Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0009
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/11/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 11, 2007 TO: Kathryn McGuire, Architect THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department FROM: Tom Porter.,Sr. Civil Eng. Development Review Division (Wastewater) Pima County Development Services Department SUBJECT: Specialists in Dermatology, Phase 2 Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D03-009 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET D-1 KEY NOTES. Identify Existing Sewer Line as PUBLIC or PRIVATE in the legend. This is the second request. SHEET D-1 GENERAL NOTES. Revise note no. 12 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. SHEET 2, 3 & D3.1: The sewer line and manholes are shown on all three sheets. Where the sewer lines are shown on drawings, identify them as PRIVATE or PUBLIC. SHEET 2, 3 & D3.1-. Provide CO at the change in the direction of the BCS, and show its rim and invert elevations. This is the second request. It must be marked w/rim and invert elevations and also as PUBLIC or PRIVATE. There should be a cleanout symbol in the legend on Sheet 1. SHEET 2, 3 & D3.1: The slope and pipe size are shown but not the length of the BCS. If the BCS is existing it should be clearly shown by line type. SHEET 2, 3 & D3.1: 2nd request. Revise the sewer site plan so that: All public sewer elements (manholes, cleanouts and mains), that are located adjacent to and less than 100’ from this project, are identified with the IMS numbers and construction plan numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) base maps or on PCWMD and PCDOT Map Guide websites. SHEET 2, 3 & D3.1:2nd request. Show the information pertaining to the point of connection of the existing BCS to the existing sewer line. Show the Pima County plan number ( or the private sewer plan number) for this existing sewer with its size and slope, and show the necessary information about the existing manholes ( IMS numbers, rim and invert elevations, etc.) located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of the new BCS. This is the second request. SHEET 2, 3 & D3.1: The line types shown for the existing and new sewer lines in the site plan should be the same as that used in the LEGEND (KEYNOTES).This is the second request. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $156.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tom Porter Telephone: (520) 740-6579 Copy: Project file |
| 05/17/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: May 17, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D03-0009. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on May 8th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED: HYDROLOGY REPORT The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities for the new construction. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. This office acknowledges the property is currently developed and the addition is going to be constructed on a finish pad. However if the cut and fill quantities are equal to zero, that must be indicated on the plan in a general note. When the development plan is approved, the plan must be walked through for site plan approval. The cut and fill quantities are required to be on a site plan per Development Standard for Site Plan Content and Specifications 2-02. Please provide the requested information. 2. Provide a general note on sheet D-3.1 stating, "This property is subject to the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." This note has not been provided. Revise the plan to show the note on the requested sheet number. 3. Provide a general note on sheet D-3.1 stating, "A floodplain use permit and elevation certificate is required for the proposed building." This note has not been provided. Revise the plan to show the note on the requested sheet number. 4. Provide a general note on sheet D-3.1 giving the required finish floor elevation and datum that is recommended in the hydrology report. This note has not been provided. Revise the plan to show the note on the requested sheet number. 5. The added notes to the development plan must be 12 point font at minimum. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that the lettering is legible when reproduced or microfilmed for record keeping purposes. Revise appropriately. |
| 05/22/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/01/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#178621 May 31, 2007 Kathryn McGuire Architect, LLC Attn: Kathryn McGuire 1521 E Broadway Blvd Tucson, Arizona 85719 Dear Ms. McGuire : SUBJECT: Specialist in Dermatology D03-0009 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 08, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Warren McElyea at (520) 918-8268, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 06/05/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 5, 2007 Kathryn McGuire Kathryn McGuire, Architect, LLC. 4000 South Javelina Run Tucson, Arizona 85730 Subject: D03-0009 Specialist in Dermatology Revised Development Plan Dear Kathy: Your submittal of May 8, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan ( Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: None provided dp-resubmittal |
| 06/05/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D03-0009 Specialist in Dermatology Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 1, 2007 DUE DATE: June 6, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Clearly show the location of required handicap ramps on site and provide a detail of such ramps including placement of truncated domes. These details were not provided for on the original approved development plan. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 Clearly show the location of required detectable warnings (truncated domes) which are required at marked crossings (crosswalks), access aisles, and sidewalks flush with vehicle use areas. The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D03-0009dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |