Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D03-0039
Parcel: 141185560

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0039
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/13/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/22/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207
Carmine DeBonis, Jr. PHONE: (520) 740-6586
Director FAX: (520) 740-6380
January 27, 2004
TO: William B. Carnell
THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson Development Services
FROM: Brandon Matheson, E.I.T.
Development Review Division (Wastewater)
SUBJECT: Springs Gymnastics Training Facility Addition – Development Plan
1st Submittal
D03-039
The above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management
Department. The following comments are offered for your use:
1. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in
the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This project will be tributary to
the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast and Santa Cruz
Interceptors. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or
conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this
date.
2. Based upon our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee
rates.
3. Add the subdivision plat case number, D03-039, to the title block of each sheet. This number
should be shown larger or bolder than the cross-reference numbers.
4. SHEET 1: Add the township, range and section to the Location Map.
5. SHEET 1: Add cross-reference numbers D01-016 and C12-95-33 to the title block.
6. SHEET 1: Show and label all involved existing public sewer lines with correct size(s) (diameters)
and county plan number(s). The connecting public sewer, G-2000-102, shown on the included
reference development plan D01-016 has not yet been released by Pima County for use.
Indicate whether or not this sewer line has been built and exists on this property.
7. SHEET 1: Show how the existing building is connected to the public sewer. Is the existing
building connected to public sewer G-95-018 running in Old Vail Road?
Page 2
8. SHEET 1: Show and label full length of existing on-site public sewer easement(s). If G-2000-102
is not going to be built, this easement will need to be abandoned and labeled as such.
9. We will require a complete set of revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these
comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.
The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. The review fee is $50 per revised
sheet for the second submittal. If the second submittal will include 1 revised sheets, a check for
$5000 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines
and response letter. If the number of revised sheets changes, please adjust the review fee
accordingly.
If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6315.
Brandon Matheson, E.I.T.
Development Review Division (Wastewater)
Copy: Project
10/22/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0039 SPRINGS GYMNASTICS TRAINING / DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: October 21, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1: Label Township, Range on Location Map.

2: Correct 9267 Old Vail Rd. To 9267 E. Old Vail Rd in Title Block.

3: Label adjacent Lot numbers.

4: Label Precision Avenue.
10/24/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D03-0039 Springs Gymnastics Training 10/23/03

() Tentative Plat
(XXXX) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
(XXXX) Other –NPPO Plan

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: ESMOND

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: n/a

COMMENTS DUE BY: November 10, 2003

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10/21/03
11/05/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT:        SPRINGS GYMNASTICS TRAINING
        D03-0039

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated September 28, 2003.  It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com
(520) 884-3882
11/12/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
11/13/2003 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: November 13, 2003
Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus
Engineering Division


SUBJECT: Springs Gymnastics Training
Development Plan D03-0039 (First Review)
T15S, R15E, Section 27

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Engineering Section has reviewed the Development Plan for the Springs Gymnastics Training Facility and does not recommend approval at this time. The Engineering Section did not receive a copy of the drainage report. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Provide a drainage report showing how the 5-year threshold retention and balanced basin detention requirements will be met. Also show 100-year water surface elevations, ponding limits, and discharge locations. (DS 2-05.2.4.H)
2. Show that 100% of the 10-year flow will be conveyed under the sidewalks and pedestrian circulation Paths. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
3. Provide and label existing and future sight visibility triangles per City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 2-05.2.4.R.
4. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Show how stormwater will be directed to the water harvesting areas to the maximum extent possible. (LUC 3.7.4.3.B and LUC 3.7.1.1.A.4)

Provide a detailed response letter showing how each of the comments has been addressed.
If you have any questions or if you wish to schedule a meeting, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or lmakus1@ci.tucson.az.us.
Loren Makus
Senior Engineering Associate
11/13/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the landscape plan to provide for revegation of any
areas disturbed in the course of creating the proposed retention basin. LUC 3.7.4.3, DS 10-01.0

2) Relocation of protected plants identified as preserved in place in the first phase changes the mitigation required for the project. Per LUC 3.8.6.2.C "Each native plant which is salvaged and transplanted on-site to meet the minimum requirements of Sec. 3.8.6.2.A.2 and Sec. 3.8.6.2.A.3 shall be supplemented with one (1) additional plant of the same genus and species as listed in Table 3.8.6-I. Revise the plans to include any required mitigation plantings.

3) List the sizes of all protected plants to be transplanted or replaced on the landscape plan.

4) Clarify if portions of the property are to remain natural desert as indicated in the previous plans. Show the limits of grading on the landscape plan.

5) Show locations of protective fencing required to protect any remaning natural areas. DS 2-06. Figure 1, DS 2-15.5.0

6) Identify any protected plants to be preserved on the site and include provisions for protective fencing. DS 2-15.5.0

7) Show the locations of individual plants used to meet the street landscape border requirements. A minimum of one tree for every thirty three feet of street frontage is required.
Also 50% vegetative coverage of the street landscape border is required. LUC 3.7.2.4
11/13/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 12, 2004.

2. Per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.10.C.1.b, Educational Uses (Instructional School) is not permitted in the Davis Monthan Approach-Departure Corridor (ADC). For further information regarding the expansion of an existing non-conforming use please contact the Zoning Administrator's office at 791-5550. If the Zoning Administrator's office determines that the expansion may be allowed for this use, the following comments must be addressed to receive Zoning Review development plan approval.

3. Note the applicable annexation case number C12-95-33 and previous development plan case number D01-016 in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans.
D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.K

4. This project has been assigned development plan case number D03-0039. Please note the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans.
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2

5. Revise the existing use to "Gymnastic School".
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3

6. Under the lot coverage calculation revise the total building area to 18,880 S.F.

7. Revise keynote 4 to state 45' ½ R.O.W.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.F

8. Dimension the width of all new PAAL's.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3

9. Dimension the width of the sidewalk area in front of the proposed building.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.K

10. Correct the proposed F.A.R. from .08 to .137. (11,880/86,551 =.137)
D.S. 2-05.2.4.M

11. Dimension the back-up spur radii. Three (3) foot radii required.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3

12. Under the vehicle parking calculation, please note the number of vehicle parking spaces required and provided. In addition, provide the number of handicap parking spaces required and provided.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.P

13. Provide the bicycle parking calculation based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520)791-5608.