Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/16/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Minimum opening width at all gated ingress/egress points shall be 20 feet. 2. Indicate method of emergencty vehicle ingress provided at each gated location. 3. Remove center islands located in front of each gated entry north of Calle La Paz. (2 locations.) 4. Provide a General Note :"Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with Sec. 508 of the Fire Code." |
| 04/30/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS |
| 04/30/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0017 FINISTERRA COMMUNITY |
| 05/02/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval for this DP 1. Show SVT's on sheet 2 of 3 for all access points onto Old Vail Road. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 05/02/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0017 FINISTERRA COMMUNITY / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 1, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Delete “Road” from Camino Serna Road on Sheets 2 and 3 Apartment. 2: Number Apartment buildings numerically and label unit numbers per Pima County Policy (See attachment). 3: Is the Office to be used for the Apartments or as a separate business? ATTACHMENT IN FILE |
| 05/12/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-017 Finisterra Community Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: May 12, 2003 DUE DATE: May 12, 2003 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is April 14, 2004. 2. Place the development plan number (D03-017) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. This development proposal is being sent back to Mayor and Council (to be heard June 23, 2003) for a change of preliminary development plan and conditions. Therefore a review of this development plan must be made for compliance with Mayor and Council conditions after the June 23rd meeting. Further comments may be forthcoming thereafter and a resubmittal will not be accepted until after M&C has established the new conditions. 4. Revise the parking space typical detail to dimension the spaces at 18 feet in depth as required by LUC 3.3.7.2.A and DS 3-05. Also, indicate the maximum slope of the handicapped aisles does not exceed 1:12. LUC 3.3.7.2.A DS 3-05 DS 2-05.2.4.P ANS/IBC 5. Provide the development designators for the proposed uses/zones. The development designator for the multifamily dwelling use in the C-1 zone is "O". The designator for the multifamily dwelling use in the O-3 zone is "L". The designator for the administrative and professional office use in the O-3 zone is "30". LUC 2.5.3.2.E.1 LUC 2.4.3.2.D.1 LUC 2.4.3.2.A.1 6. Revise the adjacent zoning on sheet 4 of 5 to read O-2 instead of RX-2 to the east, and to show that a portion of the property adjacent to the south is zoned O-3. DS 2-05.2.3.H 7. Label future curb and sidewalk locations along MS&Rs (Broadway Blvd and Old Spanish Trail). Dimension widths of all rights-of-way for both MS&R (future and existing ROW) and non MS&R streets. Dimension DS 2-05.2.4.F DS 2-05.2.4.L 8. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide a direct connection to all adjacent rights-of-way. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS2-08.4.1.A & D 9. Add a lot coverage calculation for the residentially developed portion of the project site and floor area ration (FAR) calculation for the commercially developed portion. The maximum lot coverage allowed under the residential development designators, "O" and "L 28 is 75%. The maximum FAR allowed under the commercial development designators, "30" is 0.75. LUC 3.2.3.2.B LUC 3.2.3.1.C & .D DS 2-05.2.4.M 10. If any freestanding lighting or signage is proposed for this project please indicate location, type, and height. Also, indicate on the plan if there are any existing billboards within the project site. DS 2-05.2.4.W DS 2-05.2.4.N 11. Kolb Road is a designated Gateway Corridor. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 12. Dimension the pedestrian circulation system. It is not clear where the width of sidewalk is proposed to be 4 feet and where it is proposed to be 6 feet in width. Note that the sidewalk must be a minimum of 6-1/2 feet in width adjacent to parking spaces where no wheelstops are provided so that vehicle overhang (2-1/2 feet) does not reduce the pedestrian sidewalk to less than 4 feet clear without obstruction. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 DS 2-08.5.1.A 13. If easements exist or are proposed on the property, show their location, width, type, and provide recordation info. DS 2-05.2.3.B 14. Remove the term "visitor parking" from the office building parking calculation , because this parking is also for use by employees. Provide a calculation of handicapped parking to indicate the number of h/c accessible spaces required and provided. ANS/ IBC 15. Provide the heights and dimensions of all buildings on the development plan drawing. Also, in the calculations add the the maximum allowed and proposed building heights for each use/development designator. DS 2-05.2.4.N 16. Show the location of the loading zone, fully dimensioned on the development plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.O 17. Show the location of bicycle parking on the development plan drawing and provide a breakdown of the number of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking required and provided. Note that the administrative and professional office use requires 75% class 1 to 25% class 2, while the multifamily swelling use requires 50% class 1 to 50% class 2. DS 2-05.2.4.Q LUC 3.3.4 18. Add zoning setback information to the project information/calculations. Setbacks may not be verified until building heights are specified (see comment #15). DS 2-05.2.4.I 19. Dimension the width of all entrance access drives. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 20. Revise handicapped parking calculations to be correct. For the south parcel, with between 151 and 200 total parking spaces provided, 6 h/c spaces are required. For the north parcel, with between 401 and 500 total spaces provided, 9 h/c spaces are required. For the office building, with between 151 and 200 total parking spaces provided, 6 h/c spaces are required. IBC 21. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan |
| 05/12/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#106336 May 23, 2003 Mr. Dave Martin AMEC Infrastructure, Inc. 3295 W. Ina Road, #200 Tucson, AZ 85741 Dear Mr. Martin: SUBJECT: Finisterra Community D03-0017 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated April, 2003. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time because there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing underground primary cable and the pad-mounted transformers that are in conflict. The costs for relocation shall be borne by the developer; however, the existing facilities may be able to work into the design for the proposed project. (Also, there is an existing de-energized underground primary cable that runs through the middle of the project which can be abandoned upon the customer’s request. Please contact Mr. Mike Kaiser, 918-8244, regarding the relocation.) Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. You may contact me at (520) 884-3879 if you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Mastrangelo Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgm Enclosure cc: Craig Gross, City of Tucson |
| 05/12/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Tanque Verde Road and Kolb Road Development Plan D03-0017 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 06 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 6. Show Development plan number on all sheets (D03-0017) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 7. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. 8. A private improvement agreement or permit will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 9. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 10. As per the information on the TDOT web site, it appears that the property is in the 404 permitting area. Please justify your 404-compliance statement. 11. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 12. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. 13. Basins with slopes steeper than 4:1 where water exceed two feet require security barriers per Stormwater Det/Ret Manual 3.6.2. 14. Dimension all basins on the DP or provide a detail. The details on sheet 5 do not have adequate information. 15. Revise (Note 21in the general notes) the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 16. All comments are preliminary until final approval from mayor and council. Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage report was reviewed for tentative plat purposes only. 2. A $150.00 review fee for the Drainage Report is required. 3. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. 4. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 5. Provide details showing dimensions for all basins. 6. Basins with slopes steeper than 4:1 where water exceed two feet require security barriers per Stormwater Det/Ret. Manual 3.6.2. 7. In section 2.0 of the DR, data was used based upon an approved DR by Baker and associates for La Playa Caliente Offices. This is acceptable however, it must be stated in this DR that you agree with the data. Include an excerpt(s) from the DR by Baker and Assoc. in this DR if possible. Please address. 8. The discharge onto Camino Serna exceeds the maximum allowable street flow of 50 cfs per D.S. 3-01.4.4.A. Please show the impact of the properties downstream of the project on Camino Serna. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 05/12/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 May 29, 2003 TO: Dave Martin, P.E., AMEC Infrastructure, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Finisterra Community Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-0017 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Per Pima County Wastewater Management’s Planning Services, there is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our records for the previous development plan (Kolb / La Paz Center, CD 9-84-25) this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. Add the development plan case number, D03-0017, and cross reference numbers, Co12-71-71 and CD 9 -84-25 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. Due to almost every bit of information on this development plan being shown by keynote, and the keynotes appearing only on the last page, this is the most difficult to understand development plan I have ever reviewed. I am not asking that the drawings for this project be labeled, rather than keynoted on the required resubmittal, and no response to this comment is necessary other than an acknowledgment, but please do not use keynotes so extensively within future development plans. Such extensive keynoting greatly slows the review process, and contributes to this office’s backlog. 5. Please contact Mr. Glen Hitz of PCWWM Planning at 740-6547 as soon as possible to determine if PCWWM will allow the proposed abandonment of the public sewer lines on this site. If other properties are utilizing these public sewer lines, PCWWM will not allow the abandonment of these lines, until new ones have been constructed and accepted into the public sewer system or other acceptable arrangements have been made. You should also talk with Mr. Hitz to determine under what circumstances, if any, PCWWM would allow the abandonment of that portion of G-72-11 along the eastern boundary of Lot 8 of Monte Catalina Estates for use a private sewer line. He might allow this, provided that the owner of this property would assume all responsibility for the maintenance of this sewer line, and all liability for failing to maintain this sewer line. This office will not be able to approve this development without documentation from Mr.Hitz that the proposed abandonments are acceptable to PCWWM. 6. Many of the existing public sewer lines proposed to be abandoned lie within existing public sewer easements. If and when Mr. Hitz authorizes the abandonment of these existing public sewer lines, please contact Ms. Janet Russell of the Pima County Real Property Division at 740-6321 and initiate the public sewer easement abandonment process. 7. Sheet 1: Show the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents in General Note 14, calculated per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F). If this proposed total is equal to or greater than 144, a Sewer Service Agreement may be required pursuant to Title 13.20.030. Typically, the Sewer Service Agreement is prepared, and three originals of the Agreement are sent to the Applicant for signature under separate cover, as soon as the proposed total number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents, and all necessary ownership information for the project has been shown. The three signed and notarized originals of the Sewer Service Agreement must be returned to the Development Review Division, before the Mylars of the development plan can be approved. 8. Sheet 1: Revise General Note 14 to read: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 9. Sheets 2-4: Label the existing public sewer lines with their size, and plan numbers, as shown on PCWWM’s section and base maps. 10. Sheets 1-4: Show the proposed private sewer lines and the proposed public sewer lines using different linetypes, accurately shown and described in the legend. We request that the proposed sewer lines be shown using the same linetype as the existing public sewer lines, but bolder. 11. Sheet 2: Show that existing public sewer line S-425-2 extends west from the manhole denoted by Keynote 8. 12. Sheet 2: The lines depicting the existing sewer easement to be abandoned (denoted by Keynote 79) are not centered over existing sewer line. Have the existing sewer lines and the existing sewer easement been shown in their correct location? 13. Sheet 3: PCWWM’s base maps show additional public sewer lines from the manhole denoted by Keynote 80. Show these sewer lines if they are present. 14. Sheet 4: The previous development plan (Kolb / La Paz Center, CD 9-84-25) shows a 20' public sewer easement by separate instrument over the existing public sewer line on Lot 8 of Monte Catalina Estates. Please check the title report for this easement, and show it if it is existing. Show the width and recording information for this easement as well. 15. Sheet 4: Show that portion of existing public sewer line between the manholes denoted by Keynotes 2 & 5 and the cleanout denoted by Keynote 6 on this sheet, and show whether it will be abandoned or preserved. 16. Sheet 4: Keynote 10 needs to be shown pointing to that section of existing sewer line between the manholes denoted by Keynotes 4 & 17. 17. Sheet 4: The alignment of the proposed public sewer lines is unacceptable. PCWWM’s large and heavy sewer maintenance vehicles will not be able to access and service the manholes denoted by Keynotes 14 & 15. Pursuant to Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A, public gravity sanitary sewage conveyance facilities must be positioned beneath the paved portions of public roads, streets, avenues, alleys and public rights-of-way, or within dedicated public sewer easements under paved private streets, to the maximum degree possible in order to maximize visual access and to maximize unrestricted 24-hour maintenance vehicle access over and to the public sanitary sewerage facilities. Route the proposed public sewer lines near the center of parking area access lanes (PAALs)to the maximum extent possible. Short sections of public sewer line may be run between building to go from one PAAL to another, but only if the buildings will not encroach on the necessary public sewer easements for these lines. In no case, may any public manhole be located between the buildings. The public manholes must be located within the PAALs. Avoid running the public sewer lines under the rainwater retention / detention basins and along any inverted crowns or valley gutters within the PAALs. The sewer lines must be designed to minimize the amount of rainwater discharged into the public sewer system during and after storm events. 18. Sheet 4: Pursuant to Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A, the public sewer lines will need to be within public sewer easements. Show the proposed public sewer easements. The proposed public sewer easements must be the full width of the PAALs where the public sewer lines are within the PAALs, and they must accommodate the turning radii of PCWWM’s sewer maintenance vehicles. These vehicles have a minium inside turning radius of 35' and a minimum outside turning radius of 55'. Any proposed public sewer easements between the buildings must be a minimum of 20' wide, or twice the depth of the proposed sewer line, whichever is greater. No buildings or structures may encroach upon the proposed public sewer easements. 19. Sheet 5: Show the width and recording information for the public sewer easement denoted in Keynote 79. 20. Note: Any of the existing public sewer lines that will remain on this property must discharge to new or existing public sewer lines. A public sewer line may not discharge to a private sewer line. 21. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second submittal. Please include a $250.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are added to the development plan, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 05/12/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | Revise the plans as necessary meet the requirements of other agencies. Submit revised plans. |
| 05/12/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Completed | SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS |
| 05/12/2003 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | NO COMMENTS |
| 05/12/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Completed | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D03-0017 Finisterra Community 5/12/2003 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Kolb Rd (Speedway to Tanque Verde) No 0 39,800 63,000 6 63,000 50,110 6 2,319 Route 9, 30 minutes, 0.30 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 05/14/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | Parks and Recreation's preliminary comments are that staff will review for compliance with M&C conditions after M&C has established the new conditions. Thanks. Glenn Hicks Parks & Recreation Dept., City of Tucson (520) 791-4873 (520) 791-4008 (fax) ghicks1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 05/16/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0017 Finisterra Community 05/15/03 ( ) Tentative Plat (3) Development Plan (3) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-25 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Kolb Rd. is Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/12/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (3) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (3) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (3) Development Plan (3) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 5/13/03 D03-0017 Finisterra Community Development Plan 1) The rezoning case associated with this Development Plan (C9-84-25, Kivel - Kolb Road) is going before the Mayor and Council for approval of a change of Preliminary Develoment Plan and rezoning conditions. Comprehensive Planning Task Force staff will review this Development Plan (D03-0017) for compliance with the Mayor and Council conditions after the June 23rd Mayor and Council meeting. A resubmittal of this Development Plan will not be accepted until after Mayor and Council has established new conditions. The applicant should be advised that new rezoning conditions must be shown in entirety on the Development Plan. |