Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D03-0036
Parcel: 116122810

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0036
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/17/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/19/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved 9/19/03.
09/29/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D03-0036
3D ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
PALO VERDE REALTY
09/29/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Needs Review
09/29/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0036 PALO VERDE REALTY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: September 26, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:


Delete direction from all street names on Location Map and on sheet 3.

Add recording Book and Page to El Rio Park in Legal Description.

Call 740-6480 to discuss possible need to change address from Saint Marys Road to Westmoreland Avenue.
10/03/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D03-0036 Palo Verde Realty 10/03/03

() Tentative Plat
(x) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-12

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Manzo Neighborhood Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: None

COMMENTS DUE BY: October 14, 2003

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(x) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( x ) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
( x ) Development Plan
(x) Landscape Plan
(x) Other – Elevation Drawings

REVIEWER: Eric Anderson 791-4505 DATE: 10/02/03

D03-0036, Palo Verde Realty
1322 W. Saint Marys Road


1. This development is subject to the conditions of rezoning case number C9-02-12. Please list the twenty-two (22) conditions on the development plan.

2. Site plans C.2 and C.3 show a scale of 1”=20’. Please change to the correct scale. Also, please place the word “North” at the proper location on all north arrows.

3. Condition #2 requires that elevations indicating colors of all existing and proposed structures shall be submitted at the time of development plan review. Please show this information on the site plan or submit as separate information to the Planning Task Force.

4. Condition #3 requires that all outdoor lighting in the off-street parking area shall be located below the height of the screen walls. Please change #7 in General Notes on drawing C.1 to state the condition. In addition, please show a drawing of how this condition will be addressed.

5. Condition #4 requires the screening of the dumpster from adjacent residential land uses and public right-of-ways. Please show the required screening on the site plans.

6. Condition #5 requires a six (6) feet high masonry wall located along the north property boundary with twenty-four (24) inch box canopy trees planted south of the wall a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet apart. The site plan shows a five (5) feet high masonry wall. In addition, the site plan has been altered in regards to the layout of the off-street parking on the property. This has created a site plan in which the required trees along the northern lot line are greater than twenty-five (25) feet apart. Please alter the site plan to adhere to condition #5 in its entirety.

7. Condition #6 requires the installation of a thirty (30) inch high masonry wall on the west side of the subject property. The site plan does not show the thirty (30) inch high masonry wall south of the point of ingress/egress along Westmoreland Avenue. Please show the thirty (30) inch high masonry wall between the point of ingress/egress and the show thirty (30) inch high masonry wall in front of the existing structure.

8. Condition #9 requires that a traffic directional sign shall be installed and maintained at the exit point onto Westmoreland Avenue. This sign is to direct traffic to Saint Mary’s Road. Please show this sign on the site plan.

9. Condition #10 requires that all masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. In addition, the condition states how the walls shall be decorated. Please show and state that the masonry screen walls will be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. Also, please show what decorative materials will be used in the construction of the walls. These two requests can be address by a wall detail on the Development Plan or the Landscape Plan.
10/14/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved From: "Castillo, Liza" <LCastillo@tucsonelectric.com>
To: 'Craig Gross' <cgross1@ci.tucson.az.us>, 'Ferne Rodriquez' <frodrig2@ci.tucson.az.us>
Date: 10/9/03 11:50AM
Subject: D03-0036, Palo Verde Realty

SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty
D03-0036

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan
dated September 16, 2003.

If existing service is to be increased, load plans will be necessary to
determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. Submit the plans
a minimum of six weeks prior to requiring service. If easements are
required, they will be secured by separate instrument

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com
(520) 884-3882
10/14/2003 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied COMMENTS
CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 16, 2003.

2. List the names, address, and telephone number of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project.
D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1

3. List the rezoning conditions on sheet C.1. Remover the title block "Restrictive Notes from Rezoning Case" on sheet C.1 and replace it with "Rezoning Conditions."
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2

4. Note the rezoning case number (C9-02-12) and development plan case number (D03-0036) in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans.
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B2

5. Add the following general note: "This project is designed to meet the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback zone criteria."
D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10

6. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plan, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public.
D.S. 2-05.2.3.B/ D.S. 2-05.2.4.G

7. Per general note four (4) sheet C.1, why is a cross access agreement required for this site? If it is not required please remove or abandon.

8. Provide the existing right-of-way information for Westmoreland Avenue and St. Mary's Road.
D.S. 2-05.2.3.C

9. If applicable, label and dimension the St. Mary's Road future right-of-way and future curb location.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.F

10. Detail handicapped parking and disabled access aisle. Detail access ramp.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.P

11. a) Provide a fully dimensioned Class II bicycle parking space detail. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria.
b) Under the bicycle parking calculation on sheet C.1, note the number of bicycle parking spaces provided.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q

12. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.R

13. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition number four (4).
D.S. 2-05.2.4.U

14. Per rezoning condition number five (5), a six (6) foot high masonry wall is required along the north property line. The plan shows a five (5) foot high masonry wall.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.U

15. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage including billboards and outdoor lighting.
D.S. 2-05.2.4.W

16. Under the Land Use Code Data on sheet C.1, revise "REG" to "REQ" and revise maximum building height from 26 feet to 16 feet as allowed by development designator 27.

17. What is the table under development designator on sheet C.1 for? Designator for the proposed use is 27 not 31 and the maximum allowed building height is 16 feet not 40 feet. Delete or revise as required.

18. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans.
D.S. 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608.
10/14/2003 DOUG WILLIAMS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Craig Gross, CDRC
SUBJECT: Palo Verde Realty
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: October 13, 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D03-0036
T14S, R13E, Section 11

Resubmittals Required: Development Plan/Landscape Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Drainage Report, Development Plan and Landscape Plans received on September 17, 2003. The drainage report is approved for Development Plan purposes. Approval of the Development and Landscape plans is not recommended at this time. Consulted and referenced for review of this project were the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS), the Pima County/City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual (DS 10-01.0) and the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM - DS 10-02.0). The following comments are offered:

DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
1. Please check the scale referenced on sheet C.2. It appears the scale referenced does not match the drawing (DS 2-05.2.1 B);
2. A small project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the Development Plan. If Sheet T1 is to be included as part of the Development Plan, then it must be identified as such. The location map must be drawn at a minimum scale of 3"= 1 mile (DS 2-05.2.1 D);
3. Correct the direction of north on Sheet C.2 (DS 2-05.2.1 H);
4. If a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer prepared the plans, provide the applicable registration or license number along with the seal and signature of the professional (DS 2-05.2.2 A 2);
5. Depict, label and dimension on the plan the ingress/egress and cross access easement identified in General Note #4, and all other easements of record (DS 2-05.2.3 B and DS 2-05.2.4 G);
6. Provide St. Mary's Road and Westmoreland Ave. right of way widths, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks (DS 2-05.2.3 C & 2-05.2.4 L);
7. Provide all utility information, including any sanitary and storm sewer data, as listed (DS 2-05.2.3D);
8. Provide the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson datum, with City Field Book and Page numbers provided (DS 2-05.2.3 E);
9. Depict and label all pertinent existing and future (MS&R) right of way information in accordance with DS 2-05.2.4 D 2 and DS 2-05.2.4 E & F, and Rezoning condition # 15);
10. The Development Plan (sheet C.2) must provide all drainage-related items listed under Development Standard 2-05.2.4 H (1-7), as applicable to this development. Please ensure the plan and the drainage report recommendations correspond with each other (DS 2-05.2.4 H);
11. Depict the future MS&R sight visibility triangles (SVT's). Future SVT's should originate at the future curb location (to be depicted on the plan), 11' from property line, per the MS&R cross section for pedestrian/utility areas in a 100' right of way (DS 2-05.2.4 I, R & DS 3-01.5.0);
12. Development Standard 6-01.0 requires a centralized onsite refuse provision for all commercial projects. The proposed location does not appear to be accessible from within the site as depicted, is proposed within a sight visibility triangle, and does not appear to be screened from the right of way or adjacent development (DS 6-01.2.2 A, DS 6-01.3.0, DS 6-01.4.1 A, E, L & M and 3-01.5.0). Revise the container storage location indicated on the plan, and provide written approval from Environmental Services Department (formerly Solid Waste Department) for curbside pickup, if proposed for this project (DS 6-01.0 and 3-01.5.0). Please note that additional comments may be provided from the Landscape reviewer regarding screening requirements.
13. Please address construction of new vertical curb along Westmoreland Avenue frontage and identify new vertical curbing to be constructed on sheet C.2, in accordance with rezoning condition #7. Contact Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) for Public Improvement Plan submittal and Right of Way improvements/permit requirements at 791-5100 (DS 2-05.2.3 C & 2-05.2.4 L);
14. Rezoning condition # 17 stipulates that any existing damaged sidewalk be replaced with new sidewalk. Replacement of new sidewalk at those locations where breaks are present, and a curb access ramp in accordance with Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Details for Public Improvements will be required at a minimum, along the Westmoreland Avenue frontage. Please provide a note indicating such on the plan and revise detail 13/C.4 accordingly (DS 3-01.3.3 A & DS 2-05.2.4 L);
15. Depict and label the retention/detention basins, fully dimensioned on the plan. Include basin details and cross-sections depicting top and bottom, any inlet/outlet details and elevations, side slopes and any proposed walls (DS 2-05.2.4 H 4 & SMDDFM 2.3.1.6 A);
16. Address roof drainage direction(s) and associated sidewalk scuppers for conveyance of 10-year flows, minimum, under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E, 2-08.5.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F);
17. Include reference to a directional sign to be installed and maintained at the egress onto Westmoreland Ave., directing traffic to proceed south onto St. Mary's Rd., in accordance with Rezoning condition # 9;

LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Demonstrate how water harvesting will be provided onsite to the maximum extent reasonably possible, per the City of Tucson's Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.7.4, and SMDDFM, Sec. 14.2.10 (DS 10-02.0).


Resubmittal will require a revised Development Plan and Landscape Plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Douglas Williams
Sr. Engineering Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
10/14/2003 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approv-Cond Per Zoning condition # 15, if any right of way dedication is required, please submit a legal description, sketch and title report dated within 30 days to the Real Estate Division.
10/14/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. On sheet C.2 the north arrow is oriented incorrectly and the scale is mislabeled.

2. The SVT's are mislabeled as to NEAR and FAR sides. The Near side SVT is the one that extends to the south. The near side SVT should be 20x185.

3. The driveway requires 18' radius curb returns.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
10/15/2003 CRAIG GROSS OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
10/15/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: October 14, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0036 Palo Verde Realty: DP

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has no comments.

Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
10/22/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Revise the landscape and screening calculations on sheet C3 to correctly identify required screening.

2) Correctly identify the scale noted on the landscape and other plans.

3) Revise the landscape plans to locate plants such as caesalpinia pulcherrima outside of any sight visibility triangles
which affect the site. Plants located in SVT's must be a type that does not typically exceed thirty inches in height.

4) Revise the note regarding decomposed granite on sht. C.3 to include dust control treatment for any adjacent right-of-way areas between the property line and the curb.
LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3

5) A thirty inch high masonry screen is required in front of the handicap parking space. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, C9 02-12

6) A six foot high wall is required along the north property boundary. C9 02-12 Show and identify all walls on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2

7) Provide a screened storage area for refuse containers.
C9 02-12

8) The landscape border required along St. Mary's is to be located based on the MS&R right of way line. Show the line on the LP and DP. LUC 3.7.2.4

9) The street landscape borders are to be a minimum of ten- feet wide along the entire street frontage. Dimension landscape areas on the landscape plan.

10) Provide calculations for vegetative coverage of the street landscape borders. A minimum of fifty percent coverage is required. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

11) Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8