Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0017
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/08/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 9/8/03. |
| 09/12/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-017 Finisterra Community Development Plan 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: September 12, 2003 DUE DATE: September 18, 2003 1. This development proposal is being sent back to Mayor and Council for a change of preliminary development plan and conditions. Therefore a review of this development plan must be made for compliance with Mayor and Council conditions after the June 23rd meeting. Further comments may be forthcoming thereafter and a resubmittal will not be accepted until after M&C has established the new conditions. 2. Revise the parking space typical detail to dimension the spaces at 18 feet in depth as required by LUC 3.3.7.2.A and DS 3-05. LUC 3.3.7.2.A DS 3-05 DS 2-05.2.4.P 3. Provide the development designators for the proposed uses/zones. The development designator for the multifamily dwelling use in the C-1 zone is "O". The designator for the multifamily dwelling use in the O-3 zone is "L". The designator for the administrative and professional office use in the O-3 zone is "30". LUC 2.5.3.2.E.1 LUC 2.4.3.2.D.1 LUC 2.4.3.2.A.1 4. Revise the adjacent zoning on sheet 4 of 5 to read O-2 instead of RX-2 to the east, and to show that a portion of the property adjacent to the south is zoned O-3. DS 2-05.2.3.H 5. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide a direct connection to all adjacent rights-of-way. Demonstrate compliance by showing pedestrian sidewalks and crosswalks which connect all buildings directly to each public right-of-way. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS2-08.4.1.A & D 6. Add a lot coverage calculation for the residentially developed portion of the project site and floor area ratio (FAR) calculation for the commercially developed portion. The maximum lot coverage allowed under the residential development designators, "O" and "L" is 75%. The maximum FAR allowed under the commercial development designators "30" is 0.75. LUC 3.2.3.2.B LUC 3.2.3.1.C & .D DS 2-05.2.4.M 7. If any freestanding lighting or signage is proposed for this project please indicate location, type, and height. Also, indicate on the plan if there are any existing billboards within the project site. DS 2-05.2.4.W DS 2-05.2.4.N 8. Kolb Road is a designated Gateway Corridor. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 9. Dimension the pedestrian circulation system. It is not clear where the width of sidewalk is proposed to be 4 feet and where it is proposed to be 6 feet in width. Note that the sidewalk must be a minimum of 6-1/2 feet in width adjacent to parking spaces where no wheelstops are provided so that vehicle overhang (2-1/2 feet) does not reduce the pedestrian sidewalk to less than 4 feet clear without obstruction DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 DS 2-08.5.1.A 10. Provide type, width, and recordation information for all existing and proposed easements. On the d.p. DS 2-05.2.3.B 11. Remove the term "visitor parking" from the office building parking calculation , because this parking is also for use by employees. Provide a calculation of handicapped parking to indicate the number of h/c accessible spaces required and provided. ANS/ IBC 12. Provide the heights and dimensions of all buildings on the development plan drawing. Also, in the calculations add the the maximum allowed and proposed building heights for each use/development designator. DS 2-05.2.4.N 13. Provide right-of-way dimensions for all adjacent rights-of way, and provide dimensioned location of curbs and sidewalks from street monument lines. 14. Show the location of the loading zone, fully dimensioned on the development plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.O 15. Show the location of bicycle parking on the development plan drawing and provide a breakdown of the number of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking required and provided. Note that the administrative and professional office use requires 75% class 1 to 25% class 2, while the multifamily swelling use requires 50% class 1 to 50% class 2. Also, revise bicycle parking calculation to state that it is based on 8% of the number of vehicle spaces provided, not the number required. DS 2-05.2.4.Q LUC 3.3.4 16. Add zoning setback information to the project information/calculations. Setbacks may not be verified until building heights are specified (see comment #12). DS 2-05.2.4.I 17. Dimension the width of all entrance access drives. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 18. Revise handicapped parking calculations to be correct. For the south parcel, with between 151 and 200 total parking spaces provided, 6 h/c spaces are required. For the north parcel, with between 401 and 500 total spaces provided, 9 h/c spaces are required. For the office building, with between 151 and 200 total parking spaces provided, 6 h/c spaces are required. IBC 19. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan |
| 09/12/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 November 3, 2003 TO: Dave Martin, AMEC Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Finisterra Community Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D03-0017 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Sheet 2: Per our meeting on this date: The new public sewer line may be installed in the PAAL along the northwest side of the project provided an appropriate public sewer easement is also provided. 2. Provide a legal description and location map of the proposed public sewer easement to this office for review and approval. 3. Sheets 2-5: Try to minimize the amount of public sewer line on-site, by converting the existing public sewer lines to private sewer lines wherever feasible. 4. Sheets 2-4: Show the proposed private sewers using a different line-type than the proposed public sewers. Show the existing public sewers using a lighter line weight or shading. Show the three types of sewers (existing public, new public, new private) in the legend. 5. Sheets 2-5: Show how the proposed sewers and sewers easements will be after all development is complete on the development plan, by taking the following steps: a) Delete the lines and labels depicting the existing public sewer lines that will be abandoned and no longer used after development is complete. 6. With respects to the abandonment of the existing public sewers and public sewer easements that are on-site. Please contact Bob Decker, PCWWM Planning Services Manager at 740-6625 for further information. 7. If the property to the south is willing to connect to the public sewer system via the private sewer lines of this project, please contact Ms. Ilene Deckard of PCWWM Planning Services regarding what standards the necessary Joint Use & Maintenance Agreement will need to meet. Please be aware that Ms. Deckard will need to review and approve the Joint Use & Maintenance Agreement, before it is signed and recorded. 8. The recording information for all of the abandonments, new public sewer easements, Joint Use and Maintenance Agreements, etc. must be shown on the Mylars of the development plan. We will be able to approve the bluelines of the development plan with blanks shown for the dockets and pages, but these blanks will need to be filled in on the Mylars. 9. The CDRC does not typically route the Mylars to us for review. Please be aware that after we approve the bluelines of the development plan, we will ask you to route the Mylars to this office for review, before submitting them to the CDRC. 10. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. Please include a $156.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 09/12/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-017 Finisterra Community Development Plan 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: September 12, 2003 DUE DATE: September 18, 2003 1. This development proposal is being sent back to Mayor and Council for a change of preliminary development plan and conditions. Therefore a review of this development plan must be made for compliance with Mayor and Council conditions after the June 23rd meeting. Further comments may be forthcoming thereafter and a resubmittal will not be accepted until after M&C has established the new conditions. 2. Revise the parking space typical detail to dimension the spaces at 18 feet in depth as required by LUC 3.3.7.2.A and DS 3-05. LUC 3.3.7.2.A DS 3-05 DS 2-05.2.4.P 3. Provide the development designators for the proposed uses/zones. The development designator for the multifamily dwelling use in the C-1 zone is "O". The designator for the multifamily dwelling use in the O-3 zone is "L". The designator for the administrative and professional office use in the O-3 zone is "30". LUC 2.5.3.2.E.1 LUC 2.4.3.2.D.1 LUC 2.4.3.2.A.1 4. Revise the adjacent zoning on sheet 4 of 5 to read O-2 instead of RX-2 to the east, and to show that a portion of the property adjacent to the south is zoned O-3. DS 2-05.2.3.H 5. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide a direct connection to all adjacent rights-of-way. Demonstrate compliance by showing pedestrian sidewalks and crosswalks which connect all buildings directly to each public right-of-way. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS2-08.4.1.A & D 6. Add a lot coverage calculation for the residentially developed portion of the project site and floor area ratio (FAR) calculation for the commercially developed portion. The maximum lot coverage allowed under the residential development designators, "O" and "L" is 75%. The maximum FAR allowed under the commercial development designators "30" is 0.75. LUC 3.2.3.2.B LUC 3.2.3.1.C & .D DS 2-05.2.4.M 7. If any freestanding lighting or signage is proposed for this project please indicate location, type, and height. Also, indicate on the plan if there are any existing billboards within the project site. DS 2-05.2.4.W DS 2-05.2.4.N 8. Kolb Road is a designated Gateway Corridor. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 9. Dimension the pedestrian circulation system. It is not clear where the width of sidewalk is proposed to be 4 feet and where it is proposed to be 6 feet in width. Note that the sidewalk must be a minimum of 6-1/2 feet in width adjacent to parking spaces where no wheelstops are provided so that vehicle overhang (2-1/2 feet) does not reduce the pedestrian sidewalk to less than 4 feet clear without obstruction DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 DS 2-08.5.1.A 10. Provide type, width, and recordation information for all existing and proposed easements. On the d.p. DS 2-05.2.3.B 11. Remove the term "visitor parking" from the office building parking calculation , because this parking is also for use by employees. Provide a calculation of handicapped parking to indicate the number of h/c accessible spaces required and provided. ANS/ IBC 12. Provide the heights and dimensions of all buildings on the development plan drawing. Also, in the calculations add the the maximum allowed and proposed building heights for each use/development designator. DS 2-05.2.4.N 13. Provide right-of-way dimensions for all adjacent rights-of way, and provide dimensioned location of curbs and sidewalks from street monument lines. 14. Show the location of the loading zone, fully dimensioned on the development plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.O 15. Show the location of bicycle parking on the development plan drawing and provide a breakdown of the number of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking required and provided. Note that the administrative and professional office use requires 75% class 1 to 25% class 2, while the multifamily swelling use requires 50% class 1 to 50% class 2. Also, revise bicycle parking calculation to state that it is based on 8% of the number of vehicle spaces provided, not the number required. DS 2-05.2.4.Q LUC 3.3.4 16. Add zoning setback information to the project information/calculations. Setbacks may not be verified until building heights are specified (see comment #12). DS 2-05.2.4.I 17. Dimension the width of all entrance access drives. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 18. Revise handicapped parking calculations to be correct. For the south parcel, with between 151 and 200 total parking spaces provided, 6 h/c spaces are required. For the north parcel, with between 401 and 500 total spaces provided, 9 h/c spaces are required. For the office building, with between 151 and 200 total parking spaces provided, 6 h/c spaces are required. IBC 19. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan |
| 09/12/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0017 FINISTERRA COMMUNITY/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 9, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete “Road” from Camino Serna on Sheets 2 and 3. Number all buildings numerically and label all unit numbers per Pima County Policy. Note: The apartment buildings west of Calle La Paz will be numbered Bldg. 1 thru Bldg. 16. The apartment buildings east of Calle La Paz will be numbered Bldg. 1 thru Bldg. 6. |
| 09/16/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Tanque Verde Road and Kolb Road Development Plan D03-0017 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 06 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. Please provide property description on the DP per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. Per previous comment. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Although Kolb Road has been developed to it's ultimate configuration, the future SVT's on Kolb Road must be shown. Per previous comment. 4. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Per previous comment. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 6. Sidewalks are required as part new development of all properties per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. 7. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. Per previous comment. 8. A private improvement agreement or permit will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 9. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Must show scupper locations. Per previous comment. 10. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 11. Basins with slopes steeper than 4:1 where water exceed two feet require security barriers per Stormwater Det/Ret Manual 3.6.2. 12. Dimension all basins on the DP or provide a detail. The details on sheet 5 do not have adequate information. Per previous comment. 13. Revise (Note 21in the general notes) the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. Attached to the comment letter is an example of the basin maintenance responsibility note required on the DP. 14. The DR and the DP show to different erosion hazard setbacks, please clarify. Please add the setback dimension on the DP. 15. All comments are preliminary until final approval from mayor and council. Drainage Report: 1. It appears the drainage report has not been revised. Therefore all the previous DR comments need to be addressed. 2. The Drainage report was reviewed for DP purposes only. 3. The DR and the DP show to different erosion hazard setbacks, please clarify. Please add the setback dimension on the DR. 4. Please show the EHS line on a reduced scale map indication the top of bank of the Pantano wash along with dimensions. 5. A $150.00 review fee for the Drainage Report is required. 6. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. 7. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. Attached to the comment letter is an example of the basin maintenance responsibility note and the maintenance check list required in the DR. 8. Provide details showing dimensions for all basins. 9. Basins with slopes steeper than 4:1 where water exceed two feet require security barriers per Stormwater Det/Ret. Manual 3.6.2. 10. In section 2.0 of the DR, data was used based upon an approved DR by Baker and associates for La Playa Caliente Offices. This is acceptable however, it must be stated in this DR that you agree with the data. Include an excerpt(s) from the DR by Baker and Assoc. in this DR if possible. Please address. 11. The discharge onto Camino Serna exceeds the maximum allowable street flow of 50 cfs per D.S. 3-01.4.4.A. Please show the impact of the properties downstream of the project on Camino Serna. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 09/16/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | This is an example of how the maintenance note should read. Detention/Retention basin inspection and Maintenance note: A. The responsibility of operating and maintaining a local detention basin rests with the owner of the facility. B. (a.) That the owner(s) shall be solely responsible for, operation, maintenance and liability for the drainage basin(s); (b.) That the owner(s) shall have an Arizona registered professional engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once a year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by city staff, upon written request; (c.) That city staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) That the owners(s) agree to reimburse the city for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the city find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. Also attached is a copy of the maintenance checklist that will need to be inserted in future all Drainage/Hydraulic reports. |
| 09/18/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS (2nd review) Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0017 Finisterra Community 9/18/03 ( ) Tentative Plat (3) Development Plan (3) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-25 (M&C 9/2/03, Ordinance No. 9880) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Kolb Rd. is Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/18/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (3) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (3) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (3) Development Plan (3) Landscape Plan (ü ) Other - as indicated in attached comments REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 9/17/03 D02-0017 Finisterra Community 1) The Comprehensive Planning Task Force (CPTF) reviews for compliance with certain rezoning conditions. As indicated in our previous comments dated 5/15/03, please list all rezoning conditions in entirety on the Development Plan. 2) In accordance with rezoning condition #1.a., please show and clearly label vehicular and pedestrian cross-access between the on-site office development and the office development to the east. 3) In accordance with rezoning condition #1.b., please show and clearly label the vehicular cross-access to the adjoining three residences in The Meadows via Placita la Paz. A copy of the cross-access agreement or the recording information must be provided prior to final Development Plan approval. 4) In accordance with rezoning condition #1.d. the 5-foot masonry wall shown along the south and west boundaries of the office development needs to be 6 feet. Please revise sheets L1, L6 and L7 accordingly. 5) In accordance with rezoning condition #1.e., please clarify whether there are any existing curb returns that will be removed and replaced with standard curbing. 6) In accordance with rezoning condition #7., please indicate on the Development Plan that all buildings within 100 feet of the south property line on the southern-most portion of the site will be no higher than 25 feet, as measured from finished grade. 7) In accordance with rezoning condition #8., please show clearly on the development and/or landscape plan the location of the interconnected pedestrian circulation system that also connects to the existing and/or planned sidewalk system along the public streets. 8) In accordance with rezoning condition #9, please show the location of at least one wall opening on the south side of the office development to allow pedestrian access between the on-site residential area and the on-site office development. D02-0017 Finisterra Community 9) In accordance with rezoning condition #10, please provide dimensioned elevation drawings, with proposed colors and materials, demonstrating that all buildings, screen walls, landscaping, etc. shall be architecturally consistent with each other, and with the surrounding development. 10) In accordance with rezoning condition #11, please provide dimensioned elevation drawings demonstrating that the building façades at the rear and sides of the office building(s) will have architectural character, design treatment and detailing comparable to the front façade. 11) In accordance with rezoning condition #12, please provide sign details demonstrating that the signs will be architecturally compatible with the overall development, and that the signs will be integrated with the landscaping. 12) In accordance with rezoning condition #13, please provide a lighting detail or details demonstrating that all outdoor lighting shall be directed downwards and shielded away from adjacent residential areas and public roadways. 13) In accordance with rezoning condition #14, please provide dimensioned elevation drawings demonstrating that all exterior mechanical equipment will be screened from view of adjacent development and street frontages, and will be architecturally integrated into the overall design of buildings within this development. 14) In accordance with rezoning condition #15, please indicate on the landscape plan that all masonry screen walls shall be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. 15) In accordance with rezoning condition # 26, please indicate all locations where sidewalks will be constructed along street frontages, and please provide the sidewalk design details on the Development Plan. |
| 09/18/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Finisterra Community D03-0017 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated August 21, 2003. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Liza Castillo Land Management Tucson Electric Power Company lcastillo@tucsonelectric.com (520) 884-3882 |
| 09/18/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | From: Castillo, Liza > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 9:32 AM > To: Craig Gross; 'Marilyn Kalthoff, City of Tucson' > Subject: FINISTERRA COMMUNITY, D03-0017 > > SUBJECT: FINISTERRA COMMUNITY > D03-0017 > > Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development > plan dated December 23, 2003. > > As you are aware there are existing electrical facilities within the > boundaries of this development. All relocation costs will be billable to > the developer. > > If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. > > Liza Castillo > Land Management > Tucson Electric Power Company > lcastillo@tep.com > Office: (520) 917-8479 > Pager: (520) 218-6565 > Fax: (520) 917-8400 |
| 09/22/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit revised plans for review. |
| 09/25/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Needs Review | comments will be provided as soon as received from Parks. |