Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0012
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/27/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 3/27/03. |
| 04/08/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0012 RICK ENGINEERING CO, INC. AUTOMALL PARCEL |
| 04/08/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 8, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0012 AutoMall Parcel: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and has no comments. |
| 04/14/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0012 AUTOMALL PARCEL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 14, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED EXCEPT ON FINAL MYLAR: CORRECT “AUTOMALL DRIVE” TO “AUTO MALL DRIVE.” LABEL SHOP BUILDINGS NUMERICALLY ON SHEET 2 & 3. CORRECT “SPRINT RD” TO “AUTO SPRINT RD” ON LOCATION MAP. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 04/17/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-012 Automall Parcel Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 17, 2003 DUE DATE: April 22, 2003 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is March 25, 2004. 2. Place the development plan number (D03-012) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. Under General Note 3, detail both restrictions listed; not only LUC 3.5.4.6.C (no soup kitchens), but also LUC 3.5.9.2.A (outdoor display or storage of fertilizer, manure, or other odorous material shall be located at least 30n feet from any lot line). LUC 2.5.5.2.B.3 4. Dimension width of sidewalks/ pedestrian circulation system per DS 2-08. DS 2-08.5.1 DS 2-05.2.4.K 5. If any new freestanding lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type. DS 2-05.2.4.N 6. Because the proposed bicycle parking is located around the rear (south) of the building on the side opposite the public right-of-way, directional signs must be provided directing bicyclists to the bicycle parking spaces. Please show on the drawing the location of the signage to be provided. DS 2-09.5.1 7. Because the project area is made up of several parcels, a lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: a signed, notarized and recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property, and an approved Pima County Tax Combination Form. Or, each lot must meet code individually and a cross access/ parking agreement must be recorded prior to approval of the development plan. Please provide calculations to show that each lot meets code and provide a copy of recorded cross-access agreement to the Zoning Review Section and add a note to the plan with the recordation information for the cross-access agreement. 8. With 114 vehicle spaces proposed for the new development, 5 handicapped parking spaces must be provided. Only 4 new h/c spaces are proposed. Please revise. ANS/ IBC 9. Per IBC Sec. 1106.4, one handicapped parking space must be van accessible, and be provided with an access aisle with a minimum width of 8 feet as shown on the detail. Please revise drawing, which shows no van accessible parking provided for the project ANS/ IBC 10. If easements exist or are proposed on the property, show their location, width, type, and provide recordation info. DS 2-05.2.3.B 11. On projects containing more than one building, loading zones must be provided for each building. Please revise. LUC 3.4.4.1.B.2 12. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan, lot combination documents or cross access/parking agreement. |
| 04/17/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 17, 2003 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the AutoMall Parcel Development Plan. The activity number is D03-0012. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 27, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. Engineering recommends approval of the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DP APPROVAL: DR The next submittal should address the following items: GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. Reference to the standard is not sufficient. 2. Show PAAL widths in the new parking area east of Shop B. DS 3-05.2.1.C 3. Place a note on the plan, "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E 4. Dimension the widths of all new sidewalks (minimum 4 ft.). DS 2-08.4 and DS 2-08.5 James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 04/17/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0012 Automall Parcel 04/17/03 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: D01-040 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: N/A GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Oracle Road COMMENTS DUE BY: April 22, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 4/8/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Automall Parcel, D03-0012 The General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual offer insight and clarification into land use and community design policies and/or criteria. Although the development plan indicates and shows pedestrian access routes for this multi pad development, there is concern for pedestrian safety with regards to pedestrian crossings at PAAL’s. This concern needs to be addressed with possible speed humps or different textured surface material for the pedestrian crossings, or a raised “table” pedestrian design, or another safety design measure that the owner feels is appropriate to enhance the safety of pedestrian traffic for this site. The development plan shows pedestrian access from the street and first row of parking to the pad of David’s Bridal. The Plans encourage the enhancement of pedestrian linkages with landscaped areas to provide shade, as well as, safe, convenient, and attractive pedestrian walkways that reduce vehicular and pedestrian conflicts. In order to promote pedestrian safety the development plan could extend the pedestrian access system from the pad of David’s Bridal east through the middle of the parking lot to the eastern most row of parking which abuts the already existing development to the east. This pedestrian walkway could be of an asphalt surface, lined by canopy trees to provide shade and reduce “heat island” impact, with trees planted along the eastern most row of parking. Provide a pedestrian crossing at the southeastern portion of the proposed project from the parking lot to the concrete sidewalk at Shops B. Provide a pedestrian crossing at the northwestern portion of the proposed project that links the sidewalk to the northwest corner of the pad - David’s Bridal. |
| 04/18/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. The consultant may wish to note that "project" is misspelled in general note #4 on sheet 1of3. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) |
| 04/21/2003 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 04/22/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/24/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | Mr. Bruce Paton Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 E. River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr. Paton: SUBJECT: Automall Parcel D03-0012 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated March 21, 2003. TEP is unable to approve the Development Plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information (TEP Easement recorded in Book 10834, Page 888-890) must be depicted on the plans. (See the enclosed easement.) Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There does not appear to be conflicts with the easement, but this can not be determined until the location of the easement has been plotted on the Development Plan. If a conflict does exist, costs for relocation shall be borne by the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 884-3879 if you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management |
| 04/24/2003 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/24/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Subdivision and Development Pima Association of Governments Review Requests Transportation Planning Division CASE #: D03-0012 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 NAME: Automall Parcel Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 DATE: 4/22/2003 STREET NUMBER 1 Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street Oracle Rd (River to Wetmore) Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? No Year: Planned Action: Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 52,800 Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 63,000 Existing Number of Lanes: 6 Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 64,863 Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 63,000 Future Number of Lanes: 6 Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development 927 (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) Route 16, 15 minutes, 0.5 miles; Route 61, 30 minutes, 0 miles Existing or Planned Bikeway None Remarks: STREET NUMBER 2 Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? No Year: Planned Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 0 Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 0 Existing Number of Lanes: 0 Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 0 Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 0 Future Number of Lanes: 0 Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: |
| 04/24/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | comments will be provided when available from Pima County Wastewater. |
| 04/24/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 May 5, 2003 TO: Bruce Paton / Eduardo Gonzales, Rick Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Automall Parcel Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-0012 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Per Pima County Wastewater Management’s Planning Services, there is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced development plan, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of the sewer service agreement. 3. The development plan is hereby approved subject to the following: 4. Add the development plan case number, D03-0012, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 5. Sheet 2: Use letters and numbers 1/8" or more in size to show the sewer information. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that this information will be legible on the scanned image of this development plan. 6. Sheet 2: Show the existing HCS lines and grease trap for the Krispy Kreme Donut shop. 7. No formal Sewer Service Agreement will be required for this project. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |