Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0038
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/08/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 10/8/03. Phase 1 is approved 10/29/03. |
| 10/09/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Needs Review | |
| 10/09/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0038 RITA RANCH MEDICAL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 9, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Number buildings numerically on Sheet 2. |
| 10/23/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: RITA RANCH MEDICAL CENTER D03-0038 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated October 2, 2003. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Submit your plans a minimum of eight (8) weeks prior to requiring service. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com (520) 884-3882 |
| 10/24/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0038 Rita Ranch Medical Center 10/23/03 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-84-84 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: November 3, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10/21/03 |
| 11/03/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-038 Rita Ranch Medical Center TRANSMITTAL: November 3, 2003 DUE DATE: November 3, 2003 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 6, 2004. LUC 5.3.8.2 2. Place the development plan number (D03-038) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. The proposed Medical Service-Outpatient use in the O-3 zone is subject to LUC Section 3.5.4.8.B, which reads: "Blood donor centers are not allowed". Please add a note so stating. LUC 2.4.3.2.A.6 4. Dimension the width of access drives at the entrances to the site. DS 2-05.2.4.D 5. It is understood from the submitted phasing plan that this project is to be developed in two phases. Please add the phasing plan to the development plan set, either as part of sheet C2 or as a separate sheet (C3) at the same scale as the development plan drawing. Provide all calculations, such as vehicle parking, h/c parking, bicycle parking, and FAR, to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase. For phase 1, proposed vehicle parking does not appear to meet the LUC requirement of 1 space per 175 square feet of floor area. Please revise. DS 2-05.2.4.C 6. Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation which includes the proposed FAR. The proposed FAR (proposed gross floor area ÷ site area) would be calculated as 40,518 S.F. GFA ÷ 228,651 S.F. site = 0.18. LUC 3.2.3.2.B 7. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 8. Remove the scale and the north arrow which are located to the left of the location map on sheet C1 as they do not apply to this sheet. 9. Indicate the location of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking on the development plan drawing. On the class 2 bicycle parking detail #3, indicate that there is a full five-foot aisle available adjacent to the racks for maneuverability of bicycles per DS 2-09. DS 2-09.6.2 10. Dimension the depth of the two backup spurs at the south end of parking lot. A minimum 3-foot backup spur is required with an additional 3-foot clear area for vehicle overhang behind the end of backup spur. DS 3-05.2.2.D 11. Show the location of Rita Road's future curb and sidewalk on the drawing. The street perimeter yard building setback along Rita Road (MS&R) is required to be the greater of 21 feet or the height of exterior building wall measured from back of future curb location. Revise setback line on drawing to be dimensioned from back of future curb and revise the setback data to specify that the 21' or height of structure MS&R setback is measured from back of future curb . DS 2-05.2.4.F & .L LUC 3.2.6.5 12. Building setbacks to adjacent O-3 zoned property are required to be 0 feet. Revise perimeter yard bldg. setback lines on the drawing and the setback data (under zoning and setback notes) to read zero feet (0') to the south and west properties, which are zoned O-3. LUC 3.2.6.4 13. If future curb location is different from existing curb location, add future sight visibility triangles. DS 2-05.2.4.I & .R 14. Label the dimensions of the proposed buildings. DS 2-05.2.4.N 15. Dimension the loading zones provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O 16 If any freestanding signage or lighting is proposed for this project, please indicate on the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.W 17. Add to the parking space detail the handicap access ramps, fully dimensioned, and their maximum slope. Also, add the concrete wheelstop to the h/c parking space typical detail. ANS/ IBC 18. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 11/04/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: November 4, 2003 Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT: Rita Ranch Medical Center. Development Plan D03-0038 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 22 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Drainage Report and Revised Development Plan The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) have been reviewed. At this time the Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan and Drainage Report for Rita Ranch Medical Center. The drainage report was reviewed for the purposes of the Development Plan review. Drainage Report Comments: Revise the drainage report to provide the required 5-year threshold retention and to provide balanced basin detention. The regional basins do not provide retention and detention is available to projects discharging directly to the regional drainageways. Show how the pedestrian circulation paths and sidewalks will be kept flood free for up to 10-year frequency floods. (DS 2-08.3.1 and 2-08.4.1.E) Development Plan Comments: Show how that grading, hydrology and landscaping plans will be designed to make maximum use of site stormwater runoff for supplemental irrigation purposes. (LUC 3.7.4) Revise the Development Plan to accommodate changes in the drainage report. A grading permit and stormwater pollution prevention plan will be required for this project. If you have any questions or if the applicant wishes to set up a meeting to address these comments, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or lmakus1@ci.tucson.az.us Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate C:/ Rita Ranch Medical Center. |
| 11/04/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. label SVT's with dimensions (ie 20x110) 2. label dimension of curb return radii for entrances onto Rita Road. They are required to be 25' (min) 3. The symbol used to denote signs in not correct IAW PC/COT SDPI 1994 ed SD 100. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 11/05/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 11/05/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per LUC 3.8.6.2.A.3 "At least thirty (30) percent of each genus and species of other Viable Protected Native Plant shall be preserved-in-place or salvaged and transplanted on-site." Revise the native plant preservation plan to meet the minimum requirements. Revise the landscape plan as necessary. 2) "The height of a screen adjacent to a property line or along a street frontage is the vertical distance measured on the development side of the screen from the finished grade at the base of the screen at all points along the screen to the top of the screen". Clarify that proposed or existing walls on the perimeter of the site meet the mimimum height requirements of LUC Table 3.7.2-I by including reference points for measurement. Loading and refuse area screening is to be a minimum of six feet high. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 3) The landscape border along Rita Road is required to measure at least ten feet wide at all points along the entire street frontage. Revise the plans to provide the minimum buffer width adjacent to the parking area. 4) Additional screening may be required for the vehicular use area adjacent to Rita Road. The screen is required to be located at the back or behind the street landscape border in compliance with DS 2-06.3.7. 5) Provide calculations % of groundcover for the street landscape border. The minimum requirement is fifty % and does include any plantings used to meet the screening requirements. DS 2-06.3.7, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.G |
| 11/05/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 11/05/2003 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 11/05/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 5, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0038 Rita Ranch Medical Center: DP CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |