Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0016
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/15/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 4/15/03. |
| 04/29/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 1010 S. Harrison Road Development Plan D03-0016 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies with re-submittal. 2. A separate grading plan is required under separate permit. To avoid confusion, please re-name the grading plan as "Development Grading Plan". 3. Please provide an administrative address. 4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 5. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 6. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. A. The responsibility of operating and maintaining a local detention basin rests with the owner of the facility. (a.) That the owner(s) shall be solely responsible for, operation, maintenance and liability for the drainage basin(s); (b.) That the owner(s) shall have an Arizona registered professional engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once a year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by city staff, upon written request; (c.) That city staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) That the owners(s) agree to reimburse the city for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the city find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. 9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 10. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 11. Show Development plan number (D03-0016) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 12. A private improvement agreement or permit will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information 13. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 14. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 15. Per re-zoning condition no. 8, "Existing drainage shall not be altered. Openings shall be provided under any walls or continuous decorative structures along the southeast and northwest property lines". Please address. 16. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 17. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. 18. Provide information on how the loading dock area will be drained. 19. Where are the keynotes descriptions called out on development plan? 20. Is there any stockpile dirt on the site? Please revise plans. 21. A 12' multi-use pathway is required along the "Old Spanist Trail" frontage of the property. Please contact Gary Crecher at the Parks and Recreation Dept. at 791-4873 for information on the requirements of the "Old Spanish Trail Bicycle and Hiking Trail". Drainage Report: 1. A $150.00 review fee for the Drainage Report is required. 2. Per re-zoning condition no. 8, "Existing drainage shall not be altered. Openings shall be provided under any walls or continuous decorative structures along the southeast and northwest property lines". Please address in the DR. 3. Provide information on how the loading dock area will be drained. 4. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. A. The responsibility of operating and maintaining a local detention basin rests with the owner of the facility. (a.) That the owner(s) shall be solely responsible for, operation, maintenance and liability for the drainage basin(s); (b.) That the owner(s) shall have an Arizona registered professional engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once a year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by city staff, upon written request; (c.) That city staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) That the owners(s) agree to reimburse the city for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the city find the owner(s) deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate |
| 04/30/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0016 CRETCHER DESIGN LLC VILLAGE SQUARE |
| 05/01/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0016 VILLAGE SQUARE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 30, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Harrison Rd. to Harrison Road on sheet 2. 2.) Number buildings numerically on sheet 2. |
| 05/02/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP based on the following conditions: 1. The reference cited in General Note 14 sheet 1 of 2 of the Delph plans is "The Manual ON Uniform Traffic Control Devices." It is not of. 2. Per chapter 25 of city code, the maximum driveway width in business zones is 35'. The access point from OST is not in compliance. 3. Label SVT's as to dimensions (ie 20x340). D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 05/08/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0016 Village Square 5/6/03 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-09 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: May 12, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 5-6-03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments D03-0016, Village Square The applicant’s request to rezone the property located at the northwest corner of Harrison Road / Old Spanish Trail that was approved by Mayor and Council is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions. Although the development plan application includes building elevations, which identifies height, and materials, there were no color renderings as required by Rezoning Condition no. 26. Please provide color renderings for typical sign monuments, walls and buildings. [Rezoning Condition no. 23 and 26] It appears from the submitted building elevations that the north side elevation phase 1, and the west side elevation phase 1, could provide more architectural detail consistent with the design treatment of the other building facades. The architectural design treatments of, but not limited to, awnings, split face block, decorative tiles, could be more fully integrated for all sides of the buildings. Please provide greater architectural detail to the north side elevation, phase 1, and the west side elevation, phase 1, which continues awning design treatment, and utilizes such design combinations as, overhangs, tile work, recesses, moldings, interesting colors/borders. [Rezoning Condition no. 21 and 26] |
| 05/12/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | |
| 05/12/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 13, 2004. 2. Per D.S. 2-05.2.1.C, all lettering and dimensions must be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. D.S. 2-05.2.1.C 3. Add a north arrow and scale to the location map. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 4. This project has been assigned development plan case number D03-0016. Note the development plan case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 5. a) Add the applicable "subject to" sections for the applicable retail use and food service uses listed under LUC Sec. 2.5.3.2.A.7 and Sec. 2.5.3.2.B.2 to the proposed use note. b) Add the following general note to the vehicle parking calculation: "At least 50 percent of the shopping center must remain retail at all times." D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 6. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plan, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B/ D.S. 2-05.2.4.G 7. Label and dimension the existing and future right-of-way for Old Spanish Trail and Harrison Road. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C 8. Will the vehicle parking, loading zones, bicycle parking be phased? If so, please demonstrate how each phase will comply with vehicle and bicycle parking, loading, landscape, and pedestrian circulation requirements. In addition, phase lines must be drawn on the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.4.C 9. Dimension the PAAL width north of the phase 2 building. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 10. If the vehicular use area is phased, demonstrate on the plan that the phase under construction must be designed so that later phases are assured legal access. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.4 11. Label and dimension the future curb location along Old Spanish trail and Harrison Road. D.S. 2-05.2.4.F 12. Label and dimension the width of the on-site pedestrian circulation system. Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A, minimum width required is four (4) feet. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K 13. Note the proposed uses for phase 1 and 3 on the plan. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M 14. Label the height of all proposed buildings on sheet TS1. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N 15. Tandem loading spaces are not allowed. Each loading space must be available for use at all times. Loading spaces may be located side by side so that a loading vehicle may enter or exit the space freely. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O 16. Per D.S. 2-05.2.4.P, a typical parking space detail for both standard and handicap spaces must be provided. For accessible parking space specifications, refer to ANSI A117.1-1998 Sections 406 and 502 for curb, ramp, and parking space requirements D.S. 2-05.2.4.P 17. Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail for both Class I and Class II spaces. The detail should include reference to materials for lighting and paving, specific type of rack, and the number of bicycles it supports. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q 18. Provide a copy of the recorded vehicular cross access agreement with the adjacent property owner/s to the north as required by rezoning condition number nine (9). 19. Provide a legend for the keynotes. 20. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 05/12/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 May 27, 2003 TO: Gary Cretcher, Cretcher Designs, LLC THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Northwest Corner of Harrison & Old Spanish Trail Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-0016 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Per Pima County Wastewater Management’s Planning Services, there is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced development plan, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. Add the development plan case number, D03-016, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. 4. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. 5. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 6. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE PROPOSED TOTAL NUMBER OF WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS FOR THIS PROJECT IS . (with this blank appropriately filled in per Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F).) If this proposed total is equal to or greater than 144, a Sewer Service Agreement may be required pursuant to Title 13.20.030. Typically, the Sewer Service Agreement is prepared, and three originals of the Agreement are sent to the Applicant for signature under separate cover, as soon as the proposed total number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents, and all necessary ownership information for the project has been shown. The three signed and notarized originals of the Sewer Service Agreement must be returned to the Development Review Division, before the development plan can be approved. 7. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 8. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 9. Sheet 2: Label the existing public sanitary sewer lines with their size and plan number as shown on Pima County Wastewater Management’s (PCWWM’s) section or base maps. 10. Sheet 2: Either don’t show the existing off-site public sewer easement, or label it as follows ' PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT PER DOCKET , PAGE With the blanks filled in properly. 11. Sheet 2: Label the existing manhole in the public sanitary sewer line with its manhole number as shown on Pima County Wastewater Management’s (PCWWM’s) section or base maps. 12. Sheet 2: Show the manhole rim and invert elevation for the existing manhole in the public sanitary sewer line. 13. Sheet 2: Show the existing cleanout at the end of the existing public sanitary sewer line, and label it as shown on Pima County Wastewater Management’s (PCWWM’s) section or base maps. 14. Sheet 2: Show the private House Connection Sewer (HCS) lines from Phase I and 3. These may not be routed under proposed rainwater retention/detention basis, and they should not be routed near any of the large trees. Also, no cleanouts in the HCS lines may be in depressed areas where they may allow rainwater runoff to enter the public sewer system. 15. Sheet 2: Label each HCS with its size and the letters HCS. 16. Sheet 2: If any private sewer collection lines will be proposed, they must be labeled with their size, length, and slope. 17. Sheet 2: If any private sewer manholes will be proposed, show the proposed rim and invert elevations on this sheet, and the manhole symbols and proposed rim elevations on the Grading Plan. 18. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second submittal. Please include a $100.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 05/12/2003 | JIM STOYANOFF | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 05/12/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Completed | see attached memo |
| 05/12/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) "All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size." DS 2-05.2.1.C 2) The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Legal description and address of site, CDRC Case Number. 3) Revise the sheet numbers to match the index on sheet P.1-4. 4) A legend is required which shows and describes all symbols and keynotes used on the drawing is to be placed on the plan, preferably on the first sheet. DS 2-05.2.1 5) Clarify the locations and provide details for all proposed walls. 6) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from damaging adjacent walls. Show the wall locations on the plans and any necessary barriers. Resubmittal of all plans is required. |
| 05/12/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Completed | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D03-0016 Village Square 5/12/2003 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Widen to 4 lanes Harrison Rd (Old Spanish Trl to Broadway) Yes 2004 11,400 24,500 2 40,000 10,937 4 1,129 Route 180, Express, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder The model is assigning less traffic in the future due to Houghton Rd improvements Old Spanish Trl (Camino Seco to Harrison) No 0 5,700 24,500 2 25,434 24,500 2 Route 7, 30 minutes, .25 miles Shared use path |
| 05/16/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 13, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0016 Village Square: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the development plans and approves the plans if Old Spanish Trail multi-use pathway is built according to sheet 2 of submittal. In addition, traffic control boxes must match the grade of the multi-use pathway and the grade must transition smoothly between the multi-use pathway and curb ramps. |