improvement Plan # I-85-18 (DS 2-05.23 E);
2. Revise the proposed fence location where depicted traversing through the eastern retention/detention basin. The fence should enclose all improvements on the property, including retention/detention areas, if this is the intent;
3. Revise curb return radii at the western driveway entrance to conform with figure 6 of Development Standard 3-01.3.2 C;
4. Provide recordation information for Macarthur Circle right of way, type and dimensioned width of paving, curb, curb cuts, and sidewalks (DS 2-05.2.3 C);
5. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, width, location and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Please refer to additional requirements listed under this Standard to ensure complete conformance with all easement requirements (DS 2-05.2.3B);
6. Please ensure all utility information is provided in accordance with the items listed in (DS 2-05.2.3 D);
7. Provide locations and types of drainage structures such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings, pipe culverts, etc. Please ensure all curb openings for drainage conveyance discussed in the report are depicted on the plan, with widths noted (DS 2-05.2.4 H 3);
8. Draw locations and indicate types of runoff acceptance points and site runoff discharge points with Q100's and corresponding drainage areas with flow arrows (DS 2-05.2.4 H 3);
9. Depict new 4' wide (minimum) sidewalks along all street frontages, 3' from back of curb. New sidewalks are required as a part of development of all properties along the entire length of street frontages (DS 2-05.2.4 L & 3-01.3.3A);
10. Depict any proposed refuse provision onsite. Please ensure full conformance to Development Standards 2-05.2.4 T and 6-01.0;
11. Depict sidewalk scuppers, fully labeled and dimensioned, for conveyance of 100% of 10-year flows under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.5.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F);
12. The Plan identifies an existing edge of pavement, yet observations of 2002 aerial photographs do not indicate any pavement onsite. Please clarify this callout note, ensure its accuracy, and revise if necessary;
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The Development Plan and Drainage Report were reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. A grading plan/permit application will be required with appropriate Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submittal documents prior to grading of the site. The grading permit should be accompanied by 3 sets of SWPPP's with text, addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this project. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html.
Resubmittal will require a revised Development Plan and Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report addressing the comments provided above.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
11/24/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D-3-0042 Federal Express Parking Lot

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-60-39 (Annex) & C9-81-85

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO

COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/24/2003

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(X) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 11/21/2003
11/24/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. The curb return radii at the western side of the development shall be a minimum of 18' not 10' as currently depicted.

2. "Meet" is misspelled in general note 4.

3. In general note 7, the Development Standard cited is incorrect. It should read "...Development Standard 3-1.0" vice 3-10.0

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
11/25/2003 CRAIG GROSS OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
11/25/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 26, 2004.

2. Remove all reference numbers for rezoning cases except for C9-81-85. This should be the only case number referenced, all others do not apply to the subject property.
D.S. 2-05.2.1.K

3. List the name, address, and telephone number/s of the primary property owner of the site.
D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1

4. List the complete rezoning conditions for case C9-81-85. For a copy of the rezoning conditions please contact me at the number provided at the bottom of sheet 2.
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B2

5. This project has been assigned development plan case number D03-042. The development plan case number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans.
D.S. 2-02.2.2.B.2

6. Under the accessible parking calculation there is a reference to a handicap parking space being located at building location. Where is the Federal Express building (principal location for office/warehouse etc.) located. If the building is located immediately adjacent to the proposed parking lot and the parking spaces serve the adjacent building/lot, the lots should be combined to function as one consolidated site. If the building is located elsewhere please address in response letter. The latter scenario would allow for a stand alone parking lot. This review is based on a stand along parking lot. Additional comments may be forthcoming depending on the possibility of the lots functioning as one.
D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3

7. Add the following general note: "This project is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone criteria."
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10

8. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plan, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public.
D.S. 2-05.2.3.B/ D.S. 2-05.2.4.G

9. Label and dimension the Park Avenue future right-of-way and future curb location. Per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) plan, Park Avenue is designated as 120 total right-of-way. Face of future curb location is located nine (9) feet from future right-of-way line.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.E, .F

10. A back-up spur must be provided at the east end of the westernmost parking lot. Vehicle parking spaces may not be located in the back-up spur area. Remove the vehicle parking spaces and dimension the back-up spur area. Refer to D.S. 3-05.2.2.D for design criteria.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3

11. A 2002 aerial shows a striped parking lot located at the northeast corner of the site near the Park Avenue/MacArthur Circle intersection. This plan does not show a parking lot at that location. Has the parking lot been removed? If it is still there, it must be shown (fully dimensioned) on the plan and a copy of the cross access agreement must be provided. If that area is not proposed for parking demonstrate on the plan how vehicles will not be able to access that portion of the site.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.T/ LUC Sec. 3.4.3.2

12. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
11/25/2003 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no comment
11/28/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the landscape plans to include the entire parcel identified on the Development Plan. DS 2-07.2.0

2) Based on Engineering comments regarding the need for sidewalks adjacent to streets, landscape elements will require relocation. Revise the plans as necessary to locate street landscape borders behind required sidewalks.

3) Include the legal description for parcel on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B

4) Per condition of case number C9-85-81 a twenty-foot wide landscape border is required along Park Avenue. Revise all plans as necessary to include the landscape border.

5) A street landscape border is required along MacArthur Circle east of the designated project site to the Park Avenue right-of-way for existing or proposed development. LUC 3.7.2.4.

6) Portions of the site not included within the project limits are required to comply with the dust control provisions of LUC 3.7.2.7. Revise the landscape plans to identify ground plane surface treatments for all portions of the parcel (DG, seed mix, existing asphalt, etc.)

7) The NPP Application has been approved conditionally. Provide for temporary fencing to protect existing protected native plants to be preserved on the landscape and grading plans. Show limits of disturbance on the landscape plan.
DS 2-07.2.2.B

8) Revise the plans as requested by other agencies.