Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/16/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 12/16/03. |
| 12/17/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 January 09, 2004 TO: Rick Bright, Rick Bright Architect, AIA, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (representing Pima County Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Kalamazoo Materials Development Plan - 1st & 2nd Submittals D03-0037 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management (PCWWM) Department. This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. Separate review letters from PDEQ and PCWWM representatives will not be prepared for this project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Rick Bright Architect, AIA, Inc. elected to make the 2nd submittal of this tentative plat, before this office had reviewed the 1st submittal, with the understanding that this would not create any obligation by this office to approve the 2nd submittal, or to expedite any necessary subsequent submittals. This office reviewed the 2nd submittal in the 1st submittal’s place in our queue of plans to review. The following comments apply to the 2nd submittal: 2. This project will be tributary to the South Rillito West (North Line) Interceptor and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. Per PCWWM Planning Services, the amount of available treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system is limited, but treatment and conveyance capacity for this small development is currently available. 3. We have determined that this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 4. Sheets D1.1 & D1.2: Add a Utility Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS. (with the blanks appropriately filled in per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F).) The number of proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents should include those for both the Phase I and the Phase II buildings. 5. Sheets D1.1 & D1.2: Add a Utility Note that states: CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 6. Sheets D1.1 & D1.2: If the design flow of the proposed private sewage collection lines is equal to or greater than 3000 gpd, using the Unit Flows Table found in Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapter 9, add the following Utility Note: CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 7. Sheets D1.1 & D1.2: Show the size of the proposed proposed sewer lines. Please note that a 4" Building Connection Sewer (BCS) line installed at 2% slope may carry the flow from no more than 256 wastewater fixture unit equivalents. 8. Sheets D1.1 & D1.2: If a 6" BCS line must be used, the connection to existing 8" public sewer line G-226 must be made a manhole. Revise if necessary. 9. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the 2nd submittal. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above project does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 12/17/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0037 KALAMAZOO MATERIAL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: December 16, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED ON CONDITION THAT “RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGE 28” IS ADDED TO AMPHITHEATER ACRES ADDITION (IN LEGAL DESCRIPTION) ON ALL SHEETS. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 12/23/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0037 Kalamazoo Material 12/23/03 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-08 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: December 29, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 12/23/03 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0037 Kalamazoo Material 10/15/03 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-03-08 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: October 27, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 10/14/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force, Comments Kalamazoo Materials – 3832 N. Stone Avenue, D03-0037 The applicant’s request to rezone the property located at 3832 N. Stone Avenue that was approved by Mayor and Council is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions. The development plan needs to list and number all the rezoning conditions as approved by Mayor and Council. 2) The applicant on the development plan needs to indicate the tentative or most probable location for future cross access to the adjacent property located to the North. [Rezoning Condition no. 2] 3) Defer to Development Services for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 3 and 8. Defer to Tucson Police Department for comments and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 9. Defer to Traffic Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 10 and 11. 6) The development plan needs to indicate on the CMU Wall details that proposed walls will be constructed with graffiti-resistant materials. |
| 12/23/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate a legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing that are to be placed on the plan, preferably on the first sheet. D.S. 2-05.2.1.J Use symbols to indicate benchmarks, clean outs, etc… 2. Remove tax code numbers on adjacent lots. Relocate text that is within the new development and that overlays other text. 3. Indicate new legal description due to lot combination. Original lot lines are to be removed. Correct and revised. 4. Indicate the following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C 5. Indicate location of 20 foot ingress, egress with dimensions. Private drive also known as P.A.A.L. requires All-weather access. A gravel drive is not acceptable. Correct and revised. D.S. 3-01.4.4.E 6. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. The refuge area may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. D.S. 3-05.2.2.B The sidewalk next to the building indicates a 4 foot width without a one foot setback. Correct and revised. 7. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; (Stone Ave.) provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.2 8. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Use a light line weight for identifying utilities. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G 9. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. Remove various elevations along Stone Ave., too cluttered. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.4 10. The future location for the trash enclosure is not acceptable. The loading zone requires its own designated area. Correct and revise plan and demonstrate vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned for future refuse location. Gates are required, indicate what material will be used. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. As per your response to Engineering you commented "The Loading Zone and trash enclosure can overlap per a discussion with Craig Gross and John Clark". An approval letter signed by John Clark will be required indicating all phases of development. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T 11. Indicate existing and proposed SVT's. Far side is 345', Near side is 125'. Correct and revised. 12. A Grading Plan review is required. A grading review can be processed once Development Plan has been approved. |
| 12/26/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 29, 2004. 2. Previous comment has not been addressed: List the name, address, and telephone number of the developer of the project. D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1 3. Since the lots are to be combined, please provide a copy of the recorded City of Tucson lot combination covenant and a copy of the approved Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form. To obtain a copy of the covenant online go to http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Lot_Combo_Declaration.pdf or you may contact the Zoning Review Section. A copy of the Pima County Assessors tax combination form may be obtained at their office. D.S. 2-05.2.1.G.2 4. Per Craig Gross, please provide written approval (e-mail or letter) from John Clark to Craig Gross, which allows for the loading zone to be located in front of the refuse container in phase II. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T/ LUC Sec. 3.4.3.2 5. Since lots are to be combined into one, remove the interior lot lines shown on the plan. 6. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro or Patricia Gehlen, (520) 791-5608. |
| 12/29/2003 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Per re-zoning condition #10, if right of way dedication is required please submit the following to the Real Estate Division; 1. Legal description and sketch for the area to be dedicated. 2. Title report dated within 30 days. If right of way dedication is not required, disregard the above. |