Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0009
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2007 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/12/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/21/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 178621 March 21, 2007 Specialists in Dermatology Attn: Kathryn McGuire 4000 S Javelina Run Tucson, Arizona 85730 Dear Ms. McGuire: SUBJECT: Specialists in Dermatology D03-0009 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted February 28, 2007. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan, we will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. * Please see facilities map Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to Pima County Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Warren McElyea at 918-8268 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: P. Gehlen and F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/26/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/27/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D03-0009 Specialist in Dermatology Development Plan Revision TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2007 DUE DATE: April 5, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The required number of parking spaces indicated on sheet D-1 of the approved Development Plan is ninety-six (96). The actual number of parking spaces shown on sheet D-3.1 C-1 is ninety-four (94). Please revise provided number of parking spaces on sheet D-1 to match what is actually provided. 2. Please revise title block removing indication of "Site Plan" and changing it to "Development Plan". 3. Sheet A-13 appears to not have been provided. Without a detail that shows the proposed height of the carport. The minimum setback from R-2 zoned property is 10 ft or 3/4 height from property line. A one (1) foot setback is required between any PAAL and open structure such as a carport measured from the carport's overhang. Traffic Engineering must also review and approve the proposed carport type to assure that passengers can enter and exit vehicles. Please provide. LUC 3.2.6.4 Perimeter Yard Indicator BB & DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 4. A new tree is placed within the pedestrian path that extends to Glenn Street. Either the tree must be relocated or the path re-routed connecting the sidewalks within the complex to sidewalk within Glenn Street. Also the trees may be within the pedestrian path that connect to Alvernon Way. All sidewalks will be a minimum of four (4) feet wide and will be installed to avoid any obstruction, which decreases the minimum width to less than four (4) feet. DS 2-08.5.1.A 5. Curb ramps or diagonal curb ramps shall be provided at all pedestrian crossings of vehicle use areas and streets where accessible routes are required. They shall be located so they do not project into vehicular traffic lanes, parking spaces, or parking access aisles. Ramps shall be located or protected to prevent their obstruction by parked vehicles. ANSI 406 Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. All slopes are to be indicated on the plan/plat and associated details. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 6. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks), access aisles, and sidewalks flush with vehicle use areas. The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including access aisles of handicapped motor vehicle parking spaces. All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrances of buildings shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 7. Please add the proposed building height and dimensions to the building footprint of Phase 2 and the proposed carport. DS 2-05.2.4.N If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D03-0009dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 03/27/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to show the same property line location and tree planting space along the south property boundary. DS 2-07.2.2 2) Clarify how the proposed parking structure will not affect the existing required trees. Add note to Development Plan. LUC 3.8, C9-98-09 3) Plantings should not be shown in the overhang area of the parking spaces on the south and east side of the site. LUC 3.7.2.3.B 4) At this point notes regarding the "future addition" or Phase 1 improvements that are being replaced should be revised or removed from sheet 1 of the Landscape Plan. |
| 03/28/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0009 Specialists in Dermatology: Revision 03/28/07 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-98-09 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: April 5, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( X ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 3/28/07 |
| 04/03/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0009 SPECIALISTS IN DERMATOLOGY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 3, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 04/05/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Access and approach to enclosure area will not be affected. 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach remains and maneuverability within development is okay. |
| 04/09/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 9, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D03-0009. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 8th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, HYDROLOGY REPORT The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide estimated cut and fill quantities for the new construction. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 2. Provide a general note on sheet D-3.1 stating, "This property is subject to the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." 3. Provide a general note on sheet D-3.1 stating, "A floodplain use permit and elevation certificate is required for the proposed building." 4. Provide a general note on sheet D-3.1 giving the required finish floor elevation and datum that is recommended in the hydrology report. HYDROLOGY REPORT COMMENTS 1. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations and this office acknowledges roof flow arrows and scuppers have been provided. However to ensure the appropriate sizing has been utilized in the hydrology report provide calculations and scupper details stating that the 10-year flow will be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all concentrated locations. DS 2-08.4.1.E. |
| 04/16/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 16, 2007 Kathryn McGuire Kathryn McGuire, Architect, LLC. 4000 South Javelina Run Tucson, Arizona 85730 Subject: D03-0009 Specialist in Dermatology Revised Development Plan Dear Kathy: Your submittal of March 8, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (TEP, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Hydrology Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: None provided dp-resubmittal |
| 04/16/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 16, 2007 TO: Kathryn McGuire, Architect THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager Development Review Division (Wastewater) Pima County Development Services Department SUBJECT: Specialists in Dermatology, Phase 2 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D03-009 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D03-009 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf SHEET C-1. Add all appropriate General Notes that are required by the Pima county Development Services Department on a Development Plan.: SHEET C-1. Add all appropriate Permitting Notes that are required by Pima County Development Services Department on a Development Plan. 5. SHEET C-1 KEY NOTES. Identify Existing Sewer Line as Public or private. 6. SHEET C-1. Show the property boundary. 7. SHEET C-1.4. Where the sewer lines are shown on drawings, identify them as private or public. 8. SHEET C-1. Provide CO at the change in the direction of the BCS, and show its rim and invert elevations. 9. SHEET C-1. Show the length, slope and the size of the new BCS. 10. SHEET C-1. Sheet 2: Revise the sewer site plan so that: All public sewer elements (manholes, cleanouts and mains), that are located adjacent to and less than 100’ from this project, are identified with the IMS numbers and construction plan numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) base maps or on PCWMD and PCDOT Map Guide websites. 11. SHEET C-1. Show the information pertaining to the point of connection of the new BCS to the existing sewer line. Show the Pima County plan number ( or the private sewer plan number) for this existing sewer with its size and slope, and show the necessary information about the existing manholes ( IMS numbers, rim and invert elevations, etc.) located immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of the new BCS. 12. SHEET C-1. The line types shown for the existing and new sewer lines in the site plan should be the same as that used in the LEGEND (KEYNOTES). 13. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $500.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |