Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/07/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 5/7/03. |
| 05/13/2003 | DOUG WILLIAMS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT: Walgreens - 12th/Valencia REVIEWER: Doug Williams DATE: 13 May 2003 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D03-0008 Resubmittal Required: Development Plan/Drainage Report/Landscape Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report received on 5 May 2003. Due to outstanding issues with the drainage submittal, subsequent Development Plan comments may be necessary, depending upon any drainage report revisions that may be needed. The previous drainage report comments have not been sufficiently addressed. The drainage comments that follow specify the major items required for drainage reports, as outlined in the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, and were requested under previous drainage review comment number one (1). The landscape plan comment does not appear to have been addressed. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1. Depict and label the future (Major Streets and Routes - MS&R) sight visibility triangles. The future curb location is 12 feet north of the future property line along the Valencia Road frontage, and 11 feet to the west of the future property line along 12th Avenue frontage. The future sidewalk locations must also be depicted in accordance with the MS&R Plan, 3' from back of future curb. For additional information on the MS&R Plan, go to: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/genplan/msr.pdf. New six foot sidewalk is required to be installed along the existing Valencia Road frontage, 3 feet from the back of existing curb (DS 2-05.2.4 L, R & DS 3-01.5.0); * 2. Depict solid waste vehicle maneuverability and access for the proposed dumpster locations, and provide a typical enclosure detail, fully dimensioned and labeled (DS 2-05.2.4 T). Please note that onsite refuse provision development standards, including dumpster placement, access to and from, enclosure and bin requirements, etc., can be found in DS 6-01.0. The vehicle maneuvering area may not be in conflict with parking spaces or loading zones, as is depicted for the southerly dumpster access; * The previous comment letter stated 2', inadvertently. DRAINAGE REPORT: 1. The report must address the size, location, and hydrologic characteristics of the onsite watersheds and drainage conditions, and contain hydrologic data sheets for each significant point of drainage concentration (under existing and developed conditions), addressing all of the items listed in sections 2.3.1.3 B (1-3) of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM); 2. The report must contain hydraulic calculation sheets for each of the stormwater conveyance systems to be constructed as a part of the project, including but not limited to, lined and unlined channels, drainage swales, storm drains, culverts and any flow through wall openings for flow acceptance and conveyance. Please note that existing overall drainage patterns and acceptance/discharge locations shall be maintained as closely as possible. The report must discuss the existing conditions and developed conditions drainage areas and 2-10-and 100-year flow rates (Q's) at a minimum, for the proposed tie-in to the existing storm drain in 12th Avenue, demonstrating no flow increases or adverse effects will occur to the existing public storm drain system (sections 2.3.1.5 C & D, SMDDFM); 3. Provide and describe reservoir routing calculation sheets for each basin, addressing the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year design floods. The calculation sheets shall, at a minimum, consist of: a working-table for each basin and a routing-table for each flow event; any hydraulic calculation sheets prepared while evaluating the stage-storage and stage-discharge relationships, any other pertinent data used in the basin analysis and design; and plotted inflow and outflow hydrographs - see # 6, below - (sections 2.3.1.6 B 1-3, SMDDFM); 4. The report must address balanced basin flow attenuation requirements, in accordance with City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations (Tucson Code, section 26-10), SMDDFM, section 3.3, and Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual, sections 1.4 & 2.1. At a minimum, it must be demonstrated that developed conditions runoff rates exiting this development do not exceed existing condition rates during the 2,10, and 100-year storm events. Existing impervious area on the site as contrasted with developed/proposed conditions impervious area must be examined in determining these runoff rates. (DS 10-01.0 &10-02.0); 5. The report must address 5-year threshold retention requirements, in accordance with the PC/COT Retention/Detention Manual, sections 1.4 & 2.2 (DS 10-01.0). The 5-year retention volume required may not be approved to be metered offsite as proposed (bleed-off), without sufficient discussion and documentation of investigations of other engineering measures, such as shallower basins or engineered basin bottoms. Please note that the maximum allowed time of disposal (infiltration) allowed for basins with contributing drainage areas up to 10 acres is 12 hours, per section 3.5.1 of the above manual. 6. The equations provided in the Retention/Detention manual are for determining preliminary values for estimated retention/detention storage volumes. Appropriate values must then be used as a starting point for required reservoir routing, in accordance with sections 3.3.2 & 3.3.3 paragraph 2, and SMDDFM, Section 2.3.1.6; 7. Include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to Local, State and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.7 B); 8. Due to the proposed phasing of this development, the report must clearly demonstrate how balanced basin flow attenuation requirements will be met for each phase, and that phase I attenuation will stand alone upon completion of its drainage improvements. LANDSCAPE PLAN: 1. Demonstrate water harvesting in landscape areas to the maximum extent reasonably possible, per Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4, and SMDDFM, Sec. 14.2.10. Please provide a revised Drainage Report, Development Plan and Landscape Plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us. Doug Williams Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 05/16/2003 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-0008 Walgreen's Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: May 16, 2003 DUE DATE: May 19, 2003 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 10, 2004. 2. The conditions of rezoning must be listed on the plan. Please add the conditions to the plan as required. (Previous Comment: This site is subject to the conditions of rezoning case C9-72-57. List the rezoning case number and list the conditions of rezoning on the plan. A copy of the rezoning case authorization letter must be provided with the next development plan submittal packet. For reference, list the "annexation" case number C9-60-39. All case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner next to the title block of all development, landscape, and NPPO plan sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.K, DS 2-05.2.2.B.2, and DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 3. Please review the Proposed Use text block and correct typos. (Previous Comment: Under the proposed use text block list the proposed use of the property as follows. Commercial Use Group: Food Service DD "28", Subject to LUC section 3.5.4.6.A and .G, and Retail Use Group: General Merchandise DD "28", Subject to LUC section 3.5.9.2.C. As reference under the same text block list the existing use of the site. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 4. See comment one (1) by the Engineering Section Reviewer, Doug Williams. Add to plan as required. (Previous Comment: Future curbs and sidewalks along Valencia Road and 12th Avenue must be shown, labeled and dimensioned to the centerline or construction centerline as determined by the City Engineer. The width of the future sidewalk must be labeled and the future face of curb location to the future property line along Valencia Road and 12th Avenue must be labeled to verify applicable street perimeter building setbacks. The existing curb to property line dimensioned for Lerdo Road must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.C 5. Per your response to the previous comment this parcel was combined into one. In addition, the owner is again proposing to split the parcel into three. Development Services Department prior to recordation of new legal descriptions for the proposed lots must approve all splits. An application and the requirements to apply for the lot split may be picked up at the Zoning Counter of the Development Services Department. Please contact me regarding the lot split process. (Previous Comment: Per the listed legal description on sheet C-1 it appears that the existing three lots which make up the original lot 8 of subdivision map and plat 8/17 have been combined into one lot. If this is so please provide a copy of the recorded lot combo covenant and Pima County Assessor's Tax Code Parcel combo form. If the lot has not been combined please download a copy of the Lot Combo Covenant from the Development Services Department web site and file a Parcel Tax Code Parcel application with the Pima County Assessor's office to combine the three tax code parcels into one. Call me if you require additional information regarding this specific comment. DS 2-05.2.4.A 6. All required documents must be provided prior to approval of the development plan. (Previous Comment: Provide documents that relate to and support the dedication of right-of-way for both 12th Avenue and Valencia Road. Contact Jim Rossi with the City of Tucson Real Estate Division with regards to the acceptance of right-of-way and required documents. The recordation information / docket and page number for the right-of-way dedication documents must be listed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.E 7. Per the revised plan the bicycle parking facilities were shown and keynotes provided. The Walgreen's must be provided with three each class one and two facilities. Per the plan only two of three each has been provided for the Walgreen's. Revise as required. For the Phase two developments the class one facilities have been provided but only one class two facility is shown. An additional class two facility must be provided for Pad 1. In addition a note indicating the type of lighting or how the lighting will be provided for the facilities must be indicated graphically or by note. Also the bicycle parking facilities on the phase 2 developments are not visible from the street frontage. Directional signage that directs the cyclists to the bicycle parking facilities must be provided. Demonstrate on the plan how this will be accomplished. Shown and annotate the directional signs. Keynote the Phase 2 bicycle parking facilities. (Previous Comment: Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 8. Show triangles as required. (Previous Comment: Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. Existing and future sight visibility triangles must be shown and labeled. Additional comments will be forthcoming on the next review due to the location of vehicle parking, signs and some of the landscaping screens that may affect the sight visibility through the triangle. DS 2-05.2.4.R 9. Please add to the LUC data block all the requested data as indicated in the previous comment:. (Previous Comment: Add a Land Use Code Data block that indicates the number of vehicle/bicycle parking spaces including handicap spaces, loading zones required and provided, Floor Area Ratio allowed and proposed, building heights allowed and proposed, Proposed principal uses and subject to LUC sections, development designators for each use, required and proposed building setbacks etc. Please include individual calculations for each phase. 10. Several of the Architect keynotes could not be found on sheet C-2, keynotes 3,6,9,10,11,14,16,18,21, and 22. Keynote 17 is pointing to a screen wall instead of the canopy column. Civil Keynote 6 could not be found. Architectural keynote 22 indicates an eight-foot high wall. The eight foot wall must be shown on the plan. Please revise as required. (Part of Previous Comment: As indicated in a previous comment a number of the keynote numbers were not shown on the plan and some of the keynotes are pointing to culture that does not match the note. 11. All text height must be a minimum of .12 (12 point). Revise the text height of the class one and two bicycle parking detail drawings. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D030008dp2.doc |
| 05/19/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The landscape improvements proposed with within the MS&R right of way area must be approved by the City Engineer. Written verification of any approvals received is required prior to site plan approval. LUC 3.7.2.9 Revise the note on sheet L-1 as necessary to clarify. 2) Any stuctures, plantings, or walls which exceed the height restrictions must be moved outside of the SVT's. DS 3-01.5.0 Revise the plans to locate the "desert spoon" and "fairy duster" outside of the SVT's. |
| 05/20/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval for this DP 1. Label all SVTs as to wether they are existing or future or both (in terms of MS&R). 2. All near side SVTs need only be 20x30 as there are existing medians. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 05/21/2003 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Needs Review | |
| 05/21/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0008 Walgreens 12th/Valencia 05/20/03 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-72-57 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12thAve-Valencia Rd. Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes (Gateway) COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/19/03 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 05/16/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments D03-0008, Walgreens 12th Ave./Valencia Rd. May 16, 2003 In response to your resubmittal, staff offers the following comments. 1. You state in the resubmittal that the owner developer will supply a written confirmation for the Right-of -Way dedication. However, staff's request is at a minimum for a written agreement to be documented as part of the development plan approval. Therefore, please provide a written agreement of understanding of right-of-way dedication requirements, as may be approved by the Department of Transportation, Engineering Division, prior to the development plan approval. 2. Your development plan indicates Phase II is designated for future development. Staff requests clarification on how Phase II, in the interim, would be screened and buffered from the adjacent residential neighborhood on the south and southeast along Lerdo Road. Rezoning case C9-72-57 (see attached copy) requires by Mayor and Council a solid masonry wall at least 6 feet in height with landscaping along the south and east property line. Furthermore, rezoning conditions requires that any additional parking areas shall be lighted, paved, and landscaped. The PAAL lane that access Lerdo Road is part of your circulation and parking area and shall meet this rezoning requirement. Please revise the landscape plan to meet the above mentioned rezoning requirements and to indicate that landscaping along the full length of 12th Avenue is within Phase I part of the development. 3. In addition, please address how, in the interim, Phase II will be protected from temporary and unapproved land uses occurring in the vicinity along the arterial streets. |