Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D03-0028
Parcel: 128111090

Address:
221 S SWAN RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/05/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/06/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved 8/6/03.
08/07/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207

CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586
Director FAX: (520) 740-6380
December 23, 2003

TO: Michele Guy, Centerline Offset, Inc.

THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (representing
Pima County Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality)
Pima County Development Review Division

SUBJECT: Pueblo Mortgage
Development Plan - 1st Submittal
D03-0028



The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management (PCWWM) Department. This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. Separate review letters from PDEQ and PCWWM representatives will not be prepared for this project. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. This project will be tributary to the South Rillito - Central Interceptor and the Roger Road and Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date.

2. Based on our historical records for this property, this project will qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate.

3. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D03-0028, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers.

4. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states:
THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.

5. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states:

THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS.

(with the blanks appropriately filled in per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F).)

6. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states:

A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.

7. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars.

Please note the following: Approval of the above project does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.

If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563.




Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Review Division

TR/tr
Copy: Project
08/07/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0028 PUEBLO MORTGAGE, INC / DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: August 7, 2003



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

NOTE:

1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
08/15/2003 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1. Indicate a brief legal description, subdivision name, lot number. D.S. 2-05.2.1.G.2

2. Indicate contour intervals along with north arrow and scale placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H

3. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the development plan drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-05.2.3

4. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C

5. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property.

Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. D.S. 2-05.2.3.D
6. For land that slopes less than approximately one (1) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one (1) foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than one hundred (100) feet apart in all directions. D.S. 2-05.2.3.E.1

7. If applicable, indicate existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. D.S. 2-05.2.3.F

8. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.2

9. Note: If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3

10. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. D.S. 2-05.2.4.E

11. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.) D.S. 2-05.2.4.F

12. Indicate all existing and proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) they are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G

13. Indicate drainage direction. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2

14. Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triabgles are based on the MS&R cross-section. D.S. 2-05.2.4.R

15. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Adherence to the Standard is to assure:
o minimum safety criteria are met;
o consideration of adjacent properties;
o provision for on-site collection and maneuvering to avoid on-street traffic conflicts;
o minimum conflict with pedestrian and vehicular traffic along streets and on-site. You can contact John Clark at 791-5414 ext.1004 for curbside pickup. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T

16. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U

17. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V

18. If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W
08/20/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved
08/20/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D03-0028 Pueblo Mortgage Inc. 8/15/03

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-13

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Broadway-Craycroft Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO

COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/01/03

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 8/13/03

Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments
D03-0028
August 13, 2003

The following corrections are required to bring the development plan into compliance with rezoning C9-02-13.

Please revise development plan and include as general notes all the rezoning conditions as outlined and formatted by Mayor and Council in communication dated September 25, 2002, (see attached copy).
Please revise development plan to include building elevations (all building sides) to determine compliance with C9-02-13, rezoning condition # 3.
Please revise development plan to include a detailed elevation of the masonry wall located along the southern and northern property lines, to determine compliance with C9-02-13, rezoning conditions # 6 & 7.
Please revise development plan to include a landscape plan, which identifies by type, quantity and location of the proposed landscape amenities.
08/20/2003 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Case Number: D03-0028
Project Name: Pueblo Mortgage, Inc.
Estimated Traffic Generation: 19 trips
08/21/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: August 21, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0028 Pueblo Mortgage Inc.:Development Plan

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has no comments.

Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions.
08/21/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT:        PUEBLO MORTGAGE, INC
        D03-0028

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated May 08, 2003.  As shown on the plans, there are existing facilities within the boundaries of this project; however, they do not appear to be in conflict with the development of this site. 

To determine how TEP will serve this commercial development submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans.  Please submit these plans a minimum of three weeks prior to requiring service.  If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. 

Liza Castillo
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Company
lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com
(520) 884-3882
08/22/2003 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Center
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner


PROJECT:
D03-028
Pueblo Mortgage, Inc.
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: August 22, 2003
DUE DATE: September 1, 2003


1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is August 4, 2004.

2. Place the development plan number (D03-028) on each sheet of the development plan and landscape plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.2

3. Dimension existing and future curb locations from street monument lines.
DS 2-05.2.3.C

4. Continuous pedestrian circulation (a sidewalk connection) must be provided between the existing building and the shed. Dimension the width of the existing sidewalks along the east and west sides of the building.
DS 2-08.4.1
DS 2-05.2.4.K

5. If any new freestanding lighting or signage is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.N

6. MS&R bldg setback is required to be the greater of 21' or height of structure wall measured from back of future curb, not from the face of curb as shown on the drawing. Revise general note 5 regarding street perimeter building setback to specify that the dimension is measured from back of future curb loccation.
LUC 3.2.6.5

7. The existing building does not meet required perimeter yard setbacks to the north and south property lines. A Lot Development Option (LDO) will be required. If a Board of Adjustment Variance is sought (see comments 10, 11, 12 and 13), the setback issue may be addressed through the variance process. LUC 3.2.6.4

8. The gross floor area of the shed must be stated on the plan and included in all calculations for parking, loading zone and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Please revise plan by dimensioning the shed and including its square footage in all calculations. LUC 3.2.3.2.B
LUC 3.2.11
DS 2-05.2.4.M &.N

9. Per IBC Sec. 1106.4, the handicapped parking space must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet. Please revise drawing, which shows no van accessible parking provided for the project. Also, provide the maximum slope of the handicapped aisle and access ramp. ANS/IBC

10. The development plan indicates that the parking area has a gravel surface. LUC section 3.3.7.3 requires all vehicular use areas to be surfaced with either asphaltic concrete, cement concrete or a penetration treatment of bituminous material and seal coat of bituminous binder and mineral aggregate. Please revise drawing. If the LUC surfacing requirements are not met, a Board of Adjustment Variance is required. If approved, place the variance case number, the date of approval, conditions and what the variance was for in the general notes of the development plan. Also, place the variance case number in the lower right hand corner of the plan, near the title block. LUC 3.3.7.3
DS 2-05.2.2.B.6
DS 3-01.3.1

11. The parking calculations indicate there is a deficit in required parking. Please revise plan. Also, two of the proposed parking spaces are within the future sight visibility triangles and so they may not be counted towards meeting rezoning condition 2 and they may not be counted towards meeting LUC parking requirements. If rezoning condition 2 is not met, Mayor and Council approval must be obtained for a change of rezoning condition. If parking requirements are not met, a Board of Adjustment Variance is required. If approved, place the variance case number, the date of approval, conditions and what the variance was for in the general notes of the development plan. Also, place the variance case number in the lower right hand corner of the plan, near the title block. LUC 3.3.4
DS 2-05.2.4.P
DS 2-05.2.2.B.6

12. Add a loading zone calculation, stating the number of loading spaces required and provided. to the development plan. Per LUC 3.4.5.5, for administrative and professional office uses with more than 1,500 square feet of gross floor area, a loading zone (fully dimensioned at 12' × 35') is required. There is no loading zone depicted on the drawing. Please revise. LUC 3.4.5
DS 2-05.2.4.O
DS 2-05.2.2.B.6

13. The width of the entrance drive is shown to be only 18 feet. The minimum required width is 24 feet. Please revise drawing. If the width of the parking area access lane is not met, a Board of Adjustment Variance is required. If approved, place the variance case number, the date of approval, conditions and what the variance was for in the general notes of the development plan. Also, place the variance case number in the lower right hand corner of the plan, near the title block. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3
LUC 3.3.7.2
DS 3-05.2.1.C
DS 2-05.2.2.B.6

14. A backup spur is required at the east end of the parking lot to allow vehicles parked in the easternmost two parking spaces to maneuver out of the spaces to exit the site. Vehicles may not back out onto a designated MS & R such as Swan Road. Dimension the depth of the backup spur. A minimum 3-foot deep backup spur is required and a minimum of 3 feet is required between the end of the spur and any obstruction to allow for vehicle overhang.
DS 3-05.2.2.D

15. Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on 8% of vehicle parking spaces provided. Also, provide a detail showing a fully dimensioned layout of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking (including width and length of spaces and a 5-foot clear area for bicycle maneuverability per DS 2-09). DS 2-05.2.4.Q
DS 2-09.6.0

16. Remove the extra decimal point from the acreage total in general note 1.

17. List all conditions of rezoning, as adopted by Mayor & Council for case number C9-89-13, on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3

18. Demonstrate compliance (graphically or by notes) with applicable rezoning conditions on the d.p. DS 2-05.2.4.U

19. If any freestanding lighting is proposed for this project please indicate location and orientation on the plan to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 4. DS 2-05.2.4.U

20. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 3 by detailing the mechanical equipment screening on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.U

21. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes setback zone. DS 2-05.2.2.10

22. Dimension the wheelstop curbs from the front of parking spaces per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Wheelstop curbing is to be located two-and-one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of parking spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C

23. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan.
09/03/2003 JIM STOYANOFF COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection.
09/03/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) 5' high masonry walls are required along the north, south, and east property boundaries per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

2) A street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. is required along the Swan Road property frontage.

3) The requirements for the interior landscape border required along the east property line must be met in order to qualify for the exception noted on sheet L1.0. Specifically, "a. An equivalent number of trees are planted elsewhere on the site between the building(s) and the property line. When the use on the site does not include buildings, the required canopy trees must be located between the principal use and the property line;
b. The trees are evenly distributed over the site; and
c. The minimum planting area required in Sec. 3.7.2.3.A.1.c is provided for each canopy tree.

4) Revise the calculations on sheet L1.0 regarding vehicular use are tree requirements. The proposed parking area is more appropriately subject to LUC 3.7.2.3.A.2.a, hence the note should state that "No motor vehicle parking space is located more than thirty (30) feet from the trunk of a tree." otherwise the plan would have to be revised to include at least one canopy tree within the vehicular use area per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.b.2.

5) Identify any existing vegetation to remain. DS 2-07.A.1.e

6) Mechanical equipment must be screened entirely from adjacent streets per LUC Table 3.7.2-I
Revise the plans to show all required screening.

7) The parking lot must be screened from Swan Road per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.
09/05/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. Pedestrian SVT's are 20'x30'.
2. Annotate that existing curb cuts are to be closed.
3. New driveway shall be 24' to match PAAL.
4. New driveway shall have 25' radii (AMG sect. 5.5)


D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us