Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D03-0034
Parcel: 138241050

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0034
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/05/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/08/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved 9/8/03.
09/12/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D03-0034
A. C. TSANG ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
MIDVALE FARMS MEDICAL CLINIC
09/16/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Needs Review
09/16/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0034 MIDVALE FARMS MEDICAL CLINIC / DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: September 15, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1: Delete La Cholla Blvd. from Location Plan.

2: Correct Sec. 5 to Sec. 15 in Location Plan.
09/18/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D03-0034 Midvale Farms Medical Clinic 9/17/03

( ) Tentative Plat
(ü) Development Plan
(ü) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
(ü) Other (NPPO Exception)

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-83-34

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A

COMMENTS DUE BY: September 24, 2003

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(ü) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(ü) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( ) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: September 16, 2003


Midvale Farms Medical Clinic
D03-0034

1. In General Note 2, please correct existing zoning from CI-1, which is a county zoning designation to I-1, the City zoning designation. This correction will not require a resubmittal to the Comprehensive Planning Task Force. Verification that correction was made will be done by the Zoning Review Section of Development Services.
09/26/2003 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: September 26, 2003
Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus
Engineering Division


SUBJECT: Midvale Farms Medical Clinic
Development Plan D03-0034 (First Review)
T15S, R13E, Section 15

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan.

The Engineering Section has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report for the Midvale Farms Medical Clinic and does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was accepted for Development Plan review purposes only. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Provide and label existing and future sight visibility triangles per City of Tucson Development Standard (DS) 2-05.2.4.R.
2. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks and pedestrian circulation Paths. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
3. The landscape diagram for the retention/detention basin on the landscape plan does not seem to match the diagrams in the drainage report and on the development plan. Revise the plans to be consistent.
4. Revise the dumpster location so that the solid waste vehicles will not be required to back up more than 40 feet. (DS 6-01.4.1.C)
5. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Show how stormwater will be directed to the water harvesting areas to the maximum extent possible. (LUC 3.7.4.3.B and LUC 3.7.1.1.A.4)
6. Provide the contour interval with the north arrow and scale. (DS 2-05.2.1.H)
7. Describe the symbol drawn between the loading area and the retention basin. If the symbol represents a river rock or rip rap lined swale, provide a detail and show that 100-year flows will be contained. (DS 2-05.2.1.J)
8. Provide minimum 18 foot curb return radii for the curb cut into Commerce Court per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson, Section 5.5.

Provide a detailed response letter showing how each of the comments has been addressed.
If you have any questions or if you wish to schedule a meeting, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or lmakus1@ci.tucson.az.us.
Loren Makus
Senior Engineering Associate
10/02/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT:        MIDVALE FARMS MEDICAL CLINIC
        D03-0034

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated September 3, 2003.  It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. 

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com
(520) 884-3882
10/02/2003 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Planning Technician Principal Planner

PROJECT:
D03-0034
Midvale Farms Medical Clinic
First Review
TRANSMITTAL: October 2, 2003
DUE DATE: October 2, 2003


COMMENTS CODE SECTION/
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 11, 2004.

2. All lettering and dimensions on the development plan shall be in twelve (12) point type or greater.
DS 2-05.2.1.C
3. Identify conditions within the location map such as major streets and routes and watercourses. Correctly identify the section, on the section, township and range portion of the location map.
DS 2-05.2.1.D.2
DS 2-05.2.1.D.3
4. Provide the applicable annexation case number and subdivision name and case number in the lower right corner next to the title block. (See comment #6.)
DS 2-05.2.1.K
DS 2-05.2.2.B.8
5. In the General Notes identify the correct zoning. Also identify the development designator, the specific use. Include all of the "subject to" section(s) and provide those requirements on the development plan.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.1
LUC Sec 2.5.3.2.A
6. List any annexation requirements and the annexation case number, C9-83-34.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.7
7. Clearly depict, with dimensions, purpose and docket and page all existing and proposed public and private easements on the development plan.
DS 2-05.2.3.B
DS 2-05.2.4.G
8. Correctly identify all zoning on the properties adjacent to this project or across any public right of way on the development plan.
DS 2-05.2.4.B
9. Provide dimensions for the distance between the building and the property lines on all side of the building.
DS 2-05.2.4.I
10. The identification of the front setback has two arrows and two lines. Please correctly identify the dimension and the line.

11. Provide a fully dimensioned parking space typical including wheel stops.
DS 2-05.2.4.P
DS 3-05.2.3.C.2
12. In the General Notes list the number of loading spaces required and the number provided.
DS 2-05.2.4.O
LUC Sec 3.4.5.4
13. Provide fully dimensioned details for the off-street bicycle parking locations. Include the materials for lighting, paving, types of security, dimensions, the specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports.
DS 2-05.2.4.Q
14. In the General Notes provide the number of bicycle parking spaces required and the number provided.
LUC Sec 3.3.4
15. Indicate the location and type of postal service.
DS 2-05.2.4.V
16. If applicable, provide the locations and types of any proposed signs.
DS 2-05.2.4.W
17. The area identified as "left vacant for future development" must also be identified as not to be graded or must be covered with D.G.

18. Outpatient medical facilities must provide twenty percent of the parking provided as accessible parking.
DS 2-05.2.4.P
ICC/ANSI-A.1-1998
19. At least one of the accessible parking spaces provided must be designed as a van accessible space with a minimum of an eight (8) foot wide space and an eight (8) foot wide access aisle. This space must be designated as a Van Accessible Space.
DS 2-05.2.4.P
ICC/ANSI-A.1-1998
20. Provide a fully dimensioned detail(s) of the accessible parking provided.
DS 2-05.2.4.P
ICC/ANSI-A.1-1998

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call , (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc
10/02/2003 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Case Number: D03-0034
Project Name: Midvale Farms Medical Clinic
Estimated Traffic Generation: 77 trips

If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me.

Sandy White
Research & Statistical Analyst
Pima Association of Governments
ph: 520-792-1093 x108
fax: 520-792-9151
swhite@pagnet.org
10/02/2003 JIM STOYANOFF COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment.
10/03/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond The Landscape Section recommends approval of the Development Plan. Submit any revisions for review.

The NPP application is approved.
10/03/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. Label the dimensions of the SVT's at the access point to the site (ie 20x110).

2. Show SVT's at the NW corner of Midvale Park Rd. and Commerce Court and label as above.

3. Install 18' radius curb returns from the access point onto Commerce Court.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
10/06/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved NO COMMENTS