Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0009
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/12/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/26/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 26, 2003 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Specialists in Dermatology Development Plan. The activity number is D03-0009. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 10, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DP, DR The next submittal should address the following items: GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 4. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements. 5. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. 2. Include the Development Plan Number (D03-0009) on all sheets. 3. Label and dimension the existing right-of-way for Alvernon and for Glenn. Also label and dimension the existing alley right-of-ways. DS 2-05.2.3.C 4. Label and dimension the MS&R future right-of-way for Alvernon and Glenn. DS 2-05.2.4.F 5. Label and dimension existing and proposed sidewalks. It is not clear on the plan where there are existing sidewalks and what their width is. Proposed new sidewalks on MS&R streets must be 6 ft. in width. Clarify and dimension appropriately. Sidewalks are required along the entire length of street frontage. DS 2-05.2.3.C DS 3-01.3.3.A 6. Show estimated cut and fill quantities. 7. Provide a sidewalk from the buildings to Alvernon. At least one sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. DS 2-08.4.1.A 8. It is impossible to distinguish the proposed sidewalk areas from the parking areas, landscape areas, etc. Within all developments, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. Sidewalks must be made evident on the plan. DS 2-08.3.1 9. The Drainage Report specifies the minimum Finish Floor Elevation (FFE) as 2433.3. The Phase One building shows an FFE of 2433. Please correct. 10. The floodplain notes on Sheets 2 and 3 are incorrect. The elevations given are not the 100-yr. Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The 100-yr. BFE as specified in the Drainage Report is 2432.3 11. The solid waste enclosure must have gates and bollards per DS 6-01. The plan must show these or include a note on the plan that the solid waste enclosure will be constructed in accordance with Development Standard 6-01. 12. Key Note 6 on Sheet 2 refers to riprap spillway per detail E Sheet 4. Detail E Sheet 4 is of a curb opening. Correct. Providing details of the spillway, weir, and scuppers on the Development Plan will expedite the approval of the Grading Plan. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Provide sizing calculations for all curb openings. Provide a sizing calculation for the Glenn Street scuppers. Show a section through the four scuppers. Size the rip-rap spillway from the weir to the scuppers. Show a section. Show a weir section. Providing details of these structures for Development Plan purposes will expedite Grading Plan approval. 2. The Drainage Report states that an existing wall located at the southwest property boundary effectively limits the effective 100-yr. peak flood. Provide a statement in the Drainage Report that this wall is capable of withstanding the force of this peak flood. James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 03/27/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#103328 March 25, 2003 Mr. John A. Evans, P.E. John A. Evans & Associates 9180 E. Placita Senna Tucson, AZ 85749 Dear Mr. Evans: SUBJECT: Specialist in Dermatology D03-009 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the Development Plan dated March, 2003. Although it appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed Development, there are underground and electrical facilities along the north, west and east property line, outside of the property boundaries. In the event any of these facilities require relocation, costs shall be borne by the developer. Also, the Development Plan shows a number of proposed trees within the TEP easement south of this project. The size and location of these plants should be approved by TEP prior to planting to avoid a conflict with the facilities. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to Marcus Hayes, Distribution Services – WI101,Tucson Electric Power Company, P. O. Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702. Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson |
| 03/27/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 3/13/03. |
| 03/27/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0009 JOHN A. EVANS, P.E. SPECIALISTS IN DERMATOLOGY |
| 04/07/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 7, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0009 Specialists in Dermatology: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and has no comments. |
| 04/07/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 April 14, 2003 TO: John Evans, John A. Evans & Associates THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E. Pima County Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Specialists in Dermatology - Phases 1 & 2 Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-009 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. The development plan is hereby approved, subject to the following: 4. All Sheets: Add the Development Plan case number, D03-0009, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 5. Sheet 1: Make the second sentence of General Note 14 into a separate General Note reading: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 6. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNITS FOR PHASE ONE IS 79. PHASE TWO IS EXPECTED TO HAVE NO MORE THAN 65 WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNITS. Note: Due to the relatively small number of wastewater fixture units being proposed, no Sewer Service Agreement will be necessary for this project. 7. Sheet 1: The legend is not consistent with the line types used to depict the sewer lines. Revise the legend appropriately. 8. Sheets 2 & 3: Connect the 4" House Connection Sewer (HCS) lines to the 8" existing public sewer line if possible. 4" HCS lines may be connected to existing 8" public sewer lines via direct tap. If the 4" HCS sewer lines must connect to the existing 15" public sewer line, the connections must be made at new or existing manholes, or existing stub-outs in the existing 15" public sewer line. Consider revising the design of the HCS lines such that only a single tap into the 15" sewer line at adjacent existing manhole is necessary. Show all necessary new manholes for this project and label them as such. 9. Sheet 3: Label the HCS connection for Phase One on this sheet, in a manner similar to the way it was shown on on Sheet 2. 10. Please provide this office with a folded set of bluelines of the revised development plan for our records, along with a cover letter clearing explaining that these bluelines are being submitted for our records only, and they are not to be reviewed. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E. Pima County Development Review Division (Wastewater) TR/DK/dk Copy: Project PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 April 14, 2003 TO: John Evans, John A. Evans & Associates THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E. Pima County Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Specialists in Dermatology - Phases 1 & 2 Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-009 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. The development plan is hereby approved, subject to the following: 4. All Sheets: Add the Development Plan case number, D03-0009, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 5. Sheet 1: Make the second sentence of General Note 14 into a separate General Note reading: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 6. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNITS FOR PHASE ONE IS 79. PHASE TWO IS EXPECTED TO HAVE NO MORE THAN 65 WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNITS. Note: Due to the relatively small number of wastewater fixture units being proposed, no Sewer Service Agreement will be necessary for this project. 7. Sheet 1: The legend is not consistent with the line types used to depict the sewer lines. Revise the legend appropriately. 8. Sheets 2 & 3: Connect the 4" House Connection Sewer (HCS) lines to the 8" existing public sewer line if possible. 4" HCS lines may be connected to existing 8" public sewer lines via direct tap. If the 4" HCS sewer lines must connect to the existing 15" public sewer line, the connections must be made at new or existing manholes, or existing stub-outs in the existing 15" public sewer line. Consider revising the design of the HCS lines such that only a single tap into the 15" sewer line at adjacent existing manhole is necessary. Show all necessary new manholes for this project and label them as such. 9. Sheet 3: Label the HCS connection for Phase One on this sheet, in a manner similar to the way it was shown on on Sheet 2. 10. Please provide this office with a folded set of bluelines of the revised development plan for our records, along with a cover letter clearing explaining that these bluelines are being submitted for our records only, and they are not to be reviewed. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E. Pima County Development Review Division (Wastewater) TR/DK/dk Copy: Project |
| 04/07/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0009 Specialists in Dermatology 04/04/03 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-98-09 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: April 8, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 04/03/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force, Comments Specialists in Dermatology, D03-0009 The request to rezone the property located at the southeast corner of Alvernon Way / Glenn Street that was approved by Mayor and Council is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions. Defer to Tucson Police Department for comments and compliance of rezoning condition #7. Include as a General Note on sheet 1 of the Development Plan to read “Signage for this development shall be limited to a maximum of one (1) freestanding sign per street frontage with a maximum of two (2) faces per sign, a maximum of 30 square feet per sign face, and a maximum sign height of eight (8) feet. Freestanding signage shall be designed of the same materials and colors as the building and shall be integrated into to the landscape buffer area. Show location of signage on the Development Plan and/or Landscape and demonstrate how signage is to be integrated into the landscape buffer area.(Rezoning Condition no. 2) Provide a detail of lighting and a note to the General Notes on sheet 1 of the Development Plan that reads “All lighting shall be directed down and away from adjacent residential properties.” (Rezoning Condition no. 6) Provide a section detail of required or proposed masonry walls that identifies height and materials, i.e. graffiti-resistant materials, textures and decorative materials. (Rezoning Condition no. 5) Provide denser landscaped buffer between dumpster enclosure and the alley which runs along the east and south property lines, to include additional trees and shrubs. (Rezoning Condition no. 1.d) The applicant has provided building elevations, which indicate that earth-tone colors will be used, with possible brighter colors to be used as accent. (Rezoning Condition no. 1.b) Provide and identify on the Development Plan unobstructed pedestrian connection from the existing bus shelter to the entrance of the proposed facility, with raised or textures crosswalks where the pedestrian system crosses PAAL’s from the parking lot to the entrance of the building. (Rezoning Condition no. 3) |
| 04/07/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0009 SPECIALISTS IN DERMATOLOGY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 4, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 04/08/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-009 Specialists in Dermatology Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 8, 2003 DUE DATE: April 8, 2003 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is March 11, 2004. 2. Place the development plan number (D03-009) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. The minimum required type size is 12 point for archiving/microfilming purposes. Some of the lettering within the drawing on sheets 1 of 6 and 2 of 6 is less than the minimum required size. Please revise. DS 2-05.2.1.C 4. The sidewalk dimension to the east of the building is shown on the drawing to be 5 feet in width, but on the detail PAAL section (detail C) and monolithic curb and sidewalk (detail F and keynote 8 it is shown to be 6-1/2 feet. Please revise or clarify in the details that the only side of the building where the sidewalk will be 6-1/2 feet wide is to the north of the building. 5. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 2 by indicating the location, height and type of all proposed free-standing signage on the development plan drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.W 6. Add future curb locations along MS&Rs Alvernon Way Glenn Street and add future site visibility triangles for the intersection of Alvernon and Glenn. Also, add future SVT's at the access drives along Alvernon and Glenn. DS 2-05.2.4.R 7. Continuous pedestrian circulation must provide a direct connection to the sidewalk along Alvernon Way DS 2-05.2.4.K DS2-08.4.1.A & D 8. For each phase, provide a Floor Area Ratio (gross floor area ÷ site area) calculation to the plan. The maximum FAR allowed under development designator 27 is 0.50. DS 2-05.2.4.M 9. If any freestanding lighting is proposed for this project please indicate location and orientation on the plan to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 6. DS 2-05.2.4.U 10. To show that they meet code for minimum dimension requirements, provide the degree of angle for the proposed angled parking spaces to the west of the building. LUC 3.3.7.2 DS 2-05.2.4.P 11. Revise required handicapped parking calculation to be based on the number of standard parking spaces provided, rather than required. ANS/ IBC 12. If easements exist or are proposed on the property, show their location, width, type, and provide recordation info. DS 2-05.2.3.B 13. Revise handicapped parking calcs to indicate that 4 h/c accessible spaces (1 per 25 standard spaces for the first 100 standard spaces) are required. ANS/ IBC 14. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/08/2003 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D03-0009 Specialists in Dermatology 4/3/2003 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Alvernon (Fort Lowell to Grant ) No 0 19,400 43,000 4 43,000 36,901 4 602 Route 11, 15 minutes, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 04/08/2003 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 04/09/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval for this DP 1. Show and label with dimensions (ie. 20x110) SVT's for both existing and future ROW conditions at all access points to the subject property. 2. There are several existing curb cuts at the subject property that are not shown on the plans. Show all existing curb cuts on the plans. Those existing curb cuts that will not be used for site access shall be labeled "existing curb cut to be closed." D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 04/10/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The NPPO Application for Exception has been accepted and approved. 2) At minimum a 30" high continuous screen is required along Alvernon and Glenn to screen the parking areas. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3) The street landscape borders at minimum must meet the 50% vegetative grouncover requirements of LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 Provide calculations per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.g. Plants used for screening purposes are not to be included in the coverage calculations. DS 2-06.3.7 4) Provide a calculation to determine the oasis allowance for the site. Any areas where plants not on the approved list may be used should be identified. DS 2-06.3.2 5) The plans should be revised to identify any material required for slope stabilization. DS 2-06.2.2.D DG should not be used on slopes steeper than 4:1. 6) Identify any areas where seeding will be used. The landscape plans include seed specifications. DS 2-07.2.2 7) The walls shown along the south and east property lines should be continuous, without gaps. LUC 3.7.3.2.A Any applicable rezoning conditions would not require a gap, but a jog, curve, notch or, setback. 8) The development plan appears to indicate trees located in islands within the parking area. Revise the development plan and the landscape plan to match. Tree planters must meet the minimum size standards of LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. |