Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0021
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/18/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 4365 N. Oracle Road Development Plan D03-0021 (Second Review) T13S, R13E, Section 23 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. A grading plan under separate permit will be required. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. See following note. Per previous comment. 4. The reason for previous note no. 8, to dimension Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way's, is to be able to locate and label the existing and future sight visibility triangles. The SVT's are measured 20' back from the face of curb. The curb locations change depending on the width of the R/W. For R/W widths of 120', the future face of curb is 9' into the R/W. For R/W widths of 150', the future face of curb is 12' into the R/W. These SVT must be shown to insure no construction is interfering with sight within the triangle. 5. The basin maintenance note is sufficient, however I will email you our standard language. 6. A private improvement agreement will be necessary for the deceleration lane proposed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for PIA information. Please provide a note on the DP indicating that permits for working in the ADOT R/W will be issued by ADOT and also contact Mr. Steve Tineo in Permits and Codes to coordinate this process with the City of Tucson. 7. A temporary construction easement from the adjacent property owner will be necessary for constructing the portions of the return curbs of the proposed ingress/egress that are not located on the Eckard site. 8. The North side of the project does not drain into the retention basin with the present grades. Please address. 9. According to the CDRC pre-submittal engineering review, intersection widening is required per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan. If you would like I could fax you a copy. Please correct. Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage report is was reviewed for Development plan purposes only. Final acceptance will be at the grading plan stage. 2. Drywells have only been used as last resort to areas that are not meeting expected infiltration rates. It appears as if dry wells have not been as successful a solution as expected and therefore tend not to be the best consideration and are highly discouraged. Other issues include: the need to get a state permit (for recharge issues); recharge near landfills (closed or current); maintenance and installation costs. See also Tucson Code Sections 26-10(c), 27-73, and other water facility codes. Essentially, we would prefer to review drainage designs without drywell(s) and if, after construction, infiltration rates are not meeting expected values, we may consider drywells as a last resort if other drainage design considerations have been exhausted. 3. Maximum disposal times of stormwater runoff are 12 hours per COT Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual 3.5.1.1. Surface/subsurface requirements, percolation tests results are required per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. XIV. Please include in the next submittal. 4. The basin maintenance note is sufficient, however I will email you our standard language. 5. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report when possible. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 07/18/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 August 19, 2003 TO: Dave Gibson, RHL Design Group, Inc. (fax 707-765-9908) Tony Bouchet, Hunter Engineering (fax 480-991-3986) THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Eckerd Drugstore #5324 Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D03-0021 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Please show how the old HCS will be abandoned. 2. Submit a blueline with the above revisions to Development Review Division for our files. There will not be a fee for this submittal. 3. Subject to the above, we hereby approve the Development Plan. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6586. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SR/SR/dk Copy: Project |
| 07/18/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0021 ECKERD DRUGSTORE / REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: July 10, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 07/23/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | An additional submittal of the Development Plan/Landscape Plan is required. The applicant shall submit a detailed letter of explanation with the re-submittal. The letter will address each comment that follows and report revisions made to the plan or documents arising from those comments. 1) Revise the plans to show the future sight visibility triangles based on the MS&R right of way lines. The triangles shown on the plan require correction. DS 3-01.5.1 2) An irrigation plan is required. Note on the landscape plans that a water conserving irrigation system will be provided and that an irrigation will be submitted with construction documents. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 3) Any landscaping located within the public right of way must be "approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type." LUC 3.7.2.9.A Provide verification in writing that the proposed landscaping is acceptable to the City Engineer. 4) The trash enclosures must include a minimum 6' high screen for the opening to screen the contents from Wetmore Road and adjacent commercial properties. Provide information or a detail of the required screening. LUC Table 3.7.2-I |
| 07/23/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 4, 2004. 2. All proposed easements (Const. & Access Easmt & Fndn. Easmt.) on this site must be shown on the plan, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B/ D.S. 2-05.2.4.G 3. a) Provide a copy of the cross access easement exhibit. In addition, provide documentation from all affected property owner/s which states that easement will be accepted by all parties involved. b) A Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) must be applied for to reduce the number of stacking spaces required. Please contact Marilyn Kalthoff at 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The DSMR application is available online at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/dsmrapplicat.pdf. If the DSMR is approved please note on the site plan the DSMR case number, date of approval, modification granted, and any conditions imposed. Disregard the DSMR process if a variance is applied for (see comment number 6 below). D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3/ D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2 4. The gross floor area of the building is noted as 13, 824 S.F. on sheet DP2 and 14, 146 S.F. on sheet DP1. In addition revise the vehicle parking calculation on both sheets as required. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M 5. Note the number of loading zone spaces required and provided. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O/ L.U.C. 3.4.4.2.C 6. Per LUC Table 3.3.7-I, the 90 degree vehicle parking spaces located west of the drive-thru lanes must have a minimum 24 foot wide aisle width (PAAL). You may apply for a Board Of Adjustment Variance to reduce the PAAL width required. If a Variance is applied for please include the request for the reduction in stacking spaces as described in comment number three. You will not be required to apply for a DSMR if you go through the Variance process. Please note on the site plan the Variance case number, date of approval, variances granted, and any conditions imposed. For information regarding the Variance process please contact Russlyn Wells at 791-5550. D.S. 2-05.2.4..P 7. Show on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q 8. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles. SVT's are required on the development plan per D.S. 2-05.2.4.R./ D.S. 2-05.2.4.R 9. Since 14 vehicle parking spaces will be removed from the adjacent parking lot, please provide a copy of the last approved site plan for the adjacent property (shopping center). The site plan must include complete vehicle parking calculations for the adjacent shopping center. This is required to verify that the adjacent shopping center will not be underparked as a result of the removal of the 14 spaces. 10. All requested changes must be made to the tentative plat/development plan and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |