Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0041
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/20/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Based upon the materials received in support of the NPPO Exception request and the landscape plan, 2 palo verde trees will be removed from the site. Mitigation for these trees will be required if they are protected plants. Mitigation per LUC 3.8.6-I for two viable plants would equal 5-15 gal replacement trees of the same species. If one palo verde was proposed to be transplanted, only two additional transplants would be required. |
| 10/22/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 January 17, 2004 TO: Bruce Call, Bruce R. Call, AECM THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (representing Pima County Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Pantano /22nd Storage Expansion Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-0041 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management (PCWWM) Department. This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. Separate review letters from PDEQ and PCWWM representatives will not be prepared for this project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. All Sheets: All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D03-0041, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 2. It is my understanding that none of the structures shown on this lot will require water or sewer service, and the remainder of this letter is based on this understanding. If this understanding is not correct, this conditional approval is not valid, and your firm must contact me as soon as possible at 740-6563, so that a revised review letter can be prepared. 3. Sheet 1: Delete General Notes 10 & 11, and replace them with a note that states THIS PROJECT REQUIRES NO WATER OR SEWER SERVICE. 4. Sheet 1: Show the size (12") and plan number (I-83-212) for the existing public sewer line that crosses the property. 5. Sheet 1: PCWWM’s sewer maintenance vehicles must be able to travel the length of the 15' public sewer easement granted by Book 37, Page 29, M&P, that crosses this lot, at any time of the day or night, 365 days per year. Per Standard Detail WWM A-3, the proposed wrought iron fences that cross this sewer easement must have easement width gates with a 20' vertical clearance, and have a locking system that includes a PCWWM padlock. The property owner must maintain the gates so that they are fully operable at all times. The gates and the easement must be fully accessible to PCWWM personnel, heavy sanity sewer maintenance vehicles and construction equipment 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Show these gates on the development plan. 6. Sheet 1: The proposed new buildings and parking canopies may not be relocated or reconfigured during the construction process in any manner such that they will encroach into the sewer easement. 7. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 10/22/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire hydrants required. Add a General Note to the plan stating:"Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code." |
| 10/22/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0041 PANTANO/22ND STORAGE EXPANSION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 22, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete directions from all street names in Location Map. Add Book 37, Page 29 to Legal description in Title Block. Number buildings numerically. If this is to be an addition to the existing 22nd Street Self-storage, number the buildings in sequential order with the existing buildings. jg |
| 11/17/2003 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen Planning Technician Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-041 Pantano/22nd Street; Storage Expansion 1st Review TRANSMITTAL: November 17, 2003 DUE DATE: November 17, 2003 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 20, 2004. 2. This property appears to be located within the area described in the annexation ordinance (Ordinance No. 6503; Section 5) which limits the uses allowed to those within the P-I zone. The specifics of the affected property are described in Pima County rezoning case C09-80-198. The allowed uses are also affected by the covenants identified in Section 5 of the annexation ordinance. The covenants are identified as Pima County Docket 7255, pages 1193 and 1194. Please provide the above identified Pima County rezoning case along with the previously identified covenants. The configuration of the current submittal is more consistent with the description of Personal Storage rather than Commercial Storage as defined in the Land Use Code. It appears that Mayor and Council may need to revise the annexation agreement to allow the expansion of the apparent non-conforming use. LUC Sec. 6.3.11.2 &6.3.11.4 3. It appears that setbacks and a required wall may also be affected by Annexation Ordinance 6503, Section 5, Pima County Rezoning Case C09-80-198 and the covenants recorded as Pima County Docket 7255, pages 1193 and 1194. The Pima County documents must be provided in order to allow for a complete review. Please be aware that the City cannot provide a complete review until all the County documents have been provided. 4. This Development Plan appears to be an expansion of an existing site. Therefore, the entire site must be presented as an expansion of the previously approved and existing development plan. In addition, a lot combination shall also be required. This apparent expansion also appears to be a greater than twenty-five percent (25%) expansion and therefore requires full code compliance for the entire site. LUC Sec. 3.3.3.12 5. Provide the Section and Township with the project-location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3 6. List all zoning variances or modification, such as Lot Development Options (LDOs) or Project Design Options (PDOs) that may be applicable to the expansion of the project. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 7. This property is subject to annexation requirements. The annexation ordnance should also be provided and identified as an annexation ordnance. The rezoning case number would then be more clearly related to the annexation. The conditions of development must also be listed as a note. DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 8. All proposed easements, if any, must be drawn on the plan. These easements must be clearly delineated and dimensioned on the site plan with the recordation information and stated purpose for ease easement. DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Dimension all parking area access lanes (PAALs). The PAALs on both the east and west of the proposed structures have not been dimensioned. LUC Sec 3.3.7.2 10. The proposed enclosed storage structure shall require one loading zone. Please provide calculations for the entire project. DS 2-05.2.4.O LUC Sec 3.4.5.2 11. Show all on site pedestrian circulation. Note pedestrian refuge areas are required along PAALs adjacent to structures. DS 2-05..4.K & DS 2-08 12. The proposed enclose storage structure shall also have required parking of one (1) space per four thousand (4000) square feet in addition to the minimum of two (2) spaces for any associated office. There is also bicycle parking required for such an office. Please provide updated parking calculations. DS 2-05.2.4.P & DS 3-05 & LUC Sec 3.3.4 13. The requirements for vehicle parking, bicycle parking, and loading zones cannot be determined without the entire site for the development plan being submitted. In addition, there may be other condition and requirements that cannot be identified and /or determined without a complete development plan. 14. Please note that any and all changes made to this Development Plan must also be made to the Landscape Plan, the Grading Plan and any additional sheet developed for this project. 15. The number of handicapped parking spaces cannot be determined until the full development plan is submitted. Please provide details for all accessible parking spaces and ramps. Calculations must also be provided. DS 2-05.2.4.P & ICC/ANIS-A117.1-1998, 2002 IBC If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St.Paul, (520) 791-5608. |
| 11/17/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: PANTANO/22ND STORAGE EXPANSION D03-0041 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated October 16, 2003. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation of electrical facilities due to this project will be billable to the developer. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans if an additional service is required. Submit the plans a minimum of six (6) weeks prior to requiring service. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tep.com office (520) 884-3879 pager (520) 218-6565 fax (520) 770-2002 |
| 11/17/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | To: Craig Gross DATE: November 17, 2003 Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT:Pantano/22nd Storage Expansion Development Plan D03-0041 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Sections 20 and 21 RESUBMITTAL NOT REQUIRED. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) have been reviewed. At this time the Engineering Division recommends approval of the DP for Pantano/22nd Storage Expansion. The DS was accepted for the purposes of the DP review. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or lmakus1@ci.tucson.az.us Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 11/17/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0041 Pantano/22nd Storage Expansion 11/13/03 ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (ü) Other (grading plan) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-95 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: November 17, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached (requires Mayor and Council Approval for Change of Conditions prior to resubmittal) ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: October 28, 2003 1. A major restriction of the I-1 zone as stated in Ordinance Number 6503 and 6750 relating to annexation zoning case number C9-85-95, requires this zone to conform to the Park Industrial (P-I) zone, except as modified by the Mayor and Council. Property must also adhere to the covenants specified and recorded in Pima County Docket 7255, pages 1193 and 1194. P-I zone in the Land Use Code (LUC), does not allow for personal storage. The development plan calls out the use as commercial storage, but plans as drawn, would indicate that the use is personal storage. In order for it to be developed as personal storage the applicant would be require to file for a "Change of Conditions" through the Rezoning Section of Development Services. Also a copy of the above mentioned docket and page should be provided for review as this is a condition of annexation. 2. All conditions of annexation for case C9-85-95 should be placed on the development plan. Please refer to Ordinance numbers 6503, 6750, and 9441 for these conditions. 3. Please change general note 3 indicating the use of the property as being personal storage. 4. A site-specific traffic access study is required per annexation condition 1d. The responsibility of reviewing this will lie with Transportation Engineering. Please provide. 5. A hydrologic drainage report is required if deemed necessary by the City's Floodplain Engineering Section and Pima County Flood Control District. Please contact them and provide copy as required by annexation condition 2.a. Any flooding problems, which may exist, must be fully in compliance with City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations. 6. A covenant to the effect that there will be no further subdividing or lot splitting without written approval of the Mayor and Council per annexation condition 4. |
| 11/18/2003 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 11/19/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. The curb return radii at the entrance shall be a minimum of 18'. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 11/20/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 11/20/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 11/24/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: December 04, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0041 Pantano/22nd Storage Expansion: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the tentative plat and has the following comments: Development plan is denied until agreement can be reached between the develop/owner and Parks and Recreation regarding dedication of a corridor for the Pantano River Park. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |