Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0032
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/09/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 October 20, 2003 TO: Steven C. Shell, Architect THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: AGM Container Controls Development Plan - 1st and 2nd Submittals D03-032 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Your firm elected to make the 2nd submittal of this development plan, before the 1st submittal had been reviewed by this office. For this reason, the 1st submittal was not reviewed, and the 2nd submittal was reviewed in the 1st submittal’s place in our queue of plans to review. The following comments pertain to the 2nd submittal. 2. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 3. Based on the previously approved development plans (under case numbers, CD9-85-79 and D98-035) for AGM Container, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 4. Sheet DP-1: There are no public sewers on the site. Delete the note that reads, ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 5. Sheet DP-1: Add a note showing the number of proposed and existing wastewater fixture unit equivalents for this project. The number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents must be calculated per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F). 6. Sheet DP-1: Show the existing public sewer line and manholes in Fort Lowell Road, and label it with it’s plan number (G-145) and it’s size (10"). 7. Sheet DP-1: Show the existing public sewer line and manholes in Palo Verde Boulevard, and label it with it’s plan number (G-223) and it’s size (8"). 8. Sheet DP-1: This project will discharge to the Pima County’s public sewer system via an existing 4" private sewer line located on the adjacent property to the east. Have you verified that the slope and condition of the existing 4" private sewer line is sufficient to carry the combined flow from these properties? If not, please do so, now. 8. The unsigned Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement for the shared private sewer line faxed to me on this date by Ms. Ellen Howlett, Treasurer of AGM Container contained several spelling errors. Please be aware that I have faxed a marked-up copy of this Agreement back to Ms. Howlett for correction. 9. The Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement must be signed and recorded before the COT CDRC can approve this development plan. Provide this office with a copy of the recorded Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement for our records. 10. Sheet DP-1: Revise the label that currently reads, EXIST 4" SEWER PER JOINT USE ACCESS EASEMENT so that it reads, EXIST. SHARED 4" PRIVATE SEWER SEE JOINT USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PER DOCKET , PAGE . with the blanks appropriately filled in with the proper recording information. 11. Please consider redrawing this development plan using a CADD system, removing all struck-out language and clouding, to make it more readable. This item is not a requirement, but please note that in its current form, this development plan does not have the professional appearance to reflect well on your firm. 12. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. Please include a $50.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. (Although the next submittal of this project will be the third submittal to the CDRC, but the second (2nd) submittal wastewater review fees will apply, as your firm elected to make the second submittal before first submittal was reviewed. If other sheets are revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 10/09/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0032 AGM CONTAINER CONTROLS, INC./REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 8, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 10/13/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-032 AGM Container Controls, Inc. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: October 13, 2003 DUE DATE: October 20, 2003 The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following change on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Revise the restrictions that the manufacturing use is subject to as follows: LUC 3.5.5.1.B, .D, .E, .F, and .H. LUC 2.7.1.2.A.2 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 10/16/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0032 AGM Container Controls, Inc. 10/15/03 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other (PDO-02-04) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-79, C9-77-32, C10-86-92 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: October 20, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 9/17/2003 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other (Photos of Surrounding Area) REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: October 13, 2003 |
| 10/22/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |