Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/18/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 8/18/03. |
| 08/20/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0031 JEFFERY A STANLEY ENGINEERING CATALINA PEDIATRICS |
| 08/21/2003 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: August 21, 2003 Planning Administrator FROM: Loren Makus Engineering Division SUBJECT: Catalina Pediatrics Development Plan D03-0031 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Engineering Section has reviewed the Development Plan (DP) for Catalina Pediatrics and does not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with the re-submittal. 2. Provide a copy of the previously approved development plan and supporting drainage studies. 3. Indicate proposed ground elevations throughout the site to provide reference for proposed grading and drainage. Label a sufficient number of points to establish drainage patterns and to show that no drainage will be directed to Swan Road Wash. (DS 2-05.2.4.H) 4. Provide and label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-05.2.4.R. 5. Show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks and pedestrian circulation Paths. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 6. Demonstrate that existing solid waste containers will provide sufficient capacity for the new development or provide a new container location. 7. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Show how stormwater will be directed to the water harvesting areas to the maximum extent possible. 8. Provide a legend showing and describing all symbols used on the plan. (DS 2-05.2.1.J) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or lmakus1@ci.tucson.az.us. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 08/21/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 21, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0031 Catalina Pediatrics: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has no comments. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 08/25/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 October 22, 2003 TO: Jeff Stanley, Jeff Stanley Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E. Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Catalina Pediatric Development Plan -1st Submittal D03-031 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: As per our meeting on October 8, 2003 we agreed to replace the first submittal of plans with corrected plans. It was our understanding there would be a $100.00 fee with the new plans and the review would be considered the first and second reviewed combined. A response letter would not be done until we received the revised plans. In addition, we would clarify with Wastewater Management the issue regarding the flow through requirement for the rezoning condition and provide this information to you in timely manner. The information regarding flow through was provided to you on October 9, 2003 via a telephone call with Debbie Ketchem. As of date, we have not received your revised set of plans. Please let us know if there is a problem with resubmitting or if there are other issues that must be resolved prior to the submittal. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6586. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SR/SR/dk Copy: Project |
| 08/25/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0031 CATALINA PEDIATRICS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 25, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label section corners on Location Map. Correct Columbus Road to Columbus Boulevard on Location Map. |
| 09/04/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated August 07, 2003. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. They must be submitted to TEP a minimum of six to eight weeks prior to requiring service. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com (520) 884-3882 |
| 09/08/2003 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Case Number: D03-0031 Project Name: Catalina Pediatrics Estimated Traffic Generation: 380 trips |
| 09/09/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-031 Catalina Pediatrics Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: September 9, 2003 DUE DATE: September 11, 2003 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 14, 2004. LUC 5.3.8.2 2. Place the development plan number (D03-031) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. The proposed Medical Service-Extended Healthcare use is subject to LUC Section 3.5.4.8.B, which reads: "Blood donor centers are not allowed". Please add a note so stating. LUC 2.5.3.2.A.10 4. Add sight visibility triangles at the intersection of the ingress-egress points with Swan Road and at the intersection of La Cienega Street with Swan Road. DS 2-03.2.4.R 5 Revise the amount of fine in the disabled parking sign detail to read $500. IBC 6. Provide a Floor Area Ration (FAR) calculation showing the maximum allowed FAR and the proposed FAR. As indicated in table 4.A, the maximum allowed FAR for medical service -outpatient uses in the C-1 zone, is 0.5. The proposed FAR (proposed gross floor area ÷ site area) would be calculated as 8,135 S.F. GFA ÷ 35,967 S.F. site = 0.23. LUC 3.2.3.2.B 7. Add to the "Streets and Road Notes" a statement that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 8. On the drawing, indicate that the adjacent zoning of the Phase 1 site (immediately to the west of the subject property) is C-1. DS 2-05.2.4.B 9. Indicate the location of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking on the development plan drawing. On the class 2 bicycle parking detail #3, indicate that there is a full five-foot aisle available adjacent to the racks for maneuverability of bicycles per DS 2-09. DS 2-09.6.2 10. Dimension the width of the on-site pedestrian sidewalk. DS 2-08 DS 2-05.2.4.K 11. In the drawing in the lower left-hand corner of detail 4, revise the width of the sidewalk to be a minimum of 4 feet, excluding vehicle overhang. DS 2-08.5.1.A 12. The details showing trash enclosure detail and dumpster wall do not appear to depict the existing refuse container shown on the drawing. The configuration of the dumpster is not the same and no wall is shown on the drawing. Please revise for consistency. DS 2-05.2.4.T 13. Provide a copy of the previously approved development plan. 14. If any freestanding lighting is proposed for this project, please indicate its location on the drawing. 2.1.A.25 15. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 09/12/2003 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 09/15/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP 1. Show and label SVT's with dimensions at Swan Road. 2. Maximum driveway entrance is 36'. 3. Update detail "A." The fine for parking in a handicap space is now $500. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) |
| 09/16/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to comply with LUC 3.7.2.3 Canopy Trees Within Vehicular Use Areas. A minimum of three trees is required and the trees must be evenly distributed. 2) A suitable dust control material, such as decomposed granite, is required within the adjacent right of way area out to the curb. Revise the plans to include the required dust control. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 3) Submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan or application for exception as appropriate. Revise the landscape plans as necessary. |
| 09/18/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0031 Catalina Pediatrics 9/17/03 ( ) Tentative Plat (XX) Development Plan (XX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 11, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XX) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan (XXX) Other - Dedication of right-of-way and drainage, by separate instrument; and Verification of neighborhood meeting held. REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 09/09/03 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS - S00-031 1) As indicated in the rezoning conditions, dedication of right-of-way for roads and drainage by separate instrument if property is not to be subdivided. Please provide dedication by separate instrument. 2) As indicated in the rezoning conditions, applicant/developer to provide written verification of offer to meet with affected neighborhood associations and property owners 15 days prior to CDRC submittal and provide summary of that meeting if appropriate. Please provide verification. |