Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0021
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/21/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 4365 N. Oracle Road Development Plan D03-0021 (Third Review) T13S, R13E, Section 23 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None. Development Plan: 1. Show and label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. As per our conversation (8-21-03), the far side SVT for the intersection of Oracle Rd. and Wetmore Rd. and the near side SVT at the Oracle Rd. ingress/egress (from face-of-curb) are required to be shown on the plans. I will approve the project conditionally, however, please submit a revised copy to me directly. I have advised Craig Gross on this development. Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage report is approved for Development plan purposes only. Final acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 2. Maximum disposal times of stormwater runoff are 12 hours per COT Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual 3.5.1.1. Surface/subsurface requirements, percolation tests results are required per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. XIV. Please include in the next submittal. It is recognized that the drywell on-site has be deleted and replaced with a basin and that this requirement not applicable until this set of comments. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 08/25/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 4, 2004. 2. Proposed easements must be recorded. On the development plan please note the recording docket and page number, width, and whether it is public or private. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B/ D.S. 2-05.2.4.G 3. The drive-thru lanes at the back of the stacking area do not meet the minimum 11-foot width required for each lane by D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.b. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 4. Provide the correct parking space and aisle dimensions for 60-degree angle parking spaces. (space width 9 feet, space depth 20 feet, aisle width 16 feet) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P 5. All requested changes must be made to the tentative plat/development plan and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 08/25/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Plans Coordination Office Development Services Department PROJECT: Eckerd Drug Store D03-021 Development Plan FROM: Dan Castro Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Zoning Review Section TRANSMITTAL: September 8, 2003 The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro at (520) 791-5608. DRC I:\devplan2003\D03-021dpappr.doc |
| 08/26/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | Revise the note related to landscaping located within the public right of way on sheet L-1 as follows: Landscaping within the MS&R right-of-way must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. LUC 3.7.2.9.A |